Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Pink Floyd Sell
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Pink Floyd Sell
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Progosopher View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 12 2009
Location: Coolwood
Status: Offline
Points: 6467 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Progosopher Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2024 at 12:57
It may be strange to those of us who listen to their music, but the fact that much of it is now 50 years old or older, and that the band members are the same, it comes down to a business rather than an artistic decision. The artistry is beyond question. The success of this band is beyond all earlier expectations. It is a way to leave a financial legacy for family and descendants with a smaller chance for petty bickering. Yes, all this music was made by people with children and grandchildren now. Apparently, this has been in the works for years.
The world of sound is certainly capable of infinite variety and, were our sense developed, of infinite extensions. -- George Santayana, "The Sense of Beauty"
Back to Top
PROGMAN View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 03 2004
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 2664 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote PROGMAN Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2024 at 13:51
Probably more to the 1987 court case than we thought. Beyond the name usage I think.

Is Pink Floyd (1987) music included too?


Edited by PROGMAN - October 06 2024 at 13:53
CYMRU AM BYTH
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17847 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Catcher10 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 07 2024 at 20:51
Originally posted by PROGMAN PROGMAN wrote:

Probably more to the 1987 court case than we thought. Beyond the name usage I think.

Is Pink Floyd (1987) music included too?

Everything I have read is anything the name Pink Floyd made, so not just what RW was involved in. But I suspect that was part of the internal bickering was having to tell Roger he was not getting anything for after The Final Cut.
But who knows....
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.133 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.