Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Elton John/Phil Collins Riddle
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedElton John/Phil Collins Riddle

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
Guests View Drop Down
Forum Guest Group
Forum Guest Group
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Elton John/Phil Collins Riddle
    Posted: April 04 2005 at 19:51

Pop god and master pianist Elton John made a progressive rock album in the seventies and it was quite a successful one. I assume you have all heard of the much beloved 'Madman on the Water'? He also auditioned to become lead vocalist/keyboardist for King Crimson and Gentle Giant shortly before attempting his 'solo' career. (He met lyricist and partner Bernie Taupin while they were both auditioning for King Crimson. Imagine Robert Fripp performing 'Rocket Man'.)

Phil Collins is another famous example of prog-turned-pop. He was at one time one of the most respected drummers in the art rock world and then slowly became one of pop's most familiar voices. He turned Genesis from a clever and revolutionary art group into a massive 80s hit machine. And then there's the solo career...

The main question is this. If someone has a very respected background in progressive rock and then suddenly changes his 'methodology' to pop music... what are we to think of them?

Back to Top
Cygnus X-2 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 24 2004
Location: Bucketheadland
Status: Offline
Points: 21342
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2005 at 20:00

I think that we are to think that what they do is they are trying to differ their sound repetoir or 'progress' musically. I for one think Elton had a great career, spanning multiple genres of music. You forgot to mention another quasi-progressive effort he made, the masterpiece "Goodbye Yellow Brick Road".

But with Genesis (and the solo career), Phil Collins did the opposite thing. Their music progressed from being complicated and difficult material to simple 4/4 pop songs (although he kept some note of their progressiveness with songs like Domino and Fading Lights).

Back to Top
Man Overboard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 07 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 3830
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2005 at 20:00
We wag our fingers in shame.
Back to Top
Prog_Bassist View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 29 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 830
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2005 at 20:46
I just say they were trying to make a living.
Back to Top
Arsillus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7374
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2005 at 21:45

Peter Gabriel said he wouldn't have hired Phil Collins if he would have known Phil was so good.

But back to the question, I view John and Collins differently. I know we call it "progressive" music for a reason- it progresses. But just because a band "progresses," doesn't mean it's better. Phil Collins wrecked probably one of the coolest bands ever. I don't think Elton John ever was really a "prog" artist as we might consider him here. He may have progressed music, but wasn't "progressive rock/music." So I think Phil Collins is a traitor.

Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2005 at 22:36

I see Elton John mre related with Billy Joel.

  1. Both are pianists
  2. Both have classical formation
  3. Elton John recorded a Prog Record (Not sure about that though)
  4. Billy Joel started playing in two prog bands (Attila and Hassles)
  5. Both ended as Pop icons

Phil Collins by his side was a great drummer, but he was formed in Pop, Motown and Jazz more than classical or Progressive, so he returned to his roots after he gained control of Genesis

Iván

            
Back to Top
alchemist View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 31 2005
Location: Colombia
Status: Offline
Points: 119
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2005 at 22:40
Phil is great, yeah a deception that he commercialized Genesis, but that is reasonable to say that what that guy did in the early years was great and that he is a great musician, this covers or shadows the fact of what he did. (so what he later did was not progressive but it wasn't that bad).

As for Elton John, he wouldn't be given the title of Sir for no reason, he is a very important figure who has done great things and has influenced modern music a lot so don't call them traitors.
no great genius has existed without a touch of madness...
Back to Top
James Lee View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 06:00

I would add another name, albeit one that doesn't really belong in the prog realm: Stevie Wonder.

Like Elton and Collins, the 70s were full of genius albums and amazingly inventive songs- and once the 80s started, you can pretty much write off the rest. Unless there's someone out there who thinks that "I Just Called to Say I Love You" is every bit as good as anything from "Innervisions" or "Songs in the Key of Life".

I could say the same about Clapton, except that he started his downfall a few years earlier than the rest...I can't stand much of his output after Derek and the Dominoes.

Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 06:56
Phil Collins was never a Progger!!!!!! He disliked the early genesis stuff and as soon as success started to come their way, was only to glad tomake the band fit in to what he liked.
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 08:04

Originally posted by Prog_Bassist Prog_Bassist wrote:

I just say they were trying to make a living.

I'd say they were already making a perfectly good living from what they were doing, but wanted to make even more. Collins wanted not just success, but actual chart domination and complete sell out. He is very much on the business side of things rather than the creative. Its a shame, but I wouldn't have anyone else drumming on all those brilliant Genesis albums.

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Velvetclown View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 8548
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 08:11
Bring me my Blacksword and true understanding 
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 08:30

Originally posted by Velvetclown Velvetclown wrote:

Bring me my Blacksword and true understanding 

Wow someone who likes 'Broadsword & the Beast'!! Well, I assume you like it..??

A wonderful album, full of quirky Blacksword lunchtime wisdom

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Swinton MCR View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 19 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 848
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 09:04
Can't forgive Elton for the truly puke-inducing Diana Funeral tribute - Don't like his pop material and haven't heard this so-called prog-album - has it got a 20 minute epic full of wizzard synth solos......
Back to Top
Man Erg View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: August 26 2004
Location: Isle of Lucy
Status: Offline
Points: 7456
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 09:07

Elton John was a 'journeyman' musician.Turning his hand to any style which he thought popular at the time.He even did Nick Drake cover versions

I believe that Phil Collins did what he did because he/they needed the money to pay off advances etc.In Armando Gallo's Genesis biography Collins mentions that,even upto ATOTT,he could just about afford to buy a pair of shoes.What make of shoes I not sure.Maybe he had champagne tastes with brown ale money then.

Do 'The Stanley' otherwise I'll thrash you with some rhubarb.
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 10:26

Originally posted by Swinton MCR Swinton MCR wrote:

Can't forgive Elton for the truly puke-inducing Diana Funeral tribute - Don't like his pop material and haven't heard this so-called prog-album - has it got a 20 minute epic full of wizzard synth solos......

I know exactly what you mean!

You could have been forgiven for thinking that 'Candle in the wind' record was a spoof, the sort of thing that comedian/satirist Chris Morris would have bluffed on 'The Day Today' or 'Brass Eye'

I've little time for Elton John. There's been a few worthwhile songs over the years, but generally I asscociate him with 'the establishment' He is a friend of the ruling classes. He is pompous, out of touch, pretentious and has a lousy lazy voice. He is the establishments idea of a 'nice' 'acceptable' homosexual; someone who works hard to send himself up, wears pantomime frocks and tiaras and spends £00000 of flowers. Frankly I think he's a d!ck.

I better stop there...

 

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Beau Heem View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 12 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 227
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 18:45
I think the true Elton was abducted by aliens after "Catain Fantastic and the Brown Dirt Cowboy"...

I mean, think of it... His next album (titled Reg Strikes Back) is from a different planet...

Funny enough, the two mentioned albums both hit the album charts as no. 1 in the opening week both in the UK nad the US.

That is something that no-one will ever top... ...if I don't turn commercial, that is.


Cheers

-Beau
--No enemy but time--
Back to Top
Arsillus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7374
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 19:34

Originally posted by alchemist alchemist wrote:



As for Elton John, he wouldn't be given the title of Sir for no reason, he is a very important figure who has done great things and has influenced modern music a lot so don't call them traitors.

I dont' think he's a traitor. Only Phil Collins is a traitor. Dare I say I enjoy some Sir Elton John? His solo stuff is A LOT better than anything Collins did.

Back to Top
Man Erg View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: August 26 2004
Location: Isle of Lucy
Status: Offline
Points: 7456
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 06 2005 at 03:27
Originally posted by Beau Heem Beau Heem wrote:

I think the true Elton was abducted by aliens after "Catain Fantastic and the Brown Dirt Cowboy"...

I mean, think of it... His next album (titled Reg Strikes Back) is from a different planet...

Funny enough, the two mentioned albums both hit the album charts as no. 1 in the opening week both in the UK nad the US.

That is something that no-one will ever top... ...if I don't turn commercial, that is.


Cheers

-Beau



I thought that the next album after Capt Fantastic was Rock of the Westies.


Edited by Man Erg

Do 'The Stanley' otherwise I'll thrash you with some rhubarb.
Back to Top
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 06 2005 at 06:17

Originally posted by Man Erg Man Erg wrote:

Originally posted by Beau Heem Beau Heem wrote:

I think the true Elton was abducted by aliens after "Catain Fantastic and the Brown Dirt Cowboy"...

I mean, think of it... His next album (titled Reg Strikes Back) is from a different planet...

-Beau



I thought that the next album after Capt Fantastic was Rock of the Westies.

Well considering Elton John was abducted by aliens, how could he have made Rock of the westies. Maybe he didn't return ontill 1988. and all albums between that period where made by and Alien lool-alike

I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
Back to Top
Man Erg View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: August 26 2004
Location: Isle of Lucy
Status: Offline
Points: 7456
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 06 2005 at 06:26
Originally posted by tuxon tuxon wrote:

Well considering Elton John was abducted by aliens, how could he have made Rock of the westies. Maybe he didn't return ontill 1988. and all albums between that period where made by and Alien lool-alike



True.I never thought of it that way.Then again,I never think of Elton John full stop!

Do 'The Stanley' otherwise I'll thrash you with some rhubarb.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.167 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.