![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123> |
Author | |||
ko ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: November 09 2009 Status: Offline Points: 314 |
![]() Posted: January 07 2010 at 18:49 |
||
That really seems extremly nonsense that one of THE first prog musicans, a pretty good composer (he composed "Shine you crazy diamond" in '68 - much before "original" prog superhit!
![]() Edited by ko - January 07 2010 at 19:11 |
|||
![]() |
|||
Epignosis ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32553 |
![]() |
||
Much as I like the Steve Miller Band...um...no.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
ko ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: November 09 2009 Status: Offline Points: 314 |
![]() |
||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Epignosis ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32553 |
![]() |
||
Because the Steve Miller Band is largely a blues rock outfit. Can you name one progressive rock album they've made? The first Youtube sample is kinda progish, but many bands in the 1970s dabbled around with this sort of experimentation. The second Youtube sample is a live version of this. The third Youtube sample...I'm sorry, but that's one of the most ordinary chord progressions in modern music. It's a nice song, but not progressive rock in the least. The fourth Youtube sample is a bit more complex, but still not progressive rock. It could be likened to Uriah Heep a bit, but still- Can you name one album that is progressive rock? |
|||
![]() |
|||
ko ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: November 09 2009 Status: Offline Points: 314 |
![]() |
||
PS Ought to say why you dont accept him, in my opinion. TBH, I think that reason is because he's American. OK, call me crazy but I saw that so many these bs pop bands/artists from East Europe are more welcome here than those great PROG acts from USA (as Mr. Steve Miller as well !). Edited by ko - January 07 2010 at 19:26 |
|||
![]() |
|||
Padraic ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 16 2006 Location: Pennsylvania Status: Offline Points: 31169 |
![]() |
||
Yes, an American whose favorite band is Kansas is clearly biased in this regard. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
jammun ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() Joined: July 14 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3449 |
![]() |
||
I love me some early-Steve Miller Band. Children of the Future is a fantastic, well-conceived album, with a couple of songs that certainly fall into the proto-prog realm. Unfortunately, prog-wise, any album that has a cover version of Key to the Highway probably is not going to gain admission here. Sailor is also a good album. But what's the high point? Living in the U.S.A., which is pure blues-rock if I've ever heard it.
Me? I have a tendency to confuse really good, atmospheric rock albums that contain some prog elements with actual prog albums. Happens all the time. See my Richard Thompson suggestion from a couple of days ago.
|
|||
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Chris S ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 09 2004 Location: Front Range Status: Offline Points: 7028 |
![]() |
||
|
|||
...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR] |
|||
![]() |
|||
Easy Money ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 11 2007 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 10680 |
![]() |
||
I think a lot of people would be surprised at how proggy a lot of early Steve Miller is, but if you look at bands from that time and place, I think they are beat out by Quicksilver Messenger Service.
Although QMS is known for being a blues-rock jam band, they also have some great proto-prog multi-sectional Medevial sounding tracks. They also, from what I understand, made an important tour of the UK early on that had a big impact on the early UK psyche proto-prog scene. |
|||
![]() |
|||
ko ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: November 09 2009 Status: Offline Points: 314 |
![]() |
||
I own an old book printed in 1976/1977, The Ilustrated New Musical Express Encyclopedia of Rock, (Salamander Books Ltd, London), where Nick Logan and Bob Woffingen wrote about early SMB as very important one of early progressive rock bands. It seems that general view about "what's prog" have to have drastically changes from that time.
i.e. The Who is one of my fav bands. I own everything officialy issued by them (including solo albums; I'v been on the gigs so many times) and it results that I'v been really suprised when I saw The Who here! TBH, I don't care, on the contrary I'm happy because I'm "diehard" fan but objectively speaking - this is a funny thing! As you said -The Who is proto prog, because of "they made prog possible". Ok, I suposed that many people are thinking on that way, so I'm not against that. But if we're following to this, how it could be even possible that Steve Miller Band with late 60's albums like Children of Future and Sailor is not deserved that proto prog status but The Who with their music from the same year is deserved to become proto prog ? Tommy as original 1969 album, as the rock opera with lack of electric guitar maybe qualified them for proto prog. But if you're listening to their live records(i.e. Woodstock perfomance, Live at Leeds or London Coliseum) from the time when Tommy went to the shops, it should be proto metal not proto prog.
(Btw, I think that Who Are You is THE album which could be "prog related" /if you loved to put them here/ because one prog musician -Rod Argent plays alot of synths on it and because of that kind of production.)
PS Above mentioned things are not my effort to argue with you guys! I'v telling you about my point of view honestly - nothing else!
Edited by ko - January 08 2010 at 03:18 |
|||
![]() |
|||
ko ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: November 09 2009 Status: Offline Points: 314 |
![]() |
||
When I said "because he's American" I wasn't thinking politicaly. I think that American prog is disregarded because American prog is to compare with that British prog rock movement of late 60s/early70's - what was great and unique - but couldnt be pattern for the bands/artists who did do progressive music in States. That's something wrong and even impossible in my opinion. So you have huge mess here. (i.e. many of those silly questions like: " what Frank Zappa have in common with prog bands as Genesis, Yes, King Crimson, ELP and Jethro Tull ?")
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Logan ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 37424 |
![]() |
||
For anyone to discount the impact of American musicians/ bands on progressive rock/music would be sheer ignorance. Particularly look to the US Psyche scene and Fusion. And the US continues to produce so much fantastic progressive music. Not to mention rock and roll/ rock, and jazz specific....
I'm not that familiar with the Steve Miller Band, but what I've heard of the 60's recording are really good and so, without being knowledgeable enough yet to fully endorse it, I would think Proto-Prog or Prog-Related. I'm not much of one for what is sometimes called Pomp Rock and AOR albums (that have a relation to Prog), which doesn't mean I don't support them in the archives because that would extreme narcissism to think that what I like is what is PA-worthy, though, of course I'm more enthusiastic about ones I like. I do like what I've heard of Steve Miller Band. Personally, I think there's too much of a bias against those who did blues-rock (blues-rock being a very Amercian form of music). Zappa is one of the most respected musicians in the archives (as well as people such as Miles Davis and Herbie Hancock). Anyway, most of that is pretty unnecessary. This is a great track: |
|||
![]() |
|||
jammun ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() Joined: July 14 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3449 |
![]() |
||
For me, I don't deny the progressive aspects of early Steve Miller. My point of view is that Children of the Future is the finest of the 'San Francisco' bands debut albums (poor old Moby Grape a distant second). Obviously In My First Mind fits the bill. From that album, so do many other tracks, notably Baby's Calling Me Home, with its harpsichord and jazzy changes. From Sailor, again a number of progressive tracks. But I thought the rule here is there has to be a progressive album? And any album that ends with what is essentially a blues medley of Junior Saw It Happen, Fanny Mae, and Key to the Highway doesn't fit the bill. I'm just saying, if we are going to be consistent then Steve Miller Band probably shouldn't be included. If they are to be included based on a few songs, then I've just seen a great Dire Straits video (see Police vs. Dire Straits thread over in that other forum) that seals the deal for DS. Edited by jammun - January 09 2010 at 14:30 |
|||
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Logan ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 37424 |
![]() |
||
A progressive album -- depends what you mean by that. I don't know that the first album is that progressive (as in innovative) because I suspect that Steve Miller Band was jumping on the Psyche bandwagon; however, it has a fusion of genres which is a very important trait of Progressive Rock. I certainly don't expect a Prog album from one in Proto-Prog or Prog-Related (though it has happened -- and of course it partially depends on what one thinks is Progressive Rock or progressive music). If you look at the Proto-Prog definition then I think that the debut and to a lesser extent the follow-up fits Proto-Prog quite well stylistically (there are other considerations to take into account). Music off other albums have Prog-Related merits. I don't think in terms of consistency that much, I approach each suggestion quite independently (there is of course the if so-and-so is here then so-and-so should be here too argument which is valid when enough comparisons can be drawn, but I avoid the, if so-and-so isn't in then so-and-so shouldn't be in arguments). I don't know Dire Straits that well, but it doesn't have any Proto-Prog merits. I'm of a much more inclusive mind-set when it comes to acts that have albums considerable for Proto-Prog than ones that only have albums considerable for Prog-Related. Not only do I not think that an act should have a full-blown "progressive" album to be includable in either Proto-Prog or Prog-Related, if that's the case, I think it's better highlighted ina Prog category for the album though I would like an album-based category for specific albums inclusion rather than bands/artists, but I don't see why ending with a blues track would make any difference -- a hallmark of progressive rock is variety. I'm sure no one would complain with a band being in Prog of an album if the last piece was pure classical (to use the term loosely). Like I said, I don't know Steve Miller Band well enough to offer full-support but see how well you think the early albums fit Proto-Prog (at least from a sound perspective and not influence or importance):
|
|||
![]() |
|||
jammun ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() Joined: July 14 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3449 |
![]() |
||
^^
Fair enough. If Proto- doesn't require the full album to be 'progressive', I'd have no problem with Steve Miller Band being here in Proto- on the basis of their first two albums, regardless of anything said previously.
|
|||
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon. |
|||
![]() |
|||
snobb ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: August 20 2009 Location: Vilnius,LT,EU Status: Offline Points: 3584 |
![]() |
||
I haven't listen all SMB albums, but their middle-late period is kind of blues-rock, pop-rock and pure pop for me. Minimum progressive feel. For sure, I can't decide on this basis only.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Logan ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 37424 |
![]() |
||
From what I've heard, I expect that those first two albums should be the crux.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Slartibartfast ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam Joined: April 29 2006 Location: Atlantais Status: Offline Points: 29630 |
![]() |
||
Only when I can fly like an eagle.
![]() |
|||
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
The Doctor ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 23 2005 Location: The Tardis Status: Offline Points: 8543 |
![]() |
||
Just say "abra-abra-cadabra"
|
|||
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
|
|||
![]() |
|||
ko ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: November 09 2009 Status: Offline Points: 314 |
![]() |
||
![]() Edited by ko - January 11 2010 at 05:28 |
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |