The most archetypal classic Progressive Rock? |
Post Reply | Page <123 |
Author | |||
richardh
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 27993 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I like DFD but not so much Dear Hunter or Thank You Scientist. I'm not convinced any of those are like VDGG though. On the definition then I suppose you are correct. However does it mean the style has to stay the same? VDGG doesn't change but King Crimson were almost a reinvention for every album which for some may the defintion of progressive rock. Genesis and Yes (and VDGG) just do the same thing (brilliantly) for every album so what does that say. I'm confused about the point of the thread tbh. Is it just about what is 'progressive' or what bands influence can be strongly heard in modern day prog? The latter is what I took it to be but then I may just be confused.
|
|||
kenethlevine
Special Collaborator Prog-Folk Team Joined: December 06 2006 Location: New England Status: Offline Points: 8951 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I guess KC...they never stopped being prog or progressive either, even though after Islands I have tough time enjoying them
|
|||
Big Sky
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 24 2022 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 530 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Richardh, I would disagree Yes did the same thing for every album. The Yes Album, Fragile, Relayer, Drama and 90125 all sound quite different from each other. You can add the Ancient to the mix from TFTGO as side long piece of music that sounds far different than anything that band ever did. Some of the changes in the musical direction Yes took are due to the keyboardist, drummers and guitarists that were in the band at the time of recording these albums. Kaye, Wakeman, Moraz and Downes would never be mistaken for the other. Steve Howe (Jazz, Country influences) and Trevor Rabin (Metal, Fusion) are stylistically far apart. Obviously, Bruford and White drumming styles are quite different. As far as KC is concerned, they get far more credit for reinventing themselves from album to album than probably is deserved. The Wetton era of KC chewed much the same ground. The 80s reincarnation of Crimson was quite different than what they had done before, but those three albums, Discipline, Beat and Three of the Perfect Pair, I have always grouped together musically. The Construkction of Light and The Power to Believe does the Industrial Metal experimentation. Just my take on the matter. As far as the posters question, Yes and Genesis are probably what people think of when it comes to the arch type Prog. ELP would take the third spot. |
|||
David_D
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15107 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Well, I can't say it better than my question is which of "The Big Six" do you find to be the most archetypal of the classic Progressive Rock, and by now I've defined "archetypal" as: "I can tell that by "the most archetypal classic Progressive Rock", I mean that which is the most typical or the most defining for the classic Progressive Rock." The rest is up to you. |
|||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
|||
Hrychu
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 03 2013 Location: poland? Status: Offline Points: 5357 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
|
|||
“On the day of my creation, I fell in love with education. And overcoming all frustration, a teacher I became.”
— Ernest Vong |
|||
Post Reply | Page <123 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |