just posting some artwork

 

It is hard for me to mention more than I have.  They are both titled "Landscape," because that is what they are.  I believe anyone can view it art however they want, that's why I dont force any more of an idea than how it is supposed to be a landscape.  The title fits better with the second one, just because of the obviousness, but with the first I could have come up with something fruity.  But the idea behind it was inspired by a landscape, and that's what it is supposed to be.  But it isn't just some abstract sculpture where you say to yourself "hey that could be a mountain or that could be the sun or waves or rolling hills and so on."  Like I mentioned in a previous post, it represents space and vastness like a true landscape inherently has.  I tried to recreate that feeling on something, although large for a sculpture, quite small in comparison to a landscape.

 

The mountain range piece is more of same approach in the idea of vastness (i really wish i had a good picture of this one).  It comes out at you and has a very stage design feel.  The mountains blend themselves together with the crisscrossing.  Also the background, although flat, peeks out between the cracks and illuminates the rest of the piece, creating space (at least for me, haha).

 

but view them however you want, they are more or less art for arts sake

 

hit me with something nasty cuncuna, that's what i like, nothing is more appreciated than a solid experienced criticism

 

Aaron