Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
pobben
Forum Newbie
Joined: April 16 2007
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 6
|
Topic: Genesis were bad to its fans. Posted: June 26 2009 at 02:50 |
One thing we all have to remember I think is when you are in a band or going solo, you make new music all the time. One album is a little different then the other one. You want as a musician play your new music at GIG's to show the fans and the audience what you have made new. And maybe when you tour the world or whatever. I would think the it's a bit " dissapointing" to hear all the time ...... Play this or play that ....I'm not a musician but i would have thought like that anyway.
Another thing about Genesis and the members. I agreed with you in some parts. That they maybe should have stayed to their roots. I lke the PG and SH era most. Some of the music after was a bit poppy for my taste. But if you take it for what it is. A step forward to the POP business to earn money. We can like it or not.
That said, if it's true what you said about PC shouting to the audience, it's not good off course, but maybe a bit frustation over what I earlier mentioned. Remember Roger Waters spitting on audience.
And one last thing, remember what happened to Bob Dylan after changing from Acustic to electric music. We as fans have our responsibilities to.
And just to mention it Michael Jackson died yesterday, that's sad even if we liked him or not
|
|
lazland
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13634
|
Posted: June 21 2009 at 12:58 |
KingCrimson250 wrote:
IIRC band politics had a fair bit to do with it as well. After Peter left, Tony became more or less the major creative force. At around the time of WAW the band was split because Tony and Mike, having tasted the success of ToTT, were very much interested in turning their music in a more commercial direction, while Phil and Steve were pretty adamant about staying the course. This pokes through a bit on WAW (Your Own Special Way...), but of course Steve wasn't very happy with the band and decided to quit, meaning that Tony and Mike now outnumbered Phil, and the more commercial avenue was set. Ironically enough, Phil was, of course, the one who would end up profiting the most from this new direction, but apparently he wasn't a fan originally.
I'm trying to remember if that's something I saw in an interview or if it's just a piece of knowledge I picked up back when I used to bang around the official Genesis forums. Either way it may not be true, so if someone could confirm one way or the other that would be cool.
Also, on a completely unrelated point, I heard Dancing With the Moonlit Knight on the radio today... they cut out the last two minutes or so though
Actually I guess it's not totally unrelated, because I do think it's interesting how today 70s Genesis gets more airplay than 80s Genesis, at least around here
|
KC250 is absolutely right about Hackett being cheesed off with the new direction evident on some of WAW, but I don't think that the ironical piece about Collins is, although I do stand to be corrected. My recollection of interviews with Collins at about the time of ATTWT and Duke was he fumed about Genesis being lumped together with so called dinosaur bands like ELP, Yes., and Floyd because he felt that Genesis were very different in that they were continually trying to redefine themselves and not staying stuck in one perceived place of music. He also, in the same interview I recall, defended the shorter pieces, saying that you did not have to make a piece of music lasting over 10 minutes for it to say something or be good. If anything, I recall interviews with Banks admitting that the second side of Genesis represented the worst music the band ever made and they had taken that direction way too far.
|
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
|
|
KingCrimson250
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 29 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 573
|
Posted: June 21 2009 at 11:41 |
IIRC band politics had a fair bit to do with it as well. After Peter left, Tony became more or less the major creative force. At around the time of WAW the band was split because Tony and Mike, having tasted the success of ToTT, were very much interested in turning their music in a more commercial direction, while Phil and Steve were pretty adamant about staying the course. This pokes through a bit on WAW (Your Own Special Way...), but of course Steve wasn't very happy with the band and decided to quit, meaning that Tony and Mike now outnumbered Phil, and the more commercial avenue was set. Ironically enough, Phil was, of course, the one who would end up profiting the most from this new direction, but apparently he wasn't a fan originally. I'm trying to remember if that's something I saw in an interview or if it's just a piece of knowledge I picked up back when I used to bang around the official Genesis forums. Either way it may not be true, so if someone could confirm one way or the other that would be cool. Also, on a completely unrelated point, I heard Dancing With the Moonlit Knight on the radio today... they cut out the last two minutes or so though Actually I guess it's not totally unrelated, because I do think it's interesting how today 70s Genesis gets more airplay than 80s Genesis, at least around here
|
|
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
|
Posted: June 21 2009 at 06:52 |
Cristi wrote:
BaldFriede wrote:
I am a bit surprised that there have been so many posts in this, but no-one mentions the situation the band was in when they changed their sound. Genesis were not only bankrupt, they were left with a big minus on their bank account from tours that turned out to be too expensive, and there was the next contractual album looming above them. What would YOU have done in that situation? |
wow, I've never heard of that. it's well known that that they did not make a lot of money during their progressive era, but still never thought of them as being bankrupt. |
They didn't break even until 'A Trick of the Tail' By the the time the Lamb came out they were in debt to Charisma to the tune of about £500,000, so I've read. But Trick, WAW, Seconds Out, ATTWT, and Duke were all big selling albums. They officially hit the BIG time with Duke, scoring bit hits both sides of the Atlantic.
I was not aware of them being 'bankrupt' as such. If they were 'bankrupt' their debts would have been written off under UK law. I think.
|
|
akamaisondufromage
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: May 16 2009
Location: Blighty
Status: Offline
Points: 6797
|
Posted: June 20 2009 at 16:05 |
Cristi wrote:
BaldFriede wrote:
I am a bit surprised that there have been so many posts in this, but no-one mentions the situation the band was in when they changed their sound. Genesis were not only bankrupt, they were left with a big minus on their bank account from tours that turned out to be too expensive, and there was the next contractual album looming above them. What would YOU have done in that situation?
|
wow, I've never heard of that. it's well known that that they did not make a lot of money during their progressive era, but still never thought of them as being bankrupt. |
Just morally bancrupt.
|
Help me I'm falling!
|
|
Cristi
Special Collaborator
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams
Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Online
Points: 43723
|
Posted: June 20 2009 at 15:35 |
BaldFriede wrote:
I am a bit surprised that there have been so many posts in this, but no-one mentions the situation the band was in when they changed their sound. Genesis were not only bankrupt, they were left with a big minus on their bank account from tours that turned out to be too expensive, and there was the next contractual album looming above them. What would YOU have done in that situation?
|
wow, I've never heard of that. it's well known that that they did not make a lot of money during their progressive era, but still never thought of them as being bankrupt.
|
|
BaldFriede
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10261
|
Posted: June 20 2009 at 04:36 |
I am a bit surprised that there have been so many posts in this, but no-one mentions the situation the band was in when they changed their sound. Genesis were not only bankrupt, they were left with a big minus on their bank account from tours that turned out to be too expensive, and there was the next contractual album looming above them. What would YOU have done in that situation?
|
BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
|
|
kirklott
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 01 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 623
|
Posted: June 19 2009 at 20:15 |
Totally agree. Most ungrateful b*stards in rock music.
And it was Phil's attitude and multiple nasty comments toward 70s fans, in particular, that made me vow to not give them another nickle after the Duke album.
I don't mean to hit below the belt, but the well-known problems in Phil's personal life are indicative of his problems in relations with other human beings, fans included. He owes some ammends.
|
"Progressive rock is the key to the continuance of human evolution." - Charles Darwin
|
|
jammun
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
|
Posted: June 18 2009 at 23:17 |
Huh? If a band is bad to its fans, there won't be any for too much longer.
|
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
|
|
A Person
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 10 2008
Location: __
Status: Offline
Points: 65760
|
Posted: June 18 2009 at 23:05 |
I don't blame Genesis for their later music not pleasing me as much as their Gabriel era music. Pink Floyd went on without Barrett and Waters, and their style changed. If you don't like the music they make then don't buy it, I personally haven't got A Momentary Lapse of Reason because of the bad reviews/me not liking The Division Bell all that much. Genesis changed after Gabriel left and like someone has said earlier in this thread, maybe they could have got a new singer, but they didn't. There isn't anything you can do about their personal decisions, the most you can do is listen to the music. If you like it, then you buy it, if you don't, then you won't.
|
|
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
|
Posted: June 18 2009 at 10:19 |
They weren't bad to me. They've brought me much happiness over the years. There are numerous reasons why I can easily forgive them for Invisible Touch, and We Cant Dance. They are listed as follows..
Trespass
Nursery Cryme
Foxtrot
Genesis Live
Selling England by the Pound
The Lamb Lies down on Broadway
A Trick of the Tail
Wind & Wuthering
Seconds Out
..and then there were three
Duke
...you get the idea..
|
|
St.Cleve Chronicle
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 02 2008
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 1131
|
Posted: June 18 2009 at 10:06 |
Genesis weren't bad to their fans. Their old fans just didn't like their new stuff.
|
|
tamijo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 06 2009
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 4287
|
Posted: June 18 2009 at 07:31 |
The problem is not that they change, change can be wonderfull,but will allways be sad to c a strong artist, forgetting about his art and only go for the money.
|
Prog is whatevey you want it to be. So dont diss other peoples prog, and they wont diss yours
|
|
Cristi
Special Collaborator
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams
Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Online
Points: 43723
|
Posted: June 17 2009 at 19:45 |
I dunno if they were bad to their fans, they gave up on prog rock too easily and rather unexplainable (if i may say so) under the simple excuse that they were tired and bored to play prog rock - or so say Mike Rutherford and Phil Collins in their reissue interview concerning the Abacab album. They say they chose to play more "straightforward" music. But wasn't Duke pretty straightforward already?!
Anyway, I think the success of Collins' debut album changed things a lot. And they risked a lot going mainstream pop-rock, but fortunately for them, their music appealed to a new audience, the 80s MTV audience, they made videos. They fitted in nicely, no other ex-prog-rock band from the 70s had their success (Yes' 90125 did but that was it). They were lucky if you ask me. Collins recalls in that interview how they were booed in holland in 81 when they played songs from the Abacab album. Rutherford simply said something like - it was our album , we do whatever we want. Banks and Collins explained that Who Dunnit was meant as a joke - well apparently nobody got that one, i didn't get it. Tony metioned that You Might Recall was supposed to be on the Abacab album but they used Who Dunnit instead, choosing "the ugly instead of the beautiful". Submarine was a B side on one of the singles. I find this song amazing, why didn't it make it on the record??
Their 80s albums and tours were successful, so giving up on their prog-rock audience did not matter much anymore I guess. I like some of their pop stuff but several songs are just unbearable - Who Dunnit, Paperlate, No Reply at All, most of the Invisible Touch album - except for Domino, Tonight Tonight tonight and Land of Confusion - , I Can't Dance, Jesus He Knows Me (I grew tired of it) and illegal Alien (pretty offenssive song, i agree).
Edited by Cristi - June 17 2009 at 19:48
|
|
catfood03
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 24 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 785
|
Posted: June 06 2009 at 13:23 |
As someone who discovered Genesis through their MTV videos as a child I must say, I love 80's Genesis! In fact, as I grew older and started to investigate their 70's works I was quite dismayed by what I heard. I didn't like it much at all. That's all changed now and I love both decades for the band quite equally.
Now I might have a different opinion if I had discovered the band at their inception (impossible, because I wasn't born yet), but because I discovered the band at their "weakest" stage (as this site seems to proclaim as gospel) and established a connection to that music I have a nostalgic attachment for those songs.
|
|
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: June 06 2009 at 08:49 |
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|
Petrovsk Mizinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
|
Posted: June 06 2009 at 01:23 |
Genesis were bad to it's fans. They ran them over with a truck and the fan blades bent and the fans stopped working
|
|
|
mark-prog74
Forum Newbie
Joined: June 05 2009
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 22
|
Posted: June 06 2009 at 00:50 |
Music is an art form. and an entertainment..the soundscape or soundtrack to lives at best. I love my music and appreciate those who have contributed to my life's soundtrack, entertained me and offered me their art. Genesis through all the changes have done just that. Do I have a favourite era? Not really my most treasured Genesis albums cross eras - Foxtrot to Wind & Wuthering. If they had never developed, never embraced their own inate changing art, every album would sound the same. For me I believe the worst theing an artist can do is to abandon art and pander to an audience. Genesis didn't do that they developed and became more vitally connected to the times in which they lived. If Genesis really had abandoned the true nature of 'progressive' music they would have gotten on the hamster-wheel of repetition and tried to re-write Foxtrot over and over again...in othe r words pandering to the fans. There are truly sublime moments on later Genesis albums just as there are on the early ones.
|
'I Know What I Like' and it's good music, well written and delivered with passion!!
|
|
Cheesecakemouse
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 1751
|
Posted: May 12 2009 at 21:37 |
moshkito wrote:
Cheesecakemouse wrote:
This is an issue i'd like to address. Fans get irate about the change in direction Genesis took in the 80s, Collins Banks and Rutherford counter argue that bands change.
This retort may appear a reasonable statement by itself, but they managed it in an unreasonable way; |
You gotta love it ... so because some fans got irate ... the artists stink? Ohhh, so Beethoven never changed? Mozart? Sibelius? Lizst?
What bothers me here is this ... what gives a fan, the right to tell me what to compose for his/her pleasure? If you don't like Picasso ... too bad ... go get a picture of an onion for your kitchen! Or a Playboy fold out for your bathroom ... this way at least these artists are of some personal use to you ... regardless of what that is, hey?
I see this behaviour as arrogant. |
I'm really sorry ... but this is far more arrogant than the artist himself/herself.
IF ... and that is a big IF ... you feel that any music, or art, is there to kiss you and nothing else ... then I am not sure that you will "EVER" appreciate any artists for what they do or did ... because you want something that they are not capable of doing, or have no desire to do ...
You know what bugs me on this? .... it is posted on a "progressive" board ... where the discussion is about the open minded-ness that helps create new musics, new experiences ... and this is like saying ... you can't do that!
There was in the one "Behind the Music" about Metallica ... and someone asked them ... "you sold out" ... and the reply was ... yeah! every night!.
One more thing ... if you have such a strong opinion about an art form and artists involved, why are you not creating your own, instead of expecting others to do it for you? |
umm.. ... I am, I'm studying music at university. I find the rest of your post amusing and feel no need to justify myself to you.
Edited by Cheesecakemouse - May 12 2009 at 21:38
|
|
|
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: May 12 2009 at 08:22 |
You know, I had another thought "were bad to its fans"? Are they being nice to us now or something?
Edited by Slartibartfast - June 06 2009 at 08:50
|
|