Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
verslibre
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 01 2004
Location: CA
Status: Offline
Points: 17162
|
Posted: June 23 2015 at 17:57 |
Big Kid Josie wrote:
In a lot of "best prog keyboardist"/"best prog drummer" threads, you'll see Emerson and Palmer often omitted, which I find odd. Whether you like their music or not, there is no denying that Emerson's one of the top 5 keyboardists in prog and Palmer one of the top 5 drummers, at least in my opinion. |
Not sure about that. In most polls (that I bother to check), Emerson and Palmer are right in there with the usual suspects. Carl's still tearing it up live with his ELP Legacy trio, too.
|
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
|
Posted: June 23 2015 at 18:21 |
short sighted as some might be as to their overall impact on prog... you'd have to be a fool.. and thankfully there are few around here.. to deny their individual talents. Even the dipsh*t music critics who love to trash ELP acknowledge that. The single greatest rock keyboard player, top 5 alltime rock drummer, and one of the greatest voices and one of the most underrated bass players in rock.
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
Polymorphia
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 06 2012
Location: here
Status: Offline
Points: 8856
|
Posted: June 23 2015 at 18:31 |
^They certainly had a big impact on prog. As to whether their albums are good or not is fair game.
And I have enormous respect for their skill, but single greatest... top 5... one of the greatest...? I just can't bring myself to agree.
|
|
|
Polymorphia
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 06 2012
Location: here
Status: Offline
Points: 8856
|
Posted: June 23 2015 at 18:32 |
zravkapt wrote:
I've always found it strange that ELP were literally one of the most popular rock bands on Earth in the early 1970s but are second-class citizens on prog forums. At the same time cult bands from the '70s like VDGG and Gentle Giant are considered more important than ELP.
|
I've never seen an instance of VDGG and GG considered more important than ELP. Better, yes. But not more important.
|
|
|
presdoug
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 24 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 8615
|
Posted: June 23 2015 at 19:20 |
I like Triumvirat more, but you couldn't have had T'rat, and a score of other great prog bands without ELP.
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
|
Posted: June 23 2015 at 19:21 |
Polymorphia wrote:
zravkapt wrote:
I've always found it strange that ELP were literally one of the most popular rock bands on Earth in the early 1970s but are second-class citizens on prog forums. At the same time cult bands from the '70s like VDGG and Gentle Giant are considered more important than ELP.
| I've never seen an instance of VDGG and GG considered more important than ELP. Better, yes. But not more important.
|
better at what? Never understand that. Better at marginalizing themselves by playing music that most people don't like or can't enjoy. Yeah.. then perhaps so.. they are. Gotta love prog fans and their logic! ELP was just as complex as talented.. but could sell a jillion records and influence 40 years of artists by the quality of their music, compositions, and performances. better? my ass.
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
Polymorphia
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 06 2012
Location: here
Status: Offline
Points: 8856
|
Posted: June 23 2015 at 21:08 |
micky wrote:
Polymorphia wrote:
zravkapt wrote:
I've always found it strange that ELP were literally one of the most popular rock bands on Earth in the early 1970s but are second-class citizens on prog forums. At the same time cult bands from the '70s like VDGG and Gentle Giant are considered more important than ELP.
| I've never seen an instance of VDGG and GG considered more important than ELP. Better, yes. But not more important.
|
better at what? Never understand that. Better at marginalizing themselves by playing music that most people don't like or can't enjoy. Yeah.. then perhaps so.. they are. Gotta love prog fans and their logic!
ELP was just as complex as talented.. but could sell a jillion records and influence 40 years of artists by the quality of their music, compositions, and performances.
better? my ass.
|
Sounds like it's a popularity contest you want. Avatar must be the greatest film in the world. And ELP as complex as Gentle Giant? Nah. ELP didn't have the manpower that Gentle Giant had to execute the latter's contrapuntal complexity. No count against ELP, just an aside. For the record, I did not claim they were better in my post, but that claims of quality should not be equated to claims of importance. But I do like both Gentle Giant and VdGG better. You can see my reasons in my initial post. It's subjectively subjective subjectivity and it makes it's way into my ratings and reviews, as it should. I feel ELP's excess works against them many times. And I curl up and die inside when I hear Hoedown. "But at least they're important" is not an argument that's going to drive me to give any of their albums five stars. And, yes, I know about your DT review.
Edited by Polymorphia - June 23 2015 at 21:09
|
|
|
Horizons
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: January 20 2011
Location: Somewhere Else
Status: Offline
Points: 16952
|
Posted: June 23 2015 at 21:15 |
Because they're cringeworthy.
|
Crushed like a rose in the riverflow.
|
|
Aussie-Byrd-Brother
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 12 2011
Location: Melb, Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 7951
|
Posted: June 23 2015 at 21:35 |
To some, ELP represent the most bombastic, embarrassing excesses of the worst elements of the Prog genre, at least of the golden vintage period. It didn't help that pretty much every album after the debut (which is seriously good and their most consistent album) had some cringe-worthy tracks, and it's pretty fair to say that their albums sound pretty dated and could only have come from the Seventies. But that's what made those early bands so important - that daring, experimental shake-up of traditional straightforward rock music, and they all sounded so completely different from each-other and like no other bands before , and ELP (for better or worse) can be proud of that claim. I probably respect ELP more than truly love them (well, again that debut is the sole really special one for me), but there's no denying their status in the big important prog groups of the Seventies, regardless of how a few snobs try to dismiss them and re-write history!
|
|
SaltyJon
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 08 2008
Location: Location
Status: Offline
Points: 28772
|
Posted: June 23 2015 at 21:57 |
|
|
|
Friday13th
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 30 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 284
|
Posted: June 23 2015 at 22:00 |
I do like ELP, but listen up 'cause I'm speaking hard truth here, ya'll 1. Their sound doesn't seem as emotionally impactful as other big names. I could name songs from all the other big names that could make me cry...not so with ELP. Now the artwork of Love Beach 2. I think a few choice tracks are phenomenal, but even their best albums had some real duds on them. Take out "Benny the Bouncer" and the long instrumental suite on the debut and I wouldn't miss 'em. 3. Keyboard domination and Emerson's reliance on the Hammond gives it a dated sound. Grand Piano, while soft, still sounds more classic, and I like when he pulls out all the moog sounds like on Karn Evil. 4. I really think this is the biggest issue: classical covers. With all this talk of what band is prog and who is really taking music in a radical new direction, when ELP play classical music all amped up it comes across as less about the creativity and more about the showing off of "look at us, we can play that Toccata too!"
They definitely were a huge influence. More than GG and VDGG. Still prefer the latter two though.
|
|
Dellinger
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12732
|
Posted: June 23 2015 at 22:29 |
I consider ELP as one of the main prog bands... and indeed over GG, VDGG, and Camel, though I don't necessarily like them better. There are songs I really love from them, but they do have many songs I really dislike, and they don't have any album that I truly love (because they would usually throw in some joke songs that I don't really like, but also because often some of their "important" songs would be rather annoying (actually, Genesis usually suffers from this, too). And in the end, I think there are less songs I like from them than form other of the big bands.
|
|
KingCrInuYasha
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 26 2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1281
|
Posted: June 23 2015 at 22:53 |
Horizons wrote:
Because they're cringeworthy. |
Hey, it could be worse. They could be Patti Smith or The Modern Lovers.
|
He looks at this world and wants it all... so he strikes, like Thunderball!
|
|
NutterAlert
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 07 2005
Location: In transition
Status: Offline
Points: 2808
|
Posted: June 24 2015 at 03:35 |
I think ELP get more of a bashing here than other prog forums, polls, etc. BSS would not be in top 10 here but has been in other prog polls (such as Prog Magazine). They asked for it due to their excesses and they were the easiest of targets for Lester Bangs and his motly peers to rip apart, but so were Genesis and Yes. I still cannot figure why Genesis are so liked on this forum above ELP.
|
|
Toaster Mantis
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898
|
Posted: June 24 2015 at 03:58 |
ELP were generally more inconsistent than the other big names in the British progressive rock movement of their day... most of their classic albums mix some very powerful and ambitious songs with overtly goofy songs (e. g. Benny the Bouncer) that either haven't aged very well, don't translate culturally to audiences outside the UK or just sound out of place on otherwise quite serious albums.
|
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
|
|
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
|
Posted: June 24 2015 at 04:10 |
Toaster Mantis wrote:
ELP were generally more inconsistent than the other big names in the British progressive rock movement of their day... most of their classic albums mix some very powerful and ambitious songs with overtly goofy songs (e. g. Benny the Bouncer) that either haven't aged very well, don't translate culturally to audiences outside the UK or just sound out of place on otherwise quite serious albums.
| That's my problem with ELP above all else is their inconsistency. The only album I enjoy from beginning to end is Trilogy, although that does have the Sheriff... I don't find them as thoughtful as other big prog bands of the time. They were all about showmanship and that does have its place and it works well, but the music just doesn't touch me as much as that of say Genesis.
|
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
|
Meltdowner
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 25 2013
Location: Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 10232
|
Posted: June 24 2015 at 04:12 |
^^ Yeah, I don't like those goofy songs, another reason why I prefer the debut.
presdoug wrote:
I like Triumvirat more, but you couldn't have had T'rat, and a score of other great prog bands without ELP. | I agree with you Doug
Edited by Meltdowner - June 24 2015 at 04:12
|
|
Guldbamsen
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin
Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23104
|
Posted: June 24 2015 at 04:32 |
Well I do like a couple of their tunes, but the major turn off for me is the way the music often seems like it gets in a fight with itself. There are so many of these 'battle' segments contained in ELP that I just lose my interest very quickly. I have often had people say something to the effect of 'wow man, I guess they're too prog for you then', and maybe they are. It just doesn't make sense that I'm hugely into avant and other such strange styles of music, where things get quite out-there and 'prog':-P I love 3 of their songs though: Tarkus, Still you turn me on and two thirds of Trilogy....
As to why people prefer Genesis over ELP? See my opening statement. To me personally Genesis' music flows a lot more elegantly and doesn't overcomplicate the music unnecessarily.
|
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: June 24 2015 at 05:39 |
^^ I can relate to that, though I probably like their work a lot more. I like a lot of prog outside the buttersoft-mellotron-epic symph format and that hasn't helped me enjoy ELP as much as I am 'supposed' to. Love some tracks and the others are just meh.
|
|
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Online
Points: 13058
|
Posted: June 24 2015 at 06:04 |
The law firm of Emerson, Lake & Palmer got me a $250,000 settlement for my motorcycle accident. CALL 1-800-ELP-HELP. The best call you'll ever make.
|
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.