Shred Room 55: The Gobi Dessert

Padraic wrote: bloodnarfer wrote: Also I saw Swans last night and it was sort of meh.. you DARE insult SWANS??  (I could never hear the appeal myself)

bloodnarfer wrote: Vompatti wrote: A Person wrote: Vompatti wrote: I hope their gay customers find some other place to eat pizza at as opposed to starving. Gay customers can eat pizza, they just will be turned down if they ask them to cater their wedding. Not that gay wedding pizzas are a thing, although they should be. I wouldn't turn down a gay pizza wedding if you know waht I mean. idk if free pizza is worth sitting through a wedding of any variety

i'd only sit through the pizza

OMG TURE THIS WILL BE MY VERY LAST POST

In case every pizza place suddenly refuses to sell pizza to gay people I don't see why the gays can't just start their own pizza places like they gay bars already, and like women have their own gyms and black people have their own seats at the bus.


Edited by Vompatti - April 07 2015 at 15:24

A Person wrote: Vompatti wrote: I hope their gay customers find some other place to eat pizza at as opposed to starving. Gay customers can eat pizza, they just will be turned down if they ask them to cater their wedding. Not that gay wedding pizzas are a thing, although they should be.

I don't want to force somebody to express support in their product for something they don't believe in, but I do wonder where the line should be drawn. The law itself is startlingly vague (and only validates the moral convictions of the religious and not those who aren't). It's impetus is good, unless you see it as just a way to bar gays from having pizza. But I think you open a can of moral conundrum worms as soon as you start thinking about what the law implies.

This conservative can't help but see this law as terribly undercooked. Like some pizzas I've had.

CPicard wrote: I make funerals for pizzas.

Pizzas go in the crematorium with the corpse so attendees can have a taste of the man he was.

CPicard wrote: twseel wrote: omgaddo vompatti puust coont 54321 Do you think vompatti will explode???

no that's just something you would expect when you pronounce the digits separately

twseel wrote: CPicard wrote: twseel wrote: omgaddo vompatti puust coont 54321 Do you think vompatti will explode??? no that's just something you would expect when you pronounce the digits separately

54321 – how do you say it?

twseel wrote: Polymorphia wrote: twseel wrote: CPicard wrote: twseel wrote: omgaddo vompatti puust coont 54321 Do you think vompatti will explode??? no that's just something you would expect when you pronounce the digits separately 54321 – how do you say it? vierenvijfitgduizend-driehonderdeenentwintig

I would explode if I said that.

A Person wrote: i've got something that reaches 55 meters if you know what i mean

i've got something that reaches 55 millimeters if you know what i mean

Polymorphia wrote: A Person wrote: Vompatti wrote: I hope their gay customers find some other place to eat pizza at as opposed to starving. Gay customers can eat pizza, they just will be turned down if they ask them to cater their wedding. Not that gay wedding pizzas are a thing, although they should be. I don't want to force somebody to express support in their product for something they don't believe in, but I do wonder where the line should be drawn. The law itself is startlingly vague (and only validates the moral convictions of the religious and not those who aren't). It's impetus is good, unless you see it as just a way to bar gays from having pizza. But I think you open a can of moral conundrum worms as soon as you start thinking about what the law implies. This conservative can't help but see this law as terribly undercooked. Like some pizzas I've had.

Even if I did agree with what the law supports I'd still agree with you in that it's a very mediocre bill, from what I've read about it. I do agree on principle that businesses should be able to refuse service to anyone they choose, including gay people, but I see this bill and a lot of the people who support it as hateful and pro gay oppression. I think the thing I can say with the most confidence is I wish there weren't people who saw this bill as necessary. It's horrible that people have to live their lives without a lot of the respect they deserve because of something as arbitrary as their sexual preference.

JD wrote: As a Canadian I find it absolutely hilarious that Republicans (the ones who support this bill the most) are also the ones who whine about too much government interference. Yet here they perpetuate the very demon they appal by creating such a ridiculous piece of legislation. Then the politicians who try and argue the appropriateness of it evoke hate groups as their example. ie. "Would you ask a Jewish baker to make a cake for the KKK?". Suggesting that in some way sexual orientation is equal to wanting to exterminate another group of people. That's F#@KED UP!!

Gay people wanting to be treated like anyone else is literally nazi-like oppression. End the tyranny, make gays illegal.