Pink Floyd’s next compilation album? |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | ||
Man With Hat
Collaborator Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team Joined: March 12 2005 Location: Neurotica Status: Offline Points: 166178 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
23 versions of Wot's...Uh The Big Deal, each one with increased reverb on the highest tom.
|
||
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect. |
||
Dellinger
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: June 18 2009 Location: Mexico Status: Offline Points: 12732 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I don't know about a compilation album... it would be nice if they got the very songs I actually like best, but then again, I have all their albums anyways, and have my own lists. Echoes could have been the ultimate compilation from them, but it really bothers me how some of the songs were edited and incomplete... and they got almost the whole Shine On You Crazy Diamond in one song, but ended up chopping the very last part, or something of the sort. As for what I would like them to release... it's an album (or even better, video) from the Animals tour... now, that would be the very best live album ever for me.
|
||
I prophesy disaster
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 31 2017 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 4811 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I don't get how an album consisting of previously unreleased material can be called a compilation album. Surely a compilation album is an album containing tracks from previous albums. How is an album of previously unreleased material different from a new album? Surely the time between recording and release is immaterial. An example is Van der Graaf Generator - Time Vaults, classified here as a compilation album but containing no tracks from any other Van der Graaf Generator album. Even the tracks from Peter Hammill albums are different versions. |
||
No, I know how to behave in the restaurant now, I don't tear at the meat with my hands. If I've become a man of the world somehow, that's not necessarily to say I'm a worldly man.
|
||
richardh
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 28107 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Echoes pretty much nailed it although I would have liked Dogs instead of some other tracks. So basically that wit Dogs and better mastering would be great. Pink Floyd albums have generally been poorly remastered. Get the guy responsible for the recent re-issue of Marillion- Fugazi and get him on the case!
|
||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17848 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I'm good with more compilation offerings, you don't have to by them if you don't want. Nobody bitches about all the ridiculously priced Beatles compilations, they will never get my money, definition of money grab.
|
||
|
||
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 17538 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Hi, At this point, I don't think that Paul and Ringo have much to say about it, and that the majority of these things are being done by record companies that can still make money from it, and the 2 Beatles left will get some residuals from it, but I sincerely doubt they have a say or any input. Besides, there are a lot of things of theirs that are still unreleased and no one is giving a damn about getting them done, up to and including the Beatles Christmas Shows (fun stuff, not exactly the best!) and a lot of material with other folks playing that were found on bootlegs, most of which are still being ignored and a lot of that material has been buried. Someday, we might get a better view of things, but I doubt it will happen in our lifetime. The BBC ownership of things, or EMI (or whoever!) are the ones to blame and be accountable for the hiding, not Ringo or Paul themselves.
|
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18314 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
How about a compilation of unreleased live material similar to The Word is Live by Yes. Floyd don't have enough live releases. They are even worse than Genesis in that department.
Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - October 04 2021 at 19:16 |
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35995 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I think it's quite common for albums that have previously released tracks from various albums with one or some previously unreleased ones to be considered a compilation album. Any newly released (rather than re-released) compilation or collection that I can think of is a new album in a sense. Call it a collection if you prefer, or an archival release, or an anthology. One can play around with semantics. I'm not understanding your reasoning, to be honest. I would like an album that compiles previously unreleased tracks -- or lives, as mentioned, would be great.
Edited by Logan - October 04 2021 at 20:20 |
||
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 17538 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Hi, Which is, of course, rather strange, because what got PF famous was their concert shows and how far out they were in 1971 and 1972, before they started doing bits and pieces of DSOTM, which then became a huge show that got the band their first million, so to speak. It was during that time that they were thought to be the ultimate "stoned" band, along with TGD, which I'm not sure was true since these folks, for one, already had a member that lost it, and 2, were already much more mature about their doping, and not exactly happy with some of it, since RW got upset more than once about too much dope going to the stage, even during DSOTM, and sometimes those bits showed up on bootlegs. My take is that, unless, you go to the early material with DG, BEFORE Dark Side, is the only material that would be more fun to listen to and enjoy, since those had a lot of improvised material in them, and I think it all ended when their shows became "mechanical" with too much film and lights, and the players had to stay on top of it and not screw up, which would have hurt many other things taking place on the original DSOTM show. This, for me, caused the live material to lose their strength, and the boots of anything beyond DSOTM have absolutely NOTHING worth listening to at all, because of the quality level they raised on their shows, which allowed very little time, and sections where any of them could fool around at all! Thus, the early days would be far out to listen to, and the "hint" might even be shown via Nick Mason's very enjoyable and far out stuff that he redid from the early days. There is a lot of material that got a lot of different takes that you could only get on bootlegs, and never have heard before.
|
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
Guldbamsen
Special Collaborator Retired Admin Joined: January 22 2009 Location: Magic Theatre Status: Offline Points: 23104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
In all honesty? I have all the Floyd material I will ever need…most especially after the recent early year boxsets they released with live gigs and studio/radio work which had never had a proper release up until then. The 1969: Dramatis-ation is a personal fave. |
||
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams |
||
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |