Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - RUSH is..........
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedRUSH is..........
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234
Poll Question: what catagory best describes this band
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
39 [75.00%]
10 [19.23%]
3 [5.77%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Jared View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 06 2005
Location: Hereford, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 19506 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 19 2005 at 10:35

I guess that Rush are Art Rock, certainly from about 'Moving Pictures' onwards, although I'm sure the term hadn't been formed back then!

I would just like to say that I think 'Counterparts' is a great album... significantly better than 'Presto' anyway.
Music has always been a matter of energy to me. On some nights I believe that a car with the needle on empty can run 50 more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. Hunter S Thompson
Back to Top
King of Loss View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 21 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Points: 16544 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 19 2005 at 10:58
Art Rock then to Pseudo-Prog, then to Pop/Rock
Back to Top
philippe View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 14 2004
Location: noosphere
Status: Offline
Points: 3597 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 19 2005 at 11:10

melodic hard rock with pseudo prog arrengements. Nothing else!

Back to Top
Cygnus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 12 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 520 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2005 at 06:48
Originally posted by Hammill Hammill wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by Hammill Hammill wrote:

Originally posted by Cygnus Cygnus wrote:

RUSH IS SIMPLY THE FIRST PROG METAL BAND. THEY ARE LIKE SABBATH FOR PROG


King Crimson were (and still are) much more heavier and progressive than Rush.

Well if you call that cacophony of noise, music maybe so. On the other hand if you want  actual tunes then Rush are heavier (but not neccesarily prog)



do you believe that albums like red, lark's tongues in aspic, construkction of light and power to believe are just noise and nothing else....??

I AM A BIG FAN OF KING AND I BELIVE THAT THEY WERE THE FIRST PROG ROCK BAND BUT HEY MAN RUSH WAS THE BAND WHICH BROUGHT HEAVY METAL RIFS TO PROG. NO MATER HOW HARD CK OR YES PLAYED RUSH WERE THE FIRST TO USE METAL STUCTURES WITH PROG THEMES.

AND AS FOR THE PROG, IF NATURAL SCIENCE, CYGNUS I AND II, 2112, YYZ AND MANY MORE OF THEIR SONG DONīT HAVE PROG STRUCTURES THEN I MUST HAVE LISTENED THEM WHEN I WAS DRUNK.
Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20030 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2005 at 07:58
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

I've never been sure about considering Rush a prog band - they're not really, are they?

Fantastic hard rock/metal band that goes above and beyond, writing epic length tracks with quiet bits and heavy bits and all manner of sections - but is it really prog?

No.

But I'm glad they're in the archives - EVERYONE should hear Rush.

Mind you, I hear what the Dead Jester is saying...

Maybe I've had one too many "happy ciggies" tonitgh...

If Rush aren't prog after recording The Fountain of Lamneth, Xanadu, Hemispheres etc, then I don't know who is. They may have veered away from it in later years, but they still qualify with ease, certainly a lot more than Queen!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.141 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.