Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Why Isn't Chicago (the band) Considered Prog?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Why Isn't Chicago (the band) Considered Prog?
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65250 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2022 at 01:07
Originally posted by nick_h_nz nick_h_nz wrote:

But seriously, what the heck is “completely prog”? People on this forum can’t even agree where the borders of what is or is not prog are, let alone what prog itself might be. You really think there is something that could be agreed by all to be “completely prog”? 😄🤪🤪🤪

It's a starting place by which a given team or admins can vote on inclusion.
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Guldbamsen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23104 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guldbamsen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2022 at 01:25
Brass Rock at it’s finest methinks.
Prog is just a sticker…perhaps one you can slap onto their first couple of outings. Who cares anyway? The music remains the same.
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams
Back to Top
nick_h_nz View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Prog Metal / Heavy Prog Team

Joined: March 01 2013
Location: Suffolk, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 6737 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote nick_h_nz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2022 at 01:28
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by nick_h_nz nick_h_nz wrote:

But seriously, what the heck is “completely prog”? People on this forum can’t even agree where the borders of what is or is not prog are, let alone what prog itself might be. You really think there is something that could be agreed by all to be “completely prog”? 😄🤪🤪🤪

It's a starting place by which a given team or admins can vote on inclusion.


😄 That is quite possibly the funniest thing I have ever read in the many years I’ve been reading this forum. 👏🏻👏🏻
Reviewer for The Progressive Aspect
Back to Top
Cristi View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams

Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Online
Points: 43599 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Cristi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2022 at 01:32
I don't think the question asked in the thread title is the right one, because here on PA they are considered prog, otherwise they would not have been here. 
Maybe the question is why aren't they more popular or more talked about here on PA and maybe elsewhere? 
Back to Top
Saperlipopette! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 11618 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Saperlipopette! Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2022 at 01:54
I'm so tired of having to check out all these so-called prog bands that sound nothing like Suppers Ready or Close to the Edge - we need a Completely Prog Sub-Genre!


Edited by Saperlipopette! - April 14 2022 at 02:01
Back to Top
Cristi View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams

Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Online
Points: 43599 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Cristi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2022 at 01:56
Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

I'm so tired of hacing to check out all these so-called prog bands that sound nothing like Suppers Ready or Close to the Edge - we need a Completely Prog Sub-Genre!

LOL
And also a subgenre called "true prog". Evil Smile
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65250 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2022 at 01:57
Originally posted by nick_h_nz nick_h_nz wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by nick_h_nz nick_h_nz wrote:

But seriously, what the heck is “completely prog”? People on this forum can’t even agree where the borders of what is or is not prog are, let alone what prog itself might be. You really think there is something that could be agreed by all to be “completely prog”? 😄🤪🤪🤪
It's a starting place by which a given team or admins can vote on inclusion.
😄 That is quite possibly the funniest thing I have ever read in the many years I’ve been reading this forum. 👏🏻👏🏻

Isn't it ?   Also happens to be true, it's just rare and we haven't had to do that in a long time.  

"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
nick_h_nz View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Prog Metal / Heavy Prog Team

Joined: March 01 2013
Location: Suffolk, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 6737 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote nick_h_nz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2022 at 02:08
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by nick_h_nz nick_h_nz wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by nick_h_nz nick_h_nz wrote:

But seriously, what the heck is “completely prog”? People on this forum can’t even agree where the borders of what is or is not prog are, let alone what prog itself might be. You really think there is something that could be agreed by all to be “completely prog”? 😄🤪🤪🤪
It's a starting place by which a given team or admins can vote on inclusion.
😄 That is quite possibly the funniest thing I have ever read in the many years I’ve been reading this forum. 👏🏻👏🏻

Isn't it ?   Also happens to be true, it's just rare and we haven't had to do that in a long time.  


It is, and I suspect many may not have seen the humour. Here’s to prog that is “complete”! 🍻 
Reviewer for The Progressive Aspect
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65250 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2022 at 02:25
Not to belabor it, but as an example, when Heavy Prog was in its infancy we had to decide if Journey should be included in the PA database as a prog rock band, and if so whether they should be considered HP.   We concluded that though Journey had released several albums that contained some progressive rock and rock-fusion material, they had never released an album that could be considered a prog rock release.   So we rejected them and Admin voted them into Prog Related.




Edited by Atavachron - April 14 2022 at 02:30
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Necrotica View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Colaborator

Joined: July 28 2015
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 3365 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Necrotica Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2022 at 02:44
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Not to belabor it, but as an example, when Heavy Prog was in its infancy we had to decide if Journey should be included in the PA database as a prog rock band, and if so whether they should be considered HP.   We concluded that though Journey had released several albums that contained some progressive rock and rock-fusion material, they had never released an album that could be considered a prog rock release.   So we rejected them and Admin voted them into Prog Related.



That's kinda wild to me. I'm curious as why they were considered for heavy prog, when the jazz fusion category seems so much more applicable to their early work Confused

Also, while I'm satisfied with Journey being prog-related because of their overall discog, I do think their debut is a full-on prog record Smile


Edited by Necrotica - April 14 2022 at 02:44
Take me down, to the underground
Won't you take me down, to the underground
Why oh why, there is no light
And if I can't sleep, can you hold my life

https://www.youtube.com/@CocoonMasterBrendan-wh3sd
Back to Top
Hugh Manatee View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 07 2021
Location: The Barricades
Status: Offline
Points: 1587 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hugh Manatee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2022 at 02:46
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

 So we rejected them and Admin voted them into Prog Related.


Ah yes, the Prog Related, that disorganised rabble of illigitimate ne'er-do-wells.

They are way to far removed to ever get near the crown even if they are allowed entrance to the throne room.


Edited by Hugh Manatee - April 14 2022 at 02:48
I should have been a pair of ragged claws
Scuttling across the floors of uncertain seas
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65250 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2022 at 02:51
Originally posted by Necrotica Necrotica wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Not to belabor it, but as an example, when Heavy Prog was in its infancy we had to decide if Journey should be included in the PA database as a prog rock band, and if so whether they should be considered HP.   We concluded that though Journey had released several albums that contained some progressive rock and rock-fusion material, they had never released an album that could be considered a prog rock release.   So we rejected them and Admin voted them into Prog Related.
That's kinda wild to me. I'm curious as why they were considered for heavy prog, when the jazz fusion category seems so much more applicable to their early work Confused
Also, while I'm satisfied with Journey being prog-related because of their overall discog, I do think their debut is a full-on prog record Smile

Didn't really matter so much initially because someone had to decide if they should be here at all, which is of course the main job of the teams.   Heavy Prog seemed a reasonable place to start.   When the band was rejected by us, no other team said "Hey we'll take those guys" so admin took on the task and a reasonable compromise was made.  

As you know , ProgRelated [and ProtoProg] is not a progressive rock category,  it is an historic & musicologic reference source.




Edited by Atavachron - April 14 2022 at 03:02
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65250 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2022 at 02:53
Originally posted by Hugh Manatee Hugh Manatee wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

 So we rejected them and Admin voted them into Prog Related.
Ah yes, the Prog Related, that disorganised rabble of illigitimate ne'er-do-wells.

They are way to far removed to ever get near the crown even if they are allowed entrance to the throne room.

A superstitious, cowardly lot, without question.
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17509 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2022 at 03:47
Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

I'm so tired of having to check out all these so-called prog bands that sound nothing like Suppers Ready or Close to the Edge - we need a Completely Prog Sub-Genre!

Hi,

The weird part of it all, is that if we look at a lot of Europe, and then Africa, and then Latin America, then South America, then Japan and the Far East ... there are a lot of bands that could be considered "prog" or "progressive", with one exception ... that the worst definition EVER of anything, states that it all has to SOUND LIKE or BE LIKE the top three or four that were crowned the best of these molds.

The result?

We stopped listening to music, and instead are always looking for something that is SIMILAR to those old buffoons (theses days, anyway!) ... instead of appreciating the very differences and really fine pieces of work out there that are completely ignored. You know what it is like? .... I'm bringing McDonald's and force you to eat burger and fries. ... we gonna loot and steal all the gold and resources so our upper class can get richer and keep the rest subservient while making sure that the royalty never go poop and are always so neat and far out and colorful, when they have some of the darkest history EVER in anything ... and you are going to BELIEVE that their media is right, of course.

Here, on PA, I think that many of the folks that made decisions, did it with a lot better thinking and ideas, than otherwise. That CHICAGO does not get the attention that it deserves, is NOT THEIR FAULT, but the result of a generation of fans that is so commercially attuned, that finding something different is stupid and not enjoyed or appreciated.

WHICH IS BIZARRE and CRAZY when it comes to the arts. England, and all of Europe, had magnificent, FILM, THEATER, WRITING, and other arts ... except one. ROCK MUSIC that will FOREVER, be banned by a commercially minded group of fans, that don't listen to music anyway ... they will forget many of these bands later and then say ... I was just young and didn't care! 

We either stand for the art ... or we don't. The classification of it is not even necessary ... but we need to believe in our "children" and their "children" ... or we will all die alone and forgotten, because we were the mememe generation that did not give a chit!
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Guldbamsen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23104 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guldbamsen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2022 at 04:07
Chicago is widely known for their hits. Genesis are widely known for their hits. To most anyone outside of places like this, prog is not a thing, and both of these acts are considered ‘artpop’.

Why is Prokofiev not considered prog?
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20240 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sean Trane Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2022 at 04:27
Originally posted by Necrotica Necrotica wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Not to belabor it, but as an example, when Heavy Prog was in its infancy we had to decide if Journey should be included in the PA database as a prog rock band, and if so whether they should be considered HP.   We concluded that though Journey had released several albums that contained some progressive rock and rock-fusion material, they had never released an album that could be considered a prog rock release.   So we rejected them and Admin voted them into Prog Related.
That's kinda wild to me. I'm curious as why they were considered for heavy prog, when the jazz fusion category seems so much more applicable to their early work Confused

Also, while I'm satisfied with Journey being prog-related because of their overall discog, I do think their debut is a full-on prog record Smile


Yup, the debut should be considered "fully-prog" because a bit JR/F indeed
The second LitF  one should be considered "prog-related", but it is more in the heavy prog genre
Wheras their Next album is heavy and has only two "proggy" tracks (the instrumental N&D and Find You if memory serves), the rest being subpar hard AOR

the rest of their discog is pure crap, IMHO.
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
octopus-4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams

Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14099 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote octopus-4 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2022 at 06:02
Originally posted by Man With Hat Man With Hat wrote:

Originally posted by yogev yogev wrote:

beacause they don't.





Yeah pretty much. This would be like asking why isn't The Clash or John Coltrane or Arlo Guthrie prog...their music isn't prog thus they aren't considered prog. 
You have just mentioned three of my favorites...add Patti Smith, Devo and Janis Joplin. Listening to them I can
forget prog for a while... 

I also share my birthday with Arlo
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Back to Top
BrufordFreak View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 25 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Status: Offline
Points: 8191 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote BrufordFreak Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2022 at 07:56
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by BrufordFreak BrufordFreak wrote:

I'm not sure I understand the opening question: Chicago has a place here in the PA database--under Jazz-Rock/Fusion. 

Personally, I only considered their first two albums as progressive rock, though elements of prog sounds and stylings pervaded lots of other songs of theirs. 

P.S. Terry Kath didn't mean to leave the band, he left the planet: accidentally shot himself while cleaning his guns in January of 1978. (Not a suicide.) Those present at the incident were totally shocked because Terry was such a careful master of his weapons collection.    


I could be wrong but I believe there was only one other person he was showing his guns to (possibly a roadie or guitar tech but I'm not entirely sure -I'd have to look it up again). Apparently, the guy he was with told him to be careful and Terry said something like "don't worry, it's not loaded. See.." and pointed the gun to his head and that was it. One of the biggest tragedies in all of rock imo. Even with what he did do on the guitar up to the point of his death he should still be ranked up there with Clapton, Hendrix, Page, etc but unfortunately he usually isn't. To prove that point I saw this poster today while walking around in the mall (I don't remember which store exactly) and Terry Kath is nowhere to be found. https://www.ebay.com/itm/333699168102

I had heard conflicting statements at the time ( I was a BIG CTA/Terry Kath fan, had just seen them that summer of 1977 at Castle Farms), but you seem to be right: sources say that Don Johnson (not the actor, one of the band's roadies) was with him. It was not Russian roulette; it was totally an accident--by a seasoned gun collector!

People forget that Terry was quite gifted singer and songwriter as well. That gravelly, forceful "White Ray Charles" voice sang the leads on "Introduction," "Make Me Smile," "I'm a Man" and even "Color My World" among others.

I think they're considered prog for their singular sound, experimental guitar play, and very creative structures and forms--often with great song-ending jams. They were a great if polished concert (in 1977). 
Drew Fisher
https://progisaliveandwell.blogspot.com/
Back to Top
MortSahlFan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 01 2018
Location: US
Status: Offline
Points: 2941 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MortSahlFan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2022 at 11:56
Sure, they're on here, but this is THE place --- the PROG archives.

But they're never talked about. But I imagine there's hundreds of Genesis conversations, who also are known for their singles, too. And yeah, bands change, but it doesn't remove those first few albums "prog credibility". And it was 1969 when their debut was out...

To piggyback on what Moshkito was saying, in any artistic field, the first who do something seem to have to take the hits while they're knocking the doors down to give artists that come after them precedent.

Unfortunately, too many in the avant-garde talking circles (which is what many do - talk more than work) think anything weird or indescribable "could sell and make millions of dollars!"

"Commerce is the enemy of art"
-Orson Welles

And yes, this is why after Terry died, the band went to sh*t, and then REALLY went to sh*t with Cetera/Foster. Maybe I'll listen to their 70s albums after Kath died sometime, but after reading the review posted on here, I think I'm going to listen.

https://www.youtube.com/c/LoyalOpposition

https://www.scribd.com/document/382737647/MortSahlFan-Song-List
Back to Top
Cristi View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams

Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Online
Points: 43599 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Cristi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2022 at 12:25
Originally posted by MortSahlFan MortSahlFan wrote:

Sure, they're on here, but this is THE place --- the PROG archives.

But they're never talked about. But I imagine there's hundreds of Genesis conversations, who also are known for their singles, too. And yeah, bands change, but it doesn't remove those first few albums "prog credibility". And it was 1969 when their debut was out...

To piggyback on what Moshkito was saying, in any artistic field, the first who do something seem to have to take the hits while they're knocking the doors down to give artists that come after them precedent.

Unfortunately, too many in the avant-garde talking circles (which is what many do - talk more than work) think anything weird or indescribable "could sell and make millions of dollars!"


I can think of a ton of other bands that deserve to be talked about and it does not happen, so it's not because of the avant prog circles, or famous bands like Genesis and so on. It's also not about credibility. 

It seems like you want everyone to love this band as much as you do, oh well... it's not possible, it never is... 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.829 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.