Print Page | Close Window

best 80s PROG ALBUM

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Polls
Forum Description: Create polls on topics related to progressive music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3568
Printed Date: December 02 2024 at 02:48
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: best 80s PROG ALBUM
Posted By: DallasBryan
Subject: best 80s PROG ALBUM
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 02:02
vote, its your right!



Replies:
Posted By: Emperor
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 02:15

I cannot vote - there's not my favorite one! I mean Peter Gabriel's PASSIONS

I will better create my top-10 of 80s albums:

1) Peter Gabriel PASSIONS (1989)

2) Peter Hammill LOOPS AND REELS (1983)

3) Frank Zappa TINSEL TOWN REBELLION (1981)

4) Dire Straits LOVE OVER GOLD (1982)

5) Peter Gabriel SECURITY (1982)

6) Jethro Tull ROCK ISLAND (1989)

7) Yes DRAMA (1980)

8) King Crimson DISCIPLINE (1981)

9) Rush MOVING PICTURES (1981)

10) King Diamond CONSPIRACY (1989)

 



-------------
I Prophesy Disaster...


Posted By: Aaron
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 02:39

the only album of those i own is 90125, and for obvious reasons i dont listen to it very often

any of those worth looking into, mind you i dont like the 80s sound, present in bands like Marillion

Aaron



Posted By: Cluster One
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 03:10
Holy crap! No RUSH?!?!?!

-------------
Marmalade...I like marmalade.


Posted By: chorus of one
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 03:17

Well no KC's Discipline, but at least you got...Holger Czukay?  Guess I don't know my 80s prog.



Posted By: video vertigo
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 03:32
None of my fav. 80s prog and 80s is my favorite decade for prog music... interesting

-------------
"The rock and roll business is pretty absurd, but the world of serious music is much worse." - Zappa


Posted By: Valarius
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 03:39
I voted Yes: 90125, but my real favourite from the 80's is, you've guessed it... "Dream Theater: When Dream and Day Unite".


Posted By: The Hemulen
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 07:13
None. The birth of the Ozrics is far more important to me - They created an entirely new form of music.


Posted By: Syzygy
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 07:19
Not much on there I'd call essential, but Holger Czukay is one of the all time greats. 

-------------
'Like so many of you
I've got my doubts about how much to contribute
to the already rich among us...'

Robert Wyatt, Gloria Gloom




Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 07:21

Out of that obscure selection I would probably go for PG3, but this is my top albums from the 80's..

Moving Pictures - Rush

Duke - Genesis

Fugazi - Marillion

Levitation - Hawkwind

Script for a jesters tear - Marillion

Once around the world - It Bites

Tales from the Lush attic - IQ

 



-------------
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!


Posted By: Fragile
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 07:28

Like Blacksword only one there I would vote for is PG3; you missed out Script,Fugazi and Misplaced Childhood,Sacrilege Dallas



Posted By: John Gargo
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 07:32
Moving Pictures - Rush is what I would vote for...   King Crimson's Discipline comes second, and then everything else at a distant third.


Posted By: Lunarscape
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 07:57
Levitation is my 80ies choice  but I voted Synergy....

-------------
Music Is The Soul Bird That Flies In The Immense Heart Of The Listener . . .


Posted By: slipperman
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 08:08

1) Rush - Moving Pictures

2) King Crimson - Discipline

and yeah, Peter Gabriel - 3



-------------
...it is real...it is Rael...


Posted By: Cesar Inca
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 08:11

 

Art of Noise and Moreira are here...

BUT WHERE ARE MARILLION, IQ, TWELFTH NIGHT, UNIVERS ZERO, RUSH, KING CRIMSON, ART ZOYD,...?

 

I won't compromise as I did in the very incomplete French prog poll... I'm not voting in here... or will I? Well, I'll vote for TANGERINE DREAM'S "Hyperborea".



Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 08:14

SCRIPT FOR A JESTER'S TEAR

THE BEST album since 1975.

 



Posted By: DallasBryan
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 10:45
its like a 40 car pile up here, prog went this way and
you guys went that away. Marillion, Dream Theatre,
IQ its ALL CRAP!!! Living in the past, wishing to
duplicate a time period. Folks this is where
progressive rock went, the Germans synthesized it.
The early 70s will never be repeated, move on and
dont miss what remained of progressive rock in the
80's. After that the record companies pretty music
snuffed it out.

If you havent heard these recordings you dont have
an opionion. I have heard the bands you guys are
whining about and they arent too exciting.

If Pendragon, Ayreon, Porcupine Tree, Dream
Theatre, Anglagard are so great why are they not
filling up stadiums like the bands before them did.
They arent on radio, because the old bands are
better, on and on and on. Do yourself a favor try this
stuff, if Im wrong big deal, if Im right you found more
essential music.

Happy Trailz


Posted By: Sweetnighter
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 10:57
Permanent Waves - Rush

Discipline - KC

Misplaced Childhood - Marillion

Tangram - Tangerine Dream


-------------
I bleed coffee. When I don't drink coffee, my veins run dry, and I shrivel up and die.
"Banco Del Mutuo Soccorso? Is that like the bank of Italian soccer death or something?" -my girlfriend


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 11:39
My best 80s prog album is: SOLARIS: MARSBELI KRONIKAK - amazing piece of prog.


Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 11:49

IQ- Tales From The Lush Attic/The Wake

Marillion - Misplaced Childhood/Seasons End

Rush - Moving pictures/Power Windows/Hold Your Fire

Tangerine Dream - Tangram/Exit/Underwater Sunlight

Vangelis - See You Later

Propaganda - A Secret Wish

Iron Maiden - Powerslave

Eloy -Time To Turn/Planets

Stephen Caudel - Wine Dark Sea

 

 



Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 12:40

SCRIPT FOR A JESTER'S TEAR

THE BEST album since 1975. 



-------------
Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally


Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 12:41
Originally posted by Velvetclown Velvetclown wrote:

SCRIPT FOR A JESTER'S TEAR

 

I concur!Big smile



-------------





Posted By: greenback
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 13:02
where are pallas - the sentinel and pendragon - jewel??

-------------
[HEADPINS - LINE OF FIRE: THE RECORD HAVING THE MOST POWERFUL GUITAR SOUND IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF MUSIC!>


Posted By: DallasBryan
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 13:06
sticking with the best, no Anti-prog!


Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 13:35

Originally posted by DallasBryan DallasBryan wrote:

its like a 40 car pile up here, prog went this way and
you guys went that away. Marillion, Dream Theatre,
IQ its ALL CRAP!!!

You are so wrong it's almost funny.

Talk about completely missing the point...

Living in the past, wishing to
duplicate a time period.

Ah - I see!

That's what you're doing.

 

Folks this is where
progressive rock went, the Germans synthesized it.
The early 70s will never be repeated, move on and
dont miss what remained of progressive rock in the
80's. After that the record companies pretty music
snuffed it out.

No - this is where it went; Bands like Marillion, IQ, Twelfth Night etc took the basics from the old school of prog, then revitalised the entire genre, stirring up new interest in the old bands and kept prog alive, new and fresh.

You also forget about the Enid - the magnificent band that straddles the two "eras".

Of course the early 70s will never be repeated - that is why the music grew and evolved into something different - still prog, but the new generation.

Record companies will never kill it.

If you havent heard these recordings you dont have
an opionion. I have heard the bands you guys are
whining about and they arent too exciting.

Heard is different to listened. They are very exciting - but you haven't cultivated the ears, to use a recording studio phrase.

I've heard most of the recordings you mention, and with the exception of 90125, they're very good - but make me wonder if you mean true prog in the original spirit, or the more avant-garde?

If Pendragon, Ayreon, Porcupine Tree, Dream
Theatre, Anglagard are so great why are they not
filling up stadiums like the bands before them did.

Times change. Audience demands change.

Nowadays Robbie Williams fills stadiums.


They arent on radio, because the old bands are
better, on and on and on.

That is not true - if it were, how come so many new bands like the rappers and boy bands get played?

And how come Marillion still hit the charts?

 Do yourself a favor try this
stuff, if Im wrong big deal, if Im right you found more
essential music.

Yes it's worth trying, and it's good - but it's only more essential if you prefer that style.


Happy Trailz

Quicksilver Messenger Service ain't prog either



Posted By: DallasBryan
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 14:29
thanks for your honesty Certified!

whats your opionion of some of these recordings.

Holger Czukay - On the Way to the Peak of Normal     
Gandalf - Magic Theater     
Bernard Xolotl - Last Wave     
Klaus Schonning - Lorian Arabesque     
Johannes Schmoelling - Wuivend Reit     
Airto Moreira - The Other Side of This     
Michael Shrieve - The Big Picture

PROG METALHEADS need not inquire.     


Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 14:32
Cert you should stick to yer Sheep 

-------------
Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally


Posted By: Prog_Bassist
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 15:04
well I can't believe you havent included some of the most important ones.

You left out tons.

But out of those, I picked pete.

-------------
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhuxaD8NzaY" rel="nofollow - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhuxaD8NzaY


Posted By: Fishy
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 16:04

my fav's from the 80's :

- Peter Gabriel - security (not really prog but marvellous anyway)

- iQ - The Wake (I used to be amazed by this one)

- Twelfth Night - Fact and fiction or collector's item (underrated album)

- yes 90125 (the one you did mention)

- Rush - Grace under pressure (hard to choose from all their greatest albums they released in the 80's)

- Tears for fears - sowing the seeds (it's not really prog but a nice combination of pop, prog and psychedelic) 

- Marillion - Script (the Nursery Cryme of the eighties)

- Peter Hammill - Patience (Hammill was still in top form during this era)

- The Chursh - starfish (not prog at all but great anyway - i discovered this in the 90's)

- Pallas - sentinel (It used to be a great album then - maybe because of the lack of other prog)

- Simple Minds - street fighting years (their only album which contains some prog sounds)

- Propaganda - a secret wish (the most original - mixture of pop, wave, electro and prog)

and...that's about all folks



Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 16:19
Originally posted by Fishy Fishy wrote:

my fav's from the 80's :

- Peter Gabriel - security (not really prog but marvellous anyway)

- iQ - The Wake (I used to be amazed by this one)

- Twelfth Night - Fact and fiction or collector's item (underrated album)

- yes 90125 (the one you did mention)

- Rush - Grace under pressure (hard to choose from all their greatest albums they released in the 80's)

- Tears for fears - sowing the seeds (it's not really prog but a nice combination of pop, prog and psychedelic) 

- Marillion - Script (the Nursery Cryme of the eighties)

- Peter Hammill - Patience (Hammill was still in top form during this era)

- The Chursh - starfish (not prog at all but great anyway - i discovered this in the 90's)

- Pallas - sentinel (It used to be a great album then - maybe because of the lack of other prog)

- Simple Minds - street fighting years (their only album which contains some prog sounds)

- Propaganda - a secret wish (the most original - mixture of pop, wave, electro and prog)

and...that's about all folks

Good to see that someone noticed Tears for Fears and Simple Minds had their moments. I thought they were both good pop/rock acts, strong on melody and the latter in particular were excellent live. If you ever saw them, or have heard 'Live in the city of light' you'll know what I mean.

As for Pallas?? They seem cotraversial around here. I bought 'The Sentinal' when it came out and loved it to bits for a about a year, then had to concede that Marillion and IQ were so much better. Still good to see an album with a cover like that, released in 1984



-------------
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!


Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 16:32

Originally posted by Velvetclown Velvetclown wrote:

Cert you should stick to yer Sheep 

You mean I should lay off the lubricants?



Posted By: DallasBryan
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 16:33


Posted By: tuxon
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 16:39
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Originally posted by Velvetclown Velvetclown wrote:

Cert you should stick to yer Sheep 

You mean I should lay off the lubricants?

Use glue instead.



-------------
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT


Posted By: frosty
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 16:58

Marillion - Clutching At Straws a criminally underated album.

IQ - Tales From The Lush Attic their best until 'Dark Matter'.

Pallas - Arrive Alive (keep thinking those nice thoughts Jim Garten).

Pendragon - Fly High, Fall Far, ok so its a mini-album but 4 cracking songs.

Twelfth Night - Fact And Fiction, don't get me started on Geoff Manns lyrics, but to even things up Live At The Target runs it a close second.

Rush - Moving Pictures or Grace Under Pressure take your pick.

Dream Theater - When Dream And Day Unite squeezing in at the arse end of the 80's should be included for the track 'Only A Matter Of Time' listen to the keyboards build at the end and see if you can keep the hairs on the back of your neck from standing up.



Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: February 10 2005 at 17:28
Originally posted by tuxon tuxon wrote:

Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Originally posted by Velvetclown Velvetclown wrote:

Cert you should stick to yer Sheep 

You mean I should lay off the lubricants?

Use glue instead.

That's disgusting...

 

 ...it burns your nose out.

 

I think I'll stay with the whisky, as Velve recommends...

 

sheep dip


Posted By: Emperor
Date Posted: February 11 2005 at 02:42
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Nowadays Robbie Williams fills stadiums.


They arent on radio, because the old bands are
better, on and on and on.

That is not true - if it were, how come so many new bands like the rappers and boy bands get played?

And how come Marillion still hit the charts?

 

 

I think the problem is that there wasn't any cheap and so atrocious pop-music in 60s and 70s. All the terms like "quality", "good", "bad", "simple", etc. are comparative. So till the latest 70s show-business still didn't make the "industry" (in a bad sense) of Music so tight. And the masses of people couldn't compare really good music with bad, because no-one produced the really bad music (like cheap pop kinda britney spears or michael jackson or different raps-schmaps...).

We know that masses (not the Fans of music as we are) prefer the simplest and the most primitive music, touching for the common human reflexes (by rhythms, sounds or lyrics), the sexual one, for example... The real Art is much higher than all this crap!



-------------
I Prophesy Disaster...


Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: February 11 2005 at 08:10

There was plenty of atrocious pop music in the 1970s - can anyone say "Bay City Rollers"?

There was also plenty of "bubblegum" pop back in the 1960s and 1950s.

Proportionally, of course there was much less than today, as back then record companies were still trying to find ways to dominate the music market (payola, buying stock from record sellers listed with Billboard, etc).

Now they've pretty much succeeded with their horrific "stables" of pretty people churning out rubbish written by "professional songwriters" and their Playlist CDs that they send to the radio stations they sponsor.

mp3s aren't killing music - the record companies are trying to.



Posted By: Jethro Fish
Date Posted: February 11 2005 at 09:03

None of the mentioned ones.

My favorite 80's releases are:

  • Marillion - Script for a jester's tear
  • Marillion - Fugazi
  • Marillion - Misplaced Childhood
  • Marillion - Clutching at straws
  • IQ - Tales from the lush attic
  • IQ - The wake



-------------
All the best,
Per

www.salvaband.com
New cd: Salva "Left to burn", out now
Available through:
www.caerllysimusic.co.uk
www.progressrec.com
www.justforkicks.de
www.salvaband.com


Posted By: Rui__
Date Posted: February 11 2005 at 09:09
Solaris - Marsbeli Kronikak


Posted By: Mategra
Date Posted: February 11 2005 at 09:18



Posted By: Aerosol Grey
Date Posted: February 11 2005 at 09:33
Script For A Jester's Tear wasn't even the best album of the year it was released.

And while I'll agree Marillion and IQ have their feet too steeped in the past glory of prog, Dream Theater have taken their taken that familiar template and run a completely different way with it.

They're one of the most fully realized prog bands since the 70s.


-------------
Prog is the new punk, becuase kids who shop at Hot Topic don't know Bill Bruford is God.


Posted By: DallasBryan
Date Posted: February 11 2005 at 12:33
I agree -
Marillion - Script for a jester's tear
*     Marillion - Fugazi
*     Marillion - Misplaced Childhood
*     Marillion - Clutching at straws
*     IQ - Tales from the lush attic
*     IQ - The wake
are good albums, but neo-prog is at least a step
down from the albums that made the poll. Solaris I
could have considered but a little to derivative for my
taste. Marillion and IQ alot too derivative.

Progress is not made by repeating the past. Master
painters for instance Kandinsky, Picasso and
Cezanne made something new they did not repeat
the past, though paint and brush were in common.
Many others tried to duplicate them in years to come
only to fail. Once someone was original enough to
come up with a new approach leaving behind
influences and creating something new then it was
art. Progressive was made IMHO.

This is what separates the men from the boys.
Original thought opposed to wanting to be
somebody else.


Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: February 11 2005 at 12:52

Originally posted by Aerosol Grey Aerosol Grey wrote:

Script For A Jester's Tear wasn't even the best album of the year it was released.

Oooh yes it was!!!

And while I'll agree Marillion and IQ have their feet too steeped in the past glory of prog, Dream Theater have taken their taken that familiar template and run a completely different way with it.

DT haven't even touched that template - they're working from a different one!

They're one of the most fully realized prog bands since the 70s.

In what way(s), precisely?




Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: February 11 2005 at 12:55

Originally posted by DallasBryan DallasBryan wrote:

I agree -
Marillion - Script for a jester's tear
*     Marillion - Fugazi
*     Marillion - Misplaced Childhood
*     Marillion - Clutching at straws
*     IQ - Tales from the lush attic
*     IQ - The wake
are good albums, but neo-prog is at least a step
down from the albums that made the poll.

Wrong again.

Neo-prog is different. I'm not saying better, because I'm leaving my opinion aside.

 Solaris I
could have considered but a little to derivative for my
taste. Marillion and IQ alot too derivative.

Early IQ was very Genesis-derived, but they had enough of their own touches to make their style innovative.

Marillion can hardly be considered derivative - they were fresh and original on all 4 of the albums you name.

Progress is not made by repeating the past. Master
painters for instance Kandinsky, Picasso and
Cezanne made something new they did not repeat
the past, though paint and brush were in common.
Many others tried to duplicate them in years to come
only to fail. Once someone was original enough to
come up with a new approach leaving behind
influences and creating something new then it was
art. Progressive was made IMHO.

Yes, and Marillion made something new. So did Twelfth Night and the Enid.

This is what separates the men from the boys.
Original thought opposed to wanting to be
somebody else. 



Posted By: Menswear
Date Posted: February 11 2005 at 14:05

Eeeww....man what kind of inaccessible collection is that?Dead

What about Moving Pictures from Rush? Or Clutching at Straws by Marillion?

This isn't right.



Posted By: DallasBryan
Date Posted: February 11 2005 at 14:10
very accessible to the contrary.


Posted By: lucas
Date Posted: February 11 2005 at 19:53

Originally posted by Sweetnighter Sweetnighter wrote:

Permanent Waves - Rush

Discipline - KC

Misplaced Childhood - Marillion

Tangram - Tangerine Dream

+

Los Jaivas : 'Alturas de Macchu Picchu' & 'Obras de Violeta Parra'

Sagrado coraçao da terra : 's/t' & 'Flecha'

Rebekka : 'Phoenix' (the german answer to Renaissance)

Vermilion sand (the japanese answer to Renaissance) 

Cai : 'noche abierta'

Gordon Giltrap : 'Peacock party'

Mike Oldfield : QE2

Anthony Phillips : PP&P

Talk Talk : 'Spirit of Eden'

Cardiacs : 'A little man and a house and the whole world window' & 'On land and in the sea'

Kate Bush : everyhting she released at that time

Saga : everything except maybe 'Wildest dreams'

Rush : everything

IQ : the first two albums

It bites : everything

NRG : no reasons given (with kevin Gilbert)

The Enid : 'The spell'

Dixie Dregs : 'Dregs of the earth', 'Unsung heroes', 'Industry standard'

Steve Morse : 'The introduction', 'Stand up', 'High tension wires'

Ambrosia : 'Road island'

Queensryche : everything

Fates Warning : 'Awaken the guardian'

Watchtower : 'Control and resistance'

Metallica : everything released at that time

Voivod : 'Nothingface'



-------------
"Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)


Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: February 12 2005 at 07:41
Good list, Lucas!


Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: February 12 2005 at 10:03

Originally posted by DallasBryan DallasBryan wrote:

thanks for your honesty Certified!

whats your opionion of some of these recordings.

Holger Czukay - On the Way to the Peak of Normal     
Gandalf - Magic Theater     
Bernard Xolotl - Last Wave     
Klaus Schonning - Lorian Arabesque     
Johannes Schmoelling - Wuivend Reit     
Airto Moreira - The Other Side of This      
Michael Shrieve - The Big Picture
PROG METALHEADS need not inquire.     

Phew - I had to do a bit of revisiting - these aren't regular visitors to my turntable; or more accurately, cassette deck...

I love Can, so Holger's recordings always appeal to me - and I respect his work deeply as I know he studied under the creator of electronic music; Karlheinz Stockhausen. "On the Way..." is a great album and as experimental in terms of textures as you would expect - but I can't help feeling it's Holger trying to keep his vision of Can alive.

I don't know the Gandalf recording - but I like their debut almost as much as I like the debut by the Swedish band of the same name!

Xolotl, Schonning and Schmoelling don't make exactly prog rock, do they? I mean, if I was going to recommend music from the 1980s to Tangerine Dream fans then those are good choices - Last Wave contains some ethereal electronica; but no prog per se.

Airto Moreira? Give me a break! It's superb World music - I wouldn't say "New Age", as it goes beyond what I think of as New Age - but it would also appeal to people who like that music.

I'd almost put Shrieve's music into the same category, as there are vague similarities in style.

 

All these recordings share one thing; a mostly constant rhythm track over which textures are interplayed, layered and otherwise manuiplated. The nearest to prog rock is Czukay, but only because of the similarities with his former band.

True prog rock of the 1980s does not lie in these recordings - but they are all worthy of consideration for inclusion on this site, IMO.

True 1980s prog IS the neo-prog of the bands I have mentioned. In my opinion, "Script..." is the greatest of the lot for its stylistic innovations, the accent on strong melody and lyrics with elegant clean-cut lines of counterpoint, emphasis on drama through structure and creating powerful and progressive songs rather than pastiches of sonic texture.

It is actually incredibly easy to do the latter - most people can sit down at a keyboard and find a voice that makes a nice sound. The art of intertwining those sounds is imprecise, and a lot can depend on luck - although I am certainly not putting your suggested recordings down - they are all superb.

However, great and progressive songwriting is a more precise art at which the Beatles were the obvious pinnacle in rock/pop, and Genesis the arguable pinnacle in 1970s prog rock - Pink Floyd an obvious alternative. Listen again (and again, if necessary) to "Script...". It took me a while to get - I think I'm still "getting it" 22 years later. There is much more to it than the deceptively simple surface;

Try this little excercise:

Write a piece of music as "simple" as either "Script...", "Chelsea Monday" or "Forgotten Sons". Ensure you have a high level of narrative and drama running through the lyrics as well as the music. Ensure also that all instruments and vocal melodies preserve a perfect counterpoint to each other without ever getting "busy", colour the lyrics without clouding them, and enjoy a little solo status at appropriate moments in the piece whilst maintaining the drama within - indeed, the prime objective is to heighten the drama, since this is a rock song. The piece must be over 6 minutes long, contain a keyboard solo and a guitar solo - both of which are entirely distinct, hummable and memorable, the lyrics must exist on multiple levels to satisfy intellectual listeners, and the overall style should be uniquely indentifiable as something that you have produced with only nods to other musicians or bands.

Simple!



Posted By: DallasBryan
Date Posted: February 12 2005 at 12:12
I beg to differ

the Marillion, IQ thread(neoprog) you mention, did
nothing but regress from its original form in the mid
to late 70's. On the other hand German bands after
experimenting with electronic noise in the early 70's
found the nitch with the sequencer, synthesizing the
english progressive rock sound and french
progressive jazz sounds into their electronics this is
progressive rock, IMO. Others would agree you dont
have too!

First with Tangerine Dream adding the hard rock
guitar of Pink Floyd to their music. Later other
synthesist adding in the Lard Free element. I dont
believe true progressive rock exists still as a whole. I
find it mergered and moving,from the Mermen -
prog/surf, NIN - prog/industrial, Airto - prog/world,
Michael Brook prog/new age, Bozzio,Levin & Stevens
prog/hard fusion, and so forth. Prog to me is
something intelligent or soul sucking that is
unaccessible as a whole made accessible after its
experimental stage.

Not some refried half wits trying to duplicate
something and add to it. Maybe those guys with
Morte Macambre in Sweden are ready to do
something interesting I have not listened to it yet, but
I would think the Anglagard, Anekdoten(for instance)
guys my be ready to do something interesting, but
they will have to step outside the "neoprog or prog or
mathrock" or whatever element to show me they
have it going on.

Otherwise they just fall into the wannabees category
to my ears!

If it isnt progressing its not progressive and if it has a
majority of rock or fusion elements balanced into it,
its progressive rock, IMO!

By using an overtly English definition you omit half
the world of progressive rock. Bands such as Lard
Free and Cluster(oh no, they are using sequencers
wheres the drummer, no lyrics what!) are omitted
from the Progarchives and have more to do with
progressive rocks evolution than even Gentle Giant
or Van der Graff Generator.

Some mid 70s French bands for instance are
experimental but its in good taste, some late 70s
German bands are more electronic but in good
taste. Frankly alot of the english fusion and english
progressive folk has no real appeal outside the
British isles.

If you want to distill the word progressive rock to
being what happened in england in the early through
mid 70s and those that wish to copycat that style
fine. But the true meaning of "progressive rock" has
more meaning than that!


Posted By: greenback
Date Posted: February 12 2005 at 13:47
Cert, if you worship Script like that, then I strongly recommend you Citizen Cain - Serpents in Camouflage! You are going to be impressed, because it really sounds like Script! Maybe you even are going to say that it is a Marillion clone!Tongue

-------------
[HEADPINS - LINE OF FIRE: THE RECORD HAVING THE MOST POWERFUL GUITAR SOUND IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF MUSIC!>


Posted By: greenback
Date Posted: February 12 2005 at 13:54

Actually  i think Schmoelling's Wuivend is an excellent album, being quite New Age!

Synergy - Audion is a good exapmle of a New Age rock album!



-------------
[HEADPINS - LINE OF FIRE: THE RECORD HAVING THE MOST POWERFUL GUITAR SOUND IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF MUSIC!>


Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: February 12 2005 at 14:08

Originally posted by DallasBryan DallasBryan wrote:

I beg to differ

the Marillion, IQ thread(neoprog) you mention, did
nothing but regress from its original form in the mid
to late 70's. On the other hand German bands after
experimenting with electronic noise in the early 70's
found the nitch with the sequencer, synthesizing the
english progressive rock sound and french
progressive jazz sounds into their electronics this is
progressive rock, IMO. Others would agree you dont
have too!

How do you mean regress? Maybe we use the word in different ways here.

To my ears, Marillion and Twelfth Night progressed rock music and allowed it to continue evolving in the main stream. There is nothing regressive about their music - if you know different, please explain.

IQ certainly took Genesis ideas in their early albums, but I defy you to tell me where the Genesis ideas are in early Marillion albums.

I can see the German synthesiser bands as a branch of Krautrock, but not English prog rock - how do you justify that? And there is little jazz rock in any of the albums you mentioned, so it's really hard to get where you're coming from.

First with Tangerine Dream adding the hard rock
guitar of Pink Floyd to their music. Later other
synthesist adding in the Lard Free element. I dont
believe true progressive rock exists still as a whole. I
find it mergered and moving,from the Mermen -
prog/surf, NIN - prog/industrial, Airto - prog/world,
Michael Brook prog/new age, Bozzio,Levin & Stevens
prog/hard fusion, and so forth. Prog to me is
something intelligent or soul sucking that is
unaccessible as a whole made accessible after its
experimental stage.

You confuse prog, experimental and progressive, methinks. You've left out prog/jazz and prog classical from your arbitrary categories.

From your definition, that I've underlined, Pink Floyd are not prog, neither are Hawkwind, Genesis or King Crimson.

That's if I've understood your definition, which seems somewhat contradictory.

Not some refried half wits trying to duplicate
something and add to it. Maybe those guys with
Morte Macambre in Sweden are ready to do
something interesting I have not listened to it yet, but
I would think the Anglagard, Anekdoten(for instance)
guys my be ready to do something interesting, but
they will have to step outside the "neoprog or prog or
mathrock" or whatever element to show me they
have it going on.

Otherwise they just fall into the wannabees category
to my ears!

If it isnt progressing its not progressive and if it has a
majority of rock or fusion elements balanced into it,
its progressive rock, IMO!

So Led Zeppelin and Deep Purple are prog by your terms? And so are the Beatles? Miles Davis?

By using an overtly English definition you omit half
the world of progressive rock.

On the contrary - it is you who are omitting a large portion of it. I am all for inclusion.

Bands such as Lard
Free and Cluster(oh no, they are using sequencers
wheres the drummer, no lyrics what!) are omitted
from the Progarchives and have more to do with
progressive rocks evolution than even Gentle Giant
or Van der Graff Generator.

How so? You said true prog doesn't exist anymore...

Some mid 70s French bands for instance are
experimental but its in good taste, some late 70s
German bands are more electronic but in good
taste. Frankly alot of the english fusion and english
progressive folk has no real appeal outside the
British isles.

If you want to distill the word progressive rock to
being what happened in england in the early through
mid 70s and those that wish to copycat that style
fine.

Personally, I do not. I think that is narrow-minded.

I also note that the bands I mention do NOT copycat the style - please explain exactly how they do that?

But the true meaning of "progressive rock" has
more meaning than that!

Amen to that.



Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: February 12 2005 at 14:09
Originally posted by greenback greenback wrote:

Actually  i think Schmoelling's Wuivend is an excellent album, being quite New Age!

Synergy - Audion is a good exapmle of a New Age rock album!

Absolutely - New Age, but not true prog - and excellent music - as I said



Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: February 12 2005 at 15:08

Originally posted by Aerosol Grey Aerosol Grey wrote:

Script For A Jester's Tear wasn't even the best album of the year it was released.

And while I'll agree Marillion and IQ have their feet too steeped in the past glory of prog, Dream Theater have taken their taken that familiar template and run a completely different way with it.

They're one of the most fully realized prog bands since the 70s.

"Dream Theater have taken their familiar template and run a different way with it."Confused

Yes they've run over to the heavy rock stable and now play stadium rock.

Flamin' ell Jason you were born in 1985 and whilst this doesnt preclude you having an opinion, it does set you at a disadvantage.

When Marillion released Script prog rock was on its last legs.Remember, that this was a debut album-compare it to early Genesis and you will find a much more focussed, complete product.This was evolution-a stepping stone to creating a singular identity and carrying the torch for an embattled genre.Genesis and Yes were directionless, ELP un-focussed and in disarray.Something completely new was not what was called for. We got something familiar but not really derivative, something that would re-ignite our enthusiasm for Prog rock.Marillion achieved this and but for the split with Fish, would continue to be a huge success.

I am a big Rush fan, but at this time and subsequently, they were moving in different directions-creating a hybrid called prog-metal that you seem to want to give Dream Theater the plaudits for. It is very unlikely that Dream theater and their cohorts would have been making this kind of music without Rush. It is Rush that have run in a different direction from the "template" as you call it and managed to be damn successful whilst doing it.The market for Rush and Dream Theater has intersected frequently over the last 10 years, yet it is Rush who consistently outsell them, both with albums sales and concert seats.



-------------





Posted By: BilboBaggins
Date Posted: February 12 2005 at 15:17

I feel the need to add an album I certainly rate as one of the best prog albums of the 80's - Once Around the World by It Bites. I mention this becuase I bet no one else will!

 

 



-------------
Thoughtfullness


Posted By: DallasBryan
Date Posted: February 12 2005 at 15:26
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Originally posted by DallasBryan DallasBryan wrote:

I beg to
differ the Marillion, IQ thread(neoprog) you mention,
did nothing but regress from its original form in the
mid to late 70's. On the other hand German bands
after experimenting with electronic noise in the early
70's found the nitch with the sequencer, synthesizing
the english progressive rock sound and french
progressive jazz sounds into their electronics this is
progressive rock, IMO. Others would agree you dont
have too!


How do you mean regress?
Maybe we use the word in different ways
here.


Not as good as the original mid 70s english

To my ears, Marillion and
Twelfth Night progressed rock music and allowed it
to continue evolving in the main stream. There is
nothing regressive about their music - if you know
different, please explain.


IQ certainly took Genesis
ideas in their early albums, but I defy you to tell me
where the Genesis ideas are in early Marillion
albums.


I can see the German
synthesiser bands as a branch of Krautrock, but not
English prog rock - how do you justify that? And there
is little jazz rock in any of the albums you mentioned,
so it's really hard to get where you're coming
from.

Thats the problem "English prog rock" as opposed
to world wide evolution of progressive rock.
Krautrock had 2 periods early 70s experimental, mid
to late 70s progressive electronic rock. English prog
rock was experimental in the 1967 to 1969ish
period. early Pink Floyd(example being experimental
english progressive rock)

First with Tangerine Dream adding the hard rock
guitar of Pink Floyd to their music. Later other
synthesist adding in the Lard Free element. I dont
believe true progressive rock exists still as a whole. I
find it mergered and moving,from the Mermen -
prog/surf, NIN - prog/industrial, Airto - prog/world,
Michael Brook prog/new age, Bozzio,Levin & Stevens
prog/hard fusion, and so forth. Prog to me is
something intelligent or soul sucking that is
unaccessible as a whole made accessible after its
experimental stage.


You confuse prog,
experimental and progressive, methinks. You've left
out prog/jazz and prog classical from your arbitrary
categories.


yes prog/jazz had its heyday in France in the mid 70s
not Canterbury, IMO and prog/classical had its
heyday in Italy in the early to later 70s.

From your definition, that I've
underlined, Pink Floyd are not prog, neither are
Hawkwind, Genesis or King Crimson.


That's if I've understood your
definition, which seems somewhat
contradictory.

You are misreading me, Hawkwind though has
more of a claim to psychedelic space metal than
progressive rock but I can buy fringe elements.

Not some refried half wits trying to duplicate
something and add to it. Maybe those guys with
Morte Macambre in Sweden are ready to do
something interesting I have not listened to it yet, but
I would think the Anglagard, Anekdoten(for instance)
guys my be ready to do something interesting, but
they will have to step outside the "neoprog or prog or
mathrock" or whatever element to show me they
have it going on. Otherwise they just fall into the
wannabees category to my ears! If it isnt progressing
its not progressive and if it has a majority of rock or
fusion elements balanced into it, its progressive
rock, IMO!


So Led Zeppelin and Deep
Purple are prog by your terms? And so are the
Beatles? Miles Davis?
By using an
overtly English definition you omit half the world of
progressive rock.


No, Led Zep, DP though prog tendancies I dont think
so, nor do I think Uriah Heep is prog, but there
album covers seem to sell many as them being
such.
Miles is a long shot and Magical Mystery Tour or Sgt.
Peppers could be considered more than fringe.
Again I am not from England so my viewpoints are
outside of your society. I deem early ELO prog and
some Supertramp for instance. I have not been
trained by your society to call everything AOR that is
not overtly complicated. Soft Machine I dont consider
mainstream prog as much as an off center element.

On the contrary - it is you
who are omitting a large portion of it. I am all for
inclusion.


Bands such as Lard Free and Cluster(oh no, they
are using sequencers wheres the drummer, no
lyrics what!) are omitted from the Progarchives and
have more to do with progressive rocks evolution
than even Gentle Giant or Van der Graff Generator.


How so? You said true prog
doesn't exist anymore...

Those bands existed at their peak about the same
time as GG and VDDG. True prog is very hard to find
now IMO.

Some mid 70s French bands for instance are
experimental but its in good taste, some late 70s
German bands are more electronic but in good
taste. Frankly alot of the english fusion and english
progressive folk has no real appeal outside the
British isles. If you want to distill the word
progressive rock to being what happened in england
in the early through mid 70s and those that wish to
copycat that style fine.


Personally, I do not. I think
that is narrow-minded.


I also note that the bands I
mention do NOT copycat the style - please explain
exactly how they do that?


Repeating the formula and not evolving, of course
progressive electronic rock evolved into world music
and new age and it stinks to but it took a completely
different route if you observe it on those terms. You
could say it evolved into avant experimental
electronica and industrial noise rock.

But the true meaning of "progressive rock" has
more meaning than that!


Amen to
that.





Many of these bands are included in the
PROGARCHIVES, and many more should be!
No harm intended just an explanation of my views.


Posted By: lucas
Date Posted: February 12 2005 at 15:27
Originally posted by BilboBaggins BilboBaggins wrote:

I feel the need to add an album I certainly rate as one of the best prog albums of the 80's - Once Around the World by It Bites. I mention this becuase I bet no one else will!

Did you see my previous post :

Los Jaivas : 'Alturas de Macchu Picchu' & 'Obras de Violeta Parra'

Sagrado coraçao da terra : 's/t' & 'Flecha'

Rebekka : 'Phoenix' (the german answer to Renaissance)

Vermilion sand (the japanese answer to Renaissance) 

Cai : 'noche abierta'

Gordon Giltrap : 'Peacock party'

Mike Oldfield : QE2

Anthony Phillips : PP&P

Talk Talk : 'Spirit of Eden'

Cardiacs : 'A little man and a house and the whole world window' & 'On land and in the sea'

Kate Bush : everyhting she released at that time

Saga : everything except maybe 'Wildest dreams'

Rush : everything

IQ : the first two albums

It bites : everything

NRG : no reasons given (with kevin Gilbert)

The Enid : 'The spell'

Dixie Dregs : 'Dregs of the earth', 'Unsung heroes', 'Industry standard'

Steve Morse : 'The introduction', 'Stand up', 'High tension wires'

Ambrosia : 'Road island'

Queensryche : everything

Fates Warning : 'Awaken the guardian'

Watchtower : 'Control and resistance'

Metallica : everything released at that time

Voivod : 'Nothingface'

 

So, you will notice I am also fond of this band.



-------------
"Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)


Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: February 12 2005 at 18:14

The problem is, DB, that you don't explain your views.

I asked a whole load of questions, simply to try to find out why you might hold such a strong anti-neo prog view, and you have not done the courteousy of answering any of them.

Maybe you find the "ripping apart" style aggressive - I find it the only way to get to the questions I need to ask and maintain some sense of context. You could read it as aggressive attacking (if you felt so defensive about your indefensible views), or you could read it as plain, simple questions. My language is not aggressive, and neither is my intention.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but to slate the entire neo-prog genre and dismiss the bands as nothing but wannabees deserves some kind of explanation - after all, there are others on this site who like the genre a great deal - aren't you curious as to why that may be - or do you just think they are stupid?



Posted By: DallasBryan
Date Posted: February 12 2005 at 18:52
there in the cage!

i answered your questions in a brief manner. I was
15 when the lamb came out for instance. I grew up in
the middle of the progressive scene in Texas and
California. I played covers of some of these bands in
a rock band at age 17(I could play in the clubs but
couldnt drink, 18 was the limit those days). I was a
roadie for VariLite setting up stage lighting in the
early 80s. I grew up and spent alot of time with many
people in the music industry, sound techs,
managers, promoters. I have met many musicians
and hung out with a few. I dont go into my personal
life very far on line, but I have listened to progressive
rock for the past 30 years. This doesnt make me a
pro, im just an opionion, I am outside the
mainstream. I am only displaying my observations.

I think you guys are missing alot of progressive rock
from the 80s and Germany and France for starters
and focusing on "a sound". The Yes sound , the ELP
sound, the Genesis sound, the KC sound. Chasing
these sounds into a dead end street. Their is an
equal sound its the Lard Free sound, the Samla
Mammas Manna sound, the Cluster sound, the
Gandalf sound, the Mezquita sound, the Horslips
sound, the Klaus Schulze sound, the Ashra sound,
the MIchael Rother sound and on.

All I wanted to do is to direct people towards the
movement of progressive rock across the world and
point towards the albums by these artists that they
would probably find enjoyable(if not a prog
metalhead, which I cant help). And get out of the
groove in the pavement. Some of these artists are
much more interesting than Genesis/Yes/ELP
clones that come up out of US and UK. But you guys
make a demand for that sort of thing, I think in
ignorance.

I know everybody doesnt agree with every album
everyone else likes,but as with Genesis you can be
safe recommending Foxtrot, SEBTP, LLDOB and
TOTT. It is easy to go through a whole catalog by an
artist you do not know before you find the treasures. I
thought it might be helpful to give a little direction and
not have to waste a bundle of money hording up the
best.

I also see many I assume younger forum members
confessing their boredom with neo prog and prog
metal acts. I understand I have listened to them too.
Because I grew up on a better diet, I have a problem
swallowing most of them upon first bite, and grow to
like them less and less the more I hear them,
laughing and mocking them in time! Im not just
trying to do this its an obvious counterfeit, substitute,
whatever for the real spirit and I cant seem to shake
it. Other bands from around the world though I hear
say 20-30% of INFLUENCE its not like the 40-60% at
least I hear of these guys. I have heard hundreds
and hundreds of bands live and the best I can
describe it would be. A cover band playing Genesis
songs(for instance), then introducing some of the
material they wrote, which sounds like wishy washy
Genesis ripoff, maybe throw in a Yes or VDDG riff,
sickening!

I never liked the Starcastles, Triumvirats,
Neuschwansteins because they were just rip offs of
a sound. Though listened to in latter context they
dont seem to show that flaw to some. Me I cant
shake it . Its like comparing Rembrandt with paint by
numbers. Both can look similar but one took an artist
to originate the design, one took a wannabee to walk
along behind in the steps left on the sand.



__________________
I dont stutter and your ears dont flap




Posted By: DallasBryan
Date Posted: February 12 2005 at 20:28
THIS IS PROGRESSIVE ROCK in the 70's!

1. SYMPHONIC ROCK

Italy (approximately 1972-77)
Arguably one of the most successful schools
influenced by the stylistic pioneers of the mid to late
60s/70s. Premiata Forneria Marconi, Banco del
Mutuo Soccorso, Le Orme, Latte E Miele, Museo
Rosenbach etc.

France (70s-early 80s)
There are at least two threads of the symphonic
school in France's impressive musical heritage.
Some bands were influenced by the British pioneers
such a Yes and King Crimson while others were
more influence by the "theatrical rock" of Genesis.
The former include Atoll, Pulsar, and Carpe Diem.
The latter, categorized as such due to their use of
costumes and stage presence, include Ange and
Mona Lisa.


2. PROGRESSIVE ROCK

Art Rock
Another term often used interchangeably with
progressive rock, art rock implies rock with an
exploratory tendency. Another definition of "art rock"
describes music of a more mainstream
compositional nature, tending to experimentation
within this framework. Early Roxy Music, David
Bowie, Brian Eno's 70s rock music, and Be Bop
Deluxe serve as examples of the latter definition.

Blues Rock
Blues rock evolved into more experimental
permutations from John Mayall, Cream and the
Yardbirds to Steamhammer, Colosseum,
Groundhogs, Tonton Macoute, and Bakerloo, due
largely to the incorporation of psychedelic and jazz
influences into the music. A similar evolution is
encountered in the United States with bands like the
Allman Brothers and Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young.

Krautrock(70s-mid 80s)
A term that usually describes the highly influential
German rock of the early 70s, especially bands
associated with the Ohr, Brain, Pilz, and Kosmische
music labels. The varying styles falling under this
umbrella were influenced by both German
experimental electronic music and the psychedelic
rock and beat of the late 60s. These range from the
Ohr and Kosmische label's wild tangle of acid rock
and electronica such as Ash Ra Tempel, Cosmic
Jokers, Guru Guru and Tangerine Dream to the
more rhythmically insistent, post-psychedelic
experimentations of Faust, Neu, Kraftwerk and Can.

Proto-Progressive
Where late 60s psych ends and early 70s
progressive rock begins is often referred to as
proto-progressive, due to the music's embryonic
similarities to the earliest progressive rock groups.
While this is accurate as far as the definition of
"proto-" goes, another common definition of this term
is sort of as "almost progressive," artists which
might bear some resemblance to the genre, but are
not commonly considered as such. Some widely
varying examples of what might be considered
"proto-prog" are The Beatles circa Magical Mystery
Tour and Sgt. Peppers ..., Tommy and Quadrophenia
period Who, Procol Harum, Traffic, early Deep Purple
and Uriah Heep.

Psychedelic (Rock)
A major precursor to the progressive rock of the 70s
is the psychedelic rock of the late 60s, which is too
vast a field to cover in detail here yet is intertwined
inextricably with its musical offspring. This
genre/qualifier covers a large amount of territory in
common with progressive rock and mostly concerns
itself with a mind-expanding approach associated
with hallucinogenic and surreal imagery and its
equivalent musical relationship. Bands falling within
this style are often cross-genre (see VIII.
Unclassified for examples) and vary from the early
pioneers such as the Beatles, Jimi Hendrix,
Jefferson Airplane, Pink Floyd, Country Joe & The
Fish, Small Faces, and Strawberry Alarm Clock.


3. BY COUNTRY

Britain (late 60s to mid 70s)
There were many groups considered "progressive
rock" at the dawn of the 70s which probably do not fit
at all into most of the above schools. Many of the
groups were associated with pioneering labels like
Vertigo, Deram, Dawn, Transatlantic, Neon, Harvest,
Charisma and Island. There were rock groups
exploring eastern stylings such as Marsupilami,
Samurai, Jade Warrior and East of Eden and heavy
post psychedelic rock like High Tide and Jody Grind.
Some of the more guitar jam oriented groups like
Man and Wishbone Ash explored lengthy rock
ruminations without succumbing to the highly
structured music of the time. Bands such as Jethro
Tull, Van Der Graaf Generator and Family were
defined by their vocalist's signature, some of them
achieving great success especially in mainland
Europe. Other important groups of the era include
the Strawbs, Raw Material, Second Hand, and
Gnidrolog.

Holland (early 70s)
Dutch musicians also exhibited strong tendencies
towards new forms of rock, influenced immediately
by the psychedelic rock from across the channel and
the Atlantic. The country's rock scene had a head
start with one of the earliest psychedelic/progressive
groups Group 1850. Focus became quickly notable
for its combination of rock, classical, and ancient
music. Other important Dutch progressives of the
era included Golden Earring, Alquin, Solution and
Finch, all of whose stylistic tendencies don't verge
overwhelmingly in any one direction.

Denmark (70s)
Denmark had a very fertile but continually ignored
underground whose progressive variations rarely fit
comfortably into any particular style (fusion greats
Secret Oyster are one exception). Perhaps the most
unrecognized scene in progressive rock.

Sweden (70s to present)
The Swedish rock underground has always
produced a wide variety of high-quality music. There
were several bands in the 70s that paralleled that of
Germany's Kosmiche music, such as Algarnas
Tradgard, International Harvester, Flasket Brinner,
and Trad Gras och Stenar. The Silence label in
Sweden was notable for introducing many rock
bands (including several of the above) who
displayed a certain traditional touch such as early
Samla Mammas Manna, Kebnekaise, Ragnarok,
and Triangulus. A noteable modern practitioner of
this notably Swedish rock style is Grovjobb.

France (70s)
Almost like there was a delay on the influences from
overseas, France developed a surprisingly
innovative rock scene in the early 70s that still
remains a separate entity from all the various styles
of music the French have added to over the years.


4. AVANT ROCK

Rock In Opposition (RIO)
Chris Cutler, original member of the British musical
collective Henry Cow and the man behind the
scenes at Recommended Records in England, had
this to say about RIO: "RIO short for Rock In
Opposition was named to give some identity to a
festival we (Henry Cow) ran in London in the Spring
of 1978 ... The only groups ever involved were: Henry
Cow, Samla Mammas Manna (Sweden), Etron Fou
Leloublan, (France) Stormy Six (Italy), Univers Zero
and Aqsak Maboul (Belgium), Art Zoyd (France) and
Art Bears."


5. JAZZ FUSION

Canterbury
This genre, named by the town in Kent, England
where the musicians in the mid-60s group The
Wilde Flowers hailed from (a band which was
progenitor to both the Soft Machine and Caravan),
drew on varying elements of classical architecture.
Although the Soft Machine and Caravan were the
only groups to originate from Canterbury itself. The
styles of the artists adopted under the Canterbury
genre varied from the psychedelic whimsy of
Caravan, the increasingly jazz-rock Soft Machine, and
the sly song structures of Kevin Ayers onto some of
the most intricate rock ever created in Hatfield and
The North and National Health. Canterbury music
also overlapped with British jazz-rock (see below),
space rock pioneers Gong, classical rock in Egg,
RIO forefathers Henry Cow and melodic progressive
group Camel.

Zeuhl
The term Zeuhl came from the genre's progenitor
Magma as part of the band's invented language
meaning "celestial." Magma brought in a wide
number of influences from Orff, Stravinsky and
Bartók to Coltrane and R&B to create one of the most
influential and original progressive rock styles of the
time. Bands that fall under the Zeuhl rubric vary from
offshoot bands such as Weidorje and Zao.


6. PROGRESSIVE ELECTRONIC ROCK

Germany (70s)
The advent of electronic music in Germany,
especially through the work of Stockhausen and the
influence of the psychedelic era, was largely a
product of the krautrock legacy. The most famous
progenitors of progressive electronic rock music are
Edgar Froese (Tangerine Dream, solo), Conrad
Schnitzler (Tangerine Dream, solo), Klaus Schulze
(Ash Ra Tempel, Tangerine Dream, solo), and
Manuel Gottsching (Ash Ra Tempel, Ashra, solo), all
who began their formative careers on the genre's
preliminary label, Ohr. These musicians evolved with
the burgeoning technology of the era to become four
of the most prolific and influential artists of their time,
all changing face over the course of time to cover an
unequalled amount of territory. This primary school
of electronic music was the dominant influence for
most of the other schools in this section.

Berlin School
Music typified as Berlin School is inherited from the
70s German pioneers in the style, especially that of
Tangerine Dream and Klaus Schulze. It is
recognizable by its prevalent use of sequencers to
give the music a rhythmic pulse behind a layering of
electronic atmospheres. Berlin School music is the
dominant European style even today, from its roots
through its myriad of modern progenitors, from the
completely derivative to the far removed. Early Berlin
School artists include Wolfgang Bock and Albert Von
Deyen.


7. UNCLASSIFIED

Several roads from the previous sections lead to the
Unclassified. In rock, jazz, folk and electronic, the
groups considered avant-garde (avant-rock,
avant-jazz and avant-folk) verge in the direction of the
unclassified as the conventions of the operative
music are thrown aside. Some excellent examples
of the Unclassified where all these musics meet
include Pierrot Lunaire's Gudrun, a place where no
particular style is the mainstay and elements are
juxtaposed in unusual ways in a strange, alchemic
cocktail. Älgarnas Trädgård's Framtiden Är Ett
Svävande Skepp, Förankrat i Forntiden is a similar
hybrid, although resulting from the psychedelic
school years earlier and covering enough influences
to make any single reference point invalid by default.
Italian pop artist Franco Battiato spent a long
number of years in the 70s creating an unparalleled
stream of albums that seemed to flirt with just about
every genre mentioned here so far, from the strange
electronic and folk experimentations of Foetus to the
later minimalist electronic works of the mid to late
70s.

I see in the 80s only a small amount of british
progressive rock left and the germans carrying on
with progressive electronic rock a little stronger into
the mid 80s. South America being pretty healthy.
Remnants here and there.


Posted By: Wizard/TRueStar
Date Posted: February 13 2005 at 13:53

Gasp............

Gabriel III is the oly thiung I have heard all the way through on this list.  I love it anyways!!!!!!!!



Posted By: arcer
Date Posted: February 13 2005 at 13:56

none of the above

 

three words

Rush - Moving Pictures



Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: February 13 2005 at 16:36
Ever heard of this band called King Crimson?


Posted By: Emperor
Date Posted: February 14 2005 at 03:34

Originally posted by DallasBryan DallasBryan wrote:

THIS IS PROGRESSIVE ROCK in the 70's!

1. SYMPHONIC ROCK

Italy (approximately 1972-77) ...

What a great article, Bryan,

Thank you!

 



-------------
I Prophesy Disaster...


Posted By: Aaron
Date Posted: February 14 2005 at 21:57

Originally posted by DallasBryan DallasBryan wrote:


If Pendragon, Ayreon, Porcupine Tree, Dream
Theatre, Anglagard are so great why are they not
filling up stadiums like the bands before them did.
They arent on radio, because the old bands are
better, on and on and on.
Happy Trailz

 

are you being serious

Aaron



Posted By: Garion81
Date Posted: February 14 2005 at 22:30
Originally posted by Aaron Aaron wrote:

Originally posted by DallasBryan DallasBryan wrote:


If Pendragon, Ayreon, Porcupine Tree, Dream
Theatre, Anglagard are so great why are they not
filling up stadiums like the bands before them did.
They arent on radio, because the old bands are
better, on and on and on.
Happy Trailz

 

are you being serious

Aaron

Dallas,

 

Let me ask you a question.  Why were the early British Progressive bands sucsseful in the US at at all?  If you can answer this question without being sarcastic I will answer yours.

 

 



-------------


"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"


Posted By: Possessed
Date Posted: March 02 2005 at 14:16
King Crimson - Discipline


Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: March 02 2005 at 15:25

DB - you are so wrong with regard to most Neo-prog; it is clear to me that the trees are interfering with your view of the woods.

I'm glad that you are promoting music that many of us have not listened to (or not listened to much), but your perceptions of Neo-prog seem born of some kind of blind obsession.

Imitations? In The Enid, Twelfth Night or Marillion? Where?

These bands gave prog the jumpstart it needed after running out of steam so quickly (5-6 years is not a long time for a genre to flourish) - so credit where it's due.

But I must hit you again on the "recycled" point. Give me some examples so I can understand - which Genesis track does "Forgotten Sons" sound like? (for example). How do The Enid sound like Yes or ELP? Which band does Twelfth Night remind you of most?

...I REALLY don't understand your point on this.



Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: March 02 2005 at 15:35

Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

But I must hit you again on the "recycled" point. Give me some examples so I can understand

So you thought that your bolts and your locks would keep me out
You should have known better after all this time
You’re gonna pay in blood for all your vicious slander
With your ugly pale skins and your putrid blue eyes
Why should I feel pity when you kill your own and feel no shame
God’s on my side, sure as hell
I’m gonna take no blame
I’m gonna take no blame
I’m gonna take no blame

So you say you believe in all of mother nature’s laws
You lust for gold with your sharpened knives
Oh when your hoards are gathered and your enemies left to rot
You pray with your bloodstained hands at the feet of your pagan gods

Then you try to place the killer’s blade in my hand
You call for justice and distort the truth
Well I’ve had enough of all your pretty pretty speeches
Receive your punishment
Expose your throats to my righteous claws
And let the blood flow, and [let the blood flow], flow, flow, flow.

Wink



-------------





Posted By: DallasBryan
Date Posted: March 02 2005 at 18:26
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

DB - you are so wrong with
regard to most Neo-prog; it is clear to me that the
trees are interfering with your view of the woods.


I'm glad that you are promoting music that many of
us have not listened to (or not listened to much), but
your perceptions of Neo-prog seem born of some
kind of blind obsession.


Imitations? In The Enid, Twelfth Night or Marillion?
Where?


These bands gave prog the jumpstart it needed
after running out of steam so quickly (5-6 years is
not a long time for a genre to flourish) - so credit
where it's due.


But I must hit you again on the "recycled" point.
Give me some examples so I can understand -
which Genesis track does "Forgotten Sons" sound
like? (for example). How do The Enid sound like Yes
or ELP? Which band does Twelfth Night remind you
of most?


...I REALLY don't understand your point on this.



sorry certified guess its a generational thing, dont
know. I used to have the best Marillion recordings
and couldnt help but here genesis sounding and
phil collins'ish vocals. And the anguished vocals do
no more for me than Peter Hammils. I have tried
many newer prog bands only to be let down, for me.

I will probably pick up on the Tool, Radiohead, Pain
of Salvation, Opeth thing sometime but it seems
futile to leave the 70s to mid 80s as things just dont
interest me or they are too much for my ancientness.
I may find something that I think is good but it wont
be something I listen to much because its would be
reaching for me to bang along with my walker!

Ill get to it sometime but the 100s that I have heard
so far, I own none of now, they didnt do anything for
me. Even Anglagard I listened to there 2 best over
and over and over and didnt find anything that I just
drooled over. Cant say that about the best 70s
continental euro bands. Hey I dont even have
anymore PFM, Banco or Locanda because too many
vocals in italian spoils it for me. I appreciate the
italian genius in the musical setting but I didnt listen
to them when I had them. Only the ones that omit the
vocals I enjoy and immensely.


Posted By: Cancion del sur
Date Posted: March 02 2005 at 23:07
alturas de machu pichu- los jaivas


Posted By: James Lee
Date Posted: March 03 2005 at 01:48

I may have missed the post where DB justified not including King Crimson's 80s recordings. I would have voted for Discipline, and it seems many here would agree.

But I voted for Art of Noise, anyway. Partly because I like it a lot, I think it's a landmark album, and partly just because I'm a contrary sort of bastard. 



-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/sollipsist/?chartstyle=kaonashi">


Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: March 03 2005 at 03:27

Originally posted by DallasBryan DallasBryan wrote:


sorry certified guess its a generational thing, dont
know.

No need to apologise - especially to an evil git like me...

I'm a bit disappointed that you were generalising - I thought you'd listened hard and come to a rational decision.

I used to have the best Marillion recordings
and couldnt help but here genesis sounding and
phil collins'ish vocals.

I suppose I'll have to agree to disagree as usual - to me, Fish has a unique voice with a hard edge, impassioned quality and Scottish tang that neither Gabriel nor Collins possess. I suppose the comparison is made because there's simply nothing else to compare him to - but I can spot Fish's vocal sound a mile off; it's easily as distinctive as PG or PC.

And the anguished vocals do
no more for me than Peter Hammils. I have tried
many newer prog bands only to be let down, for me.

I know where you're coming from with Peter Hammill - sometimes the vocal gymnastics seem highly inappropriate, or he keeps the passion at too high a level for too long. Fish, OTOH seems to have an instinctive knowledge of where to add colour and where to sustain drama.

Once you've got over his tendency to strain at the high notes, and realised that it's all intense emotion - about as real as you can get - Fish can send the shivers up and down the spine like nothing. Admittedly, that might be fanboy speak...

Out of all the Marillion albums, "Script for a Jester's Tear" is the one that consistently surprises me every time I hear it - I recommend as many revisits as possible to that album - and I would also recommend "Fact and Fiction" by Twelfth Night (although in lower doses). If you don't already have a copy of "In The Region of the Summer Stars" by the Enid, then get that above all others if you like intelligent symphonic music. It's nothing short of spectacular - especially if, as you seem to imply, you prefer instrumental to vocal music.

I will probably pick up on the Tool, Radiohead, Pain
of Salvation, Opeth thing sometime but it seems
futile to leave the 70s to mid 80s as things just dont
interest me or they are too much for my ancientness.

If you haven't checked out "Kid A" or "Amnesiac", then do so - I think you might like them, especially if you approach both albums from a Can/Czukay angle. Not sure about the other bands - prog metal doesn't do too much for me in general, although I have heard much to like in that genre. Tool and PoS leave me a bit cold, and I have yet to listen to the one Opeth album I own...


I may find something that I think is good but it wont
be something I listen to much because its would be
reaching for me to bang along with my walker!

Ill get to it sometime but the 100s that I have heard
so far, I own none of now, they didnt do anything for
me. Even Anglagard I listened to there 2 best over
and over and over and didnt find anything that I just
drooled over. Cant say that about the best 70s
continental euro bands. Hey I dont even have
anymore PFM, Banco or Locanda because too many
vocals in italian spoils it for me. I appreciate the
italian genius in the musical setting but I didnt listen
to them when I had them. Only the ones that omit the
vocals I enjoy and immensely.

If you really want to hear a neo-prog band that sound like Genesis, track down a copy of "Tales from the Lush Attic" by IQ. Some of the keyboard sounds are very dodgy indeed, but there is some superb original work on there too, if you stick with it, and it is a good place to find the best side of neo-prog. It's true that there's a lot of rubbish in the genre, but the good stuff is utterly brilliant and not worth missing out on, IMHO.

I like much of PFM's output tremendously - tho' I must admit I try to blot out the vocals. The music makes the effort worthwhile - something I never found with Locanda. Banco are still in my "Will listen to one day" pile..., and Anglagard were a great disappointment to me - I heard so much praise, then I heard this odd assortment of bits and bobs tacked together with awful vocals.

I would still recommend "Script..." and "Fugazi" above all other neo-prog for anyone who doesn't "get it" (well above "Misplaced Childhood") - but don't expect to get it from one or two listens, as it's definitely an acquired taste.

I'm still getting it 22 years down the line, and it tastes better every time... 



Posted By: DallasBryan
Date Posted: March 03 2005 at 03:41
I would agree that Script and Fugazi I liked better and
would say they are good albums. Probably not as
unoriginal as I am always raving about the genre as
a whole. Cant recall everything about them but I do
remember they were enjoyable, under the
microscope they were slighty outside of my best of
prog classification, maybe top 100, but I like several
styles of music and they fall just outside of
necessary for my tastes. If someone asked I would
direct them to give those two a try.

Radiohead was not my bag on the tauted OK
Computer, so I blew them off. I listened to clips of
Kid A and heard something much better, I think. Tool
sounds interesting but a little overpowering in the
clip I listened to.

Understand that Gentle Giant and King Crimson are
not great great to me either. Though I hear the
complex time changes and individual
omnidirectional soloing it doesnt do much for me
until they are able to create an intercourse with their
instrumentals. GG does so more often but the start
stop timing breaks my interest as I prefer music for
enjoyment verses manual dexterity.

Sure Larks Tongue and Octopus as great, but its
been 20 years since I cared.


Posted By: Dragon Phoenix
Date Posted: March 03 2005 at 03:57
Of the ones listed, Peter Gabriel 3. Although I would also prefer the first Marillion albums, as well as PG4.

The real prog materpiece of the eighties?

Kate Bush - Hounds of love


Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: March 03 2005 at 04:22

Best 80's prog album IMO:

Nothing tops it, but its closely followed by:

Every other 80's Rush album except Power Windows..and..

Script for a jesters tear - Marillion
Fugazi - Marillion
Clutching at Straws - Marillion
Duke - Genesis
Once around the world - IT Bites
The Spell - The Enid



-------------
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!


Posted By: sigod
Date Posted: March 03 2005 at 04:48
Originally posted by Mategra Mategra wrote:



Yay!!! 

And I bet Dallas has never heard of them!

IMPTY!


-------------
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill


Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: March 03 2005 at 06:13
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Best 80's prog album IMO:

Nothing tops it, but its closely followed by:

Every other 80's Rush album except Hold Your Fire..and..

Me too! I'll have some of that...Big smileClap



-------------





Posted By: Prog_head
Date Posted: March 03 2005 at 08:14

The best 80's Prog:

Marillion : Script for a jester's tear, Fugazi, or Rush Moving Pictures  



Posted By: greenback
Date Posted: March 03 2005 at 13:31

this one:

the atmosphere on an album is very important for me, that's why i like so much neo prog!

okay: honorable mentions:

pendragon - jewel

eloy - planets

marillion - fugazi

marillion - script

marillion - season's end

marillion - misplaced

rush - signals

it bites - big lad

iq - wake

iq - tales from lush

ant phillips - 1984

pallas - sentinel

rush - moving

.

.

.



-------------
[HEADPINS - LINE OF FIRE: THE RECORD HAVING THE MOST POWERFUL GUITAR SOUND IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF MUSIC!>


Posted By: Swinton MCR
Date Posted: March 03 2005 at 13:41
The eighties - Maybe 1984 by Ant Phillips, or possibly one of the IQ efforts or maybe Twelfth Night - Certainly none of the ones you listed (But I haven't heard most of those !)

-------------
Play me my song, here it comes again


Posted By: Beau Heem
Date Posted: March 03 2005 at 14:28
I'm having a hard time choosing whether to bash neo-prog or the progressive electronic stuff.

Both are uninspired and uninspiring.

Those terms match mostly everything, though...

Cheers

-Beau


-------------
--No enemy but time--


Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: March 03 2005 at 14:32

The Porpoise's "Blowhole" is close to the top!
What about Crustacian Festivities' "Flat Out At Ramadan"

Or anything by Jaco Pastorius,Stanley Clarke or Bentom Radley?

Big smile

 



-------------





Posted By: BilboBaggins
Date Posted: March 03 2005 at 14:44

Art of Noise .... prog? come on!!

As much as I do like Mr Gabriel, by far the best prog album of the 80s was Once Around the World by       It Bites. A classic!



-------------
Thoughtfullness


Posted By: Dan Bobrowski
Date Posted: March 03 2005 at 16:50

Ahem, Allan Holdsworth's Metal Fatigue.

Oh, and King Crimson's Discipline.

Eric Johnson: Tones.

 



Posted By: Chris Stainton
Date Posted: March 03 2005 at 17:32

My personal favorite would be Marillion's "Clutching At Straws". True, not their most progressive but it contains for me the most powerful lyrics ever from Fish.

I voted for 90125. IV (aka Security) is my favorite Gabriel album.



Posted By: James Lee
Date Posted: March 03 2005 at 19:18

What's next- a "best vocals in an instrumental" poll? 

Should there a forum law against creating definitive-sounding polls with choices severely limited according to your own tastes?

DB has learned much from the American election process. May the best man (that you have actually heard of and doesn't disgust you) win!



-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/sollipsist/?chartstyle=kaonashi">


Posted By: Jaja Brasil
Date Posted: March 03 2005 at 23:01

Hi Everybody,

From the list I just like PG 3 (I prefer " SECURUTY") and 90125 (but I don't think it was very progressive...)

My favourites are:

FUGAZY - MARILLION

SCRIPT FOR A JESTER'S TEAR - MARILLION

BROADSWORD AND THE BEAST - JETHRO TULL

 

Best greetings...



Posted By: Possessed
Date Posted: March 03 2005 at 23:05
Originally posted by James Lee James Lee wrote:

What's next- a "best vocals in an instrumental" poll? 

Should there a forum law against creating definitive-sounding polls with choices severely limited according to your own tastes?



Posted By: DallasBryan
Date Posted: March 04 2005 at 00:16
Originally posted by James Lee James Lee wrote:


Should there a forum law against creating
definitive-sounding polls with choices severely
limited according to your own tastes?




Then there would be NO polls, everyone is working
from the limits of their own knowledge. This is
obviously not brain surgery.

You may not agree with me but I aint dead!


Posted By: James Lee
Date Posted: March 04 2005 at 04:11
Originally posted by DallasBryan DallasBryan wrote:

Originally posted by James Lee James Lee wrote:


Should there a forum law against creating
definitive-sounding polls with choices severely
limited according to your own tastes?




Then there would be NO polls, everyone is working
from the limits of their own knowledge. This is
obviously not brain surgery.

You may not agree with me but I aint dead!

it's a fair point. But you must admit that your choices favor your concept of prog, which excludes what many people on the forum would consider necessary inclusions.

It's worth a lighthearted jab or two, anyway. No personal offense meant.



-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/sollipsist/?chartstyle=kaonashi">


Posted By: sigod
Date Posted: March 04 2005 at 04:53
Originally posted by James Lee James Lee wrote:

Originally posted by DallasBryan DallasBryan wrote:

Originally posted by James Lee James Lee wrote:


Should there a forum law against creating
definitive-sounding polls with choices severely
limited according to your own tastes?




Then there would be NO polls, everyone is working
from the limits of their own knowledge. This is
obviously not brain surgery.

You may not agree with me but I aint dead!

it's a fair point. But you must admit that your choices favor your concept of prog, which excludes what many people on the forum would consider necessary inclusions.

It's worth a lighthearted jab or two, anyway. No personal offense meant.



IMPTY


-------------
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill


Posted By: BigBrownBear
Date Posted: March 04 2005 at 08:26

I do agree, sort of, with Mr Lee as it is fustrating when there are lots of obvious exclusions from a poll list. But by the same token it is also great when someone acknowledges the existance of an album you thought no one else listens to. it is also an important learning experience for those who may for one reason or another not have the backgraound knowledge of prog. That is the most important job of ProgArchives to further the knowledge of prog.

We could however try to change the wording of the Poll question such as 'Which of these 80's Albums was the best' rather than such sweeping questions like 'best prog album of the 80's' Either way you would not stop people from coming up with their own suggestions in the replies. Which is a very good thing as I have discovered many new listening pleasures from this.

The funniest poll was the 'best keyboard player' poll recently. There were so many obviously missing people it was hilarious. It was the first poll where the 'Others' choice won the poll! Another way of looking at the same poll when you read the replies was that it was obvious that Tony Banks was winning it and he wasn't even listed!! 



Posted By: CrimsonKing
Date Posted: March 04 2005 at 18:40
Why isn't King Crimson represented? Did someone fall asleep in the 80s?

-------------
RED EYE


Posted By: Cygnus
Date Posted: July 18 2005 at 08:39

RUSH EVERYTHING APART POWER WINDOWS

FATES WARNING AWAKEN... , PERFECT SYMETRY



Posted By: Borealis
Date Posted: July 18 2005 at 09:36

Actually, just about everything from the 80's is sh*t. The only good albums (Discipline, Tangram, Planets, Levitation...) all came out in 80 or 81, alfter that, nothing!

I hope in future generation, humanity will forget about this sad musical period...



-------------
Vive le Québec libre!...


Posted By: Drew
Date Posted: July 18 2005 at 14:58

Originally posted by Cluster One Cluster One wrote:

Holy crap! No RUSH?!?!?!

what he said



Posted By: Hammill
Date Posted: July 18 2005 at 17:06
 Queensryche-rage for order

 Peter Hammill- Black Box/out of water/enter k

 Fates Warning-perfect symmetry

 Camel- nude

 Watchtower-Control and Resistance/Energetic Dissasembly

 Rush-moving pictures permanent waves and many more albums from different bands.


-------------


Posted By: Empathy
Date Posted: July 18 2005 at 17:23
Originally posted by Trouserpress Trouserpress wrote:

None. The birth of the Ozrics is far more important to me - They created an entirely new form of music.


I second this!


-------------
Pure Brilliance:



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk