What is the average album rating? |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | ||||||||||||||
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Philly Status: Offline Points: 15784 |
Topic: What is the average album rating? Posted: June 30 2008 at 22:25 |
|||||||||||||
What's the average rating for an album on the site? Is the data for this available?
|
||||||||||||||
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
||||||||||||||
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
Posted: July 01 2008 at 03:49 | |||||||||||||
Could you clarify, are you asking how it is caculated?
|
||||||||||||||
Abstrakt
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 18 2005 Location: Soundgarden Status: Offline Points: 18292 |
Posted: July 01 2008 at 13:51 | |||||||||||||
I think he's wondering what rating the average PA album has. (Or what the average rating of an album on PA is)
Edited by Abstrakt - July 01 2008 at 13:54 |
||||||||||||||
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Philly Status: Offline Points: 15784 |
Posted: July 02 2008 at 08:30 | |||||||||||||
^Exactly. If we took every album and averaged their ratings together, what would we have.
|
||||||||||||||
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
||||||||||||||
Passionist
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 14 2005 Location: Finland Status: Offline Points: 1119 |
Posted: July 02 2008 at 08:50 | |||||||||||||
I think 3 would be a fair guess I'll put 5€ on it! |
||||||||||||||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Posted: July 02 2008 at 09:08 | |||||||||||||
There are two averages inthis case:
Iván |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21151 |
Posted: July 02 2008 at 09:30 | |||||||||||||
^ that would be the arithmetical mean ... but M@x also implemented weights for the user status (user/collab) and on top of that there's also the weighted average algorithm
I remember from previous threads that the average was somewhere in the 3.5 area ... Edited by MikeEnRegalia - July 02 2008 at 09:31 |
||||||||||||||
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Philly Status: Offline Points: 15784 |
Posted: July 02 2008 at 11:34 | |||||||||||||
Well Ivan I would hope that I could figure 1. out by myself. |
||||||||||||||
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
||||||||||||||
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Philly Status: Offline Points: 15784 |
Posted: July 02 2008 at 11:34 | |||||||||||||
Specifically I was wondering about the average without the weightings. |
||||||||||||||
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
||||||||||||||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21151 |
Posted: July 02 2008 at 11:38 | |||||||||||||
actually 3/5 is the *typical* rating ... the mathematical average would be 2.5.
|
||||||||||||||
Padraic
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 16 2006 Location: Pennsylvania Status: Offline Points: 31169 |
Posted: July 02 2008 at 11:44 | |||||||||||||
Actually it's 3...the range is between 1 and 5. Think of the average between numbers uniformly distributed between 0 and 4, and then add 1. Or look up the definition of the mean of a uniform distribution. Edited by NaturalScience - July 02 2008 at 11:47 |
||||||||||||||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21151 |
Posted: July 02 2008 at 11:47 | |||||||||||||
^ can't argue with that, mathematically. But I still think of a rating scale from 0 to 5, it's just the the 0 was "outlawed".
|
||||||||||||||
Padraic
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 16 2006 Location: Pennsylvania Status: Offline Points: 31169 |
Posted: July 02 2008 at 11:49 | |||||||||||||
Odd - does it matter what we call the lowest possible rating? |
||||||||||||||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: July 02 2008 at 20:35 | |||||||||||||
Eek!
That's not something you can glean from the site without a lot of hard graft (manually adding up all the individual ratings for each album).
From what I can gather the site actually uses two weighted algorithms:
1) The user/collab weighting algorithm is used to display the average rating for each album based upon weightings for ratings without review, user ratings with review and collab ratings with review. This is the value shown on the album page and in the top-100 charts.
2) The weighted-average algorithm is used to calculate chart position and employs user/collab weighting and weightings for site-average rating per album and site-average-number of ratings per album.
In theory it should be possible to back-calculate the site-average from the weighted-average algorithm, but the result of the algorithm is not displayed as a value. Edited by Dean - July 02 2008 at 20:41 |
||||||||||||||
What?
|
||||||||||||||
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Philly Status: Offline Points: 15784 |
Posted: July 02 2008 at 22:40 | |||||||||||||
^ I figured that would be the case. Thought I'd take a shot though. The numerical rating of an album is rather worthless without it I think.
|
||||||||||||||
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
||||||||||||||
tuxon
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 21 2004 Location: plugged-in Status: Offline Points: 5502 |
Posted: July 02 2008 at 23:53 | |||||||||||||
Give me a second and i'll calculate it.
|
||||||||||||||
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
||||||||||||||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Posted: July 03 2008 at 00:38 | |||||||||||||
Not necesarilly, because some people consider 3 stars a bad rating bellow the average despite the numbers..
Iván
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
rileydog22
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 24 2005 Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Points: 8844 |
Posted: July 03 2008 at 00:53 | |||||||||||||
Beatcha to it. It's 3.1415926535. |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
tuxon
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 21 2004 Location: plugged-in Status: Offline Points: 5502 |
Posted: July 03 2008 at 02:18 | |||||||||||||
I probably missed some albums, but this is pretty much it.
have to ask M@X for more precise nrs.
I would like to calculate the average's by subgenre aswell, but I don't feel like it.
was fun to do btw.
edit: I missed the various artist albums, so that's 275 albums I didn't use, only makes up for some 2% so shouldn't skew the averages too much. Edited by tuxon - July 03 2008 at 02:26 |
||||||||||||||
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
||||||||||||||
Queen By-Tor
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 13 2006 Location: Xanadu Status: Offline Points: 16111 |
Posted: July 03 2008 at 02:19 | |||||||||||||
Mike wins the prize! Edited by King By-Tor - July 03 2008 at 02:20 |
||||||||||||||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |