Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Rush Retirement Rumors: Your Thoughts.
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedRush Retirement Rumors: Your Thoughts.

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2016 at 10:06
Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

Originally posted by Cristi Cristi wrote:

Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

They jumped on the prog rock train when it was almost out of the station. I call that "epigones".


but epigone has such a negative connotation to it, an inferior creator, an imitator which in my opinion Rush has never been.

But that's exactly my opinion of them. Had they added anything new and surprising I would not call them "epigones", but they didn't. At least not to my ears. I know they are very much loved on the American continent, but I simply can't warm up to them. They are way too streamlined for my taste. Their huge number of followers alone is proof for that; bands that go against the grain (which are those bands I prefer) have much less followers.


Well I guess no one likes every band and that's fine, but I don't get how you think they did add anything new or surprising. I'd be the first to admit they started out sounding like a Zep tribute act, but by the time they made 2112 I can honestly say that no one else I'm aware of sounded like that. Even if you hate the sound..



Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2016 at 09:52
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Epigones? Makes no sense, does not apply...Unless you want to apply that to many, many bands then ok. Clearly you don't know how they almost were shut down early in their career by the record label, wanting that "hit" record along the lines of traditional hard rock, being told by execs "no more long songs!"

2112 is that album that went against this grain you speak of and they did what they thought was best...make their own music. 
After CoS the label wanted the hit record as they did not understand the progressive rock/metal stuff they were doing...So what does the band do?? They go with the grain and create an album with a side long epic with a dystopian storyline set in the year 2112....Yea that was not "going against the grain" Are you kidding me!! 
Also you have to remember this was in the mid 70's....Rush were not that huge as you say with followers, they were still an opening act for bands like ELO, BOC, Aerosmith, Kansas, Nazareth and Kiss.

It's best you just say "I don't like them" and be on your way, that will garner you more positive comments.

I don't care about positive comments. And yes, there are many more bands that I call "epigones".

And you obviously don't get what I mean by "going against the grain". The music of Rush is in my opinion easy to listen to and not challenging at all. And that's why it does not go against the grain.

As to your advice: I think it is best you say "I like them" and be on your way.




BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
Barbu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2005
Location: infinity
Status: Offline
Points: 30855
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2016 at 09:35
Passion and integrity, that's what this band is all about.
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17966
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2016 at 09:19
Epigones? Makes no sense, does not apply...Unless you want to apply that to many, many bands then ok. Clearly you don't know how they almost were shut down early in their career by the record label, wanting that "hit" record along the lines of traditional hard rock, being told by execs "no more long songs!"

2112 is that album that went against this grain you speak of and they did what they thought was best...make their own music. 
After CoS the label wanted the hit record as they did not understand the progressive rock/metal stuff they were doing...So what does the band do?? They go with the grain and create an album with a side long epic with a dystopian storyline set in the year 2112....Yea that was not "going against the grain" Are you kidding me!! 
Also you have to remember this was in the mid 70's....Rush were not that huge as you say with followers, they were still an opening act for bands like ELO, BOC, Aerosmith, Kansas, Nazareth and Kiss.

It's best you just say "I don't like them" and be on your way, that will garner you more positive comments.
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2016 at 06:25
Originally posted by Cristi Cristi wrote:

Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

They jumped on the prog rock train when it was almost out of the station. I call that "epigones".


but epigone has such a negative connotation to it, an inferior creator, an imitator which in my opinion Rush has never been.

But that's exactly my opinion of them. Had they added anything new and surprising I would not call them "epigones", but they didn't. At least not to my ears. I know they are very much loved on the American continent, but I simply can't warm up to them. They are way too streamlined for my taste. Their huge number of followers alone is proof for that; bands that go against the grain (which are those bands I prefer) have much less followers.


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
Cristi View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams

Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Offline
Points: 45662
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2016 at 06:08
Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

They jumped on the prog rock train when it was almost out of the station. I call that "epigones".


but epigone has such a negative connotation to it, an inferior creator, an imitator which in my opinion Rush has never been.
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2016 at 05:54
They jumped on the prog rock train when it was almost out of the station. I call that "epigones".


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
Cristi View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams

Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Offline
Points: 45662
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2016 at 04:55
Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:


I don't care at all because I never liked them (which is no secret here). In my opinion they are epigones.

Sorry for being negative, but you asked for my thoughts.


how are they epigones?

you don't like them, ok, fine, but "epigones"?
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2016 at 04:38
Originally posted by GKR GKR wrote:

Their legacy is huge and there is a lot to hold up to.

I would be very dissapointed for never have the chance of seeing them live - they come to my town only once and I was very young - but... cest la vie.

I don't care at all because I never liked them (which is no secret here). In my opinion they are epigones.

Sorry for being negative, but you asked for my thoughts.


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
uduwudu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 17 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2601
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2016 at 03:06
Originally posted by Ancient_Mariner Ancient_Mariner wrote:

I know people who hate Rush just due to Geddy's vocals.  Most of them horrific taste in music though. ;)

Personally I love them.  But I love wailing metal singers like Halford, Dickinson, and Tate.  Geddy has a unique character to be sure.

I was watching Rush in Rio and even then you can tell time has taken its toll, but not as much as the 2013 CWA video.  They could drop vocals all together and I'll still dig them.  Actually that would be sweet, an instrumental album... I can dream.


This is a very good idea. The idea of vocals (always) for rock is a very outdated idea. As most popular music has become a non-commercial proposition then being, uh, progressive (doing things different) would be interesting. The only downside is not hearing the lyrics -n the case of Rush. In other cases... brilliant.

Anyway it's Neil Peart whose hung up his sticks - arthritis.

While I'm (really) glad to have seen Rush twice the DVDs are a much better idea.

If he improves they may do selected and smaller tours. Webcasts, DVDs and even, radio might even reach an audience. Better to do what they can if they can and do it well than not at all. But if there is a compromise and he makes his arthritis worse then it's time to move on.

He could be a, er, proper writer.
Back to Top
Roj View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Manchester, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2016 at 08:00
For a variety of reasons I've never been fortunate enough to see Rush so I'd be gutted if they do knock it on the head now.  There's always been some reason and it's just not happened for me.  Back in the day they never played my town, choosing aircraft hangar venues in the middle of nowhere, hence I didn't make it.  Recently there's always been some reason I couldn't catch them when they were in town (on holiday, already sold out, clashed with other gigs, you know the drill).

If it does come to pass at least I have a couple of their concert DVDs to return to.  The Snakes and Arrows Live DVD is really outstanding.
Back to Top
kjtheguitarist View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: February 14 2016
Location: Korea, South
Status: Offline
Points: 58
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 18 2016 at 21:20
If they don't want to retire.
I'm gonna be happy with it.
But if they want to retire.
I understand.
Because they did great job.
And the legacy will live on.
That's it.

Edited by kjtheguitarist - February 18 2016 at 21:43
Back to Top
Cosmiclawnmower View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 09 2010
Location: West Country,UK
Status: Offline
Points: 3959
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2016 at 16:43
Having seen them 8 times in 35 years, the last being on the time machine tour, Rush are one group who I feel if they decided to stop touring and even recording, I would happily accept it. They have put a vast amount of effort into keeping their fans (more than) happy and have always put their supporters at the top of their agenda and what ever they want for themselves now is fine by me. They will always leave behind a 'top notch, full stop' legacy of musical and personal integrity.

Back to Top
Jake_Simons View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 15 2016
Location: Iowa
Status: Offline
Points: 14
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2016 at 13:21
I really hope the boys aren't throwing in the towel.
I've seen them once recently on their R40 tour and thought that they still rocked. Even Geds voice was still on point. Neil, could use some rest. Clap
Rush, King Crimson, Megadeth.
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20617
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 17 2015 at 13:31
Originally posted by Barbu Barbu wrote:

Originally posted by zachfive zachfive wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

There is NO rock singer at age 60+ that has a good voice anymore.....


Tommy Shaw, the man sounds as good as he did 40 years ago.

Richard Thompson?
Thompson sounds better. So does Geddy, btw (Less supersonic shrieking, I guess.)
Back to Top
Intruder View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 13 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 2210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 17 2015 at 10:23
I'm no Rush fan.....far from it, but I love digging up the early stuff once in a while - especially side 1 of Caress and side 2 of FBN...and Hemispheres was a hoot.....can't forget MP and 2112.....and Exit and ATWAS.....I even saw them twice in two days in Worster, Mass. in '84.....blistering shows.  But I'm not a fan....far from it. 
I like to feel the suspense when you're certain you know I am there.....
Back to Top
verslibre View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 01 2004
Location: CA
Status: Offline
Points: 18576
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 17 2015 at 08:55
Ann Wilson is amazing! I can't believe I forgot about her as I own everything by Heart, minus the odd live album I still don't have.
 
And yes, Tommy Shaw sounds great for a guy who's been in the biz as long as he...and Glenn Hughes goes all the way back to Trapeze, and earlier, to the '60s, with Finders Keepers, and he sounds fantastic!
 
Saga's Michael Sadler is another candidate, and he also has a 40-year-long career, and counting.
 
Ronnie James Dio (RIP) had a career longer than those guys (and girl), even...
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17966
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 16 2015 at 23:01
Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

Ann Wilson could still knock em dead last time I saw her sing.

I agree she is a machine...Gonna see her in September with Heart.

I'm glad my comment is bringing the replies I was hoping for.....I also think at 67 Klaus Meine is still hanging tough..dude has chops.
Back to Top
Barbu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2005
Location: infinity
Status: Offline
Points: 30855
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 16 2015 at 22:43
Originally posted by zachfive zachfive wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

There is NO rock singer at age 60+ that has a good voice anymore.....


Tommy Shaw, the man sounds as good as he did 40 years ago.

Richard Thompson?
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17298
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 16 2015 at 21:10
Ann Wilson could still knock em dead last time I saw her sing.
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.498 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.