Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Aerosol Grey
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 05 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 109
|
Posted: February 11 2005 at 09:33 |
Script For A Jester's Tear wasn't even the best album of the year it was released.
And while I'll agree Marillion and IQ have their feet too steeped in
the past glory of prog, Dream Theater have taken their taken that
familiar template and run a completely different way with it.
They're one of the most fully realized prog bands since the 70s.
|
Prog is the new punk, becuase kids who shop at Hot Topic don't know Bill Bruford is God.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
DallasBryan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 23 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3323
|
Posted: February 11 2005 at 12:33 |
I agree -
Marillion - Script for a jester's tear
* Marillion - Fugazi
* Marillion - Misplaced Childhood
* Marillion - Clutching at straws
* IQ - Tales from the lush attic
* IQ - The wake
are good albums, but neo-prog is at least a step
down from the albums that made the poll. Solaris I
could have considered but a little to derivative for my
taste. Marillion and IQ alot too derivative.
Progress is not made by repeating the past. Master
painters for instance Kandinsky, Picasso and
Cezanne made something new they did not repeat
the past, though paint and brush were in common.
Many others tried to duplicate them in years to come
only to fail. Once someone was original enough to
come up with a new approach leaving behind
influences and creating something new then it was
art. Progressive was made IMHO.
This is what separates the men from the boys.
Original thought opposed to wanting to be
somebody else.
Edited by DallasBryan
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: February 11 2005 at 12:52 |
Aerosol Grey wrote:
Script For A Jester's Tear wasn't even the best album of the year it was released.
Oooh yes it was!!!
And while I'll agree Marillion and IQ have their feet too steeped in the past glory of prog, Dream Theater have taken their taken that familiar template and run a completely different way with it.
DT haven't even touched that template - they're working from a different one!
They're one of the most fully realized prog bands since the 70s.
In what way(s), precisely?
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: February 11 2005 at 12:55 |
DallasBryan wrote:
I agree - Marillion - Script for a jester's tear * Marillion - Fugazi * Marillion - Misplaced Childhood * Marillion - Clutching at straws * IQ - Tales from the lush attic * IQ - The wake are good albums, but neo-prog is at least a step down from the albums that made the poll.
Wrong again.
Neo-prog is different. I'm not saying better, because I'm leaving my opinion aside.
Solaris I could have considered but a little to derivative for my taste. Marillion and IQ alot too derivative.
Early IQ was very Genesis-derived, but they had enough of their own touches to make their style innovative.
Marillion can hardly be considered derivative - they were fresh and original on all 4 of the albums you name.
Progress is not made by repeating the past. Master painters for instance Kandinsky, Picasso and Cezanne made something new they did not repeat the past, though paint and brush were in common. Many others tried to duplicate them in years to come only to fail. Once someone was original enough to come up with a new approach leaving behind influences and creating something new then it was art. Progressive was made IMHO.
Yes, and Marillion made something new. So did Twelfth Night and the Enid.
This is what separates the men from the boys. Original thought opposed to wanting to be somebody else. |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Menswear
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 02 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 63
|
Posted: February 11 2005 at 14:05 |
Eeeww....man what kind of inaccessible collection is that?data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81a2a/81a2a4f9a10eb0f6443e683c351d69987fa1d974" alt="Dead"
What about Moving Pictures from Rush? Or Clutching at Straws by Marillion?
This isn't right.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
DallasBryan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 23 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3323
|
Posted: February 11 2005 at 14:10 |
very accessible to the contrary.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
lucas
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 06 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 8138
|
Posted: February 11 2005 at 19:53 |
Sweetnighter wrote:
Permanent Waves - Rush
Discipline - KC
Misplaced Childhood - Marillion
Tangram - Tangerine Dream
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ab76/9ab76fef929d9831029a4e83e44c64e800fd0435" alt=""
+
Los Jaivas : 'Alturas de Macchu Picchu' & 'Obras de Violeta Parra'
Sagrado coraçao da terra : 's/t' & 'Flecha'
Rebekka : 'Phoenix' (the german answer to Renaissance)
Vermilion sand (the japanese answer to Renaissance)
Cai : 'noche abierta'
Gordon Giltrap : 'Peacock party'
Mike Oldfield : QE2
Anthony Phillips : PP&P
Talk Talk : 'Spirit of Eden'
Cardiacs : 'A little man and a house and the whole world window' & 'On land and in the sea'
Kate Bush : everyhting she released at that time
Saga : everything except maybe 'Wildest dreams'
Rush : everything
IQ : the first two albums
It bites : everything
NRG : no reasons given (with kevin Gilbert)
The Enid : 'The spell'
Dixie Dregs : 'Dregs of the earth', 'Unsung heroes', 'Industry standard'
Steve Morse : 'The introduction', 'Stand up', 'High tension wires'
Ambrosia : 'Road island'
Queensryche : everything
Fates Warning : 'Awaken the guardian'
Watchtower : 'Control and resistance'
Metallica : everything released at that time
Voivod : 'Nothingface'
|
"Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: February 12 2005 at 07:41 |
Good list, Lucas!
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: February 12 2005 at 10:03 |
DallasBryan wrote:
thanks for your honesty Certified!
whats your opionion of some of these recordings.
Holger Czukay - On the Way to the Peak of Normal Gandalf - Magic Theater Bernard Xolotl - Last Wave Klaus Schonning - Lorian Arabesque Johannes Schmoelling - Wuivend Reit Airto Moreira - The Other Side of This Michael Shrieve - The Big Picture PROG METALHEADS need not inquire. |
Phew - I had to do a bit of revisiting - these aren't regular visitors to my turntable; or more accurately, cassette deck...
I love Can, so Holger's recordings always appeal to me - and I respect his work deeply as I know he studied under the creator of electronic music; Karlheinz Stockhausen. "On the Way..." is a great album and as experimental in terms of textures as you would expect - but I can't help feeling it's Holger trying to keep his vision of Can alive.
I don't know the Gandalf recording - but I like their debut almost as much as I like the debut by the Swedish band of the same name!
Xolotl, Schonning and Schmoelling don't make exactly prog rock, do they? I mean, if I was going to recommend music from the 1980s to Tangerine Dream fans then those are good choices - Last Wave contains some ethereal electronica; but no prog per se.
Airto Moreira? Give me a break! It's superb World music - I wouldn't say "New Age", as it goes beyond what I think of as New Age - but it would also appeal to people who like that music.
I'd almost put Shrieve's music into the same category, as there are vague similarities in style.
All these recordings share one thing; a mostly constant rhythm track over which textures are interplayed, layered and otherwise manuiplated. The nearest to prog rock is Czukay, but only because of the similarities with his former band.
True prog rock of the 1980s does not lie in these recordings - but they are all worthy of consideration for inclusion on this site, IMO.
True 1980s prog IS the neo-prog of the bands I have mentioned. In my opinion, "Script..." is the greatest of the lot for its stylistic innovations, the accent on strong melody and lyrics with elegant clean-cut lines of counterpoint, emphasis on drama through structure and creating powerful and progressive songs rather than pastiches of sonic texture.
It is actually incredibly easy to do the latter - most people can sit down at a keyboard and find a voice that makes a nice sound. The art of intertwining those sounds is imprecise, and a lot can depend on luck - although I am certainly not putting your suggested recordings down - they are all superb.
However, great and progressive songwriting is a more precise art at which the Beatles were the obvious pinnacle in rock/pop, and Genesis the arguable pinnacle in 1970s prog rock - Pink Floyd an obvious alternative. Listen again (and again, if necessary) to "Script...". It took me a while to get - I think I'm still "getting it" 22 years later. There is much more to it than the deceptively simple surface;
Try this little excercise:
Write a piece of music as "simple" as either "Script...", "Chelsea Monday" or "Forgotten Sons". Ensure you have a high level of narrative and drama running through the lyrics as well as the music. Ensure also that all instruments and vocal melodies preserve a perfect counterpoint to each other without ever getting "busy", colour the lyrics without clouding them, and enjoy a little solo status at appropriate moments in the piece whilst maintaining the drama within - indeed, the prime objective is to heighten the drama, since this is a rock song. The piece must be over 6 minutes long, contain a keyboard solo and a guitar solo - both of which are entirely distinct, hummable and memorable, the lyrics must exist on multiple levels to satisfy intellectual listeners, and the overall style should be uniquely indentifiable as something that you have produced with only nods to other musicians or bands.
Simple!
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
DallasBryan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 23 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3323
|
Posted: February 12 2005 at 12:12 |
I beg to differ
the Marillion, IQ thread(neoprog) you mention, did
nothing but regress from its original form in the mid
to late 70's. On the other hand German bands after
experimenting with electronic noise in the early 70's
found the nitch with the sequencer, synthesizing the
english progressive rock sound and french
progressive jazz sounds into their electronics this is
progressive rock, IMO. Others would agree you dont
have too!
First with Tangerine Dream adding the hard rock
guitar of Pink Floyd to their music. Later other
synthesist adding in the Lard Free element. I dont
believe true progressive rock exists still as a whole. I
find it mergered and moving,from the Mermen -
prog/surf, NIN - prog/industrial, Airto - prog/world,
Michael Brook prog/new age, Bozzio,Levin & Stevens
prog/hard fusion, and so forth. Prog to me is
something intelligent or soul sucking that is
unaccessible as a whole made accessible after its
experimental stage.
Not some refried half wits trying to duplicate
something and add to it. Maybe those guys with
Morte Macambre in Sweden are ready to do
something interesting I have not listened to it yet, but
I would think the Anglagard, Anekdoten(for instance)
guys my be ready to do something interesting, but
they will have to step outside the "neoprog or prog or
mathrock" or whatever element to show me they
have it going on.
Otherwise they just fall into the wannabees category
to my ears!
If it isnt progressing its not progressive and if it has a
majority of rock or fusion elements balanced into it,
its progressive rock, IMO!
By using an overtly English definition you omit half
the world of progressive rock. Bands such as Lard
Free and Cluster(oh no, they are using sequencers
wheres the drummer, no lyrics what!) are omitted
from the Progarchives and have more to do with
progressive rocks evolution than even Gentle Giant
or Van der Graff Generator.
Some mid 70s French bands for instance are
experimental but its in good taste, some late 70s
German bands are more electronic but in good
taste. Frankly alot of the english fusion and english
progressive folk has no real appeal outside the
British isles.
If you want to distill the word progressive rock to
being what happened in england in the early through
mid 70s and those that wish to copycat that style
fine. But the true meaning of "progressive rock" has
more meaning than that!
Edited by DallasBryan
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
greenback
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: August 14 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3300
|
Posted: February 12 2005 at 13:47 |
Cert, if you worship Script like that, then I strongly recommend you Citizen Cain - Serpents in Camouflage! You are going to be impressed, because it really sounds like Script! Maybe you even are going to say that it is a Marillion clone!
|
[HEADPINS - LINE OF FIRE: THE RECORD HAVING THE MOST POWERFUL GUITAR SOUND IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF MUSIC!>
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
greenback
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: August 14 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3300
|
Posted: February 12 2005 at 13:54 |
Actually i think Schmoelling's Wuivend is an excellent album, being quite New Age!
Synergy - Audion is a good exapmle of a New Age rock album!
|
[HEADPINS - LINE OF FIRE: THE RECORD HAVING THE MOST POWERFUL GUITAR SOUND IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF MUSIC!>
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: February 12 2005 at 14:08 |
DallasBryan wrote:
I beg to differ
the Marillion, IQ thread(neoprog) you mention, did nothing but regress from its original form in the mid to late 70's. On the other hand German bands after experimenting with electronic noise in the early 70's found the nitch with the sequencer, synthesizing the english progressive rock sound and french progressive jazz sounds into their electronics this is progressive rock, IMO. Others would agree you dont have too!
How do you mean regress? Maybe we use the word in different ways here.
To my ears, Marillion and Twelfth Night progressed rock music and allowed it to continue evolving in the main stream. There is nothing regressive about their music - if you know different, please explain.
IQ certainly took Genesis ideas in their early albums, but I defy you to tell me where the Genesis ideas are in early Marillion albums.
I can see the German synthesiser bands as a branch of Krautrock, but not English prog rock - how do you justify that? And there is little jazz rock in any of the albums you mentioned, so it's really hard to get where you're coming from.
First with Tangerine Dream adding the hard rock guitar of Pink Floyd to their music. Later other synthesist adding in the Lard Free element. I dont believe true progressive rock exists still as a whole. I find it mergered and moving,from the Mermen - prog/surf, NIN - prog/industrial, Airto - prog/world, Michael Brook prog/new age, Bozzio,Levin & Stevens prog/hard fusion, and so forth. Prog to me is something intelligent or soul sucking that is unaccessible as a whole made accessible after its experimental stage.
You confuse prog, experimental and progressive, methinks. You've left out prog/jazz and prog classical from your arbitrary categories.
From your definition, that I've underlined, Pink Floyd are not prog, neither are Hawkwind, Genesis or King Crimson.
That's if I've understood your definition, which seems somewhat contradictory.
Not some refried half wits trying to duplicate something and add to it. Maybe those guys with Morte Macambre in Sweden are ready to do something interesting I have not listened to it yet, but I would think the Anglagard, Anekdoten(for instance) guys my be ready to do something interesting, but they will have to step outside the "neoprog or prog or mathrock" or whatever element to show me they have it going on.
Otherwise they just fall into the wannabees category to my ears!
If it isnt progressing its not progressive and if it has a majority of rock or fusion elements balanced into it, its progressive rock, IMO!
So Led Zeppelin and Deep Purple are prog by your terms? And so are the Beatles? Miles Davis?
By using an overtly English definition you omit half the world of progressive rock.
On the contrary - it is you who are omitting a large portion of it. I am all for inclusion.
Bands such as Lard Free and Cluster(oh no, they are using sequencers wheres the drummer, no lyrics what!) are omitted from the Progarchives and have more to do with progressive rocks evolution than even Gentle Giant or Van der Graff Generator.
How so? You said true prog doesn't exist anymore...
Some mid 70s French bands for instance are experimental but its in good taste, some late 70s German bands are more electronic but in good taste. Frankly alot of the english fusion and english progressive folk has no real appeal outside the British isles.
If you want to distill the word progressive rock to being what happened in england in the early through mid 70s and those that wish to copycat that style fine.
Personally, I do not. I think that is narrow-minded.
I also note that the bands I mention do NOT copycat the style - please explain exactly how they do that?
But the true meaning of "progressive rock" has more meaning than that!
Amen to that.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14557/145571d301faa2003a114de3880ebeb13c0a2bea" alt=""
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: February 12 2005 at 14:09 |
greenback wrote:
Actually i think Schmoelling's Wuivend is an excellent album, being quite New Age!
Synergy - Audion is a good exapmle of a New Age rock album!
|
Absolutely - New Age, but not true prog - and excellent music - as I said data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7585f/7585f2d4295b9fe66548e6bca9ae2d06cb5e5e62" alt=""
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Reed Lover
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
|
Posted: February 12 2005 at 15:08 |
Aerosol Grey wrote:
Script For A Jester's Tear wasn't even the best album of the year it was released.
And while I'll agree Marillion and IQ have their feet too steeped in the past glory of prog, Dream Theater have taken their taken that familiar template and run a completely different way with it.
They're one of the most fully realized prog bands since the 70s.
|
"Dream Theater have taken their familiar template and run a different way with it."data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2af4/f2af41ed0d779656e05c88340ea752ec0b44de73" alt="Confused"
Yes they've run over to the heavy rock stable and now play stadium rock.
Flamin' ell Jason you were born in 1985 and whilst this doesnt preclude you having an opinion, it does set you at a disadvantage.
When Marillion released Script prog rock was on its last legs.Remember, that this was a debut album-compare it to early Genesis and you will find a much more focussed, complete product.This was evolution-a stepping stone to creating a singular identity and carrying the torch for an embattled genre.Genesis and Yes were directionless, ELP un-focussed and in disarray.Something completely new was not what was called for. We got something familiar but not really derivative, something that would re-ignite our enthusiasm for Prog rock.Marillion achieved this and but for the split with Fish, would continue to be a huge success.
I am a big Rush fan, but at this time and subsequently, they were moving in different directions-creating a hybrid called prog-metal that you seem to want to give Dream Theater the plaudits for. It is very unlikely that Dream theater and their cohorts would have been making this kind of music without Rush. It is Rush that have run in a different direction from the "template" as you call it and managed to be damn successful whilst doing it.The market for Rush and Dream Theater has intersected frequently over the last 10 years, yet it is Rush who consistently outsell them, both with albums sales and concert seats.
Edited by Reed Lover
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
BilboBaggins
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 01 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 108
|
Posted: February 12 2005 at 15:17 |
I feel the need to add an album I certainly rate as one of the best prog albums of the 80's - Once Around the World by It Bites. I mention this becuase I bet no one else will!
|
Thoughtfullness
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
DallasBryan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 23 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3323
|
Posted: February 12 2005 at 15:26 |
Certif1ed wrote:
DallasBryan wrote:
I beg to
differ the Marillion, IQ thread(neoprog) you mention,
did nothing but regress from its original form in the
mid to late 70's. On the other hand German bands
after experimenting with electronic noise in the early
70's found the nitch with the sequencer, synthesizing
the english progressive rock sound and french
progressive jazz sounds into their electronics this is
progressive rock, IMO. Others would agree you dont
have too!
How do you mean regress?
Maybe we use the word in different ways
here.
Not as good as the original mid 70s english
To my ears, Marillion and
Twelfth Night progressed rock music and allowed it
to continue evolving in the main stream. There is
nothing regressive about their music - if you know
different, please explain.
IQ certainly took Genesis
ideas in their early albums, but I defy you to tell me
where the Genesis ideas are in early Marillion
albums.
I can see the German
synthesiser bands as a branch of Krautrock, but not
English prog rock - how do you justify that? And there
is little jazz rock in any of the albums you mentioned,
so it's really hard to get where you're coming
from.
Thats the problem "English prog rock" as opposed
to world wide evolution of progressive rock.
Krautrock had 2 periods early 70s experimental, mid
to late 70s progressive electronic rock. English prog
rock was experimental in the 1967 to 1969ish
period. early Pink Floyd(example being experimental
english progressive rock)
First with Tangerine Dream adding the hard rock
guitar of Pink Floyd to their music. Later other
synthesist adding in the Lard Free element. I dont
believe true progressive rock exists still as a whole. I
find it mergered and moving,from the Mermen -
prog/surf, NIN - prog/industrial, Airto - prog/world,
Michael Brook prog/new age, Bozzio,Levin & Stevens
prog/hard fusion, and so forth. Prog to me is
something intelligent or soul sucking that is
unaccessible as a whole made accessible after its
experimental stage.
You confuse prog,
experimental and progressive, methinks. You've left
out prog/jazz and prog classical from your arbitrary
categories.
yes prog/jazz had its heyday in France in the mid 70s
not Canterbury, IMO and prog/classical had its
heyday in Italy in the early to later 70s.
From your definition, that I've
underlined, Pink Floyd are not prog, neither are
Hawkwind, Genesis or King Crimson.
That's if I've understood your
definition, which seems somewhat
contradictory.
You are misreading me, Hawkwind though has
more of a claim to psychedelic space metal than
progressive rock but I can buy fringe elements.
Not some refried half wits trying to duplicate
something and add to it. Maybe those guys with
Morte Macambre in Sweden are ready to do
something interesting I have not listened to it yet, but
I would think the Anglagard, Anekdoten(for instance)
guys my be ready to do something interesting, but
they will have to step outside the "neoprog or prog or
mathrock" or whatever element to show me they
have it going on. Otherwise they just fall into the
wannabees category to my ears! If it isnt progressing
its not progressive and if it has a majority of rock or
fusion elements balanced into it, its progressive
rock, IMO!
So Led Zeppelin and Deep
Purple are prog by your terms? And so are the
Beatles? Miles Davis?By using an
overtly English definition you omit half the world of
progressive rock.
No, Led Zep, DP though prog tendancies I dont think
so, nor do I think Uriah Heep is prog, but there
album covers seem to sell many as them being
such.
Miles is a long shot and Magical Mystery Tour or Sgt.
Peppers could be considered more than fringe.
Again I am not from England so my viewpoints are
outside of your society. I deem early ELO prog and
some Supertramp for instance. I have not been
trained by your society to call everything AOR that is
not overtly complicated. Soft Machine I dont consider
mainstream prog as much as an off center element.
On the contrary - it is you
who are omitting a large portion of it. I am all for
inclusion.
Bands such as Lard Free and Cluster(oh no, they
are using sequencers wheres the drummer, no
lyrics what!) are omitted from the Progarchives and
have more to do with progressive rocks evolution
than even Gentle Giant or Van der Graff Generator.
How so? You said true prog
doesn't exist anymore...
Those bands existed at their peak about the same
time as GG and VDDG. True prog is very hard to find
now IMO.
Some mid 70s French bands for instance are
experimental but its in good taste, some late 70s
German bands are more electronic but in good
taste. Frankly alot of the english fusion and english
progressive folk has no real appeal outside the
British isles. If you want to distill the word
progressive rock to being what happened in england
in the early through mid 70s and those that wish to
copycat that style fine.
Personally, I do not. I think
that is narrow-minded.
I also note that the bands I
mention do NOT copycat the style - please explain
exactly how they do that?
Repeating the formula and not evolving, of course
progressive electronic rock evolved into world music
and new age and it stinks to but it took a completely
different route if you observe it on those terms. You
could say it evolved into avant experimental
electronica and industrial noise rock.
But the true meaning of "progressive rock" has
more meaning than that!
Amen to
that.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14557/145571d301faa2003a114de3880ebeb13c0a2bea" alt=""
| |
Many of these bands are included in the
PROGARCHIVES, and many more should be!
No harm intended just an explanation of my views.
Edited by DallasBryan
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
lucas
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 06 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 8138
|
Posted: February 12 2005 at 15:27 |
BilboBaggins wrote:
I feel the need to add an album I certainly rate as one of the best prog albums of the 80's - Once Around the World by It Bites. I mention this becuase I bet no one else will!
|
Did you see my previous post :
Los Jaivas : 'Alturas de Macchu Picchu' & 'Obras de Violeta Parra'
Sagrado coraçao da terra : 's/t' & 'Flecha'
Rebekka : 'Phoenix' (the german answer to Renaissance)
Vermilion sand (the japanese answer to Renaissance)
Cai : 'noche abierta'
Gordon Giltrap : 'Peacock party'
Mike Oldfield : QE2
Anthony Phillips : PP&P
Talk Talk : 'Spirit of Eden'
Cardiacs : 'A little man and a house and the whole world window' & 'On land and in the sea'
Kate Bush : everyhting she released at that time
Saga : everything except maybe 'Wildest dreams'
Rush : everything
IQ : the first two albums
It bites : everything
NRG : no reasons given (with kevin Gilbert)
The Enid : 'The spell'
Dixie Dregs : 'Dregs of the earth', 'Unsung heroes', 'Industry standard'
Steve Morse : 'The introduction', 'Stand up', 'High tension wires'
Ambrosia : 'Road island'
Queensryche : everything
Fates Warning : 'Awaken the guardian'
Watchtower : 'Control and resistance'
Metallica : everything released at that time
Voivod : 'Nothingface'
So, you will notice I am also fond of this band.
|
"Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: February 12 2005 at 18:14 |
The problem is, DB, that you don't explain your views.
I asked a whole load of questions, simply to try to find out why you might hold such a strong anti-neo prog view, and you have not done the courteousy of answering any of them.
Maybe you find the "ripping apart" style aggressive - I find it the only way to get to the questions I need to ask and maintain some sense of context. You could read it as aggressive attacking (if you felt so defensive about your indefensible views), or you could read it as plain, simple questions. My language is not aggressive, and neither is my intention.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but to slate the entire neo-prog genre and dismiss the bands as nothing but wannabees deserves some kind of explanation - after all, there are others on this site who like the genre a great deal - aren't you curious as to why that may be - or do you just think they are stupid?
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
DallasBryan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 23 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3323
|
Posted: February 12 2005 at 18:52 |
there in the cage!
i answered your questions in a brief manner. I was
15 when the lamb came out for instance. I grew up in
the middle of the progressive scene in Texas and
California. I played covers of some of these bands in
a rock band at age 17(I could play in the clubs but
couldnt drink, 18 was the limit those days). I was a
roadie for VariLite setting up stage lighting in the
early 80s. I grew up and spent alot of time with many
people in the music industry, sound techs,
managers, promoters. I have met many musicians
and hung out with a few. I dont go into my personal
life very far on line, but I have listened to progressive
rock for the past 30 years. This doesnt make me a
pro, im just an opionion, I am outside the
mainstream. I am only displaying my observations.
I think you guys are missing alot of progressive rock
from the 80s and Germany and France for starters
and focusing on "a sound". The Yes sound , the ELP
sound, the Genesis sound, the KC sound. Chasing
these sounds into a dead end street. Their is an
equal sound its the Lard Free sound, the Samla
Mammas Manna sound, the Cluster sound, the
Gandalf sound, the Mezquita sound, the Horslips
sound, the Klaus Schulze sound, the Ashra sound,
the MIchael Rother sound and on.
All I wanted to do is to direct people towards the
movement of progressive rock across the world and
point towards the albums by these artists that they
would probably find enjoyable(if not a prog
metalhead, which I cant help). And get out of the
groove in the pavement. Some of these artists are
much more interesting than Genesis/Yes/ELP
clones that come up out of US and UK. But you guys
make a demand for that sort of thing, I think in
ignorance.
I know everybody doesnt agree with every album
everyone else likes,but as with Genesis you can be
safe recommending Foxtrot, SEBTP, LLDOB and
TOTT. It is easy to go through a whole catalog by an
artist you do not know before you find the treasures. I
thought it might be helpful to give a little direction and
not have to waste a bundle of money hording up the
best.
I also see many I assume younger forum members
confessing their boredom with neo prog and prog
metal acts. I understand I have listened to them too.
Because I grew up on a better diet, I have a problem
swallowing most of them upon first bite, and grow to
like them less and less the more I hear them,
laughing and mocking them in time! Im not just
trying to do this its an obvious counterfeit, substitute,
whatever for the real spirit and I cant seem to shake
it. Other bands from around the world though I hear
say 20-30% of INFLUENCE its not like the 40-60% at
least I hear of these guys. I have heard hundreds
and hundreds of bands live and the best I can
describe it would be. A cover band playing Genesis
songs(for instance), then introducing some of the
material they wrote, which sounds like wishy washy
Genesis ripoff, maybe throw in a Yes or VDDG riff,
sickening!
I never liked the Starcastles, Triumvirats,
Neuschwansteins because they were just rip offs of
a sound. Though listened to in latter context they
dont seem to show that flaw to some. Me I cant
shake it . Its like comparing Rembrandt with paint by
numbers. Both can look similar but one took an artist
to originate the design, one took a wannabee to walk
along behind in the steps left on the sand.
__________________
I dont stutter and your ears dont flap
Edited by DallasBryan
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |