Dream Theater is the greatest progressive act in American music history and the only American prog band on par with the British "Big Four".
Frank Zappa is winning that one all day long but after that there is a major vacuum.(personally I believe most US bands that started as prog gave it up far too quickly)
Dream Theater are important certainly although they have released a lot of albums that divide opinion especially in recent years. They started in the 80's and are widely respected for Images and Words and Awake. I also believe (my ''hot take'') that A Change Of Seasons is the greatest prog metal track and the sub genre's equivalent of Suppers Ready.
^^ Relayer is my favourite but I think Tales is a strong contender. I also prefer Time and a Word to the Yes Album. I haven't listened to Echoes in a long time, but I would pick Shine over it from memory. Think of Me with Kindness is a wonderful song - the best? Not for me.
My hottest takes off the top of my head:
- I hope this isn't blasphemy but IQ and Galahad don't appeal to me (Not had an exhaustive listen, but I do keep dipping back in) - Folklore is overrated as a BBT album - Yessongs version of Fragile tracks >>>>> Fragile - I prefer Phil Collins era Genesis (with the exception of Selling England), but I prefer Peter Gabriel solo to Collins solo - Flower Kings' Flower Power should be one disc long and it should be called Garden of Dreams - Falling into Infinity >>> Six Degrees and Octavarium
The first comment is a personal opinion that you are well entitled to and probably shared by many so not really a ''hot take'' in my view. IQ are considered stalwarts and survivors while Galahad are okay but no one bigs them up that much. Personally I like The Last Great Adventurer a heck of a lot.
Folklore is the best BBT album overall and The Transit Of Venus Across The Sun their best track and intro (my ''hot take'' and opinion)
Fragile v Yessongs versions. Well there is no Southside Of The Sky to compare and that is my favourite track on the album and maybe the best Yes track (another ''Hot Take''). Roundabout is so much better on the album it's ridiculous (Alan could never deal with those latin style rhythm's that Bill weaves on the album. Heart Of The Sunrise does benefit from a harder edged approach certainly. Don't care about the rest much. I declare it a tie!
Agree on Genesis - I like the Phil Collins era and regard Trick as my favourite Genesis album. I think those albums stand up better generally now just from a recording perspective. Gabiel solo being better than Collins solo will never be a hot take (read the room)
The Flower Kings
Six Degrees and Octavarium are nowadaysn the only DT albums I listen to other than A Change Of Seasons. My hot take/persoanl opinion on DT is that Scenes From A Memory Part 2 is really not that good at all.
Again, I don't think Christi showed concern with anything you said, and they can throw out suggestions against derailing a thread; I don't see an issue with that. Also, I don't understand how me mentioning Rush applies to YOU taking issue with someone else's remark (about a big name list mind you).
People can list their top 6's if they feel it necessary, and people can also not put Rush in their top 10 prog bands list if they don't like their music (like me).
Either I can't read your words, despite going through your claims several times, or you are too ignorant to acknowledge the implications of things you already said (I'm not hallucinating; I believe you said you regret singling me out, and I couldn't be more thankful! )
I spent a career explaining technical details to juries, complex cases to AUSA and DAs etc. I've put it in simple terms that they can get, used diagrams, power-points, etc, etc. You don't get it. It happens. Very Rare, but it does happen. But, to be fair, I'll explain one last time to you why I used your post in my response to Christi.
Ie. Christi thought I should not have posted my hot take ( Big 6 take) as he implied it could derail the thread ( it's not helpful to use his words). I stated any post in a thread named Hot Takes could derail this thread if it was controversial or unpopular enough.
Hot Takes is asking for a contrarian post. I used yours as an example, because Rush is popular here (thus much more likely to get a responses) and your take is quite the take as far as Rush is concerned. I would think that you would agree with that. If you would have said Rush's best album was Moving Pictures or Hemispheres that would not have been a Hot Take and would have just gotten a collective shrug.
My point to Christi was if my take is not helpful (thus no place for it in this thread as he implied), then why not the post on Rush or any hot take for that matter. That's why I pointed out to Christi would he have felt better if my hot take was Peart was overrated, Gilmour not much more than an average guitarist and a 3rd year classical guitar student would dust your rock guitar hero that was proclaimed the best in the world. Would those takes be anymore helpful? The thread is Hot Takes. They are contrarian opinions. If there is a possibility a take may set you off maybe you should stay away from the thread.
There is no intrinsic value in a thread like this, but taken in the right spirit, can be fun and of interest seeing where various members fall on some subjects. That's why I responded to him complaining about my take. He was not receiving my take in the spirit that this thread was intending. And if my post was a problem, then why not others. If he would have disagreed with my take on the Big 6 instead of implying it had no place here, I would not have said anything.
Thus why I used your take in my response to Christi. You do understand that Rush's most popular period not only on a Prog site like this but, any site covering Rush will be the period from 2112 to Moving Pictures, which is their Prog period. I thought your take had been the most daring and contrarian take up that point. Thus, I used your post to point out to Christi that how was my post anymore contrarian than the take you made and if my post could derail a thread, why not others and used your take as an example. Could have used any other post and in hindsight should have concerning how my post set you off. That's why, I have mentioned several times now, over several posts, I regret using your post, so that you GET IT. I also said I thought your post was quite contrarian. In fact I thought it was quite a good take, even if I disagreed with it and even said "so be it" that it did not bother me, it was your take (opinion).
But, what are the "implications" you are alluding to? Would you have felt better with me responding directly to your original hot take instead of responding to Christi bringing your post into the discussion as I have expressed the reasons for repeatedly?
Here are the Bullitt points for you:
1) I have no issue with your take. That's why I did not respond directly to your original take on Rush. 2) I thought your take was a nice contrarian take, even if I disagreed with it. It's why I said it did not bother me 3) If Christi did not like my Big 6 take, implying it could derail this thread and thus did not have a place in this thread, then couldn't the same be said for any take and used your take as an example. 4) I let Christi know that I did not care if he thought my take had no place here. If he does not like what I post, I suggest he ignore me. 5) I regret using your take in my response to Christi as obviously you are quite sensitive to my use of the take. 6) Knowing your sensitivities, I will never use any post of yours going forward in responding to anyone else. 7) Going forward, it probably will be just a good idea not to respond to any post of yours.
Fine,
If you want to go comparing guitar heroes to 3rd class Juliard students or make band lists of your own, go ahead - nobody is stoping you. If you look at other posts, you will notice that users tend to compare songs, albums, eras, etc, not musicians to the outside world.
I don't need bear repeating of paragraphs explaining why you did this or that. Controversies don't need to be created over someone not liking Rush or Pink Floyd, and then trying to justify your response by saying "someone questioned my format" because they want consistency. Hot Takes are Hot Takes, not lists of your top prog bands - there are certainly existing threads on this that you can check out.
No amount of diagrams or repeating will persuade a truthful person like me that you were "denied" for issuing
a band list when the thread topic says something else.
We don't like making mistakes, but we love passing the blame!
my hottest take would probably be that I'd rather listen to a good song instead of technical flexing. Most 70s proggers understood that, so did neo-proggers, heck even early Dream Theater had buncha awesome tunes, but later on the plot got lost methinks.
I don't care how fast of a guitar player you are or how many time signatures you crammed into your 12-min long djent epic, I want to hear some good/creative songwriting - this is what prog to me, first and foremost
it absolutely is, and I personally got some other faves that would be considered hot takes:
Marillion - Somewhere Else (I actually prefer it over Brave AND Marbles), Holidays in Eden, Anoraknophobia
Genesis - from Phil's era, Invisible Touch+We Can't Dance+s/t >>> Duke+Abacab+ATTWTT+W&W. A Trick Of The Tail is Phil's era best tho, no hot take here
some other unpopular albums that I absolutely love: Dream Theater - Falling Into Infinity Steven Wilson - To The Bone (his best solo album) King Crimson - Islands, The Power To Believe The Mars Volta - Octahedron Fates Warning - Inside Out, FWX, Disconnected (their best album)
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
There never really was a prog resurgence (at least not a major one)
---------- i'm shopping for a new oil-cured sinus bag that's a happy bag of lettuce this car smells like cartilage nothing beats a good video about fractions
Contemporary Scandinavian progressive music is extremely overrated.
You need to develop a bit why you think so.
I don't see it how it's "extremely overrated". I don't think it's even overrated.
Today's exaggeration in championing Scandinavian progressive music dates back to the 1990s. Obviously, when the early 90s are debated in the context of prog-rock, people usually mention "Hybris" by Änglagård as a kind of revelation, as if "Hybris" was a lonely phenomenon at the time. However, the 1990s are an underrated decade in prog-rock, and actually, there are several truly great prog-rock debut albums from the early 90s. For instance, Casino was a one-off prog-rock project by Clive Noland and Jeff Mann. Their self-titled concept album also features Sylvain Gouvernaire from Iris and Karl Groom from Threshold.
Unfortunately, Jeff Mann passed away shortly after the "Casino" CD was released on the Dutch 'progressive' label SI Music in 1992.
But before he left, Mann left behind the "Casino" CD, which is perhaps the UK's best prog-rock album of the early '90s.
Or, Swiss band Galaad. For their first concept album, titled "Premier février," also released in 1992, the band delivered a powerful and theatrical prog-rock sung in French [without copying Ange!], with the originality of the singer as well as some magnificent melodies.
Both of the aforementioned albums are better early 90s prog achievements than Änglagård's "Hybris."
Contemporary Scandinavian progressive music is extremely overrated.
You need to develop a bit why you think so.
I don't see it how it's "extremely overrated". I don't think it's even overrated.
Today's exaggeration in championing Scandinavian progressive music dates back to the 1990s. Obviously, when the early 90s are debated in the context of prog-rock, people usually mention "Hybris" by Änglagård as a kind of revelation, as if "Hybris" was a lonely phenomenon at the time. However, the 1990s are an underrated decade in prog-rock, and actually, there are several truly great prog-rock debut albums from the early 90s. For instance, Casino was a one-off prog-rock project by Clive Noland and Jeff Mann. Their self-titled concept album also features Sylvain Gouvernaire from Iris and Karl Groom from Threshold.
Unfortunately, Jeff Mann passed away shortly after the "Casino" CD was released on the Dutch 'progressive' label SI Music in 1992.
But before he left, Mann left behind the "Casino" CD, which is perhaps the UK's best prog-rock album of the early '90s.
Or, Swiss band Galaad. For their first concept album, titled "Premier février," also released in 1992, the band delivered a powerful and theatrical prog-rock sung in French [without copying Ange!], with the originality of the singer as well as some magnificent melodies.
Both of the aforementioned albums are better early 90s prog achievements than Änglagård's "Hybris."
You said "extremely overrated". That's a superlative if I may say so.
It's all subjective, I think Änglagård's Hybris is better than all the albums you mention here.
I would say TFK are overrated, but that's just my take on the band. Also TFK has quite a few imitators. It's become a bit predictable.
Contemporary Scandinavian progressive music is extremely overrated.
You need to develop a bit why you think so.
I don't see it how it's "extremely overrated". I don't think it's even overrated.
Today's exaggeration in championing Scandinavian progressive music dates back to the 1990s. Obviously, when the early 90s are debated in the context of prog-rock, people usually mention "Hybris" by Änglagård as a kind of revelation, as if "Hybris" was a lonely phenomenon at the time. However, the 1990s are an underrated decade in prog-rock, and actually, there are several truly great prog-rock debut albums from the early 90s. For instance, Casino was a one-off prog-rock project by Clive Noland and Jeff Mann. Their self-titled concept album also features Sylvain Gouvernaire from Iris and Karl Groom from Threshold.
Unfortunately, Jeff Mann passed away shortly after the "Casino" CD was released on the Dutch 'progressive' label SI Music in 1992.
But before he left, Mann left behind the "Casino" CD, which is perhaps the UK's best prog-rock album of the early '90s.
Or, Swiss band Galaad. For their first concept album, titled "Premier février," also released in 1992, the band delivered a powerful and theatrical prog-rock sung in French [without copying Ange!], with the originality of the singer as well as some magnificent melodies.
Both of the aforementioned albums are better early 90s prog achievements than Änglagård's "Hybris."
You said "extremely overrated". That's a superlative if I may say so.
It's all subjective, I think Änglagård's Hybris is better than all the albums you mention here.
I would say TFK are overrated, but that's just my take on the band. Also TFK has quite a few imitators. It's become a bit predictable.
But i don't think the entire scene is overrated.
"Hybris'', as a mostly instrumental album with only a few verses here and there and not so great vocals, isn't even close to the albums I mentioned above.
Änglagård played some vintage keyboards, of course, and they had "complexity'', but after listening to the album a few times, there's nothing particularly memorable about it. There's a lot to complain about regarding its production as well.
"Hybris" is just one of a number of extremely overrated prog-rock albums from Scandinavia.
"Hybris'', as a mostly instrumental album with only a few verses here and there and not so great vocals, isn't even close to the albums I mentioned above.
Änglagård played some vintage keyboards, of course, and they had "complexity'', but after listening to the album a few times, there's nothing particularly memorable about it. There's a lot to complain about regarding its production as well.
"Hybris" is just one of a number of extremely overrated prog-rock albums from Scandinavia.
"Hybris'', as a mostly instrumental album with only a few verses here and there and not so great vocals, isn't even close to the albums I mentioned above.
Änglagård played some vintage keyboards, of course, and they had "complexity'', but after listening to the album a few times, there's nothing particularly memorable about it. There's a lot to complain about regarding its production as well.
"Hybris" is just one of a number of extremely overrated prog-rock albums from Scandinavia.
That's just your opinion.
Well, I'm afraid that it's not just my opinion if I hear that Änglagård were ripped off a lot from King Crimson, particularly from their "Larks' Tongues in Aspic" and "Starless and Bible Black" eras.
Furthermore, Änglagård somehow sound like they were compelled to play prog-rock, much like the majority of those other Scandinavian prog-rock bands. Also, although I'm sure they adore the genre, the Scandinavians seem to be forcing the dark side of prog-rock instead of its bittersweet and colourful nature. I mean, instead of appreciating the prog-rock genre's vibrant scenery, it seems like many of them pushed the one-dimensional atmosphere of dark wave and gothic rock into their take on prog-rock. It causes a good portion of Scandinavian progressive music to be dull and colourless.
The Ummagumma studio album is better than The Dark Side of the Moon.
---------- i'm shopping for a new oil-cured sinus bag that's a happy bag of lettuce this car smells like cartilage nothing beats a good video about fractions
"Hybris'', as a mostly instrumental album with only a few verses here and there and not so great vocals, isn't even close to the albums I mentioned above.
Änglagård played some vintage keyboards, of course, and they had "complexity'', but after listening to the album a few times, there's nothing particularly memorable about it. There's a lot to complain about regarding its production as well.
"Hybris" is just one of a number of extremely overrated prog-rock albums from Scandinavia.
That's just your opinion.
Well, I'm afraid that it's not just my opinion if I hear that Änglagård were ripped off a lot from King Crimson, particularly from their "Larks' Tongues in Aspic" and "Starless and Bible Black" eras.
Furthermore, Änglagård somehow sound like they were compelled to play prog-rock, much like the majority of those other Scandinavian prog-rock bands. Also, although I'm sure they adore the genre, the Scandinavians seem to be forcing the dark side of prog-rock instead of its bittersweet and colourful nature. I mean, instead of appreciating the prog-rock genre's vibrant scenery, it seems like many of them pushed the one-dimensional atmosphere of dark wave and gothic rock into their take on prog-rock. It causes a good portion of Scandinavian progressive music to be dull and colourless.
Ripping off means plagiarism which I do not think happened here. KC was an influence, nothing wrong with that.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.180 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.