Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The Strange Omissions of the Archives
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

The Strange Omissions of the Archives

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 10>
Author
Message
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65249
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2019 at 19:55
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Psych absolutely laid the groundwork if not the rough blueprint for Prog, but inclusions are usually psych artists that had some important impact on what became known as prog rock, i.e. Jefferson Airplane.   Whereas the Dead, Big Brother, and Steppenwolf not so much.   I may think the Dead are a progressive rock band (in fact I do, and have seriously considered as a SC submitting them for Proto or -Related), but the marked influence Airplane and Giles,Giles&Fripp and Hendrix and Spirit had on prog is more evident.
It may have laid the ground work in some respects but Mothers of Invention, The Nice, Procol Harum, the Moody Blues, Clouds/123 and maybe one or two others(even PF if we want to throw them in)were doing progressive music(or proto prog)in 1967.

Which is why most of those bands are here in full Prog categories: Crossover, Avant, Symph, etc. rather than Proto or -Related like where the Dead might be placed.






Edited by Atavachron - July 30 2019 at 19:56
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Snicolette View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 02 2018
Location: OR
Status: Offline
Points: 6039
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Snicolette Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2019 at 19:59
I see both points of yours (Mike) and Atavachron (David, I think?).  No one knew what it was, it was an organic growth at the time....again, I was there and to me, I can see the direct lines, but I don't expect that everyone would and also understand that this is a Prog site, not a Psych site.  
"Into every rain, a little life must fall." ~Tom Rapp
Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18253
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2019 at 20:00
I don't understand why the Dead aren't in here. They should be in here for prog related at least if not psych/ space. My guess is those who make these decisions are not aware of the Grateful Dead's space jams(not to mention Terrapin Station) and only know their radio hits. 
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65249
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2019 at 20:03
^ Oh I think they know about the Space, but that isn't generally a prog marker.   It's shocking, I know.

"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18253
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2019 at 20:04
Originally posted by Snicolette Snicolette wrote:

I see both points of yours (Mike) and Atavachron (David, I think?).  No one knew what it was, it was an organic growth at the time....again, I was there and to me, I can see the direct lines, but I don't expect that everyone would and also understand that this is a Prog site, not a Psych site.  

Sorry, I don't mean to be rude here but unless you were in the recording studios or hung out with these early bands you weren't there. You don't know what the musicians were thinking or what they were actually striving for. Early prog didn't get much exposure it was very underground. Those albums I mentioned were not psych. DOFP by the Moodies was not psych. It was early prog/ proto prog or art rock. Art rock and psych were separate. I'm not the only one who feels that way. I have spoken to others who were "there" who agree with me. I actually used to think that way too and in did for a very long time until I took a really long deep look at it. Sure on the surface it seems like prog evolved from psych(since psych may have started earlier) but it didn't. It was already starting by the time psych hit it's commercial peak. As I said before they were two separate ideologies. 


Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - July 30 2019 at 20:15
Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18253
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2019 at 20:11
Originally posted by stegor stegor wrote:

Originally posted by patrickq patrickq wrote:

Originally posted by admireArt admireArt wrote:

TUXEDOMOON, The Furure Sound of London, Carbon Based Lifeforms, Alva Noto
Tuxedomoon +1


Tuxedomoon +2 and I raise you Pere Ubu. XTC goes without saying, again.

Pere Ubu isn't on here? Well, you have to have the Tubes also then.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65249
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2019 at 20:19
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by Snicolette Snicolette wrote:

I see both points of yours (Mike) and Atavachron (David, I think?).  No one knew what it was, it was an organic growth at the time....again, I was there and to me, I can see the direct lines, but I don't expect that everyone would and also understand that this is a Prog site, not a Psych site.  
Sorry, I don't mean to be rude here but unless you were in the recording studios or hung out with these early bands you weren't there. You don't know what the musicians were thinking or what they were actually striving for. Early prog didn't get much exposure it was very underground. Those albums I mentioned were not psych. DOFP by the Moodies was not psych. It was early prog/ proto prog or art rock. Art rock and psych were separate. I'm not the only one who feels that way. I have spoken to others who were "there" who agree with me. I actually used to think that way too and in did for a very long time until I took a really long deep look at it. Sure on the surface it seems like prog evolved from psych but it didn't. It was already starting by the time psych hit it's commercial peak. As I said before they were two separate ideologies.

They became separate, but you can't tell me the Nice, one of the single most important early symphonic rock bands, was not in reality an English Psych group.   Just listen to the first two LPs.   Psych in the most kitschy and classic way.

Which leads me to my next point which is that being in the friggin' studio is not required to draw clear lines between the music being made & recorded, who was influencing who, and which albums were impacting subsequent albums.   Far more accurate and historically correct than what any book or historian or opinion has to say about it.   Follow the music, it's all right there.


"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18253
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2019 at 20:19
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Psych absolutely laid the groundwork if not the rough blueprint for Prog, but inclusions are usually psych artists that had some important impact on what became known as prog rock, i.e. Jefferson Airplane.   Whereas the Dead, Big Brother, and Steppenwolf not so much.   I may think the Dead are a progressive rock band (in fact I do, and have seriously considered as a SC submitting them for Proto or -Related), but the marked influence Airplane and Giles,Giles&Fripp and Hendrix and Spirit had on prog is more evident.
It may have laid the ground work in some respects but Mothers of Invention, The Nice, Procol Harum, the Moody Blues, Clouds/123 and maybe one or two others(even PF if we want to throw them in)were doing progressive music(or proto prog)in 1967.

Which is why most of those bands are here in full Prog categories: Crossover, Avant, Symph, etc. rather than Proto or -Related like where the Dead might be placed.



Yes, that's exactly my point. They were prog bands not psych bands and didn't evolve from psych either(since they were so early). Tongue
Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18253
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2019 at 20:20
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by Snicolette Snicolette wrote:

I see both points of yours (Mike) and Atavachron (David, I think?).  No one knew what it was, it was an organic growth at the time....again, I was there and to me, I can see the direct lines, but I don't expect that everyone would and also understand that this is a Prog site, not a Psych site.  
Sorry, I don't mean to be rude here but unless you were in the recording studios or hung out with these early bands you weren't there. You don't know what the musicians were thinking or what they were actually striving for. Early prog didn't get much exposure it was very underground. Those albums I mentioned were not psych. DOFP by the Moodies was not psych. It was early prog/ proto prog or art rock. Art rock and psych were separate. I'm not the only one who feels that way. I have spoken to others who were "there" who agree with me. I actually used to think that way too and in did for a very long time until I took a really long deep look at it. Sure on the surface it seems like prog evolved from psych but it didn't. It was already starting by the time psych hit it's commercial peak. As I said before they were two separate ideologies.

They became separate, but you can't tell me the Nice, one of the single most important early symphonic rock bands, was not in reality an English Psych group.   Just listen to the first two LPs.   Psych in the most kitschy and classic way.

Which leads me to my next point which is that being in the friggin' studio is not required to draw clear lines between the music being made & recorded, who was influencing who, and which albums were impacting subsequent albums.   Far more accurate and historically correct than what any book or historian or opinion has to say about it.   Follow the music, it's all right there.



Hey, stop taking her side. LOL.

At least provide specific examples then(something I have yet to see). 


Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - July 30 2019 at 20:24
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65249
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2019 at 20:24
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Psych absolutely laid the groundwork if not the rough blueprint for Prog, but inclusions are usually psych artists that had some important impact on what became known as prog rock, i.e. Jefferson Airplane.   Whereas the Dead, Big Brother, and Steppenwolf not so much.   I may think the Dead are a progressive rock band (in fact I do, and have seriously considered as a SC submitting them for Proto or -Related), but the marked influence Airplane and Giles,Giles&Fripp and Hendrix and Spirit had on prog is more evident.
It may have laid the ground work in some respects but Mothers of Invention, The Nice, Procol Harum, the Moody Blues, Clouds/123 and maybe one or two others(even PF if we want to throw them in)were doing progressive music(or proto prog)in 1967.

Which is why most of those bands are here in full Prog categories: Crossover, Avant, Symph, etc. rather than Proto or -Related like where the Dead might be placed.
Yes, that's exactly my point. They were prog bands not psych bands and didn't evolve from psych either(since they were so early). Tongue

Psychedelic rock was huge, far bigger than prog ever was even in prog's popular heyday.   It still is, for crying out loud.   The Doors, Hendrix and Pink Floyd (yes Floyd was a psych band) are still far more popular than ELP or Yes or Tull.   Zappa, the Nice, GG&F, most certainly did evolve from Psych, if not in style than in spirit.


"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65249
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2019 at 20:29
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by Snicolette Snicolette wrote:

I see both points of yours (Mike) and Atavachron (David, I think?).  No one knew what it was, it was an organic growth at the time....again, I was there and to me, I can see the direct lines, but I don't expect that everyone would and also understand that this is a Prog site, not a Psych site.  
Sorry, I don't mean to be rude here but unless you were in the recording studios or hung out with these early bands you weren't there. You don't know what the musicians were thinking or what they were actually striving for. Early prog didn't get much exposure it was very underground. Those albums I mentioned were not psych. DOFP by the Moodies was not psych. It was early prog/ proto prog or art rock. Art rock and psych were separate. I'm not the only one who feels that way. I have spoken to others who were "there" who agree with me. I actually used to think that way too and in did for a very long time until I took a really long deep look at it. Sure on the surface it seems like prog evolved from psych but it didn't. It was already starting by the time psych hit it's commercial peak. As I said before they were two separate ideologies.
They became separate, but you can't tell me the Nice, one of the single most important early symphonic rock bands, was not in reality an English Psych group.   Just listen to the first two LPs.   Psych in the most kitschy and classic way.

Which leads me to my next point which is that being in the friggin' studio is not required to draw clear lines between the music being made & recorded, who was influencing who, and which albums were impacting subsequent albums.   Far more accurate and historically correct than what any book or historian or opinion has to say about it.   Follow the music, it's all right there.

At least provide specific examples then(something I have yet to see). 

Examples of ... ?  

That's why I say it's in the LPs chronologically.   Anyone can just claim "A band was this or it was that", but that's not good enough, is it.   You go to the releases--  what albums had been released at what specific moments, who was listening, and which influences then can clearly be heard, audible on later albums by other artists.  

That's music history


"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18253
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2019 at 20:30
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Psych absolutely laid the groundwork if not the rough blueprint for Prog, but inclusions are usually psych artists that had some important impact on what became known as prog rock, i.e. Jefferson Airplane.   Whereas the Dead, Big Brother, and Steppenwolf not so much.   I may think the Dead are a progressive rock band (in fact I do, and have seriously considered as a SC submitting them for Proto or -Related), but the marked influence Airplane and Giles,Giles&Fripp and Hendrix and Spirit had on prog is more evident.
It may have laid the ground work in some respects but Mothers of Invention, The Nice, Procol Harum, the Moody Blues, Clouds/123 and maybe one or two others(even PF if we want to throw them in)were doing progressive music(or proto prog)in 1967.

Which is why most of those bands are here in full Prog categories: Crossover, Avant, Symph, etc. rather than Proto or -Related like where the Dead might be placed.
Yes, that's exactly my point. They were prog bands not psych bands and didn't evolve from psych either(since they were so early). Tongue

Psychedelic rock was huge, far bigger than prog ever was even in prog's popular heyday.   It still is, for crying out loud.   The Doors, Hendrix and Pink Floyd (yes Floyd was a psych band) are still far more popular than ELP or Yes or Tull.   Zappa, the Nice, GG&F, most certainly did evolve from Psych, if not in style than in spirit.



Well, some of that is arguable. 

Anyway, they all had progressive elements. They just didn't get labelled prog or progressive until much later. Even the Beatles on Sgt. Peppers had progressive elements. Many consider a day in the life to be a prog song. They both evolved concurrently. That's my opinion. Progressive music/proto prog/art rock became prog rock later but it was there around the same time(or at the very least those elements were) psych started. 

The Doors were proto prog also. Aside from Pink Floyd who I consider prog no psych band was as big as ELP, Yes, Genesis, JT etc. Prog in it's hey day was most certainly bigger than psych. Look up album sales. The term psych became more well known than the term prog but that's starting to change. 


Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - July 30 2019 at 20:34
Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18253
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2019 at 20:33
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

[QUOTE=Atavachron]
Psych absolutely laid the groundwork if not the rough blueprint for Prog, but inclusions are usually psych artists that had some important impact on what became known as prog rock, i.e. Jefferson Airplane.   Whereas the Dead, Big Brother, and Steppenwolf not so much.   I may think the Dead are a progressive rock band (in fact I do, and have seriously considered as a SC submitting them for Proto or -Related), but the marked influence Airplane and Giles,Giles&Fripp and Hendrix and Spirit had on prog is more evident.
It may have laid the ground work in some respects but Mothers of Invention, The Nice, Procol Harum, the Moody Blues, Clouds/123 and maybe one or two others(even PF if we want to throw them in)were doing progressive music(or proto prog)in 1967.

Which is why most of those bands are here in full Prog categories: Crossover, Avant, Symph, etc. rather than Proto or -Related like where the Dead might be placed.
Yes, that's exactly my point. They were prog bands not psych bands and didn't evolve from psych either(since they were so early). Tongue

Psychedelic rock was huge, far bigger than prog ever was even in prog's popular heyday.   It still is, for crying out loud.   The Doors, Hendrix and Pink Floyd (yes Floyd was a psych band) are still far more popular than ELP or Yes or Tull.   Zappa, the Nice, GG&F, most certainly did evolve from Psych, if not in style than in spirit.



Well, some of that is arguable. 

Anyway, they all had progressive elements. They just didn't get labelled prog or progressive until much later. Even the Beatles on Sgt. Peppers had progressive elements. Many consider a day in the life to be a prog song. They both evolved concurrently. That's my opinion. Progressive music/proto prog/art rock became prog rock later but it was there around the same time(or at the very least those elements were) psych started. 

The Doors were proto prog also and are listed as such on here. Aside from Pink Floyd who I consider prog not a psych no psych band was as big as ELP, Yes, Genesis, JT etc. Prog in it's hey day was most certainly bigger than psych. Look up album sales. The term psych became more well known than the term prog but that's starting to change. 


Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - July 30 2019 at 20:41
Back to Top
dougmcauliffe View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 23 2019
Location: US
Status: Offline
Points: 3895
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dougmcauliffe Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2019 at 20:34
Originally posted by tempest_77 tempest_77 wrote:

Originally posted by dougmcauliffe dougmcauliffe wrote:

WHERES KING GIZZARD


They've been cleared for addition for 2.5 months now, we're just waiting for them to be added.


Aye that’s some good news
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65249
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2019 at 20:41
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Psychedelic rock was huge, far bigger than prog ever was even in prog's popular heyday.   It still is, for crying out loud.   The Doors, Hendrix and Pink Floyd (yes Floyd was a psych band) are still far more popular than ELP or Yes or Tull.   Zappa, the Nice, GG&F, most certainly did evolve from Psych, if not in style than in spirit
The Doors were proto prog also. Aside from Pink Floyd who I consider prog no psych band was as big as ELP, Yes, Genesis, JT etc. Prog in it's hey day was most certainly bigger than psych. Look up album sales. The term psych became more well known than the term prog but that's starting to change. 

Prog had a brief and glorious moment and did top the Charts, but the staying power of classic 60s Psych outdoes 70s prog.   Ask someone on the street if they've heard of the Doors, Hendrix, Janis Joplin, or the Dead and almost all will say "Of course" or "Yeah my Dad used to like those guys".   Then ask about ELP, Gentle Giant, or even Genesis and they probably won't even know 80s Genesis let alone the prog era version.


"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Snicolette View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 02 2018
Location: OR
Status: Offline
Points: 6039
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Snicolette Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2019 at 20:43
And I feel that we can agree to disagree. Discussion is all that is happening here and my perspective is different based on my own life experience...Just as my musical taste is, and everyone else's.  And I appreciate the open discussion without denigration into name-calling etc.  No, during the psych era I was not in the studio with those people, but I know what I heard and how it played out over the ensuing years....I do know how I heard how things changed as they changed, but that isn't in everyone's experience.  I had a very unusual circumstance in being near to the hotbed of pyschedelia and seeing it come close to home in it's time.  And also was certainly listening and going to all of the shows, reading all of the press, etc. during the heyday of the introduction of Prog as it occurred.  And I do contend that without the previous way being paved by what went before, I don't think it would have been as possible for it to flourish.  
"Into every rain, a little life must fall." ~Tom Rapp
Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18253
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2019 at 20:43
Examples of ... ?   

That's why I say it's in the LPs chronologically.   Anyone can just claim "A band was this or it was that", but that's not good enough, is it.   You go to the releases--  what albums had been released at what specific moments, who was listening, and which influences then can clearly be heard, audible on later albums by other artists.   

That's music history


I already did that on the previous page. I mentioned bands who released progressive albums. Do I have to keep mentioning the same bands over and over? 
Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18253
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2019 at 20:45
Originally posted by Snicolette Snicolette wrote:

And I feel that we can agree to disagree. Discussion is all that is happening here and my perspective is different based on my own life experience...Just as my musical taste is, and everyone else's.  And I appreciate the open discussion without denigration into name-calling etc.  No, during the psych era I was not in the studio with those people, but I know what I heard and how it played out over the ensuing years....I do know how I heard how things changed as they changed, but that isn't in everyone's experience.  I had a very unusual circumstance in being near to the hotbed of pyschedelia and seeing it come close to home in it's time.  And also was certainly listening and going to all of the shows, reading all of the press, etc. during the heyday of the introduction of Prog as it occurred.  And I do contend that without the previous way being paved by what went before, I don't think it would have been as possible for it to flourish.  

Prog became popular after psych but that's it. That's probably what you are going by and that's understandable. Most people were not exposed to anything termed prog(even later)other than the first King Crimson album.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65249
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2019 at 20:49
^ She's telling you she was raised in a Psych hotbed.   So did I, I grew up in San Francisco in the 60s & 70s.   It doesn't get more psychedelic than that (heck I lived a block from Janis and next door to Santana, literally).   When you've lived and listened to the music from the inside out, things become more clear regarding impact and influence.






Edited by Atavachron - July 30 2019 at 20:56
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10617
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Easy Money Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2019 at 21:11
Re the term progressive rock.

I first heard this term when FM stations in the states started playing whole album sides instead of singles, bands that made albums that catered to this format were called "Progressive Rock Bands". This applied to The Beatles, the Moody Blues, Deep Purple, Santana, Pink Floyd, Allman Brothers, The Who, Mandrill, Procol Harum, The Doors, "Electric Ladyland" album etc
A lot of these bands were also called psychedelic, at the time they were not mutually exclusive terms, that comes later.

The term "Progressive Rock" later sort of morphed under the guidance of a younger generation and began to apply only to certain British bands such as Yes, ELP, King Crimson etc. The rest is history.

Edited by Easy Money - July 30 2019 at 21:22
Help the victims of the russian invasion:
http://www.jazzmusicarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=28523&PID=130446&title=various-ways-you-can-help-ukraine#130446
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 10>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.168 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.