Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
boo boo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 08:20 |
While it's true that ELP had the least impressive discography of the big prog bands, and less impressive than many of the less popular prog bands like Caravan, Gong and so on. They still had 4 albums that are very much worth owning. They don't deserve the bashing that they have recieved constantly for 4 decades.
Tarkus is probably the weakest of their first 4 because side B is a real mixed bag (Bitche's Crystal, Time and a Place and Infinite Space being the gooduns, I think Jeremy Bender and Are You Readdy Eddie were included mainly to prove to critics that ELP didn't take themselves that seriously) but the title track alone makes it an essential addition to your prog collection. It's my favorite prog epic that isn't from Yes or Pink Floyd.
The other 3 are VERY cohesive all around. The s/t is a tremendous debut, Trilogy is ELP at their most tasteful and melodic but Brain Salad Surgery is the crowning acievement for me, heh, even Benny the Bouncer is good for a laugh. It has everything that made the band great. The only thing that would have made it better is if When the Apple Blossoms Bloom in the Windmills of Your Mind I'll Be Your Valentine and the title track were included. Though they do make it as bonus tracks on the deluxe edition.
The Works albums do have some good material on them. But talk about a sharp decline
Edited by boo boo - May 25 2010 at 08:21
|
|
Bonnek
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 01 2009
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 4515
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 08:54 |
raindance wrote:
ELP were too adventorous for the mainstream and so didn't get it. Emerson was a pioneer in keyboard sounds/technology that are still being replicated today. You mention Genesis! well they weren't great musicians so were limited in their creativity and so made more accessible music that hasn't aged very well at all! |
What do musical skills have to do with creativity? It's usually the other way round, it's your limitations that encourage you to be creative. Great musicianship can even lead to creative lazyness. ELP and DT are good examples of that. Everyone who can play can produce many notes, the challenge is to make something meaningful with them. Like Genesis did indeed. PS. Genesis = no great musicians? limited creativity? I won't even go into that. PS2. ELP too adventorous for the mainstream? if there was ever one prog mainstream band it was ELP! PS3. Don't think I don't like ELP. Their debut and a couple of scattered songs are fantastic. Their style just didn't age well
Edited by Bonnek - May 25 2010 at 08:55
|
|
boo boo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 09:05 |
Yeah I never got the whole Genesis weren't great musicians thing, they were all very skilled musicians, yeah even Phil... and Mike, always the underdog.
Bonnek is right to a point that virtuoso musicians can be very lazy and DT certainly qualify but I think ELP were very inspired and creative at least from 70 to 73.
Edited by boo boo - May 25 2010 at 09:07
|
|
Rocktopus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 02 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 4202
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 09:15 |
raindance wrote:
ELP were too adventorous for the mainstream and so didn't get it. Emerson was a pioneer in keyboard sounds/technology that are still being replicated today. You mention Genesis! well they weren't great musicians so were limited in their creativity and so made more accessible music that hasn't aged very well at all! |
You actually got everything wrong here. Genesis Gabriel-era were really quite obscure, while (the silly and dated music of) ELP sold millions of albums and filled stadiums. Of course all that had changed by the end of the 70's but not because ELP were too adventurous
|
Over land and under ashes
In the sunlight, see - it flashes
Find a fly and eat his eye
But don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
|
|
Bonnek
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 01 2009
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 4515
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 09:16 |
^^ I didn't want to write a whole page so I generalised a bit I shouldn't have said ELP and DT are good examples of that, but ELP and DT have many songs that are good examples of that.
Edited by Bonnek - May 25 2010 at 09:16
|
|
boo boo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 09:36 |
I honestly don't care how dated something is, I don't listen to music to be "modern", in fact the more distinctly of it's time something is the more fascinating I may find it to be. It's always interesting to observe how music has evolved over the years.
That being said I don't think Genesis are dated, of all the prog bands their sound was the least rooted in the trends of the 70s, they have always had a very timeless sound. Now ELP, maybe they are dated but I don't care. I love the moog and hammond. Aesthetically it still sounds awesome, just because it sounds "70-ish" doesn't turn me off, why should I be turned off by something for sounding like it was recorded in my favorite decade of music? Especially when it was.
Edited by boo boo - May 25 2010 at 09:38
|
|
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 11:39 |
I got to disagree with those who say that their "sound didn't age well". What sound? Bombast of organ and synths? Classical leanings?
They just aren't for everyone, but neither they're the most adventurous band around. They were one heck-of a Prog band with an original sound, but some are not fond of that 'original sound'. I like some of their music, but for me the main detractor was that their albums weren't really consistent in great/memorable material.
|
|
Bonnek
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 01 2009
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 4515
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 11:59 |
^ yes, Bombast of organ and synths. You put that very well And I agree to the rest of your post as well by the way. Well, except the ageing bit. ELP really have very little replay value for me.
Edited by Bonnek - May 25 2010 at 12:01
|
|
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 12:05 |
Pablo, "aging" in this case does not refer to the object of our debate but to the way the object is perceived. Yes, of course the "bombast of organ and synths" by ELP are the same , what changed was the perception. Not too many people can now like "bombast of organ and synths" (whether the music is good or not).
|
|
rushfan4
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66264
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 12:05 |
To a certain extent I kind of get what people are saying regarding ELP's music sounding dated, but I think that this probably applies to far more prog bands than we would care to admit. The whole 70's prog sound is dated. Doesn't mean that you still can't like it.
|
|
|
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 12:22 |
rushfan4 wrote:
To a certain extent I kind of get what people are saying regarding ELP's music sounding dated, but I think that this probably applies to far more prog bands than we would care to admit. The whole 70's prog sound is dated. Doesn't mean that you still can't like it. |
That's my point. If someone considers ELP's bombastic sound dated, then why not consider Genesis and Yes dated for their own kind-of style?
|
|
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 12:25 |
harmonium.ro wrote:
Pablo, "aging" in this case does not refer to the object of our debate but to the way the object is perceived. Yes, of course the "bombast of organ and synths" by ELP are the same , what changed was the perception. Not too many people can now like "bombast of organ and synths" (whether the music is good or not). |
I answered both questions, to the second one I said this:
"They just aren't for everyone, but neither they're the most adventurous band around. They were one heck-of a Prog band with an original sound, but some are not fond of that 'original sound'. I like some of their music, but for me the main detractor was that their albums weren't really consistent in great/memorable material."
|
|
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 12:30 |
That's a good position in itself, but it doesn't explain the great variation (read: decrease) of the number of fans.
|
|
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group
Site Admin
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35940
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 12:32 |
It is about perception, but a lot of 70's progresssive rock (and a fair amount of 60's music too) has a "timeless" quality to my ears. A lot of 80's music sounds really dated to me, but other music has this timeless quality. 80's RIO/ Avant commonly sounds less dated to me than 80's Neo-Prog. I think part of that has to do with not being so familiar with the styles of music that avant prog groups were making at the time; whereas, I hear that typical 80's influence in Neo-Prog that I was familiar with at the time. So the RIO sounds fresher to these years. I think I can extend the same principle to quite an extent to 70's prog that sounds dated and not so dated to these ears, but it's not really that.... Some remains fresh, and some sounds hackneyed (not saying it is) and stale now. "From the Beginning", though of its time, still sounds, mostly, fresh to me (and quite timeless), but something like "Tarkus" does not. Though there are definite indicators in the song as to when it was made, a song like "From the Begginning" would be that much more difficult to figure out fairly precisely when it was made for me than "Tarkus". One style dropped out of fashion, and the other continued with variation.
Another poppish song that sounds timeless to me is Mellow Candle's "Messenger Birds", I could not guess that was released in 1972 (and recorded in '711, I think).
I love a lot of music that is very dated (very obviously of its time) -- that can make music appeal more to me -- especially with 60's music.
|
|
|
Triceratopsoil
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 12:33 |
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Yes released Relayer but after three years they released the decent Going for the one, went down again with Tormato but very soon and despite the loss of Jon Anderson who is a symbol of the band, they released the outstanding Drama, for that moment it was 1981 and nobody cared for old Symphonic formula.
|
Tormato is better than Drama
|
|
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 12:36 |
harmonium.ro wrote:
That's a good position in itself, but it doesn't explain the great variation (read: decrease) of the number of fans. |
Ah, you're right there.
For that, a good explanation I don't have. I would need to know if the 70's fans of ELP were really fans of their music.
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 12:37 |
Rocktopus wrote:
raindance wrote:
ELP were too adventorous for the mainstream and so didn't get it. Emerson was a pioneer in keyboard sounds/technology that are still being replicated today. You mention Genesis! well they weren't great musicians so were limited in their creativity and so made more accessible music that hasn't aged very well at all! |
You actually got everything wrong here.
Genesis Gabriel-era were really quite obscure, while (the silly and dated music of) ELP sold millions of albums and filled stadiums.
Of course all that had changed by the end of the 70's but not because ELP were too adventurous
|
Nah, don't care Rocktopus, a couple of members (Progger and Raindance) used to team to attack Genesis with extreme hatred, that would be OK if Tony R hadn't found suspicious connections between the two.
Anybody who says Genesis members have limited creativity doesn't know what he's talking about.
Iván
|
|
|
Rocktopus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 02 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 4202
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 12:38 |
Logan wrote:
Another poppish song that sounds timeless to me is Mellow Candle's "Messenger Birds", I could not guess that was released in 1972 (and recorded in '711, I think).
|
I would never have guessed it was recorded 1299 years ago!
|
Over land and under ashes
In the sunlight, see - it flashes
Find a fly and eat his eye
But don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
|
|
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group
Site Admin
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35940
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 12:44 |
|
|
|
TheGazzardian
Prog Reviewer
Joined: August 11 2009
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 8690
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 13:03 |
The Quiet One wrote:
That's my point. If someone considers ELP's bombastic sound dated, then why not consider Genesis and Yes dated for their own kind-of style? |
As somebody who is a big fan of Yes and Genesis but didn't get ELP, even after listening to BSS & Tarkus, I wouldn't say that their sound is entirely dated.
But the sound effects on Toccata? Definitely dated.
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.