Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Online
Points: 17512
Posted: December 29 2010 at 18:57
Dean wrote:
Really? I think he's a dreadful actor. (David Bowie)
With all due respect, I think that he is pretty good ... not great ... but very good in some cases, and not so good in others.
The Man Who Fell to Earth (1976) - Nicholas Roeg film, that also uses his music and Brian Eno's, some music of which ended up in one of his albums. Very good. The film is better, because of how it is directed and photographed, which is Nich's strength.
Baal (1982) TV Movie and the Kurt Weill music thing I told you about. Was not seen in America that I am aware of, as only PBS would have shown it, but PBS ... is not that hip after all! Not sure this is available To my knowledge, this is not widely distributed or heard. Most Bowie fans can not relate to Weill/Brecht.
The Hunger (1983) Based on the famous writer's work, is very good, and has a very good cast. Susan Sarandon is better than him, but she makes him work. Catherine Deneuve is no pushover either, and people like him would not be there if they could not hold their ground well enough. Tony Scott directed. Based on Whitley Strieber's novel.
Merry Christmas Mr. Lawrence (1983) Nagisa Oshima's film is excellent and also features Ryuichi Sakamoto's music and his acting as the Japanese boss in the camp. A bit cartoonish, but more towards the samurai idealism, than any of the actors involved in it. It is a very nice film and has excellent music, and the characterization in the film is very good, and the two "englishman" (Tom Conti is one) are probably more "conventional" than David would be.
Basquiat (1996) Were this not a very good film all around, and a real show about what New York was all about ... take notice all you proggies!!! ... I would not recomend this, but Julian Schnabel's film is quietly personal and gentle and allows the actors their space. David is a bit of a show off playing Andy Warhol, but by that time, Andy was absolutely horrendously pathetic in front of any camera ... and had become a total cartoon and Daevid played that up some, but left the cartoon at home ... which is good for the film, because he could have blown it up!
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Online
Points: 17512
Posted: December 29 2010 at 19:24
paroxix wrote:
The Final Cut is where the floyd i know best ended though the divison bell was an excellent album
Again, some of the material in "The Final Cut" was originally a part of The Wall before it was cut down to fit 2 LP's ... the other song or two were added cuts like "Not Now John" ... the anti was material was originally a part of The Wall.
If you take the anti-war material and put sit it next to The Wall, just like you would one of those puzzle like things, you can place the anti-war stuff in several areas and show that The Wall as a concept, would make much more sense, specially the side 4 stuff with the militaristic stuff and the marching hammers ... it helps the story be fuller and more complete. As it is right now, The Wall's story is haphazard and not very complete or good, and the kid is just a lost soul that has a problem with the military ... ohh wait ... the social milieu is the military ... ohhh wait ... who's the nazin in this whole thing ... wait a minute ... what's? .... you can go on and on, and it is unclear and incomplete because of the cuts. The visualness in the film for these moments is what makes them valuable ... but if you did not have that, I think that you would have said ... what the fu__ is that all about?
But, as Dean mentioned, one could start a discussion of Roger's distate with commercial anything and the nazi style of control and things, would be a big part of that ... but in the end, either th emilitaristic stuff becomes a part of a convoluted story, or you clear it up ... screwed up time with parents from WW2, and then misguided information, and then malicious schooling causes a kid to go at it alone and become a menace to society? ... usually society doesn't care and just tells you take this heroin and die so we can say ... what a tragedy! And Roger knows that!
If there were no restrictions, The Wall would be 3 LP's long, at about 120/130 minutes of music and film at the very least ... the film run time is about 95 minutes on the videos ... so if you take away some cartoon/visual time, you have the 2 LP's at about 80 to 85 minutes or so.
I would agree, however, that some of this is thinking and adding in my own head and might not be real, or complete, but the original version of The Wall that was tested ran over 100 minutes, and I think I had 103 minutes before .,.. some of which was restored on a director's cut, but still missing the complete cut of the original film ... or the military stuff would not make sense and neither would the concert in Berlin, later, and then the recent version, which is much more overtly political, which is closer to the Final Cut ideas, than it is to the anti-social themes in The Wall, commenting on schools and the time and place, which usually does not feature mom's, dad's and history much, but a very personal view.
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
When pop(ular) music ceases to bea consuner driven product (based on appealing to basic senses) then pop hand / or rock has progressed.
Prog rock does get treated as though it's pop (same mentality.) After all if a jazz musician leaves someone's band no one notices much or cares - it happens all the time.
But if Paul is dead (swoon...) The paradigm of the Beatles as providing the idea of the pop group is one that lasts. Just because this acceptance has lasted 40 years has no bearing on whether prog / pop / whatever has progressed. It merely shows dormancy and mental moribundity. Toe the line...
So you need a test. Would (if music sells at all now) your test subjects appeal should their albums be released in plain white sleeves with only technical information/ credits?
While it's a shame for the art of rock covers to be absent (Hipgnosis / Roger Dean) there aren't really that many album covers that are particularly good. So it's an imaginary test. Choose your victims from any aspect of music (baroque to blues, Abba to Zappa, Korn, Hole etc.)
Joined: September 06 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 33
Posted: December 29 2010 at 19:52
what i meant by that was the final cut was a good album and was the last good floyd album in my opinion (except the divison bell) so i liked it becuase of the war themes in it but a momentary laspe of reason wasn't so good but when roger waters left after the final cut it all went downhill so the final cut is the last true floyd album
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Online
Points: 17512
Posted: December 29 2010 at 20:24
paroxix wrote:
what i meant by that was the final cut was a good album and was the last good floyd album in my opinion (except the divison bell) so i liked it becuase of the war themes in it but a momentary laspe of reason wasn't so good but when roger waters left after the final cut it all went downhill so the final cut is the last true floyd album
Ohhh ... I get it ... if you like it because of Roger, then it is good ... and if you don't like it is ain't good ...
You do know that if the artist was me, or you, what we would say, right? ... I wouldn't want you to buy my work! And please leave off!
Pink Floyd was an "entity" ... not one person ... and I'm not sure that "The Wall" would have stood out as well as it did without David's guitar work, or Richard's excellent keyboards, and Roger's dedication to his own feelings to help make it what it became ... and there are many things in there that David has no problem singing or playing with.
What you want to say, is that the "entity" was not the same as the one that you thought you liked better ... but that doesn't make it the last "true" Pink Floyd album ... the ones that David did, also count ... not to you ... but to everyone ... and above all ... to the people involved, because you are denying them their life! Think about it!
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
The Final Cut was the last concept album form PF. Diviosn Bell has some idea of communication but it's not a concept album as much as DSOTM to The Final Cut. One should consider Water's musical partners now Rick Wright was not around. Michael Kamen added so much texture to The Final Cut. It's an austere album but has a lot to it. Not pop music.
Interestingly I once read a comment criticisng Waters' work. Would any record company distribute or consumer purchase these records had they been by some unknown? A rhetorical question I thought. Probably some critic trying to make sense of Pro And Cons...
PF only fell when their compilations hit the stores. Shine On is awful and missing so much; the rarities album should at least have been added to Relics which should have been paert of OBTW. The golden greats Echoes has (so I hear) a truncated Echoes - about 10 mins lost.
Joined: September 06 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 33
Posted: December 29 2010 at 22:36
moshkito wrote:
paroxix wrote:
what i meant by that was the final cut was a good album and was the last good floyd album in my opinion (except the divison bell) so i liked it becuase of the war themes in it but a momentary laspe of reason wasn't so good but when roger waters left after the final cut it all went downhill so the final cut is the last true floyd album
Ohhh ... I get it ... if you like it because of Roger, then it is good ... and if you don't like it is ain't good ...
You do know that if the artist was me, or you, what we would say, right? ... I wouldn't want you to buy my work! And please leave off!
Pink Floyd was an "entity" ... not one person ... and I'm not sure that "The Wall" would have stood out as well as it did without David's guitar work, or Richard's excellent keyboards, and Roger's dedication to his own feelings to help make it what it became ... and there are many things in there that David has no problem singing or playing with.
What you want to say, is that the "entity" was not the same as the one that you thought you liked better ... but that doesn't make it the last "true" Pink Floyd album ... the ones that David did, also count ... not to you ... but to everyone ... and above all ... to the people involved, because you are denying them their life! Think about it!
still not explaing my self fully i love floyd after meddle and until the final cut while early floyd is quire good its not my cup of tea. also after rogers left i feel floyd fell apart becuase there wasn't a great song writing partnership is the band any more and david took over which i feel wasn't good for the band and the final cut is the last floyd AS I KNOW FLOYD ALBUM becuase they're still in there most sucessful lineup and what waters and gilmour did together was AMAZING honestly the final cut is one of my least favourite floyd album I'll take anything over it. its just i don't like any floyd albums after the wall but the final cut is when classic floyd ended
Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12732
Posted: December 29 2010 at 23:14
^ But you have said "except The Division Bell", that makes all the discography you say you dislike after Waters left only one album, "Momentary Lapse of Reason". And for me, Final Cut is not "Classic Floyd" either, for it is exclusivley written by Waters, and Wright was not part of the band then, and you can hear a huge difference there... as a matter of fact, I would be a bit tempted to say that not even "The Wall" is "Classic Floyd" either.
Joined: September 06 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 33
Posted: December 30 2010 at 00:30
Dellinger wrote:
^ But you have said "except The Division Bell", that makes all the discography you say you dislike after Waters left only one album, "Momentary Lapse of Reason". And for me, Final Cut is not "Classic Floyd" either, for it is exclusivley written by Waters, and Wright was not part of the band then, and you can hear a huge difference there... as a matter of fact, I would be a bit tempted to say that not even "The Wall" is "Classic Floyd" either.
this whole thread though is about when do you think floyd fell and just because i like the divison bell doesn't mean i consider it floyd at their best or most "classic" and i only have the final cut included there becuase its like what the other guy said its a continuation of of the wall and fills in gaps in the concept but no its not really classic floyd and the wall it still is classic floyd espically disc two with comfortably numb,stop,the trial,vera,hey you and nobody home
Joined: March 06 2009
Location: Lexington, VA
Status: Offline
Points: 971
Posted: December 30 2010 at 01:40
Personally feel they lost it when Roger Waters spit in a fan's face on the Animals tour. This propagated the The Wall concept that Roger had been considering throughout the tour which reared its ugly head on the double album, an album which I really want to enjoy but cannot get around the fact that it is just uninspiring. The Wall has some very good material on it but it bears the resemblance of rehashed arena rock mixed with disco at times, not the cutting edge art-rock of their previous albums which are distinctive.
I feel Styx or Journey could have pulled off the same sound on the Wall. Nick Mason's drumming could have been accomplished by any adequate replacement, cannot say any of Richard Wright's keyboard work is all to memorable either. Gilmour's guitar-work settles into a dull niche that many a less skilled guitar player could have put to the table(not like his work on Animals, Dsotm, or Wywh).
By pressing his creative agenda on the rest of the band, waters made them dispensable as musicians because frankly this band had always worked best writing as a collective whole. Floyd in my mind is desperately trying to hold on with the release of The Wall but somewhere in the children choir chorus' of Another Brick in the Wall the band that was in the late 60s and the 70s was no more in my eyes
Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5154
Posted: December 30 2010 at 06:26
I belong to those who think that Floyd never fell from anywhere.
Even under severe internal issues they managed to put out 2 great albums such as The Wall and The Final Cut, and if this was not enough they managed Roger's depature more than worthily, I have no problem with Momentary neither with The Division Bell and their live shows continued being great, having what I consider one of the best live sounds ever.
My favourite period though is from Meddle till The Wall both inclusive.
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Online
Points: 17512
Posted: December 30 2010 at 16:00
mr.cub wrote:
Personally feel they lost it when Roger Waters spit in a fan's face on the Animals tour. This propagated the The Wall concept that Roger had been considering throughout the tour which reared its ugly head on the double album, an album which I really want to enjoy but cannot get around the fact that it is just uninspiring.
Roger had more than one upset moment ... there is at least one bootleg that he got upset with fans for fighting for pieces of the pig, and he swore at them.
To be honest with you, I probably would have too! ... because it means that the music you (or I, or PF) created is not important and that you only want a souvenir or an autograph to prove to yourself that you were there ... no matter what it takes! That's as selfish as Roger's comments if not more so ... ohhh wait ... we worship star seekers here!
I feel Styx or Journey could have pulled off the same sound on the Wall. Nick Mason's drumming could have been accomplished by any adequate replacement, cannot say any of Richard Wright's keyboard work is all to memorable either. Gilmour's guitar-work settles into a dull niche that many a less skilled guitar player could have put to the table(not like his work on Animals, Dsotm, or Wywh).
This is grossly unfair and a really distorted comparison. I'm not going to say that one musician is better or worse than another, but those 2 bands could not create something original and meaningful ... specially after their lead singers left. And "Behind the Music" had talked to one of those lead singers ... who came back, and had hiw own piece already written, and Styx was upset, but they played it ... and it became their biggest selling album! And Journey has been crap since their Mr. Perry left ... trying to find carbon copies! ... how's that for bad musicianship ... that they can't even respect the very person they loved the most and made them the most money!
Nick Mason has one thing that most drummers don't have ... specially today with these metronome actors out there, that can't drum at all ... they can only keep time. Nick has a "feel" for music, mood and touch, that 90% of all the "progressive" drummers do NOT have. Richard ... how sad that you do not think he is good .. perhaps you should get an 8 track machine and separate his work ... it's spacey, jazzy, moody, and far out ... and really well played and thought out ... but if all you like is riff players, you are definitly listening to the wrong band, and Pink Floyd is not what you like or could ever appreciate. Dave is an excellent guitarist, and maybe not notewise, but few could find, in their day, the moment to soar above it all ... which he learned doing things like Saucerful of Secrets and Astronomy Domine. But his greatest gift, was using pedals and effects to enhance his playing and sound ... which today is second nature to all those cheapas$ guitarists that we listen to in many a "prog" band!
By pressing his creative agenda on the rest of the band, waters made them dispensable as musicians because frankly this band had always worked best writing as a collective whole.
It was always a collaborative effort, with the problem that Roger had a better knack for lyrics than the other 3 did, and David finally came to it after DSOTM ... it was not a big deal. But it became one, when Roger heard things in his head that were becoming difficult for others to do ... which you could easily see in his own solo albums! But to say that Richard was not a good keyboard player ... is sad ... and terribly hurting ... he was phenomenal, but maybe he was one of those people that can help you ... but you have to go slow ... so he can adjust to it!
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
Nick Mason has one thing that most drummers don't have ... specially today with these metronome actors out there, that can't drum at all ... they can only keep time. Nick has a "feel" for music, mood and touch, that 90% of all the "progressive" drummers do NOT have.
[quote]
Yes, that's it. Feel. There's a thread I began about under appreciated musos and to me Mason is one. He may not be a tech wizard like Bruford / Peart but that feel and imagination that gave Saucer and Time such depth could not have been achieved by anybody else. Tech ability is one thing but here it's where the individual shines and becomes. Yes, it was his instinct and creativity that along with the others makes these albums of material inspire debate, discussion and diatribe...
One must take into account the individual. Roger is a very competitive driven man whereas Wright is not. Wright is not a rocker - he hardly makes an appearance on much of More for instance - they're a power trio on the Nile Song. But Up The Khyber and Quicksilver are very much his thing.
Wright's first big contribution to Floyd was his arrangements and harmonies for the first album. Syd's tunes yes, but without Wright it would have been say an album that would be more like a folk rock effort. probably a good one but their organist lifted it into that realm of uniqueness. This in turn probably inspired Waters' ideas that were a ball that kept on rolling.
I have a copy, as yet not heard of PF at Knebworth in 1975. Apparently in the hot sun and the for effect two Spitfires sent the keyboards out of tune. Leaving Wright isolated, out of tune and the experience pretty well destroyed him. He's wasn't like Roger and get steamed up but move on.
Joined: March 06 2009
Location: Lexington, VA
Status: Offline
Points: 971
Posted: December 31 2010 at 01:03
moshkito wrote:
mr.cub wrote:
Personally feel they lost it when Roger Waters spit in a fan's face on the Animals tour. This propagated the The Wall concept that Roger had been considering throughout the tour which reared its ugly head on the double album, an album which I really want to enjoy but cannot get around the fact that it is just uninspiring.
Roger had more than one upset moment ... there is at least one bootleg that he got upset with fans for fighting for pieces of the pig, and he swore at them.
To be honest with you, I probably would have too! Who are you Roberto Alomar? Spitting on another person??? ... because it means that the music you (or I, or PF) created is not important and that you only want a souvenir or an autograph to prove to yourself that you were there ... no matter what it takes! That's as selfish as Roger's comments if not more so ... ohhh wait ... we worship star seekers here!
I feel Styx or Journey could have pulled off the same sound on the Wall. Nick Mason's drumming could have been accomplished by any adequate replacement, cannot say any of Richard Wright's keyboard work is all to memorable either. Gilmour's guitar-work settles into a dull niche that many a less skilled guitar player could have put to the table(not like his work on Animals, Dsotm, or Wywh).
This is grossly unfair and a really distorted comparison. How so? The mixing of the drums is the same, the keyboard work is equally complementary and in the background, putting the guitar work is put in the foreground and frankly Gilmour drops a fat one
I'm not going to say that one musician is better or worse than another, but those 2 bands could not create something original and meaningful is that so???? ... specially after their lead singers left. And "Behind the Music" had talked to one of those lead singers ... who came back, and had hiw own piece already written, and Styx was upset, but they played it ... and it became their biggest selling album! And Journey has been crap since their Mr. Perry left ... trying to find carbon copies! ... how's that for bad musicianship ... that they can't even respect the very person they loved the most and made them the most money! I never mentioned anything about the Journey or Styx lead singers, I was commenting on the sound of the band. On the Wall Pink Floyd sounds like a band sucked off all originality in terms of their sound. Additionally the song writing is weak because it falls into cliches and itnto terribly unoriginal pomposity equivalent to these other arena rock bands. Big deal Journey still tours...Gilmour tours with a battalion of backup singers and other session musicians that could have landed in Normandy and taken Berlin in three weeks.
Nick Mason has one thing that most drummers don't have ... specially today with these metronome actors out there, that can't drum at all ... they can only keep time. Nick has a "feel" for music, mood and touch, Not on the Wall. As a drummer I cannot say that Mason has a particularly great feel for music. I would consider his drumming to be dull, mechanical and really nothing more than a metronome on the Wall.
that 90% of all the "progressive" drummers do NOT have. Richard ... how sad that you do not think he is good .. perhaps you should get an 8 track machine and separate his work ... it's spacey, jazzy, moody, and far out ... and really well played and thought out I appreciate Wright's work before the wall but frankly feel its lousy on that release
... but if all you like is riff players, you are definitly listening to the wrong band, and Pink Floyd is not what you like or could ever appreciate. Oh I appreciate Floyd but Dave's riffs on the wall are derivatives!!!!. Dave is an excellent guitarist, and maybe not notewise, but few could find, in their day, the moment to soar above it all ... which he learned doing things like Saucerful of Secrets and Astronomy Domine. Boom examples of Gilmour doing great things not playing like some replacement arena rock guitarist of the late 70s and 80s. But his greatest gift, was using pedals and effects to enhance his playing and sound ... which today is second nature to all those cheapas$ guitarists that we listen to in many a "prog" band!
By pressing his creative agenda on the rest of the band, waters made them dispensable as musicians because frankly this band had always worked best writing as a collective whole.
It was always a collaborative effort, with the problem that Roger had a better knack for lyrics than the other 3 did, and David finally came to it after DSOTM ... it was not a big deal. But it became one, when Roger heard things in his head that were becoming difficult for others to do Heard his own ego saying to himself...Yeah I'm bigger than the band ... which you could easily see in his own solo albums! But to say that Richard was not a good keyboard player ... is sad ... and terribly hurting ... he was phenomenal, but maybe he was one of those people that can help you ... but you have to go slow ... so he can adjust to it! Never said he wasnt good. He's lousy on the wall because he was too coked up to play anything worth listening to. Great Gig in the Sky is a favorite of mine and I love Rick's work up until the Wall when he becomes a side show to Roger's ego
The arean rock thing is a true intent. In The Flesh and In The Flesh? were supposed to be parodoes of the big stadium rock sound (Big, bland full of tension and fear. Etc.) Taken in context - as played by an anonymous surrogate band this turned out quiet effective. It was meant to be a joke but no one got it ---- the joke (what exactly is a...?)
Joined: May 20 2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 5575
Posted: December 31 2010 at 11:26
they never had a permanent fall they hit bad fazes and roadblocks like any band does, Syd Barrett leaving was a fall so was Rick Wright leaving and so was Roger Waters quiting. But they did always come back with something until they decided to retire in 95' with all of their dignity and creative integrity very much intact
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Online
Points: 17512
Posted: December 31 2010 at 13:47
mr.cub wrote:
To be honest with you, I probably would have too! Who are you Roberto Alomar? Spitting on another person??? ... because it means that the music you (or I, or PF) created is not important and that you only want a souvenir or an autograph to prove to yourself that you were there ... no matter what it takes! That's as selfish as Roger's comments if not more so ... ohhh wait ... we worship star seekers here!
I'll reserve judgement since you obviously ignored, or dis-regarded the reference ... as to how you would feel if it was you ... do you defend the money you are taking in, or do you stick up for the art and the work you do. Be careful ... one answer will never make you famous or take you to the heights that you obviously so worship but have no guts to stand up for!
Not on the Wall. As a drummer I cannot say that Mason has a particularly great feel for music. I would consider his drumming to be dull, mechanical and really nothing more than a metronome on the Wall.
We need to get you to sit through "Live in Pompeii" ... too bad that you are comparing him to some of the metal thrashig kids nowadays that can only count to 4, and barely do wipeouts that last any more than 4 beats!
But it became one, when Roger heard things in his head that were becoming difficult for others to do Heard his own ego saying to himself...Yeah I'm bigger than the band ... which ...
I don't think he did, and in person he is not the megalomaniac that we're making him out to be ... he's very intelligent, educated and quite knowledgeable and capable of holding a conversation very wll.
I do think that he might have gotten frustrated with trying to present his ideas, and on a bad day with gas someone said ... I don't feel like it ... but I doubt that Roger would do that to anyone in the band ... they had already come through so much and too far and for too long, to be that insensitive and stupid. I don't find that Roger's work is not as good ... I find "Amused to Death" as good, if not better than "The Wall" for example, and much better focused ... but sometimes one has to put aside their own tastes and abilities to do something else ... and no one here is going to say that Jeff Beck stunk up the album ... he was phenomenal, but I am not sure that David could have given it the harder rock edge that Roger might have been looking for, because Dave is probably too much based on melody, rather than anything else in the music itself ... in that sense, yeah .. he's more of a rock'n'roll'er than the other 3.
Thx
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
and no one here is going to say that Jeff Beck stunk up the album ...
I'll put my hand up and say that I haven't heard Beck play anything I've actually liked since his 60s recordings (and I'm not including Hi Ho Silver Lining). He may win countless polls and be considered the guitarists' guitarist but he just doesn't do it for me.
As for the "fall" of PF, I don't like the sound of their albums after Waters left, or Waters' solo albums. This is to do with the production and not any particular change in songwriting, band chemistry etc.
Edited by A B Negative - January 03 2011 at 07:06
"The disgusting stink of a too-loud electric guitar.... Now, that's my idea of a good time."
Joined: March 06 2009
Location: Lexington, VA
Status: Offline
Points: 971
Posted: January 08 2011 at 14:05
moshkito wrote:
mr.cub wrote:
[quote] Not on the Wall. As a drummer I cannot say that Mason has a particularly great feel for music. I would consider his drumming to be dull, mechanical and really nothing more than a metronome on the Wall.
We need to get you to sit through "Live in Pompeii" ... too bad that you are comparing him to some of the metal thrashig kids nowadays that can only count to 4, and barely do wipeouts that last any more than 4 beats
I have seen Live in Pompeii...and I never compared him to a metal thrash drummer. I'm explicitly citing this (which embodies the majority of his work on the Wall).... And as I said before, this is the fall of the band
Joined: November 01 2005
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 417
Posted: March 21 2011 at 20:30
Well, that's a reasonable overview of AMLoR, what is rare. Hats off to you!
Of course it's not the best floyd album. IMO is their second weakest effort, surpassed in blandness and tedium only by that Waters-solely led album that I can't even write its name.
I understand the use of the verb "to fall" as suggesting a band that became out of the high expectations that the band itself created by their work. In this sense I believe that the last GREAT album is Animals. The Wall has a lot of songs that have only dramatic value (being weak songs per se), the Waters-graveyard album has a good opener, an acceptable title track and lots of embarrasing stuff musically speaking (in view of PF's body of work), AMLoR has the big problem of being a product of its time but has at least two good tracks (Learning to Fly & Terminal frost) and two great ones (Sorrow & on the turning away) and their final one has a lot of good and very good tracks worth of respect even when compared to the classic 1971-1977 era.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.195 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
The fall of Pink Floyd
Topic Options
Dean wrote:
. And as I said before, this is the fall of the band