Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
jojim
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 27 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 155
|
Posted: December 14 2005 at 20:14 |
I liked Kate Bush's music till the album "Aerial". As a male person she
incorporated for me the eternal vamp and at the same time the
innocent young girl looking for love, emotions and - perhaps -
surrender. From her album "Red shoes" I liked "Song of Solomon". There
she sings "... I don't want your bullsh*t, I just want your sexuality
...". That is obvious enough. The older song "Baboushka" is also
treating the relationship between man and woman. - That was ok for me -
as a male person.
The new album "Aerial" has a big flaw in my opinion. She is not seeking
anymore, she has found. She has her little son whom she is loving
absolutely. - This is a crucial problem in art. If you are
satisfied, happy and well situated there is notihing you can contribute
to art. Your senses are dull. They are blocked by your feelings of
happyness. Kate is expressing her happyness on "Aerial". That is ok.
But it does not meet my personal taste. It's a statement that cannot
reach my ears. The music is flat, there are some birds ont the CD
singing from time to time. Peaceful atmosphere. But this is not my
situation. And perhaps not of many persons.
I would recommend this album to any new mother and father, or, to
mothers and fathers in general. And if your are able to make money with
that - the better. And for her little boy it is the money he will spend
in the future. That's ok.
Art is only fisable in a situation of pain, sorrow, hopelessness. This
claim is not too bad. I have heard only very seldom, that the
oppositehas been going to work. Tschaikowsky has written his last
symphony in a kind of agony. And that's what makes it great. If he
would have been happy like a jumping dog before dinner the work would
have been flat. This does not claim that we all should be unhappy.
Flat - that's my impression of the music of the totally happy
mother Kate. I will make this record a gift to a girl that wants to
have children soon. And for that purpose it's perfect. Happiness is a
warm gun - the Beatles once told us. But does it help making good music?
|
YES - Close to the edge / UK - UK / GENESIS - The lamb lies down / KING CRIMSON - Discipline / MIKE OLDFIELD - Tubular bells / JETHRO TULL - Aqualung / GENTLE GIANT - Three friends / TMO - IMF
|
|
lucas
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 06 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 8138
|
Posted: December 14 2005 at 20:24 |
rockandrail wrote:
Don't remember the title but the one song she "sings" (expires?) with Peter gabriel sucks a lot. |
It's either "another day" (appearing on the 'Christmas special' TV show) or "don't give up", both songs bringing tears to my eyes. But I suppose you are not aware of the first song, so you are probably refering to "don't give up", and in this case I don't understand yiur feelings towards this song : it is pure beauty.
|
"Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)
|
|
Rashikal
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 07 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 546
|
Posted: December 14 2005 at 21:22 |
i dont understand why everyone here likes kate bush. she is POP. and if she does do some prog, it's really unimpressive.
|
|
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28028
|
Posted: December 15 2005 at 02:49 |
jojim wrote:
I liked Kate Bush's music till the album "Aerial". As a male person she incorporated for me the eternal vamp and at the same time the innocent young girl looking for love, emotions and - perhaps - surrender. From her album "Red shoes" I liked "Song of Solomon". There she sings "... I don't want your bullsh*t, I just want your sexuality ...". That is obvious enough. The older song "Baboushka" is also treating the relationship between man and woman. - That was ok for me - as a male person.
The new album "Aerial" has a big flaw in my opinion. She is not seeking anymore, she has found. She has her little son whom she is loving absolutely. - This is a crucial problem in art. If you are satisfied, happy and well situated there is notihing you can contribute to art. Your senses are dull. They are blocked by your feelings of happyness. Kate is expressing her happyness on "Aerial". That is ok. But it does not meet my personal taste. It's a statement that cannot reach my ears. The music is flat, there are some birds ont the CD singing from time to time. Peaceful atmosphere. But this is not my situation. And perhaps not of many persons.
I would recommend this album to any new mother and father, or, to mothers and fathers in general. And if your are able to make money with that - the better. And for her little boy it is the money he will spend in the future. That's ok.
Art is only fisable in a situation of pain, sorrow, hopelessness. This claim is not too bad. I have heard only very seldom, that the oppositehas been going to work. Tschaikowsky has written his last symphony in a kind of agony. And that's what makes it great. If he would have been happy like a jumping dog before dinner the work would have been flat. This does not claim that we all should be unhappy.
Flat - that's my impression of the music of the totally happy mother Kate. I will make this record a gift to a girl that wants to have children soon. And for that purpose it's perfect. Happiness is a warm gun - the Beatles once told us. But does it help making good music?
|
Interesting but I suspect that is a deeply flawed argument.When musicians get together in a band for the first time they tend to be both happy and inspired..at the same time! As regards Kate Bush the latest album does show some settleness in the music but she has deliberately used this mood to create someting fascinatiing and slightly surreal (like the song about the Washing Machine!).You can only judge an album like this after a few years IMO.
|
|
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
|
Posted: December 15 2005 at 03:19 |
jojim
You raise some very interesting points there. There may be some truth in that an artist produces their best work when living with adversity.
I would have to disagree with you generally on Aerial though. I know it's all down to ones personal taste and I would agree that this is not exactly her best album, but I would say that it is better than Lionheart and The Red Shoes. Aerial has all the good KB trademarks throughout and I would say it is more progressive than the aforementioned albums.
I think also richardh is right about needing to allow these albums to sink in over a few years perhaps. I found that with both Hounds of Love and The Dreaming, I had to re-visit them a number of times to appreciate exactly how brilliant they were, especially The Dreaming which is very experimental.
|
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
|
jojim
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 27 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 155
|
Posted: December 15 2005 at 05:13 |
Agreed. I just give it a try later on. Aerial means perhaps "not to catch" And that is what happens here with Kate.
On the other side: the new McCartney album fascinates me over the top.
Ok it's POP. But in a way it has also some elements of Prog, or let me
say, the feeling of Prog (e.g. "vanity faire"). This musical statement
can touch me. It's weird. Paul reaches my ears. And he is as long in
the business as Kate. But this is of course a personal feeling. And I'm
a man. I listened at least 100 times to the whole McCartney album
"Chaos ...". Just to say.
|
YES - Close to the edge / UK - UK / GENESIS - The lamb lies down / KING CRIMSON - Discipline / MIKE OLDFIELD - Tubular bells / JETHRO TULL - Aqualung / GENTLE GIANT - Three friends / TMO - IMF
|
|
kenmeyerjr
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 30 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 235
|
Posted: December 15 2005 at 13:11 |
Boy, for me, The Dreaming and Hounds hit me like a ton of bricks on the first listen and never let up (and I have a soft spot for Lionheart as well, as I think it was the first one I bought loooong ago). I need some time for Aerial to sink in, especially since it is a double album.
|
If you like art of musicians, check my site (the music section) and tell me what you think! http://www.kenmeyerjr.com
|
|
DEzerov
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 17 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 340
|
Posted: December 15 2005 at 13:25 |
Rashikal wrote:
i dont understand why everyone here likes kate bush.
she is POP. and if she does do some prog, it's really unimpressive.
|
Funny, I've never heard Experiment IV, Houdini, Get Out of My House,
Heads We're Dancing, Breathing, Sat In Your Lap, et al. played on top
40 pop radio...
In fact, I'd say that most of these titles are pretty god*amned impressive examples of prog. But just my humble opinion.
|
The moon is made by some lame cooper and you can see the idiot has no idea about moons at all - Nikolay Gogol
|
|
chopper
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20030
|
Posted: December 15 2005 at 14:03 |
DEzerov wrote:
Rashikal wrote:
i dont understand why everyone here likes kate bush.
she is POP. and if she does do some prog, it's really unimpressive.
|
Funny, I've never heard Experiment IV, Houdini, Get Out of My House,
Heads We're Dancing, Breathing, Sat In Your Lap, et al. played on top
40 pop radio...
In fact, I'd say that most of these titles are pretty god*amned impressive examples of prog. But just my humble opinion.
|
Well said Dezerov, nobody should confuse Kate Bush with the stuff that
passes for "pop" these days. Westlife are pop, Kate Bush is not.
|
|
soundsweird
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 08 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 408
|
Posted: December 16 2005 at 02:24 |
Worst song: The song she does with Prince on "Red Shoes", "Why Should I Love You?"
I have to agree somewhat with Jojim about "Aerial"; although I found several tracks to like, I think that the woman has lost her edge. I also feel that her gift for melody has abandoned her; most of the songs get a groove going, and that's about it. No "verse, chorus, verse, bridge, chorus" songs (with a few exceptions). The song "Bertie" could have been great if not for the cloying lyrics. But mostly, it's the fact that she never lets loose on this album. It makes for a lack of contrast, chugging along at mid-tempo. Moments of power or delicacy are missing in action.
|
|
Rashikal
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 07 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 546
|
Posted: December 16 2005 at 16:44 |
kate bush is horrid, get off her balls.
|
|
GTOMax
Forum Newbie
Joined: December 16 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3
|
Posted: December 16 2005 at 16:55 |
This is probably not the best thing to post as my first message, but
didn't anyone think that Hounds of Love was just a little too
weird? I mean, a few of those songs reminded me of a Listerine
commercial or something -- and when she starts growling of a dog, well,
I now know where they got the idea for Sigorney Weaver's character in
Ghostbusters originally.
I'm sure Kate is mostly sane, but most of her material is just too much
for me -- I listen to some pretty weird stuff, too. Hell, I own a
whole bunch of Penderecki recordings and find them to be less weird
(Magnificat, Threnody can't outcreep Hounds of Love).
|
Randall
|
|
kenmeyerjr
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 30 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 235
|
Posted: December 16 2005 at 17:04 |
Hhahhahaha, that is sorta funny, tho....posting that Kate Bush is a bit weird...and having a big Manson as your signature!
|
If you like art of musicians, check my site (the music section) and tell me what you think! http://www.kenmeyerjr.com
|
|
Dazo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 20 2005
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 178
|
Posted: December 16 2005 at 17:14 |
ranger wrote:
its too hard to choose most of her songs are awful |
What a twat!
Can I say Twat?
|
Call that an argument?
That was never an argument.
|
|
Dalex_61
Forum Newbie
Joined: December 15 2005
Location: Pompeii - Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 34
|
Posted: December 16 2005 at 17:15 |
I read two or three highly interesing posts in this topic. I have to say that I like Kate Bush very much. Having said that, I really don't care if she makes prog music or not, but I don't think so. Let's say that Kate's music is a world apart. About her new CD, well... I read many different opinions and that's actually a peculiar album... the music seems to grow lighter and lighter... it's a sort of breeze passing by. I'm sure I'll have to listen to this CD more and more to make up my mind.
Should I add that all I said is just my opinion?
|
|
Dazo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 20 2005
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 178
|
Posted: December 16 2005 at 19:12 |
gdub411 wrote:
I recently purchased 2 lps from her and couldn't get through them both. The music is tortuous to my ears I can tell that these will not be growers either. It's like quirky cliched 80's pop with this caterwauler of a singer that just grates on my nerves. I am sorry if this offends anyone, but hey...since the thread was brought up...why not. |
Can I ask why you "purchased 2 lps from her"?
Were they recomended to you?
|
Call that an argument?
That was never an argument.
|
|
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28028
|
Posted: December 16 2005 at 19:24 |
Dazo wrote:
ranger wrote:
its too hard to choose most of her songs are awful |
What a twat!
Can I say Twat?
|
No!
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: December 16 2005 at 19:55 |
richardh wrote:
Dazo wrote:
ranger wrote:
its too hard to choose most of her songs are awful |
What a twat!
Can I say Twat?
|
No!
|
Not without backing it up! In what way is he a twat? Expand further!
|
|
|
Forgotten Son
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 13 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1356
|
Posted: December 16 2005 at 20:07 |
Snow Dog wrote:
richardh wrote:
Dazo wrote:
ranger wrote:
its too hard to choose most of her songs are awful |
What a twat!
Can I say Twat?
|
No!
|
Not without backing it up! In what way is he a twat? Expand further! |
He has the properties of femal genitalia?
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: December 16 2005 at 20:11 |
Forgotten Son wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
richardh wrote:
Dazo wrote:
ranger wrote:
its too hard to choose most of her songs are awful |
What a twat!
Can I say Twat?
|
No!
|
Not without backing it up! In what way is he a twat? Expand further!
|
He has the properties of femal genitalia?
|
..or maybe he has similarities to a pregnant fish?
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.