Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
|
Posted: March 02 2011 at 12:22 |
OK...anyway i don't consider a musical system without tubes in the highs or full tubes...a big system with only solid state amplification is a joke. Even the best solid state sound cold, electronic in the mid/highs.
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: March 02 2011 at 12:49 |
oliverstoned wrote:
OK...anyway i don't consider a musical system without tubes in the highs or full tubes...a big system with only solid state amplification is a joke. Even the best solid state sound cold, electronic in the mid/highs. |
See, you wouldn't get into these polemic arguments if you stopped making polemic statements.
Valves/tubes are great, they are also wonderfully cool to own and look at.
MosFETS are great, and have remarkably similar characteristics to valves/tubes, but are not as wonderfully cool to own or look at.
What gives valved/tubed systems their colouration is the output matching transformer, not the bottle. If you like that warm harmonic distortion on your music (and most of us do) then go for it.
|
What?
|
|
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
|
Posted: March 02 2011 at 13:26 |
It's not about look at all...
I talk about empiric things that everybody who comes at home
(or at some frien's home as well) can experience; there's no need for gold-plated ears. My system "pushes walls", there's no distorsion at all, we feel at the heart of the sound and the lows are incredible, the
highs and extreme sing incredibly, you rediscover any disc.
You'd be happy to hear how CD works (it's possible)but it's because it's Tube in the mid/highs and that the system is over optimized at all levels...
OK MOS FET are better on the paper. But a great one billion solid-state system always sound cold, flat, harsh in the mid-highs compared to Tube.
It's something that every honest people may certify. So this means that
figures, measurements don't reflect the result, the musicality of any device. this is something that has to be experienced, that's all i can say.
Tube amps mesure less good than solidstate but are 100X times more musical in the mid highs/highs/extreme high which is spectum part to
which we're the most "sensible" (in french)
However, solid state is unbeatable for low/extreme low.
But if you have to have only one integrated amp, it must be tube...
and then you can add a good sub for low and extreme low.
That's why the logic is to perform bi amplification. And it works.
You can even do "tri amplification" adding a sub for extreme low.
That's the royal way, including a preamp and a good source.
PS: yes the output transformer is very important in the sound, so is
power in general so that's why we audiophiles, work on it
Edited by oliverstoned - March 02 2011 at 13:28
|
|
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17845
|
Posted: March 02 2011 at 13:36 |
Dean wrote:
|
Wasn't that a place or thing in Star Wars??
(sorry my bad... )
|
|
|
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
|
Posted: March 02 2011 at 13:44 |
I tell everybody all i know....Jolida 302 is a fantastic amp
(from USA) that costs around 1000 dollars and compare to
the best tube amps and so anything else...
An absolute reference
Of course you can use two using it as mono block, one for each canal
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: March 02 2011 at 14:01 |
You'll get no argument from me Oliver. I love valves (sorry, dropping the americanism of "tubes" now), I learnt my electronics using valves and even built a valve sound-to-light unit back in the 70s (using thyratrons) to go with my valve pre-amp, valve power-amp, valve power supply and valve tuner. What we didn't like about solid-state amps back then was their brightness - unfortunately that brightness was how things should have sounded, that was what flat, linear, undistorted response sounded like and we didn't like it - it didn't "fit" with the harshly reflective and acoustically dynamic and active environment that we listen to music in. This effect occurred again when we went from vinyl to CD, again we got to hear what flat, linear, undistorted response sounded like and we didn't like it. In human-survival terms those higher than normal speech frequencies mean "danger", "flee", "hide", that's why our ears are tuned to them and why we don't like them.
CD feeding into solid-state is as near perfect transparent reproduction as it is possible to get electrically - the problem now is converting that perfect electrical energy into acoustic energy, and there the transducers (ie loudspeakers or headphones) and the environment (room or ear-holes) have a huge impact and are the weak link in any system. It is impossible to replicate the recording environment in a living room with cones of paper and coils of wire.
What you get with valves and vinyl is that colouration in the mids and tops that agrees with our ears, not what is flat, linear and distortion free. This cannot be replicated with filters, (though it can be modeled in DSP to some extent), to get that sound you have to use those components.
/edit: Distortion is anything in the acoustic signal that the record's producer/sound-engineer did not put in the original recording. I'm not referring to the nasty horrible stuff like crossover distortion, overdrive or clipping - that is avoidable and inexcusable in any system, but the subtle and the "nice" that even the best system's add. If you do anything to the signal you have introduced distortion - applying filtering is distortion, any non-linear component in the system is distortion, mismatched cables are distortion, valves and transformers introduce distortion - they cannot help it - it's physics... If you can tell the difference between two systems then that difference is distortion - the question then is not which system is providing the distortion when compared to the original source (answer = both) , but which distortion do you prefer.
Edited by Dean - March 02 2011 at 15:50
|
What?
|
|
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17845
|
Posted: March 02 2011 at 15:08 |
^ Interesting......make an arguement for a non-tube setup, which is ok as they are pricey. Jolida I see only sold thru dealers, so I pay a pretty good markup probably...upwards of 50% is my guess, is it worth it?
I don't listen to FM anymore, so that is why I am thinking just go the amp/integrated amp road. Plus my Zune HD has HD FM so I can listen thru that if I need to.
I have not seen mention speakers of choice??
|
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: March 02 2011 at 16:29 |
I never recommend anything to anyone (sorry) - with electronics as long as you are buying quality brands you will be getting quality product - what you are paying for is build standard not performance. Oliver recommended a NAD integrated amp - it's great - I've had one (a 3020A) for 30 years as my "2nd system" (ie in the dining room), it is powered-up 24/7 and has never gone wrong - even the level control is crackle-free, but to be honest, anything in that price range will sound and perform much the same.
Speakers are personal, recommendations only go so far- you need to pick something you like and what fits your room.
All can argue is don't buy on price-tickets, buy with your ears - go to a good HiFi retailer with a good listening/demo room and have a listen - you cannot buy online or on the recommendation of someone else unless you've heard the set-up yourself. Take along your favourite albums, something you know every note and nuance so you can compare it to you existing equipment - the albums they provide will sound great, but if you don't know them you won't be able to tell anything by listening.
|
What?
|
|
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17845
|
Posted: March 02 2011 at 16:49 |
^ Thanks Dean.......I know NAD is good stuff...looking into that, although I see their int amps do not have a phono input, at least the ones I looked at.
Speakers I totally agree on....I have never bought speakers online, I always listen at the store with my fav mix CD.....and I always buy what my ears tell me sound the best.
I appreciate both your guys input......regards!
|
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: March 02 2011 at 17:12 |
^ NAD make a pretty good external Phono stage, but it is external. (then few amps have phono stage now-a-days)
|
What?
|
|
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
|
Posted: March 03 2011 at 01:38 |
The Nad phono stage is not TOO bad but that's far from being a good one.
But that's another story.
Nad is what i recommend for teh cheaper possible setup because it's very musical for integrated solid state, a warm sound closer to the real live thing than many more expensive solid states.
But it's still light years away from tube in the mid/highs.
|
|
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
|
Posted: March 03 2011 at 01:41 |
Dean wrote:
oliverstoned wrote:
OK...anyway i don't consider a musical system without tubes in the highs or full tubes...a big system with only solid state amplification is a joke. Even the best solid state sound cold, electronic in the mid/highs. |
See, you wouldn't get into these polemic arguments if you stopped making polemic statements.
Valves/tubes are great, they are also wonderfully cool to own and look at.
MosFETS are great, and have remarkably similar characteristics to valves/tubes, but are not as wonderfully cool to own or look at.
What gives valved/tubed systems their colouration is the output matching transformer, not the bottle. If you like that warm harmonic distortion on your music (and most of us do) then go for it.
|
See, you did't consider that in his threads, Oliver get's to decide what's polemic.
|
|
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
|
Posted: March 03 2011 at 02:16 |
"What you get with valves and vinyl is that colouration in the mids and tops that agrees with our ears, not what is flat, linear and distortion free."
Yes and when you add great solid state in the low you reach musical bliss!
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: March 03 2011 at 03:56 |
Catcher10 wrote:
Dean wrote:
|
Wasn't that a place or thing in Star Wars??
(sorry my bad... ) |
MOSFETS are cooler than Star Wars (honest).
MOSFETS (Metal Oxide Silicon Field Effect Transistor) and Bipolar Transistor are not the same, and while both are called "solid-state" it is unfair to tar both with the same brush.
MOSFETS work in a similar way to valves and have very similar transfer characteristics, (the relationship from input signal to output signal) - on the negative side what MOSFETS don't have is an nice glass bottle and a nice glowing heater, but on the plus side they don't need a nasty 400V high-tension supply or nasty matching transformers to drive a speaker.
|
What?
|
|
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
|
Posted: March 03 2011 at 04:04 |
^^ so by "yes" you mean that tube amps aren't really audiophile? Because last time I checked, audiophile means reproducing the original recording as accurately as possible.
Edited by Mr ProgFreak - March 03 2011 at 04:05
|
|
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
|
Posted: March 03 2011 at 05:07 |
Yes of course, there are different kinds of solid state, i used to have
a pure Class A headphone amp. The sound was excellent, very close to tube...but not as good. IN THE LOW and EXTREME LOW HOWEVER, SOLID STATE IS UNBEATABLE.
BUT THE FIRST PRIORITY (when you don't have an unlimited budget)IS TO HAVE GREAT HIGHS & MID HIGHS.
A PURE "CLASS A" AMP FOR A HOME SYSTEM WILL COSTS at least 4 TIMES MORE THAN TUBE AND IS TWO TIMES LESS GOOD IN THE HIGHS THAN TUBE.
Edited by oliverstoned - March 03 2011 at 06:21
|
|
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
|
Posted: March 03 2011 at 06:30 |
I'd like to add that there are solid state which sound "colored" as well.
And coloration and musicality are two very different notions.
We audiophiles are looking for the most neutral devices so we don't have to compensate this by that. But it has to be musical as well.
On another hand, some devices are lighlty colored but still highly desirable as they're extremely musical. Like the legendary tube tuner Marantz 10B which is the absolute best tuner ever because there's no other tuner doing so sweet music. For example teh tuner Goldmund Mimesis
IV (solid state) goes further on hifi criterias (it's the Ferrari of tuner) and it's one of the very best sources on earth (and it costed
10 000 euros when first released) but it's not as musical as the Marantz.
All that to say that figures don't tell much, if nothing about the result.
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: March 03 2011 at 06:42 |
oliverstoned wrote:
Yes of course, there are different kinds of solid state, i used to have a pure Class A headphone amp. The sound was excellent, very close to tube...but not as good. IN THE LOW and EXTREME LOW HOWEVER, SOLID STATE IS UNBEATABLE.
BUT THE FIRST PRIORITY (when you don't have an unlimited budget)IS TO HAVE GREAT HIGHS & MID HIGHS.
A PURE "CLASS A" AMP FOR A HOME SYSTEM WILL COSTS at least 4 TIMES MORE THAN TUBE AND IS TWO TIMES LESS GOOD IN THE HIGHS THAN TUBE. |
You really must stop making these polemic statements if you don't wish us to respond. You are using phrases like "as good" and "less good" as quantifable empiric measures, which they are most certainly not. You are even giving the impression that "Class A" is a measure of worth, which is it is not.
|
What?
|
|
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
|
Posted: March 03 2011 at 08:13 |
"as good" or "less good" is like the salt is salty and the sugar is sugaree. Everybody agrees on that. It's empiric indeed.
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: March 03 2011 at 08:34 |
oliverstoned wrote:
"as good" or "less good" is like the salt is salty and the sugar is sugaree. Everybody agrees on that. It's empiric indeed. |
Sugar and salt can be quantified, good cannot - put two times more salt and it is two times more salty, put half as much sugar and it is two times less sugary - BUT you cannot put half as much "good" into something, it will not be two times less "good" - that is not empiric, it certainly isn't objective, in fact that barely manages to be subjective. Empiric is something that is measured by observation - but it still has to be measured.
|
What?
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.