Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Ipacial Section
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 15 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 124
|
Topic: Complex time signatures? Posted: November 18 2005 at 09:46 |
My (varied) musical experience has tought me that even amateur musicians don't have to stretch themselves to much in order to compose, arrange & perform music in complex time signatures: 5/8, 7/8, 9/8, 11/8, etc....
So what is all the fuss about them? Time signatures are meaningless!! Some music in 9/8 is easy to play & at the same time some music in 4/4 is almost impossible to play.
And don't talk to me about shifting from 3/8 to 7/4 half way though a bar, or having a 4/4 guitar line playing against a 5/8 rhythm, with an 11/4 piano in the background!! Cause it's all lemon squeazy to me!!
Edited by Ipacial Section
|
www.soundclick.com/ipacialsection
|
|
VanBuren
Forum Groupie
Joined: October 27 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 83
|
Posted: November 18 2005 at 10:00 |
it just sounds cool, don't look too mcuh into it
|
|
chopper
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20030
|
Posted: November 18 2005 at 10:00 |
Sometimes you're not particularly aware that a song is not in a standard 4/4 time sig. Sometimes it can be tricky. It may be easy peasy to you, but try drumming along with Genesis' "Apocalypse in 9/8" without counting - not so easy.
|
|
Ipacial Section
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 15 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 124
|
Posted: November 18 2005 at 10:02 |
chopper wrote:
Sometimes you're not particularly aware that a song is not in a standard 4/4 time sig. Sometimes it can be tricky. It may be easy peasy to you, but try drumming along with Genesis' "Apocalypse in 9/8" without counting - not so easy. |
*Still not impressed*
|
www.soundclick.com/ipacialsection
|
|
krusty
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 27 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1777
|
Posted: November 18 2005 at 10:30 |
Indifferent.
I think there's a lot more to a piece of music than whether it's 3/4, 4/4, 5/8, 7/8, 9/8, 11/8, etc...
If fact it's time sig should be one of the the last thing's to consider when listening to a piece.
By that I mean fairly transparent.
|
|
|
Ipacial Section
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 15 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 124
|
Posted: November 18 2005 at 10:39 |
krusty wrote:
Indifferent.
I think there's a lot more to a piece of music than whether it's 3/4, 4/4, 5/8, 7/8, 9/8, 11/8, etc... If fact it's time sig should be one of the the last thing's to consider when listening to a piece. By that I mean fairly transparent.
|
That comment is typical of someone who 'listens' to music. And for what it is, it is fine.
But i'm talking from the point of view of a music composer & performer. In which case the time signature is a very improtant thing to consider.
|
www.soundclick.com/ipacialsection
|
|
Bj-1
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 04 2005
Location: No(r)Way
Status: Offline
Points: 31523
|
Posted: November 18 2005 at 10:40 |
chopper wrote:
but try drumming along with Genesis' "Apocalypse in 9/8" without counting - not so easy. |
I can do that!
|
RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
|
|
Sean Trane
Special Collaborator
Prog Folk
Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20338
|
Posted: November 18 2005 at 10:40 |
It is the ideas expressed in the song that makes it excellent, not the time signature it is in.
Floyd made brilliant tracks in 4/4 and Genesis's Turn It Off Again is in 13/8 and awful.
Not impressed solely by the complex rythmic patterns
Edited by Sean Trane
|
let's just stay above the moral melee prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword
|
|
Trotsky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 25 2004
Location: Malaysia
Status: Offline
Points: 2771
|
Posted: November 18 2005 at 10:52 |
Maybe a straight 7/4 may not impress you ... how about a piece where two musicians are playing according to two different time signatures and only overlap occasionally ... like one guy in 13/8 another in 5/8 but occasionally the patterns come together
I must say I once wrote a largely instrumental piece multi-time signature piece so difficult for the band to play that the lyrics were written in recognition of the chaos of the piece! ... we only got it right 1/3 of the time despite playing it on and off for 4 years!
|
"Death to Utopia! Death to faith! Death to love! Death to hope?" thunders the 20th century. "Surrender, you pathetic dreamer.”
"No" replies the unhumbled optimist "You are only the present."
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21275
|
Posted: November 18 2005 at 10:56 |
Indifferent. Complexity is relative ... a signature may seem complex to one person and really simple to another. Whether it makes sense depends more on the context of the song than on the complexity itself.
|
|
|
Ipacial Section
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 15 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 124
|
Posted: November 18 2005 at 10:59 |
Trotsky wrote:
Maybe a straight 7/4 may not impress you ... how about a piece where two musicians are playing according to two different time signatures and only overlap occasionally ... like one guy in 13/8 another in 5/8 but occasionally the patterns come together
I must say I once wrote a largely instrumental piece multi-time signature piece so difficult for the band to play that the lyrics were written in recognition of the chaos of the piece! ... we only got it right 1/3 of the time despite playing it on and off for 4 years!
|
Music that uses time signatures in a way that is too outrageous never sounds good. It is therefore unimpressive. Music is only impressive if it is good.
Now i'm into chaotic music, but music that is too OTT just gives me a head ache. And i wouldn't even describe 'musique concrete' as being OTT.
The chaos of the piece that you wrote (not to mention your inability to get it right more than a third of the time) must indicate to you how pointless it is to make over-complex music just for the sake of it. Complex musical techniques should be employed to enhance the music, not to make it unlistenable & unplayable, just for the sake of complexity.
There's a fine line between music & noise. When a band crosses that line, i think it is time for them to give up. Before they enter the realms of ultra-pretentiousness.
Besides, i've always believed that music isn't about showing off, to me it's about sharing.
|
www.soundclick.com/ipacialsection
|
|
romanm
Forum Newbie
Joined: November 03 2005
Location: Monaco
Status: Offline
Points: 26
|
Posted: November 18 2005 at 11:16 |
The beatles used to play in 4/4 and they´re my favourite band ever, but i think that sometimes prog bands have to brake the line, everybody can play in 4/4, and sometimes its good to hear the drums in 9/8 or 13/8 followed by the guitar in 5/8 or stuff like that
|
ohh can you feel our souls ignite.......
|
|
BePinkTheater
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 01 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1381
|
Posted: November 18 2005 at 11:21 |
I belive that time signitures are a pretty good metaphor for the spirit of prog. Now one would like to belive that artist write in odd time signitures not to be writing in weird meters, but because that is the feel they want or that is how a melodic line they hear fits. One would hope to belive that this is true; that it is a thoughtful decision as opposed to just doing it to be different. Obviously there are artists that dont think like this, and really do it just to be doing it. This is more prominant with younger musicians and amateurs. A great example is DT's When Dream and Day Unite. In this debut album, a lot of it seems forced . But in their later albums, the time signitures seem more natrual and apropriat.
Now my point is this: The use of odd meters and odd meter changes allows freedom. If an artist is hearng the begining of the line in 5/4 but the end of it in9/8, then he can do that. It is this type of freedom that is the spirit of progressive rock. Prog bands hear their music out of a verse/chorus/verse form. so they dont use that form, they do what they hear. If they hear a 5 minute instrmental section, they do it.
Prog is about total freedom for the artist to do what he feels is rockin \m/
|
I can strangle a canary in a tin can and it would be really original, but that wouldn't save it from sounding like utter sh*t.
-Stone Beard
|
|
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
|
Posted: November 18 2005 at 11:25 |
As long as they are used to embellish a piece of rock m,usic, and not purely to demonstrate how 'clever' the band is...
The best prog bands use them to add drama - or whatever mood they seek to achieve - Yes, Genesis and the like are masters at this, as were VDGG..
|
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
|
Catholic Flame
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 295
|
Posted: November 18 2005 at 11:28 |
Improvising would be more difficult in unusual time signatures. If you had practiced your licks in different keys (church modes?) then had to use different time sig. it would add another thick layer of complexity. Probably why most Rock and Jazz is done in 4/4.
But if you want to hear different time signatures done well invest in Dave Brubeck's Time Out. This is a Jazz swing group from the late 50's. Each song is a different time signature and they can swing in any of them.
|
“Great things are not accomplished by those who yield to trends and fads and popular opinion.”
~Jack Kerouac
|
|
Ipacial Section
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 15 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 124
|
Posted: November 18 2005 at 11:35 |
*Still not impressed*
Edited by Ipacial Section
|
www.soundclick.com/ipacialsection
|
|
Catholic Flame
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 295
|
Posted: November 18 2005 at 11:45 |
Ipacial Section wrote:
*Still not impressed* |
What ever.
|
“Great things are not accomplished by those who yield to trends and fads and popular opinion.”
~Jack Kerouac
|
|
Trotsky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 25 2004
Location: Malaysia
Status: Offline
Points: 2771
|
Posted: November 18 2005 at 11:59 |
Ipacial Section wrote:
Trotsky wrote:
Maybe a straight 7/4 may not impress you ... how about a piece where two musicians are playing according to two different time signatures and only overlap occasionally ... like one guy in 13/8 another in 5/8 but occasionally the patterns come together
I must say I once wrote a largely instrumental piece multi-time signature piece so difficult for the band to play that the lyrics were written in recognition of the chaos of the piece! ... we only got it right 1/3 of the time despite playing it on and off for 4 years!
|
Music that uses time signatures in a way that is too outrageous never sounds good. It is therefore unimpressive. Music is only impressive if it is good.
Now i'm into chaotic music, but music that is too OTT just gives me a head ache. And i wouldn't even describe 'musique concrete' as being OTT.
The chaos of the piece that you wrote (not to mention your inability to get it right more than a third of the time) must indicate to you how pointless it is to make over-complex music just for the sake of it. Complex musical techniques should be employed to enhance the music, not to make it unlistenable & unplayable, just for the sake of complexity.
There's a fine line between music & noise. When a band crosses that line, i think it is time for them to give up. Before they enter the realms of ultra-pretentiousness.
Besides, i've always believed that music isn't about showing off, to me it's about sharing.
|
Oh please ... actually it had very little to with showing off and much to do with challenging ourselves as musicians ... not that we didn't show off elsewhere! ... this started off as an interesting, somewhat angular riff and I wrote three different sections for it, initially thinking that they were all in the same time, and it was easy enough for me by myself ... plus as a keyboardist I happened to write it in a guitar/bass unfriendly key ... and for once we didn't adjust ... it was more a fun piece than anything else ... with an improvised solo for yours truly ... and we never once played it for a show ...
BTW, the last time you tried to share ... did the person reject you with a "still not impressed"
Edited by Trotsky
|
"Death to Utopia! Death to faith! Death to love! Death to hope?" thunders the 20th century. "Surrender, you pathetic dreamer.”
"No" replies the unhumbled optimist "You are only the present."
|
|
Drew
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2005
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 12600
|
Posted: November 18 2005 at 12:01 |
Sure!
|
|
Duncan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 23 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 180
|
Posted: November 18 2005 at 12:28 |
Lovely little poll here. For your next one, how about "what's the point in using counterpoint? It's not even hard to play!"
You can't divorce mechanical aspects of music from the music itself and then
evaluate them. Prog might use complex time signatures, but they're only
one of many deviations from generic norms. Are you going to denounce
moog solos on the grounds that any halfwit can play them, and might
just do so indulgently?
Oh, and if you really find playing three-part polyrhythms as lemon-squeazy as 4/4, gosh. Hats off to you, sir.
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.