Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Peace Frog
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 17 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 994
|
Topic: The Flaming Lips on PA Posted: December 16 2005 at 16:28 |
I don't particularly care too much if they're on here or not. I just want to see what everyone else thinks.
If Radiohead is on PA, why couldn't the Flaming Lips be?
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Moatilliatta
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 01 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3083
|
Posted: December 17 2005 at 01:19 |
The Flaming Lips are cool, but i'm not sure if they should be included in the archives; they're not really progressive.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
|
Posted: December 17 2005 at 01:27 |
Peace Frog wrote:
If Radiohead is on PA, why couldn't the Flaming Lips be?
|
Plese stop with this kind of arguments, if a mistake is done it's not a valid excuse to commit other even worst.
Give reasons, don't say, "Well "A" is not prog "B" neither, but if "A" is here, let's include "B". data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9103f/9103ff127db928f1c1f3c2b00e4fb01850112111" alt=""
Flaming Lips is just Alternative Pop.
Iván
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Emiaj
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 30 2005
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 127
|
Posted: December 17 2005 at 02:56 |
Flaming Lips????..for prog's sake..
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
goose
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
|
Posted: December 17 2005 at 10:24 |
ivan_2068 wrote:
Peace Frog wrote:
If Radiohead is on PA, why couldn't the Flaming Lips be?
|
Plese stop with this kind of arguments, if a mistake is done it's not a valid excuse to commit other even worst.
Give reasons, don't say, "Well "A" is not prog "B" neither, but if "A" is here, let's include "B". data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9103f/9103ff127db928f1c1f3c2b00e4fb01850112111" alt=""
Flaming Lips is just Alternative Pop.
Iván |
I certainly agree with the first bit, although I'm a bit less sure on the last sentence. I think by any regular definition it wouldn't be a stretch to call them art rock - nothing to do with prog, but since this site also has a subgenre of prog called art rock it gets a bit confusing.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Peace Frog
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 17 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 994
|
Posted: December 17 2005 at 11:06 |
I agree that they aren't prog. There are sub-genres on this site though, that would make sense to add them. There are also many reasons not to add them. I think they're more experimental than Radiohead, and I could see them in the Experimental/Post rock section. But the Flaming Lips would be the least associated with prog on PA.
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Ricochet
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
|
Posted: December 17 2005 at 11:19 |
I have no idea who the Flaming Lips are...samples?
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Manunkind
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 2373
|
Posted: December 17 2005 at 11:23 |
Plenty of Flaming Lips on PA already... or should I say Flaming Fingertipsdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4be35/4be35324097aa66cc1273ec10d08dbe20a3d58f5" alt=""
That sucked, I know, I know
|
"In war there is no time to teach or learn Zen. Carry a strong stick. Bash your attackers." - Zen Master Ikkyu Sojun
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: December 17 2005 at 11:34 |
Granting that Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots is a very progressive album, if not quite prog, The Flaming Lips don't really belong here. Too much of their catelogue is alternative/psychedelic pop. Their next album, At War with the Mystics, is described as jazz/electronica. I have high hopes for that album.
As of now, no, they don't belong in the Archives.
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Moatilliatta
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 01 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3083
|
Posted: December 18 2005 at 01:37 |
stonebeard wrote:
Granting that Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots is a very progressive album, if not quite prog, The Flaming Lips don't really belong here. Too much of their catelogue is alternative/psychedelic pop. Their next album, At War with the Mystics, is described as jazz/electronica. I have high hopes for that album.
As of now, no, they don't belong in the Archives.
|
There is an mp3 up on their website off the new album. I gave it a listen. I don't hear jazz in this particular song. It sounds like a song that would be off of one of their recent albums. It's still pretty good. Do you know when the album is due out?
Secondly, I agree with your statement. Their early material, which I do not like, is nowhere near prog. Yoshimi is great, as is The Soft Bulletin, definitely creative work, but it isn't prog.
I haven't heard Zaireeka; is it any good?
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: December 18 2005 at 01:48 |
Moatilliatta wrote:
stonebeard wrote:
Granting that Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots is a very progressive album, if not quite prog, The Flaming Lips don't really belong here. Too much of their catelogue is alternative/psychedelic pop. Their next album, At War with the Mystics, is described as jazz/electronica. I have high hopes for that album.
As of now, no, they don't belong in the Archives.
|
There is an mp3 up on their website off the new album. I gave it a listen. I don't hear jazz in this particular song. It sounds like a song that would be off of one of their recent albums. It's still pretty good. Do you know when the album is due out?
Secondly, I agree with your statement. Their early material, which I do not like, is nowhere near prog. Yoshimi is great, as is The Soft Bulletin, definitely creative work, but it isn't prog.
I haven't heard Zaireeka; is it any good?
|
"Mr. Ambulance Driver?" Yeah, I was surpried by that. I had read somewhere, probably on the Lips' site, that At War with the Mysics would be a jazz/electronic fusion album."Mr. Ambulance Driver" is just a good, sad pop song. I hope the rest of the album is jazz/electronic. The latest I've heard about its release date is February, though that was quite awhile ago. It should be out by summertime.
Yoshimi and The Soft Bulletin are vastly different, yet similar. Yoshimi uses much more keyboards and electronica, yet both retain the lush sound of latter-day Lips. One can see how the Lips can easily bloom into a prog band. This is why I have such high hopes for At War with the Mysics.
Zaireeka is great, even closer to prog (though sill a far cry away) than Yoshimi. It's very inaccessible, but beautiful and interesting to listen to/expeiriment with. I don't listen to it often, because it's a pain in the arse to get 4 different sound sources together at one time.
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
|
Posted: December 18 2005 at 01:49 |
goose wrote:
I certainly agree with the first bit, although I'm a bit less sure on the last sentence. I think by any regular definition it wouldn't be a stretch to call them art rock - nothing to do with prog, but since this site also has a subgenre of prog called art rock it gets a bit confusing. |
Art Rock is not an invention of this forum, Art Rock is clearly described by most sites and it's the borderline between Prog and mainstream, more precisely the borderline of Prog and AOR.
Fklaming Lips was never, is not and will never be a Progressive Rock band, they are Alternative and nothing more.
I don't agree with Radiohead either, but If I had to choose I'd stay with Radiohead, they are better and much closer to dark Prog at least in their last albums.
And to be honest, Peace Frog's argument is not very convicing either
I don't particularly care too much if they're on here or not. I just want to see what everyone else thinks |
Please if not even you care about them how in hell can yopu ask for their inclusion?
Iván
Edited by ivan_2068
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: December 18 2005 at 01:51 |
ivan_2068 wrote:
goose wrote:
I certainly agree with the first bit, although I'm a bit less sure on the last sentence. I think by any regular definition it wouldn't be a stretch to call them art rock - nothing to do with prog, but since this site also has a subgenre of prog called art rock it gets a bit confusing. |
Art Rock is not an invention of this forum, Art Rock is clearly described by most sites and it's the borderline between Prog and mainstream, more precisely the borderline of Prog and AOR.
Fklaming Lips was never, is not and will never be a Progressive Rock band, they are Alternative and nothing more.
I don't agree with Radiohead either, but If I had to choose I'd stay with Radiohead, they are better and much closer to dark Prog at least in their last albums.
Iván
|
Will never be Prog? I hope they can. They're certainly heading in that direction.
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Moatilliatta
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 01 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3083
|
Posted: December 18 2005 at 01:55 |
stonebeard wrote:
Moatilliatta wrote:
stonebeard wrote:
Granting that Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots is a very progressive album, if not quite prog, The Flaming Lips don't really belong here. Too much of their catelogue is alternative/psychedelic pop. Their next album, At War with the Mystics, is described as jazz/electronica. I have high hopes for that album.
As of now, no, they don't belong in the Archives.
|
There is an mp3 up on their website off the new album. I gave it a listen. I don't hear jazz in this particular song. It sounds like a song that would be off of one of their recent albums. It's still pretty good. Do you know when the album is due out?
Secondly, I agree with your statement. Their early material, which I do not like, is nowhere near prog. Yoshimi is great, as is The Soft Bulletin, definitely creative work, but it isn't prog.
I haven't heard Zaireeka; is it any good?
|
"Mr. Ambulance Driver?" Yeah, I was surpried by that. I had read somewhere, probably on the Lips' site, that At War with the Mysics would be a jazz/electronic fusion album."Mr. Ambulance Driver" is just a good, sad pop song. I hope the rest of the album is jazz/electronic. The latest I've heard about its release date is February, though that was quite awhile ago. It should be out by summertime.
Yoshimi and The Soft Bulletin are vastly different, yet similar. Yoshimi uses much more keyboards and electronica, yet both retain the lush sound of latter-day Lips. One can see how the Lips can easily bloom into a prog band. This is why I have such high hopes for At War with the Mysics.
Zaireeka is great, even closer to prog (though sill a far cry away) than Yoshimi. It's very inaccessible, but beautiful and interesting to listen to/expeiriment with. I don't listen to it often, because it's a pain in the arse to get 4 different sound sources together at one time.
|
Yea, it's long. I'll have to check it out one of these days. And I'm sure the new album will be lush and enjoyable, even if it's not jazzy.
ivan_2068 wrote:
Art Rock is clearly described by most sites and it's the borderline between Prog and mainstream, more precisely the borderline of Prog and AOR.
|
What does AOR stand for?
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
|
Posted: December 18 2005 at 02:07 |
stonebeard wrote:
Will never be Prog? I hope they can. They're certainly heading in that direction. |
For God's sake Stonebeard, they have 22 years in the market!!!!!!!!!!
Isn't that enough time to define their genre, most bands don't last so much. Most of them are way passed their 40's, ifthey were not Prog' until now, most surely they will never be, and even if they release a proggy or two albums, they would never be a Prog band because already released 11 non Prog albums.
BTW: AOR = Album Oriented Rock (Booston, Journey, Asia, Toto, etc)
Iván
Edited by ivan_2068
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Moatilliatta
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 01 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3083
|
Posted: December 18 2005 at 02:21 |
Thanks.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
kebjourman
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 393
|
Posted: February 03 2006 at 17:44 |
god i love the flaming lips!!!!!!!!!!!!
dunno if theyre prog though
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Hemispheres
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 22 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 533
|
Posted: February 08 2006 at 20:05 |
i got Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots and i didnt really enjoy the keys they annoyed me same with a supper furry animals album i got for christmas
|
[IMG]http://www.wheresthatfrom.com/avatars/miguelsanchez.gif">[IMG]http://www.rockphiles.com/all_images/Act_Images/TheMothersOfInvention/mothers300.jpg">
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: February 08 2006 at 22:52 |
ivan_2068 wrote:
stonebeard wrote:
Will never be Prog? I hope they can. They're certainly heading in that direction. |
For God's sake Stonebeard, they have 22 years in the market!!!!!!!!!!
Isn't that enough time to define their genre, most bands don't last so much. Most of them are way passed their 40's, ifthey were not Prog' until now, most surely they will never be, and even if they release a proggy or two albums, they would never be a Prog band because already released 11 non Prog albums.
BTW: AOR = Album Oriented Rock (Booston, Journey, Asia, Toto, etc)
Iván
|
Any band can become prog regardless of their past albums, I believe. But even in the span of 4 or so years from The Soft Bulletin to Yoshimi, they showed remarkable progression. And wouldn't you say Yoshimi is heading in that direction? Now, we'll see truly if it wasn't just a one-off when At War With the Mystics comes out in 2 months... What I think you're thinking of is whether or not they should be admitted to the archives if they managed to make a very prog album, in which I would say no as well.
Now, Wayne Coyne has cited that some of his infuences were Eno, Pink Floyd and Roxy Music...all bands that are now, in one shape or form, on Prog Archives. I do not mean to imply that just because one's influences are prog, that the person's music will be as well. But it shows that, possibly, as the band is maturing, these influences reveal themselves more and more.
By the way: Zaireeka is incredible proggy, not only in concept.
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Runaway
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 15 2005
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 130
|
Posted: February 08 2006 at 23:00 |
Flaming Lips are one of my all time fav bands, but they are not prog! Except for one song (The Spark That Bleed, that is a mini epic).
And the new album is released at my birthday!!! (3 of abril)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e8d/87e8df83ce72662bbb416676070d3558b4ba7267" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |