Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
It was evident that ELP had lost its inventiveness after Brain Salad Surgery and a tiring tour. They chose to have a double LP with each member contributing a side and the last side being a collaborative effort, instead of a one-disc album where they perform as a group. And the result of such a decision is probably the most terrible double-LP album in the history of the genre. Only Lake's material has some lovely moments as well as parts with him on the vocals on Pirates.
Love Beach, despite its awful sleeve design, is a masterpiece album in comparison with Works.
Only Lake's material? What about Piano Concerto No. 1? It's a
genuinely good avant-garde, psychedelic, neo-classical song. It's on par
with The Nice live records such as Five Bridges. Yes, it is messy, but
isn't that the point of this kind of music?
For me Emerson's side and the band side make for a very decent album. The rest I find a bit of a mixed bag.
And as for Works vol 2 - it's ELP's equivalent of Led Zeppelin's Coda, i.e. a bunch of leftover stuff from previous albums that wasn't worthy of release in the first place.
QuoteReply Posted: 13 hours 8 minutes ago at 00:41
Nergdnur Ddot wrote:
Hosydi wrote:
It was evident that ELP had lost its inventiveness after Brain Salad Surgery and a tiring tour. They chose to have a double LP with each member contributing a side and the last side being a collaborative effort, instead of a one-disc album where they perform as a group. And the result of such a decision is probably the most terrible double-LP album in the history of the genre. Only Lake's material has some lovely moments as well as parts with him on the vocals on Pirates.
Love Beach, despite its awful sleeve design, is a masterpiece album in comparison with Works.
Only Lake's material? What about Piano Concerto No. 1? It's a genuinely good avant-garde, psychedelic, neo-classical song. It's on par with The Nice live records such as Five Bridges. Yes, it is messy, but isn't that the point of this kind of music?
In his early musical days, Keith Emerson refused his music teacher's suggestion for him to study classical music in London because young Emerson had little interest in classical music at the time and chose jazz piano. With the popularity of progressive rock, however, Keith Emerson was recognized as a very talented keyboard player who often fuses rock and classical music sounds, and as a first-class entertainer, gifted for extroverted and theatrical performances—firstly in The Nice and then in the trio Emerson, Lake & Palmer—he became a superstar in the 70s, perhaps one of the most iconic that ever existed in rock music, and such fame may have been the reason Keith Emerson developed an egomaniacal aspiration to be recognized as a serious classical music composer as well, and that ambition led him to create Piano Concerto No. 1. But this grand ambition has exceeded his writing skills in the classical genre. The Piano Concerto No. 1 is shallow and lacks refinement and sounds mechanical. Although the idea was to produce something substantial, the execution fell short of the expectations one has with classical music.
For those who frequently engage with classical music and are well-acquainted with the compositions of renowned composers, the initial two movements of Keith Emerson's Piano Concerto No. 1 may come across as lacking originality and exhibiting a formulaic structure. These movements do not have the richness or emotional depth of more typical concertos from the classical masters. The excessive use of standard forms and tropes dilutes the overall impact of the piece, rendering it less memorable than other pieces in the genre. Although the third movement in Emerson's concerto is more lively, it is also much different from the first two movements, and that inconsistency may disturb the listener in attempting to see cohesion within the work as a whole. A perfect concerto has to have stylistic coherence of some variety throughout its multiple movements, something that Piano Concerto No. 1 does not possess.
Compared to piano concertos by renowned composers, such as those Keith Emerson aspired to be like, it lacks content.
QuoteReply Posted: 12 hours 20 minutes ago at 01:29
It's true that Piano Concerto No1 was a 'rock star' doing classical music and it's also true that the London Philharmonic were not invested in it (that story is in Emerson Auto-Bio ''Pictures Of An Exhibitionist''). However it's also perfectly okay to like and enjoy it. It was largely inspired by a combination of Aaron Copland's Appalachian Spring and Emerson's commute on the train between Brighton and London. It oozes grandeur and Emerson's personal feelings for his home and has some extremely memorable sections. I like it a lot. We don't need to compare it to Brahms. That is plainly rediculous.
QuoteReply Posted: 11 hours 35 minutes ago at 02:14
Emerson was one of that band of keyboard plays who were inspired by the classics and were also aspiring composers, Along with Rod Argent, Rick Wakeman, and Jon Lord.
In the case of the bands Argent and ELP there was also the rivalry/conflict/contrast between the composer and the songwriter - i.e. Emerson-Lake and Argent-Ballard.
QuoteReply Posted: 11 hours 18 minutes ago at 02:31
richardh wrote:
It's true that Piano Concerto No1 was a 'rock star' doing classical music and it's also true that the London Philharmonic were not invested in it (that story is in Emerson Auto-Bio ''Pictures Of An Exhibitionist''). However it's also perfectly okay to like and enjoy it. It was largely inspired by a combination of Aaron Copland's Appalachian Spring and Emerson's commute on the train between Brighton and London. It oozes grandeur and Emerson's personal feelings for his home and has some extremely memorable sections. I like it a lot. We don't need to compare it to Brahms. That is plainly rediculous.
Well, I didn't have to mention Brahms. Suffice it to mention Robert John Godfrey, the pianist and composer educated at the Royal Academy of Music in London, and founder of The Enid, whose work possesses a certain sophistication that surpasses Emerson's stuff when viewed through the lens of neoclassical compositions.
ROBERT JOHN GODFREY He may have the appearance of a college professor with his long beard and studious expression, but Robert John Godfrey is the main driving force behind THE ENID, the Symphonic Prog band that's been around now for well over 40 years. Although this album, "Fall of Hyperion" (1974), is billed as a Robert John Godfrey solo album, it's really an album by The Enid in all but name, and presumably, that's why this album is included at the beginning of The Enid albums roster on Prog Archives. Most importantly though, this album SOUNDS like The Enid, with all of the symphonic pomp and ceremony you might expect from such a distinguished Prog-meister as "Professor Godfrey". His first album release as The Enid, "In the Region of the Summer Stars"was released two years later in 1976, followed swiftly by the humorously-titled "Aerie Faerie Nonsense" album in 1977. This solo album "Fall of Hyperion" features vocals, although the first four albums by The Enid proper were all orchestral pieces with no lyrics. It wasn't until the release of the band's fifth album, "Something Wicked This Way Comes" in 1983, that lyrics were featured for the first time. Robert John Godfrey worked with Barclay James Harvest in the early 1970's before deciding to go solo. Godfrey and The Enid have 20 studio albums to their credit, and despite him being diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease in 2013, The Enid still continues to this day with many changes of line-up along the way. Although Robert John Godfrey has had to retire from touring due to his illness, he IS The Enid, because without keyboard maestro Godfrey ever- present at the helm, the band would never have existed.
The album opens in grand symphonic style with "The Raven". This anthemic piece of music is so extravagantly ostentatious in in all of its glorious pomp and splendour, that you may feel the patriotic urge to stand up and give a rousing rendition of "Land of Hope and Glory", or maybe the "Star Spangled Banner" if you're an American. Yes, it really IS that anthemic. It's booming, it's bombastic, and it's fantastic! You really have to hear it to believe it. This grand stentorian, orchestral symphony would have been equally at home as a magnificent finale to the album. And so, how do you follow up such a marvellous 9-minute album opener? You follow it with "Mountain", a 7-minute-long, energetic and euphonic piece of music with classical glissandos galore. Even classical music buffs couldn't fail to be impressed by this flawless fugue. This theatrical and emotionally uplifting music is like Renaissance with knobs on, where the dynamic and dramatic classical influences are even more in evidence. This is masterful Symphonic Prog taken to even more powerful extremes of classical greatness. Sailing onwards now on a patriotic wave of glory, comes the 6-minute "Water Song". You can expect to hear a profusion of grand- sounding keyboard runs on the piano with the ever-present full orchestra there in all of their magnificent power and glory.
Side Two opens with "Isault", an emotional powerful song with all of the grand theatrics of a BBC costume drama. It's grandiose and spectacular and just what we've come to expect by now from such an accomplished keyboard maestro as "Professor Godfrey". And now we come to "The Daemon of the World, a 15-minute long 6-piece suite to round off the album in grand style. Listen in awe and be prepared to be swept away by the magnificent grandstanding on display here in this powerful symphonic opus. It's melodious and triumphal with constant changes of tempo, staccato breaks, and sparkling fast and slow keyboard runs. This marvellous finale is sure to delight fans of The Enid and the whole Symphonic Prog genre generally. There's even the stentorian sound of a pipe organ thrown in for good measure. What more could you ask for!?
A gloriously powerful album of passionate majestic anthems that's guaranteed to astound and delight fans of classically- inspired Symphonic Prog. This album might be described as overblown and pretentious (just like this review) by those who aren't in the know, but to prog aficionados, this is prog heaven! Let Robert John Godfrey carry you away to a Land of Hope and Glory in this unashamedly pompous and sonorous extravaganza. It's an absolute must-have album for connoisseurs and collectors of classic British Symphonic Prog.
Edited by Psychedelic Paul - 11 hours 9 minutes ago at 02:40
QuoteReply Posted: 11 hours 9 minutes ago at 02:40
Floydoid wrote:
Emerson was one of that band of keyboard plays who were inspired by the classics and were also aspiring composers, Along with Rod Argent, Rick Wakeman, and Jon Lord.
In the case of the bands Argent and ELP there was also the rivalry/conflict/contrast between the composer and the songwriter - i.e. Emerson-Lake and Argent-Ballard.
QuoteReply Posted: 11 hours 6 minutes ago at 02:43
I love Aerie Fairie Nonsense most by The Enid. Yep RJG is one of a kind could even upstage Emerson with his antics when covering Hendrix at one famous festival back in the day!
QuoteReply Posted: 9 hours 20 minutes ago at 04:29
richardh wrote:
Floydoid wrote:
Emerson was one of that band of keyboard plays who were inspired by the classics and were also aspiring composers, Along with Rod Argent, Rick Wakeman, and Jon Lord.
In the case of the bands Argent and ELP there was also the rivalry/conflict/contrast between the composer and the songwriter - i.e. Emerson-Lake and Argent-Ballard.
also Jobson - Wetton in UK?
Ah yes, and Monkman of course was another classically trained keyboardist / composer often in conflict with his other band members, notably leaving both Curved Air and Sky to move on... whether it was due to conflicting personalities I don't know.
Edited by Floydoid - 9 hours 17 minutes ago at 04:32
QuoteReply Posted: 5 hours 51 minutes ago at 07:58
Like many such albums, Works 1 is a good album that could have been a great album distilled down to one record. In fact, I would go far as to say one could distill Works 1 and Works 2 into one album and have a masterpiece.
Side One
"C'est la Vie"
"Hallowed Be Thy Name"
"L.A. Nights"
"Nobody Loves You Like I Do"
"Maple Leaf Rag"
Side Two
"Tiger in the Spotlight"
"The Enemy God Dances with the Black Spirits"
"I Believe in Father Christmas"
"Fanfare for the Common Man"
Stripped of bloat and pretension, focusing on songwriting yet still highlighting each member, the album could perhaps have been ELP's most popular. It would be fun (and the great addition of Joe Walsh on "L.A. Nights" is the very definition of fun). It certainly would have staved off ELP's eventual decline and stagnation, and might have even changed the pervading critical view of the band as prog dinosaurs.
Edited by The Dark Elf - 3 hours 29 minutes ago at 10:20
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
We don't need to compare it to Brahms. That is plainly ridiculous.
Hi,
I have no issues with the comparison, except one ... it is an attempt to make fun of Keith's work and not take it seriously.
The same goes for TARKUS in the hands of Rachel Flowers ... a beautiful Piano Concerto, but none of us here will ever wish to raise the level of things beyond a stupid "song" ... and downplay the value of our generation's talents ... comparing it to Brahms? What's the point? Modern music is stupid and not worthy of the name?
I would think that person is not listening to music at all, and has to create comparisons to point out his/her taste in music is far better than Keith's.
Oh well ... subjectivity is alive and well on PA, specially when it is ridiculous and not exactly well founded in music directions and understanding ... so music has not changed since Brahms, and everyone else is crap! Had to happen on PA for sure!
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
QuoteReply Posted: 3 hours 35 minutes ago at 10:14
Hosydi wrote:
Nergdnur Ddot wrote:
Hosydi wrote:
It was evident that ELP had lost its inventiveness after Brain Salad Surgery and a tiring tour. They chose to have a double LP with each member contributing a side and the last side being a collaborative effort, instead of a one-disc album where they perform as a group. And the result of such a decision is probably the most terrible double-LP album in the history of the genre. Only Lake's material has some lovely moments as well as parts with him on the vocals on Pirates.
Love Beach, despite its awful sleeve design, is a masterpiece album in comparison with Works.
Only Lake's material? What about Piano Concerto No. 1? It's a genuinely good avant-garde, psychedelic, neo-classical song. It's on par with The Nice live records such as Five Bridges. Yes, it is messy, but isn't that the point of this kind of music?
In his early musical days, Keith Emerson refused his music teacher's suggestion for him to study classical music in London because young Emerson had little interest in classical music at the time and chose jazz piano. With the popularity of progressive rock, however, Keith Emerson was recognized as a very talented keyboard player who often fuses rock and classical music sounds, and as a first-class entertainer, gifted for extroverted and theatrical performances—firstly in The Nice and then in the trio Emerson, Lake & Palmer—he became a superstar in the 70s, perhaps one of the most iconic that ever existed in rock music, and such fame may have been the reason Keith Emerson developed an egomaniacal aspiration to be recognized as a serious classical music composer as well, and that ambition led him to create Piano Concerto No. 1. But this grand ambition has exceeded his writing skills in the classical genre. The Piano Concerto No. 1 is shallow and lacks refinement and sounds mechanical. Although the idea was to produce something substantial, the execution fell short of the expectations one has with classical music.
For those who frequently engage with classical music and are well-acquainted with the compositions of renowned composers, the initial two movements of Keith Emerson's Piano Concerto No. 1 may come across as lacking originality and exhibiting a formulaic structure. These movements do not have the richness or emotional depth of more typical concertos from the classical masters. The excessive use of standard forms and tropes dilutes the overall impact of the piece, rendering it less memorable than other pieces in the genre. Although the third movement in Emerson's concerto is more lively, it is also much different from the first two movements, and that inconsistency may disturb the listener in attempting to see cohesion within the work as a whole. A perfect concerto has to have stylistic coherence of some variety throughout its multiple movements, something that Piano Concerto No. 1 does not possess.
Compared to piano concertos by renowned composers, such as those Keith Emerson aspired to be like, it lacks content.
Thanks for your explanation. I do think though that the Brahms comparison is a bit out of place. It is much closer to Stravinski at core. I think the messiness is a feature, not a bug. You are in for a crazy psychedelic ride, and you expect an epic classic tune. ELP has always been more avant-garde jazzy-esque or blue-esque than traditional European music.
Edited by Nergdnur Ddot - 3 hours 27 minutes ago at 10:22
QuoteReply Posted: 2 hours 24 minutes ago at 11:25
Nergdnur Ddot wrote:
Hosydi wrote:
Nergdnur Ddot wrote:
Hosydi wrote:
It was evident that ELP had lost its inventiveness after Brain Salad Surgery and a tiring tour. They chose to have a double LP with each member contributing a side and the last side being a collaborative effort, instead of a one-disc album where they perform as a group. And the result of such a decision is probably the most terrible double-LP album in the history of the genre. Only Lake's material has some lovely moments as well as parts with him on the vocals on Pirates.
Love Beach, despite its awful sleeve design, is a masterpiece album in comparison with Works.
Only Lake's material? What about Piano Concerto No. 1? It's a genuinely good avant-garde, psychedelic, neo-classical song. It's on par with The Nice live records such as Five Bridges. Yes, it is messy, but isn't that the point of this kind of music?
In his early musical days, Keith Emerson refused his music teacher's suggestion for him to study classical music in London because young Emerson had little interest in classical music at the time and chose jazz piano. With the popularity of progressive rock, however, Keith Emerson was recognized as a very talented keyboard player who often fuses rock and classical music sounds, and as a first-class entertainer, gifted for extroverted and theatrical performances—firstly in The Nice and then in the trio Emerson, Lake & Palmer—he became a superstar in the 70s, perhaps one of the most iconic that ever existed in rock music, and such fame may have been the reason Keith Emerson developed an egomaniacal aspiration to be recognized as a serious classical music composer as well, and that ambition led him to create Piano Concerto No. 1. But this grand ambition has exceeded his writing skills in the classical genre. The Piano Concerto No. 1 is shallow and lacks refinement and sounds mechanical. Although the idea was to produce something substantial, the execution fell short of the expectations one has with classical music.
For those who frequently engage with classical music and are well-acquainted with the compositions of renowned composers, the initial two movements of Keith Emerson's Piano Concerto No. 1 may come across as lacking originality and exhibiting a formulaic structure. These movements do not have the richness or emotional depth of more typical concertos from the classical masters. The excessive use of standard forms and tropes dilutes the overall impact of the piece, rendering it less memorable than other pieces in the genre. Although the third movement in Emerson's concerto is more lively, it is also much different from the first two movements, and that inconsistency may disturb the listener in attempting to see cohesion within the work as a whole. A perfect concerto has to have stylistic coherence of some variety throughout its multiple movements, something that Piano Concerto No. 1 does not possess.
Compared to piano concertos by renowned composers, such as those Keith Emerson aspired to be like, it lacks content.
Thanks for your explanation. I do think though that the Brahms comparison is a bit out of place. It is much closer to Stravinski at core. I think the messiness is a feature, not a bug. You are in for a crazy psychedelic ride, and you expect an epic classic tune. ELP has always been more avant-garde jazzy-esque or blue-esque than traditional European music.
One could find worth in both pieces. Even a silly gnome statue from the garden can find a cherished place in our hearts. Though, one can't help but notice that, in contrast to Brahms' Piano Concerto No. 1, Emerson's Piano Concerto No. 1 has the depth of a kiddie pool.
It was evident that ELP had lost its inventiveness after Brain Salad Surgery and a tiring tour. They chose to have a double LP with each member contributing a side and the last side being a collaborative effort, instead of a one-disc album where they perform as a group. And the result of such a decision is probably the most terrible double-LP album in the history of the genre. Only Lake's material has some lovely moments as well as parts with him on the vocals on Pirates.
Love Beach, despite its awful sleeve design, is a masterpiece album in comparison with Works.
Only Lake's material? What about Piano Concerto No. 1? It's a genuinely good avant-garde, psychedelic, neo-classical song. It's on par with The Nice live records such as Five Bridges. Yes, it is messy, but isn't that the point of this kind of music?
In his early musical days, Keith Emerson refused his music teacher's suggestion for him to study classical music in London because young Emerson had little interest in classical music at the time and chose jazz piano. With the popularity of progressive rock, however, Keith Emerson was recognized as a very talented keyboard player who often fuses rock and classical music sounds, and as a first-class entertainer, gifted for extroverted and theatrical performances—firstly in The Nice and then in the trio Emerson, Lake & Palmer—he became a superstar in the 70s, perhaps one of the most iconic that ever existed in rock music, and such fame may have been the reason Keith Emerson developed an egomaniacal aspiration to be recognized as a serious classical music composer as well, and that ambition led him to create Piano Concerto No. 1. But this grand ambition has exceeded his writing skills in the classical genre. The Piano Concerto No. 1 is shallow and lacks refinement and sounds mechanical. Although the idea was to produce something substantial, the execution fell short of the expectations one has with classical music.
For those who frequently engage with classical music and are well-acquainted with the compositions of renowned composers, the initial two movements of Keith Emerson's Piano Concerto No. 1 may come across as lacking originality and exhibiting a formulaic structure. These movements do not have the richness or emotional depth of more typical concertos from the classical masters. The excessive use of standard forms and tropes dilutes the overall impact of the piece, rendering it less memorable than other pieces in the genre. Although the third movement in Emerson's concerto is more lively, it is also much different from the first two movements, and that inconsistency may disturb the listener in attempting to see cohesion within the work as a whole. A perfect concerto has to have stylistic coherence of some variety throughout its multiple movements, something that Piano Concerto No. 1 does not possess.
Compared to piano concertos by renowned composers, such as those Keith Emerson aspired to be like, it lacks content.
Thanks for your explanation. I do think though that the Brahms comparison is a bit out of place. It is much closer to Stravinski at core. I think the messiness is a feature, not a bug. You are in for a crazy psychedelic ride, and you expect an epic classic tune. ELP has always been more avant-garde jazzy-esque or blue-esque than traditional European music.
One could find worth in both pieces. Even a silly gnome statue from the garden can find a cherished place in our hearts. Though, one can't help but notice that, in contrast to Brahms' Piano Concerto No. 1, Emerson's Piano Concerto No. 1 has the depth of a kiddie pool.
Pretty weird statement. In contrast to Prokofiev's Battle on Ice or Wagner's Tristan Und Isolde, Close to the Edge also has the depth of a kiddie pool and so is a lot of prog classics. It reminds me of jazz purists bashing on Steely Dan because it is closer to Yacht Rock than real stuff like Coltrane and the likes. As much as I like Tony Banks or Rick Wakeman, they will never be as good as Ravel.
Edited by Nergdnur Ddot - 1 hour 37 minutes ago at 12:12
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.203 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.