Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Band That Angers You Most
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedBand That Angers You Most

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 7>
Author
Message
The Pessimist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 13 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3834
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2010 at 12:16
Originally posted by jampa17 jampa17 wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Originally posted by aginor aginor wrote:

^ well I usually do that but I'm still not so found of that sort of activity (I have friends  who enjoys it verry much and are not afraid of blood (to get out their inner Viking probably). i guess it has to do about getting out agression and energy (but then start boxing or beggin triathlon)

but yes metal concerts are also good to see from beheind the pit, where the sound is better, I avoided nicely the pit when I saw Slipknot but I went nuts for myself and jumped around and danced (verry fun band even though they are nu -metal band)


Yeah, getting out aggression is good. I mean when I'm going to see a band I'm going to see the band, not to go nuts. But if the opportunity comes along to shove someone about that you don't know... well I personally wouldn't turn that down

I must admit though, I do enjoy the music from the back. It's a lot clearer I find. Slipknot? Ah man I couldn't go nuts for them... Not after seeing Decapitated and also Suffocation last year as well Just wouldn't feel right...
 
Totally agree with you Alex... music is better on the back... but if you go to see someone you really like, at least I love to be in first row and see the action...
 
About hitting unknown persons... I do agree with you... it's nice... but I'm too short so I have more risk to end up more hurt than anyone... so... it depends... If I don't care a hell about the band... maybe I join the pit for a little agression... but with slow-metal bands like that.. nope... it has to be trash or speed metal... I guess..!!!


Or DEATH METAL.

Or even GRIND.

In fact, Grind's probably the best to hurt someone to
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg
Back to Top
rushfan4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66588
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2010 at 12:42
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

[/QUOTE]<

Second coming of Christ?  Of course not.  But I have to say that either you haven't listened to the music in much depth or at least weren't paying attention.  I actually like Nirvana and one of the things that made them appealing was that I could detect a little Frippian influence.  I totally dismissed them when they were all the rage.  Smells is really as close as any of the songs get to bubblegum pop with feedbacky guitar.  LOL

But back to the question, there are none.  If I don't like something there's plenty out there to like so what's the point of getting angry at a band?
[/QUOTE]
I agree....I live in the Emerald City, we here do not consider him the 2nd coming of Christ...that came from outside Seattle...probably NY critics. Nirvana is good and I agree you have to dig deep. I'm not gonna dive into where the sound came from here, but it came from the lush green forests we have here....but take a listen to Mudhoney. Wink
 
Back to the question......I don't get angry at a band.....many pop music I just don't get because we all know these people will be gone next year.....I can appreciate they are trying to make some kind of statement, but I don't get it. Will the Jonas Bros be making albums 30 yrs from now??
 
[/QUOTE]
As much as I love the Beatles, the Jonas Bros are the early Beatles of today.  The band of good looking young guys that make teenage girls lose their composure.  It'll be curious to see if the Jonas Bros disappear from existence along with their youthful good looks, or if they develop and grow as a band in a way similar to what the Beatles did.  Personally, I see them showing up on reality TV 20 years for now in programs like I'm A Celebrity Get Me Out of Here, but who knows.
Back to Top
jampa17 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2009
Location: Guatemala
Status: Offline
Points: 6802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2010 at 12:45
Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Originally posted by jampa17 jampa17 wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Originally posted by aginor aginor wrote:

^ well I usually do that but I'm still not so found of that sort of activity (I have friends  who enjoys it verry much and are not afraid of blood (to get out their inner Viking probably). i guess it has to do about getting out agression and energy (but then start boxing or beggin triathlon)

but yes metal concerts are also good to see from beheind the pit, where the sound is better, I avoided nicely the pit when I saw Slipknot but I went nuts for myself and jumped around and danced (verry fun band even though they are nu -metal band)


Yeah, getting out aggression is good. I mean when I'm going to see a band I'm going to see the band, not to go nuts. But if the opportunity comes along to shove someone about that you don't know... well I personally wouldn't turn that down

I must admit though, I do enjoy the music from the back. It's a lot clearer I find. Slipknot? Ah man I couldn't go nuts for them... Not after seeing Decapitated and also Suffocation last year as well Just wouldn't feel right...
 
Totally agree with you Alex... music is better on the back... but if you go to see someone you really like, at least I love to be in first row and see the action...
 
About hitting unknown persons... I do agree with you... it's nice... but I'm too short so I have more risk to end up more hurt than anyone... so... it depends... If I don't care a hell about the band... maybe I join the pit for a little agression... but with slow-metal bands like that.. nope... it has to be trash or speed metal... I guess..!!!


Or DEATH METAL.

Or even GRIND.

In fact, Grind's probably the best to hurt someone to
 
Which band are Grind....??? sounds like I want to know them... jajaja...
Change the program inside... Stay in silence is a crime.
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17966
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2010 at 12:54
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Second coming of Christ?  Of course not.  But I have to say that either you haven't listened to the music in much depth or at least weren't paying attention.  I actually like Nirvana and one of the things that made them appealing was that I could detect a little Frippian influence.  I totally dismissed them when they were all the rage.  Smells is really as close as any of the songs get to bubblegum pop with feedbacky guitar.  LOL

But back to the question, there are none.  If I don't like something there's plenty out there to like so what's the point of getting angry at a band?
I live in the Emerald City...we do not consider him the 2nd coming of Christ...that came from outside Seattle, probably NY critics or MTV. Agree you have to dig deep to get the sound and where it came from, some old neighborhood garages, visited by Mudhoney Clap, Melvins Clap and others...before Nirvana.
 
Back to thread......Yea I don't get angry.....too much other stuff out there to explore and no need for anger. I will say I don't care for gimmicks like Lady Gaga, so I don't get it, one of my kids says she's a dude??Shocked
 
Anyway...make peace not war Big smile
Back to Top
akamaisondufromage View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 16 2009
Location: Blighty
Status: Offline
Points: 6797
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2010 at 13:04
Cry
Originally posted by Gamemako Gamemako wrote:

Two that really get on my nerves:

The Ramones -- "Hey look everybody, we f**king suck at everything, can't write music, can't play our instruments, and we should be rich a f**king famous!" Poppycock.

Nickelback -- Talk about formulaic.
 
For you then here's Da Brudders Sucking at everything, Not playing the music they didn't write, and you're right failing to become rich and famous - I for one loved them and tis sad they are nearly all passed from here!  Cry 
 
 
At their lyrical best wiv Happy Family!
Help me I'm falling!
Back to Top
thellama73 View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2010 at 13:14
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

I don't care for gimmicks like Lady Gaga, so I don't get it, one of my kids says she's a dude??Shocked


Why is it that whenever a pretty girl becomes popular in the music world, people start alleging she's a dude? I remember the same thing happened to Gwen Stefani back when No Doubt made it big. I don't understand this.

As far as gimmicks go... *cough* Peter Gabriel *cough*
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17966
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2010 at 13:25
Originally posted by thellama73 thellama73 wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

I don't care for gimmicks like Lady Gaga, so I don't get it, one of my kids says she's a dude??Shocked


Why is it that whenever a pretty girl becomes popular in the music world, people start alleging she's a dude? I remember the same thing happened to Gwen Stefani back when No Doubt made it big. I don't understand this.

As far as gimmicks go... *cough* Peter Gabriel *cough*
Specifically my kids said that......not me....I don't think she is a dude. Never heard that about Gwen..she's hot.
IMO, Gabriel was in character on stage....and then "normal" after the shows. yes or no? Alice Cooper...same deal, I doubt he walked around the streets cutting his head off all the time or a snake around his shoulder. Whether on stage or not Gaga is wearing wires and stars all the time......Hey props for her if she feels the need to be always in "character"........but I don't get it.
(hmm  does any sense anger from me....Uhh ohh..better go take a happy pill..) LOL
 
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2010 at 13:55
Originally posted by rushfan4 rushfan4 wrote:

[/QUOTE]
As much as I love the Beatles, the Jonas Bros are the early Beatles of today.  The band of good looking young guys that make teenage girls lose their composure.  It'll be curious to see if the Jonas Bros disappear from existence along with their youthful good looks, or if they develop and grow as a band in a way similar to what the Beatles did.  Personally, I see them showing up on reality TV 20 years for now in programs like I'm A Celebrity Get Me Out of Here, but who knows.
[/QUOTE]
May be a bit premature to call the Jonas Bros the early Beatles of today until they make a radical change in musical direction like the Beatles did.  I don't know of many bands other than the big B that has done that.  Todd Rundgren had a somewhat brief flirtation with prog with Utopia after a very successful career in pop.  Any others come to mind that I've overlooked?
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
rushfan4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66588
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2010 at 14:00
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Originally posted by rushfan4 rushfan4 wrote:

As much as I love the Beatles, the Jonas Bros are the early Beatles of today.  The band of good looking young guys that make teenage girls lose their composure.  It'll be curious to see if the Jonas Bros disappear from existence along with their youthful good looks, or if they develop and grow as a band in a way similar to what the Beatles did.  Personally, I see them showing up on reality TV 20 years for now in programs like I'm A Celebrity Get Me Out of Here, but who knows.

May be a bit premature to call the Jonas Bros the early Beatles of today until they make a radical change in musical direction like the Beatles did.  I don't know of many bands other than the big B that has done that.  Todd Rundgren had a somewhat brief flirtation with prog with Utopia after a very successful career in pop.  Any others come to mind that I've overlooked?
[/QUOTE]
"I know the Beatles, and you sir, are no Beatles". LOL  It is really their effect on teenage girls that I am referring to.  To be honest, I've only seen them play 1 song and that was live on New Years Day last year because they were on Dick Clark.  The song kind of reminded me of the type of song that the Beatles wrote in their early days.  They will most probably fade into obscurity like most every other boy band that grows up, but ... 
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17966
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2010 at 14:36
FYI........Album of the Day on the Zune Marketplace is
Rush - 2112
 
Released 34 yrs ago this week... 
Kudos to Zune content team...not everything is about Lady Gaga and Jonas Bros....
 
ClapClapThumbs Up


Edited by Catcher10 - February 03 2010 at 14:44
Back to Top
The Pessimist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 13 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3834
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2010 at 16:22
Originally posted by jampa17 jampa17 wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Originally posted by jampa17 jampa17 wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Originally posted by aginor aginor wrote:

^ well I usually do that but I'm still not so found of that sort of activity (I have friends  who enjoys it verry much and are not afraid of blood (to get out their inner Viking probably). i guess it has to do about getting out agression and energy (but then start boxing or beggin triathlon)

but yes metal concerts are also good to see from beheind the pit, where the sound is better, I avoided nicely the pit when I saw Slipknot but I went nuts for myself and jumped around and danced (verry fun band even though they are nu -metal band)


Yeah, getting out aggression is good. I mean when I'm going to see a band I'm going to see the band, not to go nuts. But if the opportunity comes along to shove someone about that you don't know... well I personally wouldn't turn that down

I must admit though, I do enjoy the music from the back. It's a lot clearer I find. Slipknot? Ah man I couldn't go nuts for them... Not after seeing Decapitated and also Suffocation last year as well Just wouldn't feel right...
 
Totally agree with you Alex... music is better on the back... but if you go to see someone you really like, at least I love to be in first row and see the action...
 
About hitting unknown persons... I do agree with you... it's nice... but I'm too short so I have more risk to end up more hurt than anyone... so... it depends... If I don't care a hell about the band... maybe I join the pit for a little agression... but with slow-metal bands like that.. nope... it has to be trash or speed metal... I guess..!!!


Or DEATH METAL.

Or even GRIND.

In fact, Grind's probably the best to hurt someone to
 
Which band are Grind....??? sounds like I want to know them... jajaja...



This band

Great music, crappy video I must apologise. I can imagine myself headbanging pretty heavily to this live.
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg
Back to Top
Kashmir75 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 25 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1029
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2010 at 19:51
Interesting responses. I am a little surprised to see someone say the Smiths. I actually quite like them.
 
I also used to like Nirvana quite a lot. This was before I became a proghead, of course. I haven't listened to them in ages. I actually preferred the more raw, aggressive sound of Bleach and In Utero to the more commercial Nevermind. But, yeah, a generation of kids thinking Cobain invented rock and roll does annoy me somewhat, when there are so many better players out there.
 
Green Day annoy me since they became massive. I didn't actually mind them pre-American Idiot when they weren't completely in the mainstream.
 
I don't hate U2 or Coldplay, per se, but they do write music with no real ambition. It's just formulaic and written for mass consumption, not for the art. A shame, because like Green Day, U2 were OK before they became massive.
 
Emo, like Fall Out Boy, and My Chemical Romance, annoys me to no end. I just don't get it. I'm not even that old. I'm 27. All these kids wearing eyeliner, it just goes right over my head. And screamo? I find it unlistenable.
Hello, mirror. So glad to see you, my friend. It's been a while...
Back to Top
Kashmir75 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 25 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1029
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2010 at 19:54
Originally posted by gottagetintogetout gottagetintogetout wrote:

No band grinds my gears more than Nirvana.  I know it's cliche, but I want to rant whenever I see a fellow teenager who thinks that Kurt Cobain is the second coming of Christ.  I also hate how he name-dropped good artists like King Crimson as his influences, when his music sounded NOTHING like theirs.  Bubblegum pop with a feedbacky guitar.
 
I can't really listen to Smells.. anymore because I've heard it so many times. In fact, I barely pull out my copy of Nevermind anymore. Overplayed. I prefer the more uncommercial raw sound of their first and third album.
Hello, mirror. So glad to see you, my friend. It's been a while...
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 04 2010 at 19:05
I won't say the band themselves annoy me but Tool fanboys are annoying as hell.  They are in a league of their own.
Back to Top
ExittheLemming View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11420
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 04 2010 at 19:32
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

I won't say the band themselves annoy me but Tool fanboys are annoying as hell.  They are in a league of their own.


Similarly, although I love some of Bowie's stuff and the remainder leaves me unmoved, I can only endorse those sentiments re Tool fanboys by saying that the Thin White Duke's terminally trendy  disciples make blinkered anointment an artform. Trapped in a room with one of these critters you will hear things like:

David invented Progressive Rock but doesn't play it cost he thinks it's a pile of hippy w**k
David was the first person to ever use drugs (which he also invented)
David invented sexuality and is biologically both male and female whose respective reproductive organs he own the copyright of.
David has an IQ of 1,489 which makes him the equivalent of a taxicab of academics and speaks 24 languages, 4 of which he invented from scratch (the Germans have never even so much as thanked him for theirs)
David invented hip-hop, drum'n'bass, reggae, krautrock, trance, ambient and psychedelia but is too self-effacing to claim the credit
David can bake, cook, sew, design balloon animals, write novels, direct movies, act and would be a successful stand-up comedian but he doesn't have the time
David invented Iggy Pop but forbids the latter from calling him 'dad'

Back to Top
zappaholic View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 24 2006
Location: flyover country
Status: Offline
Points: 2822
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 04 2010 at 19:46
Originally posted by ExittheLemming ExittheLemming wrote:

Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

I won't say the band themselves annoy me but Tool fanboys are annoying as hell.  They are in a league of their own.


Similarly, although I love some of Bowie's stuff and the remainder leaves me unmoved, I can only endorse those sentiments re Tool fanboys by saying that the Thin White Duke's terminally trendy  disciples make blinkered anointment an artform. Trapped in a room with one of these critters you will hear things like:

David invented Progressive Rock but doesn't play it cost he thinks it's a pile of hippy w**k
David was the first person to ever use drugs (which he also invented)
David invented sexuality and is biologically both male and female whose respective reproductive organs he own the copyright of.
David has an IQ of 1,489 which makes him the equivalent of a taxicab of academics and speaks 24 languages, 4 of which he invented from scratch (the Germans have never even so much as thanked him for theirs)
David invented hip-hop, drum'n'bass, reggae, krautrock, trance, ambient and psychedelia but is too self-effacing to claim the credit
David can bake, cook, sew, design balloon animals, write novels, direct movies, act and would be a successful stand-up comedian but he doesn't have the time
David invented Iggy Pop but forbids the latter from calling him 'dad'

 
Kinda reminds me of the Chuck Norris Facts.
 
"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard." -- H.L. Mencken
Back to Top
presdoug View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 24 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 8737
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2010 at 10:43
The Clash-their music is so annoyingly commercial.
Back to Top
Cactus Choir View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2008
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 1043
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2010 at 10:52
U2 (Bono) - crimes including the wearing of shades indoors and the flashing of numerous pointless V-signs
Lily Allen - A pretend chav singing cod ska
Massive Attack - sixth form politics, annoying "moody" expressions and stupid facial hair
"And now...on the drums...Mick Underwooooooooood!!!"

"He's up the pub"
Back to Top
Jozef View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 17 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 2204
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2010 at 10:53
Gong: Never understood the appeal behind this band. I have listened to both Angel's Egg and You numerous times and still just can't get into their music. I actually prefer the little that I've heard of the Gong-Expresso material. I know their fans are extremely devoted and there are a great many of them here, so I guess I'm on the minority here.


Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2010 at 11:01
I refuse to acknowledge people who act like U2 didn't exist before 2000 and didn't make incredibly excellent music (up until 1993).
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 7>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.191 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.