Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Prog and Intellect
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedProg and Intellect

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 11>
Author
Message
shockedjazz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 12 2008
Location: Madrid (spain)
Status: Offline
Points: 169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2010 at 11:39
And yeah i dont write proper english...i say it to avoid some obvious comments.
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2010 at 11:46
I thought people who have a lot of questions about the world listen to Robert Zimmerman?   
Back to Top
shockedjazz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 12 2008
Location: Madrid (spain)
Status: Offline
Points: 169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2010 at 11:57
Yes indeed Schopenauer talks a lot of music...and the treatment of the topic is more or less accepted for the first Nietzsche:
Music is supose to be the art wich contacts directly with the will, while other arts seem to be connected with representation. Thats why a irrational quality is associated with music...and thats the main reason Nietzsche liked Wagner, at first. 
But when he turned out of him..he ended liking things like spanish zarzuela.
So i dont see Nietzsche as specialy prog ( musicaly) philosoper.
Prog is rich in musical ideas- so aesthetical determined representations.
Psych is much more Dionisian than prog.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2010 at 13:20
Originally posted by shockedjazz shockedjazz wrote:

So many intelectual display against inntelectualism is not very suspicious? As the ones who hates philosophy, are not they the philosophical tipe themselfs? I goes also for the so called Nietzsche "the Dick" that was one of the main reason why nowadays people still talks intelectualy of anti-intelectual views.
So bashing him ( as intelectual) appears to be a little bit childish.
The people today so relied in scientific views about enviroment and cultural influence....Dont you see the place of Nieztsche in your inherited intelectual antiintelctualism?
Arent you fighting with yourselves, dear intelectuals behind the mask?...in this case a neewspaper with two holes Geek LOL.
There's a difference between disliking philosophy and being philosophical. The study of Philosophy for philosophy's sake is not being philosophical and there is a difference between having a (personal) philosophy and having to read (and pretend to understand) the interminable drivel of "professional" philosophers in the vain hope that it will explain something that cannot be explained by just thinking about it. Name dropping Nietzsche, Kant or Wittgenstein just means I know how to use Wikipedia, and Rob's joke about Popeye being an existentialist flies over my head and lies in a crumpled heap on the floor behind me. Do you have to be a sophist to be sophisticated, do you have to be philosophical to love wisdom?
 
btw: I'm not anti-intellectual, just anti-philosopher. Tongue
What?
Back to Top
elder08 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 25 2010
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 236
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2010 at 13:27
Originally posted by Rune2000 Rune2000 wrote:

This topic reminds me of that hilarious Uncyclopedia article I read earlier today.

"If your IQ is under 130, or if you are unable to pretend that your IQ is not under 130, you should not even attempt writing Prog Rock. Progressive Rock is—to put it bluntly—for smart people. If you are not one of these smart people, you simply cannot make Progressive Rock music."

or how about:

"If you're talking about Progressive Rock and want to sound smarter and more sophisticated than the person you're talking to, it is recommended you reference King Crimson and/or their first album at least once."

Great stuff. Thumbs Up
Haha I did some editing in this you know the part where it says if you wanna sound smart mention camel hahahahaha
"There are people who say we [Pink Floyd] should make room for younger bands. That's not the way it works. They can make their own room."- David Gilmour
Back to Top
Alberto Muñoz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2010 at 13:41
Not relation between prog and intelect.
 
Thread/




Back to Top
lazland View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13776
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2010 at 14:12
I'm not a great intellectual, philosopher, naturist, professorial, or much else, but I really CAN spot a damn good prog song when I hear oneClown

And no, I'm probably not taking this very seriouslyTongue
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org

Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
Back to Top
rod65 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 28 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 248
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2010 at 14:47
Originally posted by kingfriso kingfriso wrote:

Somehow the word 'intellectual' got very loaded with negativity around here. I myself am an intellectual, which means I study and have an interest in head-breaking matters as world politics, art, ethics, philosophy, physics and human behaviors. The majority of people in Holland (I don't know what's the situation in other countries) don't care about more then one of these intellectual matters I've mentioned (I guess 40% don't care about a single one).

These matters are important for our society, for our freedom, for human progress. Then why is the word 'intellectual' so bad? I'm proud to be able to understand problems and think of solutions of problems on a bigger or more sophisticated scale. This also applies to the music I'm listening to. I'm able to like music that has more sophistication and a way bigger concept that most three-minute pop-songs.   

And I do think the average prog listener is more intellectual then the average hit-chart or hip-hop listener. Prog music is harder to understand and has older listeners that have had more time think.

I, also, get rather confused sometimes about the negative associations with the word "intellectual." We are animals with the capacity for symbolic thought and political organization. To forget any of these things, or to under-value any of these things, is, IMO, to devalue our humanity.

As for the relationship between prog and intellect, I suppose there may be one, but certainly not one that is, in any absolute sense, exclusive. Many prog songs and prog artists address themselves to the intellect. Many don't. Perhaps the ratio is different in more popular genres, but absolute judgements are out of place. Hell, there are even some smart country songs out there.  In any case, though, I do not think it is a matter of one type of music being innately smarter than another, but rather a case of which human faculties any given artist chooses to address in any given song. In prog, I've found that my intellect is address fairly often, but the same is true, as has been pointed out in this thread, with jazz and classical music. I could also say the same about much of Woody Guthrie's music, and a long list of others.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2010 at 15:00
 
Originally posted by kingfriso kingfriso wrote:

Somehow the word 'intellectual' got very loaded with negativity around here. Because it has been used to describe people who don't do anything but read and talk and present themselves as superior only because of that, when they might well be extremely handicapped in other areas of life. Being intellectual is not bad at all. What's bad is thinking that because you are one your sh*t doesn't stink.  I myself am an intellectual, which means I study and have an interest in head-breaking matters as world politics, art, ethics, philosophy, physics and human behaviors. The majority of people in Holland (I don't know what's the situation in other countries) don't care about more then one of these intellectual matters I've mentioned (I guess 40% don't care about a single one).  Most people don't have TIME or education to be interested in those things. Some people have to, well, you know, SURVIVE first... 

These matters are important for our society, for our freedom, for human progress. Then why is the word 'intellectual' so bad? I'm proud to be able to understand problems and think of solutions of problems on a bigger or more sophisticated scale. But it would be more useful if you come up with those solutions and make them public and of any utility for the rest. If not is just mental jerk-off. This also applies to the music I'm listening to. I'm able to like music that has more sophistication and a way bigger concept that most three-minute pop-songs.    I can't stress this enough: don't think have reached THE upper echelon of complex music by listening to Yes or Magma... Try some academic (classical) music and compare please.. Or even some jazz... 

And I do think the average prog listener is more intellectual then the average hit-chart or hip-hop listener.Yes, probably. But not because of a difference in intelligence. They have been socialized different, they were raised different, in different environments, with different goals, etc etc etc.  Prog music is harder to understand and has older listeners that have had more time think. Not really. Most old people of intellect I know disdain prog music in favor of classical music or jazz or even folk music... Is not THAT hard to understand when you compare it with, say, Schoenberg. 

Back to Top
rod65 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 28 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 248
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2010 at 15:15
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

 
Originally posted by kingfriso kingfriso wrote:

Somehow the word 'intellectual' got very loaded with negativity around here. Because it has been used to describe people who don't do anything but read and talk and present themselves as superior only because of that, when they might well be extremely handicapped in other areas of life. Being intellectual is not bad at all. What's bad is thinking that because you are one your sh*t doesn't stink.  I myself am an intellectual, which means I study and have an interest in head-breaking matters as world politics, art, ethics, philosophy, physics and human behaviors. The majority of people in Holland (I don't know what's the situation in other countries) don't care about more then one of these intellectual matters I've mentioned (I guess 40% don't care about a single one).  Most people don't have TIME or education to be interested in those things. Some people have to, well, you know, SURVIVE first... 

These matters are important for our society, for our freedom, for human progress. Then why is the word 'intellectual' so bad? I'm proud to be able to understand problems and think of solutions of problems on a bigger or more sophisticated scale. But it would be more useful if you come up with those solutions and make them public and of any utility for the rest. If not is just mental jerk-off. This also applies to the music I'm listening to. I'm able to like music that has more sophistication and a way bigger concept that most three-minute pop-songs.    I can't stress this enough: don't think have reached THE upper echelon of complex music by listening to Yes or Magma... Try some academic (classical) music and compare please.. Or even some jazz... 

And I do think the average prog listener is more intellectual then the average hit-chart or hip-hop listener.Yes, probably. But not because of a difference in intelligence. They have been socialized different, they were raised different, in different environments, with different goals, etc etc etc.  Prog music is harder to understand and has older listeners that have had more time think. Not really. Most old people of intellect I know disdain prog music in favor of classical music or jazz or even folk music... Is not THAT hard to understand when you compare it with, say, Schoenberg. 


Well said, T
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2010 at 15:55
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

 
Originally posted by kingfriso kingfriso wrote:

Somehow the word 'intellectual' got very loaded with negativity around here. Because it has been used to describe people who don't do anything but read and talk and present themselves as superior only because of that, when they might well be extremely handicapped in other areas of life. Being intellectual is not bad at all. What's bad is thinking that because you are one your sh*t doesn't stink.  I myself am an intellectual, which means I study and have an interest in head-breaking matters as world politics, art, ethics, philosophy, physics and human behaviors. The majority of people in Holland (I don't know what's the situation in other countries) don't care about more then one of these intellectual matters I've mentioned (I guess 40% don't care about a single one).  Most people don't have TIME or education to be interested in those things. Some people have to, well, you know, SURVIVE first... 

These matters are important for our society, for our freedom, for human progress. Then why is the word 'intellectual' so bad? I'm proud to be able to understand problems and think of solutions of problems on a bigger or more sophisticated scale. But it would be more useful if you come up with those solutions and make them public and of any utility for the rest. If not is just mental jerk-off. This also applies to the music I'm listening to. I'm able to like music that has more sophistication and a way bigger concept that most three-minute pop-songs.    I can't stress this enough: don't think have reached THE upper echelon of complex music by listening to Yes or Magma... Try some academic (classical) music and compare please.. Or even some jazz... 

And I do think the average prog listener is more intellectual then the average hit-chart or hip-hop listener.Yes, probably. But not because of a difference in intelligence. They have been socialized different, they were raised different, in different environments, with different goals, etc etc etc.  Prog music is harder to understand and has older listeners that have had more time think. Not really. Most old people of intellect I know disdain prog music in favor of classical music or jazz or even folk music... Is not THAT hard to understand when you compare it with, say, Schoenberg. 

Glad somebody finally got around to this guy. I knew you'd deliver, T. Clap
Back to Top
Paravion View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 01 2010
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 470
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2010 at 16:04
There's not necessarily anything wrong with the word 'intellectual'. As the guy writing in red says, in this particular context - where it (as I see it) is used to refer to the range of people who assumes a possible correlation between prog and intellect -  there is something wrong with it.

Originally posted by kingfriso kingfriso wrote:

I myself am an intellectual, which means I study and have an interest in head-breaking matters as world politics, art, ethics, philosophy, physics and human behaviors. The majority of people in Holland (I don't know what's the situation in other countries) don't care about more then one of these intellectual matters I've mentioned (I guess 40% don't care about a single one).
To make guesses like that disqualifies you as an intellectual. You really can't say unless you examine it properly (ie. not solely based on own or peer experiences). A survey determined to find out what percentage of Hollands population engage themselves in this sort of higher thinking would be pseudoscientific and plain stupid. Luckily, not everyone thinks about things in abstract and complex terms. We need intellectuals - but we certainly also need those who are not 'tormented' by head-breaking matters.

Also, real intellectuals would never present themselves as intellectuals. They are called so by others and it would be way too self-indulgent. 

I have an interest in language, and I have been studying lingustics for a long period of years now. It means that I have aquired a skill to think (talk and write) about language in an abstract and complex way. And in most senses I guess I can't really escape being an 'intellectual' or a 'wannabe-intellectual' - but would never claim to be one.

The whole issue of a possible correlation between 'prog' and 'intellect' is nonsense.


Edited by Paravion - May 20 2010 at 16:05
Back to Top
Symphonie View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: February 18 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2010 at 16:37
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

 
Originally posted by kingfriso kingfriso wrote:

Somehow the word 'intellectual' got very loaded with negativity around here. Because it has been used to describe people who don't do anything but read and talk and present themselves as superior only because of that, when they might well be extremely handicapped in other areas of life. Being intellectual is not bad at all. What's bad is thinking that because you are one your sh*t doesn't stink.  I myself am an intellectual, which means I study and have an interest in head-breaking matters as world politics, art, ethics, philosophy, physics and human behaviors. The majority of people in Holland (I don't know what's the situation in other countries) don't care about more then one of these intellectual matters I've mentioned (I guess 40% don't care about a single one).  Most people don't have TIME or education to be interested in those things. Some people have to, well, you know, SURVIVE first... 

These matters are important for our society, for our freedom, for human progress. Then why is the word 'intellectual' so bad? I'm proud to be able to understand problems and think of solutions of problems on a bigger or more sophisticated scale. But it would be more useful if you come up with those solutions and make them public and of any utility for the rest. If not is just mental jerk-off. This also applies to the music I'm listening to. I'm able to like music that has more sophistication and a way bigger concept that most three-minute pop-songs.    I can't stress this enough: don't think have reached THE upper echelon of complex music by listening to Yes or Magma... Try some academic (classical) music and compare please.. Or even some jazz... 

And I do think the average prog listener is more intellectual then the average hit-chart or hip-hop listener.Yes, probably. But not because of a difference in intelligence. They have been socialized different, they were raised different, in different environments, with different goals, etc etc etc.  Prog music is harder to understand and has older listeners that have had more time think. Not really. Most old people of intellect I know disdain prog music in favor of classical music or jazz or even folk music... Is not THAT hard to understand when you compare it with, say, Schoenberg. 



The thought of every man is by definition subjective, but man, despite its subjectivity, based his thinking objectively. If Kingfriso fully support himself as an intellectual, and proposed the idea of an observation (not scientific, but still a valid observation) on the correlation between the depth of music and deep thoughts, it is quite valid.
This is not because some people preach humility (ha ha, still a Christian value!) that they are at a more advanced stage of thought. Similarly, a person claiming intellectual does not necessarily think superior to another,
he just reassumed his perception of the subject..
I agree that humility can sometimes be a virtue, but keep in mind that it may also be a limit.
Kingfriso, I am supporting you, at the risk of sounding snobbish to others.

Back to Top
Paravion View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 01 2010
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 470
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2010 at 16:57
Originally posted by symphonie symphonie wrote:

The thought of every man is by definition subjective, but man, despite its subjectivity, based his thinking objectively.
That's a generalization (every man), and I'm not sure you know what you talk about - i'm not. (?based his thinking objectively?(past tense?) )  
Originally posted by symphonie symphonie wrote:

If Kingfriso fully support himself as an intellectual, and proposed the idea of an observation (not scientific, but still a valid observation) on the correlation between the depth of music and deep thoughts, it is quite valid.
I guess he can convince himself that he is an intellectual and capable of making valid observations - but so what? An obeservation (not to confuse ourselves too much) is an observation. The question of validity in the case of observations is in most contexts pointless. The assumption can be said to be valid or not.  

Also - I'm not humble and virtious. I just don't  - and wouldn't want to - call myself an intellectual.  


Edited by Paravion - May 20 2010 at 17:04
Back to Top
rod65 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 28 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 248
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2010 at 16:59
Originally posted by Symphonie Symphonie wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

 
Originally posted by kingfriso kingfriso wrote:

Somehow the word 'intellectual' got very loaded with negativity around here. Because it has been used to describe people who don't do anything but read and talk and present themselves as superior only because of that, when they might well be extremely handicapped in other areas of life. Being intellectual is not bad at all. What's bad is thinking that because you are one your sh*t doesn't stink.  I myself am an intellectual, which means I study and have an interest in head-breaking matters as world politics, art, ethics, philosophy, physics and human behaviors. The majority of people in Holland (I don't know what's the situation in other countries) don't care about more then one of these intellectual matters I've mentioned (I guess 40% don't care about a single one).  Most people don't have TIME or education to be interested in those things. Some people have to, well, you know, SURVIVE first... 

These matters are important for our society, for our freedom, for human progress. Then why is the word 'intellectual' so bad? I'm proud to be able to understand problems and think of solutions of problems on a bigger or more sophisticated scale. But it would be more useful if you come up with those solutions and make them public and of any utility for the rest. If not is just mental jerk-off. This also applies to the music I'm listening to. I'm able to like music that has more sophistication and a way bigger concept that most three-minute pop-songs.    I can't stress this enough: don't think have reached THE upper echelon of complex music by listening to Yes or Magma... Try some academic (classical) music and compare please.. Or even some jazz... 

And I do think the average prog listener is more intellectual then the average hit-chart or hip-hop listener.Yes, probably. But not because of a difference in intelligence. They have been socialized different, they were raised different, in different environments, with different goals, etc etc etc.  Prog music is harder to understand and has older listeners that have had more time think. Not really. Most old people of intellect I know disdain prog music in favor of classical music or jazz or even folk music... Is not THAT hard to understand when you compare it with, say, Schoenberg. 



The thought of every man is by definition subjective, but man, despite its subjectivity, based his thinking objectively. If Kingfriso fully support himself as an intellectual, and proposed the idea of an observation (not scientific, but still a valid observation) on the correlation between the depth of music and deep thoughts, it is quite valid.
This is not because some people preach humility (ha ha, still a Christian value!) that they are at a more advanced stage of thought. Similarly, a person claiming intellectual does not necessarily think superior to another,
he just reassumed his perception of the subject..
I agree that humility can sometimes be a virtue, but keep in mind that it may also be a limit.
Kingfriso, I am supporting you, at the risk of sounding snobbish to others.


An interesting discussion going on here. Maybe drifting from the matter of prog and intellect and maybe not. My own take on intellect is that is is a matter of both pleasure and utility. If we spend all our time thinking interesting thoughts but never find a way to put our thoughts into practice, even modestly, then yes, T, I agree with you absolutely. But thinking is, or at least can be, one of the greatest pleasure's in life--and in that sense, any art that contributes to the richness of our thoughts and thus enriches our intellects is a gift. At least that's how I see it. Also, I wonder--and I make no claim to actual knowledge here--but I wonder whether the enrichment of our intellects may at least potentially also enrich our capacity for meaningful social action. Just a thought, and if it turns out to be b.s, I'll be the first to admit it.

Hope I haven't gone on too long.
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17965
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2010 at 17:51
Originally posted by Symphonie Symphonie wrote:

Hi, as you know, rare are those who are listening to prog music.

Those I know who do have intellectual trends, in the sense that they ask themself more questions about life in general. Indeed, the progressive music helps me personally to get quickly in an intense way of thinking: So I appreciate more the qualities of the music.
Of course, these are only generalizations, but I was wondering if you've noticed similar cases in your community?


Friedrich Nietzsche said: “Without music, life would be an error.” And nobody on Earth has reflected more than Nietzsche. What do you think about this reflection? 
 
I prefer Shakespeare's version much better ... something to the effect that he that hath no music has no soul! ... it says it all way better ... and to say that nobody has reflected more than Nietzche is rather small minded and not intellectual at all in my book, since there are so many ... so many ... out there that talk and discuss music and intellect ... but get blown away by "fans" ... and this board is a very good example of it. And there are a lot of people here that are very good, very intellectual, and also knowledgeable ... and have a massive history of things behind their noggin ... and the real issue is ... how open minded are you to want to increase your knowledge and appreciation with all the folks here (not just some! ALL), without judgement or idealism in the way? ... just remember that "music" is the essence of life, love and communication. The rest is talk!" ... and I wrote that!
 


Edited by moshkito - May 20 2010 at 17:53
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65523
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2010 at 17:55
 ^  Huzzah !
Back to Top
Sckxyss View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 05 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2010 at 19:29
Originally posted by Paravion Paravion wrote:

There's not necessarily anything wrong with the word 'intellectual'. As the guy writing in red says, in this particular context - where it (as I see it) is used to refer to the range of people who assumes a possible correlation between prog and intellect -  there is something wrong with it.

Originally posted by kingfriso kingfriso wrote:

I myself am an intellectual, which means I study and have an interest in head-breaking matters as world politics, art, ethics, philosophy, physics and human behaviors. The majority of people in Holland (I don't know what's the situation in other countries) don't care about more then one of these intellectual matters I've mentioned (I guess 40% don't care about a single one).
To make guesses like that disqualifies you as an intellectual. You really can't say unless you examine it properly (ie. not solely based on own or peer experiences). A survey determined to find out what percentage of Hollands population engage themselves in this sort of higher thinking would be pseudoscientific and plain stupid. Luckily, not everyone thinks about things in abstract and complex terms. We need intellectuals - but we certainly also need those who are not 'tormented' by head-breaking matters.

Also, real intellectuals would never present themselves as intellectuals. They are called so by others and it would be way too self-indulgent. 


Intelligence has nothing to do with pride or "self-indulgence"... he is simply being self-aware. I'm sure every truly smart person knows that they're smart. You're saying that as soon as they tell someone, they're no longer a real intellectual? You and many others here seem to be afraid of your own intelligence at the risk of being a "snob".

Also, while Friso's first observation doesn't prove his intelligence, it also doen't disqualify him as you claim LOL.
Back to Top
presdoug View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 24 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 8711
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2010 at 19:35
found out (for those that are interested) that Schoepenhauer also said that "music is the greatest of the arts, because it is best at conveying human feeling"-don't know if human feeling for him is part of the will, or representation-man, it has been a long time since i have read any Schoepenhauer
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2010 at 19:46
Originally posted by presdoug presdoug wrote:

found out (for those that are interested) that Schoepenhauer also said that "music is the greatest of the arts, because it is best at conveying human feeling"-don't know if human feeling for him is part of the will, or representation-man, it has been a long time since i have read any Schoepenhauer

Music, pure abstract music (instrumental music, he probably was talking about classical music) IS the best bridge to the actual human feeling, it's a window to the true inner self of the artist, where he doesn't rely on words, where he can't communicate anything directly and has to employ sound, which go straight pass the language-processing areas of the brain into regions more related to memory and emotion... Music is the greatest of the arts. As much as I love prog, I don't think prog is the greatest of the arts though. But it's a great one and even sublime one in the right hands. 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 11>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.169 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.