Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Suggest New Bands and Artists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Casualties of Applied Metaphysics (Avant/Eclectic)
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedCasualties of Applied Metaphysics (Avant/Eclectic)
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 14 2010 at 19:55
Originally posted by Tsevir Leirbag Tsevir Leirbag wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

CoAM have been rejected by Eclectic and Avant in the past - if they are to be re-evaluated by either team it means they qualify as a "Controversial Band" and require the unanimous vote of every team member.
 
Quote Identification of a controversial proposal

Bands and artists will be considered potentially controversial if they:

  • Are not generally listed by other prog sites* AND/OR
  • They have been rejected in the past on the basis of their prog credentials

::snip::

 
Means that if ONE member rejects them, they're rejected?
That's the rule.
What?
Back to Top
Tsevir Leirbag View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 03 2009
Location: Montréal
Status: Offline
Points: 8321 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 14 2010 at 19:56
Alright, I just wasn't sure if that was what it meant.
We'll stick to the rules.
Les mains, les pieds balancés
Sur tant de mers, tant de planchers,
Un marin mort,
Il dormira

- Paul Éluard
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 14 2010 at 20:27
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

CoAM have been rejected by Eclectic and Avant in the past - if they are to be re-evaluated by either team it means they qualify as a "Controversial Band" and require the unanimous vote of every team member.
 
Quote Identification of a controversial proposal

Bands and artists will be considered potentially controversial if they:

  • Are not generally listed by other prog sites* AND/OR
  • They have been rejected in the past on the basis of their prog credentials

::snip::


Correct me if I am wrong, Dean, but nobody ever doubted that they were progressive when they were proposed the first time; it's just that nobody could quite agree on which genre they belonged in. I don't really see how this rule applies, in that case.

My memory could be fuzzy, though. Embarrassed
Back to Top
Tsevir Leirbag View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 03 2009
Location: Montréal
Status: Offline
Points: 8321 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 14 2010 at 20:37
Originally posted by JLocke JLocke wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

CoAM have been rejected by Eclectic and Avant in the past - if they are to be re-evaluated by either team it means they qualify as a "Controversial Band" and require the unanimous vote of every team member.
 
Quote Identification of a controversial proposal

Bands and artists will be considered potentially controversial if they:

  • Are not generally listed by other prog sites* AND/OR
  • They have been rejected in the past on the basis of their prog credentials

::snip::


Correct me if I am wrong, Dean, but nobody ever doubted that they were progressive when they were proposed the first time; it's just that nobody could quite agree on which genre they belonged in. I don't really see how this rule applies, in that case.

My memory could be fuzzy, though. Embarrassed
 
I think he's right.
I even think NOBODY said they weren't progressive. But that's some time ago, not sure if I remember well.
Les mains, les pieds balancés
Sur tant de mers, tant de planchers,
Un marin mort,
Il dormira

- Paul Éluard
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 14 2010 at 20:54
Originally posted by Tsevir Leirbag Tsevir Leirbag wrote:

Originally posted by JLocke JLocke wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

CoAM have been rejected by Eclectic and Avant in the past - if they are to be re-evaluated by either team it means they qualify as a "Controversial Band" and require the unanimous vote of every team member.
 
Quote Identification of a controversial proposal

Bands and artists will be considered potentially controversial if they:

  • Are not generally listed by other prog sites* AND/OR
  • They have been rejected in the past on the basis of their prog credentials

::snip::


Correct me if I am wrong, Dean, but nobody ever doubted that they were progressive when they were proposed the first time; it's just that nobody could quite agree on which genre they belonged in. I don't really see how this rule applies, in that case.

My memory could be fuzzy, though. Embarrassed
 
I think he's right.
I even think NOBODY said they weren't progressive. But that's some time ago, not sure if I remember well.
Their rejection from ZART was on the grounds that they were not Avant-Prog - as stated on three seperate occasions by James when repeated claims that the music was Avant Garde were made - implying that it was the "Prog" part that the ZART team had the problem with.
What?
Back to Top
DamoXt7942 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar

Joined: October 15 2008
Location: Okayama, Japan
Status: Offline
Points: 17493 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 15 2010 at 02:01
Also Psych/Space Team have already evaluated Casualties Of Applied Metaphysics around last April (yet I've not joined there) and rejected because of their less Psych/Space essence.
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 15 2010 at 02:18
^ Yeah, they're definitely not Space-Rock. 
Back to Top
clarke2001 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 14 2006
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 4160 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 15 2010 at 09:22
Originally posted by Negoba Negoba wrote:

PA has already included amateur content from members.



Not because it was from members and no because it was amateur. Officially released/singed/purchasable units were evaluated, and evaluated music itself is prog rock.

We included loads of amateurish releases worldwide that had nothing to do with our members. We're not friend's music database, not even a good music database, we are listing released prog. Simple as that.


I know that you know that, I just had to get it off my chest...and just in case anyone's in doubt.Smile
Percussion, sir!
Back to Top
Tsevir Leirbag View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 03 2009
Location: Montréal
Status: Offline
Points: 8321 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 15 2010 at 15:57
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Tsevir Leirbag Tsevir Leirbag wrote:

Originally posted by JLocke JLocke wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

CoAM have been rejected by Eclectic and Avant in the past - if they are to be re-evaluated by either team it means they qualify as a "Controversial Band" and require the unanimous vote of every team member.
 
Quote Identification of a controversial proposal

Bands and artists will be considered potentially controversial if they:

  • Are not generally listed by other prog sites* AND/OR
  • They have been rejected in the past on the basis of their prog credentials

::snip::


Correct me if I am wrong, Dean, but nobody ever doubted that they were progressive when they were proposed the first time; it's just that nobody could quite agree on which genre they belonged in. I don't really see how this rule applies, in that case.

My memory could be fuzzy, though. Embarrassed
 
I think he's right.
I even think NOBODY said they weren't progressive. But that's some time ago, not sure if I remember well.
Their rejection from ZART was on the grounds that they were not Avant-Prog - as stated on three seperate occasions by James when repeated claims that the music was Avant Garde were made - implying that it was the "Prog" part that the ZART team had the problem with.
 
Oh, sorry then Embarrassed
I guess it won't be accepted this time again...
Les mains, les pieds balancés
Sur tant de mers, tant de planchers,
Un marin mort,
Il dormira

- Paul Éluard
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 15 2010 at 16:06
Originally posted by Tsevir Leirbag Tsevir Leirbag wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Tsevir Leirbag Tsevir Leirbag wrote:

Originally posted by JLocke JLocke wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

CoAM have been rejected by Eclectic and Avant in the past - if they are to be re-evaluated by either team it means they qualify as a "Controversial Band" and require the unanimous vote of every team member.
 
Quote Identification of a controversial proposal

Bands and artists will be considered potentially controversial if they:

  • Are not generally listed by other prog sites* AND/OR
  • They have been rejected in the past on the basis of their prog credentials

::snip::


Correct me if I am wrong, Dean, but nobody ever doubted that they were progressive when they were proposed the first time; it's just that nobody could quite agree on which genre they belonged in. I don't really see how this rule applies, in that case.

My memory could be fuzzy, though. Embarrassed
 
I think he's right.
I even think NOBODY said they weren't progressive. But that's some time ago, not sure if I remember well.
Their rejection from ZART was on the grounds that they were not Avant-Prog - as stated on three seperate occasions by James when repeated claims that the music was Avant Garde were made - implying that it was the "Prog" part that the ZART team had the problem with.
 
Oh, sorry then Embarrassed
I guess it won't be accepted this time again...

What a shock. Ermm
Back to Top
UndercoverBoy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 10 2009
Location: Tulsa, OK, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 5148 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 15 2010 at 17:25
Cry
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 17 2010 at 10:55
So...

Is any team currently evaluating or re-evaluating this submission?
Back to Top
Negoba View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5210 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 17 2010 at 10:58
In any case, the newest album is a big step forward in quality from what I'd heard before. Keep making music guys!!!
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
Back to Top
Sckxyss View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 05 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1319 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 20 2010 at 04:55
Just to stir the pot a little... Say a band had two borderline prog/pop albums that got suggested to and rejected by a genre team. Then, a year later, released an undisputable 100% prog album. Have they lost their chance to be in the database because they were already rejected once?

My point is think it should be fair to allow a reevaluation if a band releases new material, especially if there is a significant improvement in quality or progressive tendencies.
Back to Top
Marty McFly View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2009
Location: Czech Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 3968 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 20 2010 at 05:11
Originally posted by Sckxyss Sckxyss wrote:

Just to stir the pot a little... Say a band had two borderline prog/pop albums that got suggested to and rejected by a genre team. Then, a year later, released an undisputable 100% prog album. Have they lost their chance to be in the database because they were already rejected once?

My point is think it should be fair to allow a reevaluation if a band releases new material, especially if there is a significant improvement in quality or progressive tendencies.

Very good point.
There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless,"

   -Andyman1125 on Lulu







Even my
Back to Top
Rivertree View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Band Submissions

Joined: March 22 2006
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 17649 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 20 2010 at 06:33
Originally posted by Sckxyss Sckxyss wrote:

Just to stir the pot a little... Say a band had two borderline prog/pop albums that got suggested to and rejected by a genre team. Then, a year later, released an undisputable 100% prog album. Have they lost their chance to be in the database because they were already rejected once?

My point is think it should be fair to allow a reevaluation if a band releases new material, especially if there is a significant improvement in quality or progressive tendencies.


as stated before such bands/artists have a controversial status - however - they don't have lost their chance ...
in such a case a team can re-evaluate and must have an unanimous decision ...




Edited by Rivertree - March 20 2010 at 06:39


Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 26 2010 at 08:17
Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

So...

Is any team currently evaluating or re-evaluating this submission?


From their Progfreak chart: http://progfreak.com/Casualties-of-Applied-Metaphysics,_dbe,artists,_auto_2283326.xhtml?path=pa/recent it seems like no team has taken up on them for a (re)evaluation, so I'm heading this for the ZART.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.418 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.