Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 29415
|
Posted: July 28 2011 at 01:20 |
ghost_of_morphy wrote:
I suppose I'm most shocked that Black Sabbath is listed here. |
Not me
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
ExittheLemming
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11420
|
Posted: July 28 2011 at 03:50 |
Catcher10 wrote:
ghost_of_morphy wrote:
I suppose I'm most shocked that Black Sabbath is listed here. |
me2 |
me 3. As much as I was weaned on Sabbath up to Technical Ecstasy,
I was very surprised to see them on PA as 'Prog Related' - hugely
influential on heavy rock and metal yes, but the discernible Sabbath
elements that can be found in some fully fledged prog are simply those
same heavy rock and metal ingredients that Prog musicians and fans
happen to like. You're married to your wife but you ain't related to
her....(I hope data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14557/145571d301faa2003a114de3880ebeb13c0a2bea" alt="Embarrassed Embarrassed" )
I also grew up listening to and loving the Who*, Queen, John Cale and
Talking Heads but really couldn't make any sort of cogent argument for
any of them being Prog Related but hey ho, the more good artists we have
on PA the better I guess.
*Ok maybe Tommy and Quadrophenia means they can go the ball but their toes looks awfully cramped in those slippers
Edited by ExittheLemming - July 28 2011 at 04:02
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65602
|
Posted: July 28 2011 at 04:07 |
ExittheLemming wrote:
As much as I was weaned on Sabbath up to Technical Ecstasy,
I was very surprised to see them on PA as 'Prog Related' - hugely
influential on heavy rock and metal yes, but the discernible Sabbath
elements that can be found in some fully fledged prog are simply those
same heavy rock and metal ingredients that Prog musicians and fans
happen to like. You're married to your wife but you ain't related to
her....(I hope ) |
true but at the time Sabbath was very much a progressive - or progressing
- rock band; early metal itself was a form of progressive rock in the
sense that it came out of the psych/blues movement and was indulging in
longer, more complex ideas with arty imagery. As well, I believe Prog
Related doesn't always indicate influence on, but participation
in, the progression of rock as art (but that's my interpretation of a
vague category)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
ExittheLemming
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11420
|
Posted: July 28 2011 at 04:13 |
^ a valid point but that would mean every single early metal band you describe should be in 'Prog Related?'
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65602
|
Posted: July 28 2011 at 04:18 |
well if they were as important and progressive as Sabbath perhaps; note that Maiden and Metallica are both here, the site has had debates on Judas Priest, and Malmsteen's Rising Force currently under eval
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: July 28 2011 at 04:21 |
ExittheLemming wrote:
^ a valid point but that would mean every single early metal band you describe should be in 'Prog Related?' |
We prefer to be more selective and for that I think those early metal bands we do have are representative rather than being inclusive. As David says Maiden and Metlaica are here, Zepp, Purple, Budgie and Heep (not metal but heavy at times) are also here.
|
What?
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
ExittheLemming
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11420
|
Posted: July 28 2011 at 04:43 |
This is interesting (BTW I don't want to undermine the valuable work that the genre teams and collabs do here)
I can hear the bilateral influence to and from Prog in Zep, Purple and at a pinch the Who (I'm not familiar with the music of Metallica, Budgie, Maiden or Heep) but with someone like Sabbath or Judas Priest, I can only hear their textural influence on Prog. It's certainly rare for any progger's record collection not to contain several albums by all the early metal artists you name (and Sabbath were certainly an integral part of the UK early 70's 'serious rock' music scene contemporaneous with Prog) but is this enough? I mean surely say, the Allman Brothers, the Band and Grateful Dead would have similar credentials albeit stateside?
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65602
|
Posted: July 28 2011 at 04:59 |
^ Yes, yes they do have similar cred, and I wouldn't be bothered by the Allmans or the Dead here, but this is really the great un-had discussion at PA, isn't it ; Between about 1969 and 79 we had an age of prog, which is to say almost every rock band of any merit was doing some sort of progressive rock. Do we recognize that period by including the bands that were a part of it whether considered Prog or not, e.g. UFO, Velvet Underground, Lennon/Oko, CSN&Y, Joni Mitchell, Scorpions, many others I can't think of.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
DavetheSlave
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 23 2007
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 492
|
Posted: July 28 2011 at 05:01 |
Where does one draw the line though? I could argue that Grand Funk Railroad probably deserve to be represented here as they were the US's answer to Black Sabbath etc and their music (their older music) definately wasn't mainstream back then.
I have accepted that but am still very bitter about the fact that Stratovarius isn't represented on the Site and the arguments will always be - if they are represented then how come another is not.
Never in my wildest dreams would I place ELO amongst my own personal progressive collection. They were categorised as pop music back in the day and I personally agree with that.
The Beatles are here yet the Rolling Stones aren't?
I'm not saying that the Stones should be here but if the one is given exposure how come not the other when they were so closely related back in the day. One was the antithesis almost of the other.
As I said - where do we draw the line?
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65602
|
Posted: July 28 2011 at 05:13 |
Good question. Where does one draw the line? You believe ELO was, or was considered, Pop-- and you're right, they were indeed a pop band. But that's kind of the point. For a time, Prog was pop; it was the cutting edge popular music (it certainly wasn't Billy Joel or Seals&Crofts). How do we deal with that startling reality?
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
DavetheSlave
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 23 2007
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 492
|
Posted: July 28 2011 at 05:21 |
I don't know that prog was ever really pop - I won't argue though. I personally think that Genesis, Yes, Floyd, KC could never have been termed pop music - in the record stores back then they would be found under the Underground category whereas ELO were categorised as Pop. I'm one of those perhaps silly individuals who can find no similarities between the Beatles and Prog data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b5f7/7b5f7509da8c945afbea45412cf846bc15abd048" alt="Embarrassed Embarrassed" other than the fact that they are both music. I do put ELO into the same personal category at home as the Beatles and the Stones and in fact as the Osmonds, the Archies etc.
Just me though.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
ExittheLemming
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11420
|
Posted: July 28 2011 at 05:28 |
Yes, it is a conundrum as there is a danger that we might continue to pine for a period when (as David so adroitly points out) when many plain vanilla rock and pop bands were charting with singles that do represent a distillation of the questing and adventurous risk taking spirit that we adore so much in Prog. I baulk at such nostalgia as I can understand why such irritates the younger brethren on PA. (Gawd, I'm the new Walter Dig Tunes - Lemming Digs Squat data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9103f/9103ff127db928f1c1f3c2b00e4fb01850112111" alt="Dead Dead" )
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
DavetheSlave
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 23 2007
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 492
|
Posted: July 28 2011 at 05:38 |
I remember being almost ostracised for my music taste in school for enjoying Yes, Floyd, Sabbath, Heep etc, - the other kids had the Stones, Donny Osmond, David Cassidy, the Beatles and later Kiss emblazened on their school bags etc.
It was almost as if my preferences added a kind of mystique to me and my mates - lol.
It was so easy to categorise music back then - Underground, Pop, Jazz or Classical.
The pop lovers were a different breed to the Underground music lovers.
Later it became Rock, Metal, Punk, Disco, Jazz and Classical.
Now - Holy Moly - Progarchives alone has more categories than their were types of music back then.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
ExittheLemming
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11420
|
Posted: July 28 2011 at 05:53 |
^ Yep, I dunno when this started exactly but something faintly unwholesome happened when the money men took a controlling interest in popular music i.e. they demarcated the eclecticism that was a feature of progressive artists and started a phoney brand patriotism war. I've always thought that Hendrix, Crimson and the Nice exemplified an attitude that 'music' was an indivisible whole where no rules should apply to mixing the ingredients. I better stop now or I'm just gonna sound like I'm nostalgic for something that never even happened in the first place...
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65602
|
Posted: July 28 2011 at 06:00 |
it was all a dream we had one afternoon
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: July 28 2011 at 06:06 |
Thanks for the tips on Kraftwerk and ELO should I reconsider and check them out anew. I don't even remember how I got into Kraftwerk in the first place. I think an abbreviated version of Autobahn got a little radio play. ELO did have a good reputation for their earlier albums amongst prog loving friends at the time. I think I just had my hands full exploring the usual suspects. I don't think we were calling that stuff prog but art rock or just really good music.
Most of my prog friends were actually my brother's (three years older) friends and he had built up a decent collection. There were pretty much none of my classmates but one that was really into that kind of music.
Chicago is another that comes to mind. More of a favorite of my brother's but I never had any of their albums. They were added after I was already here though.
Edited by Slartibartfast - July 28 2011 at 06:13
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
jean-marie
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 27 2010
Location: FRANCE
Status: Offline
Points: 2585
|
Posted: July 28 2011 at 06:07 |
About Kraftwerk check the dvd Minimum Maximum it's all you need to become friend with the band,
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
tamijo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 06 2009
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 4287
|
Posted: July 28 2011 at 07:01 |
To many to mention, but im fine with that, all just a matter of how you define things.
|
Prog is whatevey you want it to be. So dont diss other peoples prog, and they wont diss yours
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Manuel
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 09 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 13481
|
Posted: July 28 2011 at 08:49 |
Warthur wrote:
I wasn't too impressed with ELO's debut - some of the Beatles homage seemed to sail dangerously close to plagiarism to my mind - but I really like Eldorado. |
Same with me. I think El Dorado is their best album, but after that, they took a more commercial approach to their music, and I eventually lost interest in the band .
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
brainstormer
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 20 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Status: Offline
Points: 887
|
Posted: July 28 2011 at 11:41 |
Can't Get it Out of My Head (if that's the official title of that track) is one of the most amazing songs ever written/engineered/performed. It has that ghostly quality that I've only found with some songs like "If You Could Read My Mind" by Lightfoot, or a few dreamy songs by the Ronettes (seriously, lol). In prog, I find "The Venture" by Yes, to have a bit of that quality, and of course, Genesis veers into that territory often as well.
|
--
Robert Pearson
Regenerative Music http://www.regenerativemusic.net
Telical Books http://www.telicalbooks.com
ParaMind Brainstorming Software http://www.paramind.net
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.