![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
paganinio ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: November 07 2008 Status: Offline Points: 1327 |
![]() Posted: September 18 2010 at 22:39 |
POPULAR ARTISTS (TOP 40, LAST 24H): Led Zeppelin, Iron Maiden. I also saw Black Sabbath and Talking Heads there before. What's wrong with these artists? They're in Prog-Related. In my opinion these artists should not display in the Popular Artists Top 40 section. |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Marty McFly ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2009 Location: Czech Republic Status: Offline Points: 3968 |
![]() |
I think it's because this top 40 list takes entries from simply what's popular, while for example Top 100-250 charts shows you only certain genres (all genres except Proto / Prog-related). Except you use something like this: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=65760&PN=1 |
|
There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless,"
-Andyman1125 on Lulu ![]() Even my |
|
![]() |
|
Easy Livin ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
![]() |
I wouldn't think it would be difficult for M@x to exclude them (and proto prog?) if the popular view is that is what's needed.
|
|
![]() |
|
tuxon ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September 21 2004 Location: plugged-in Status: Offline Points: 5502 |
![]() |
Why exclude something. the most popular artist list is likely derived from the number of visits on a certain day, most likely when a band get's somehow in the news it will get more hits.
It's a nice way to see what artist have something going. bigger progartists are always in the list, sometimes a lesser known artist get in the list, so probably than there's something going on with the artist, maybe a new released album frosaid artist, or a drummer decides to leave (in case of DT that will not show in the list as they are already on the list normally anyway). so this is normal for such list and even very much what people like me want from such lists, an idea what's going on in a short look at the list. never heard of BunChakeze, probably newly added and gathering some interest.
|
|
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
|
![]() |
|
Marty McFly ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2009 Location: Czech Republic Status: Offline Points: 3968 |
![]() |
^ But Bob, why to exclude them at all ? After all they had to go through (getting here Prog-related band is far more difficult than "normal" Prog), after all rejections and obstacles, these two genres will be persecuted even more. I know that they're not full Prog, we all are aware of it, but they're here on ProgArchives, so if they're popular, why to exclude them ? It's not Top40 Prog only artists, but it's Popular artists, ProgArchives artists, so including Talking Heads and anything that's popular here. And charts, not just excluding by default setting, but virtually preventing people from searching for Proto-Prog and Prog-related artists. Why ? If people will rate "A Night at Opera", it's their decision, so it means that people think a lot about this album, so why not to see it in charts ? But it's another debate of course. |
|
There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless,"
-Andyman1125 on Lulu ![]() Even my |
|
![]() |
|
tuxon ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September 21 2004 Location: plugged-in Status: Offline Points: 5502 |
![]() |
click the link and see why there here on this list. Edited by tuxon - September 19 2010 at 09:59 |
|
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
|
![]() |
|
Easy Livin ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
![]() |
I wasn't suggesting we exclude them, just responding to the original post. M@x is always open to feedback, so I was just seeking views.
Looks like 2-1 against any change so far.
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Epignosis ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32553 |
![]() |
They're here. They're popular.
I'm good with that. ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Marty McFly ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2009 Location: Czech Republic Status: Offline Points: 3968 |
![]() |
OK Bob, I didn't understand your post in this light. Being in Crossover Team taught me a lot about Prog-related. At first, I thought that a lot of artists can be placed in Prog-related, but I realized that this isn't true and
I see it differently, in more sober light. It's genre reserved for certain, carefully selected artists. However, as for equality of P-R / P-P genres with other Full Prog genres, I'm all for it. |
|
There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless,"
-Andyman1125 on Lulu ![]() Even my |
|
![]() |
|
Windhawk ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 28 2006 Location: Norway Status: Offline Points: 11401 |
![]() |
Oh my. Someone needs to start checking out the classics :-) |
|
Websites I work with:
http://www.progressor.net http://www.houseofprog.com My profile on Mixcloud: https://www.mixcloud.com/haukevind/ |
|
![]() |
|
paganinio ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: November 07 2008 Status: Offline Points: 1327 |
![]() |
it's not surprising. Gentle Giant are too gentle to be heard of. I don't know what I'm saying either. |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |