Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Top 10s and lists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Top 50 of the 2010s as rated on RYM and PA
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Top 50 of the 2010s as rated on RYM and PA

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Message
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15122
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2022 at 01:09
Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

btw: Swans - To Be Kind
is RYMs no. 1 album for 2014 (all genres included)
-has 268 reviews, over 22000 ratings and a 4.00 average  

Yes, but when I worked out this list, I didn't find this album to be in line with the Prog Rock definition, I used as basis for making it.

                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
PhideauxFan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 14 2007
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 4579
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote PhideauxFan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 13 2022 at 03:41
Thank you for that list ! Wink

I've got 23 of these albums.
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15122
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 13 2022 at 03:51
Originally posted by PhideauxFan PhideauxFan wrote:

Thank you for that list ! Wink

I've got 23 of these albums.

Aallriight, then your collection certainly includes some of the most appreciated 2010's albums - which I in general am fond of concerning my collection.
 
And thanks! Smile


Edited by David_D - May 13 2022 at 03:54
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
Saperlipopette! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 11621
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (2) Thanks(2)   Quote Saperlipopette! Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 13 2022 at 04:47
Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:

Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

btw: Swans - To Be Kind
is RYMs no. 1 album for 2014 (all genres included)
-has 268 reviews, over 22000 ratings and a 4.00 average  

Yes, but when I worked out this list, I didn't find this album to be in line with the Prog Rock definition, I used as basis for making it.

So you suddenly take decisions like than that now? Would be one of the proggiest albums on the list imo, but you do as you please.
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15122
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 13 2022 at 06:37
Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

So you suddenly take decisions like than that now? Would be one of the proggiest albums on the list imo, but you do as you please.

When working out a list like this one, many decisions about what to include must be taken, as RYM's definition of Progressive Rock is very different from PA's. On RYM for instance, To Be Kind is not considered to be Prog.
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
Saperlipopette! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 11621
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Saperlipopette! Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 13 2022 at 06:40
Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:

Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

So you suddenly take decisions like than that now? Would be one of the proggiest albums on the list imo, but you do as you please.

When working out a list like this one, many decisions about what to include must be taken, as RYM's definition of Progressive Rock is very different from PA's. On RYM for instance, To Be Kind is not considered to be Prog.
But it makes little-or no sense to me as Swans are in the Progarchives and Post Rock is a well established Sub-genre here.


Edited by Saperlipopette! - May 13 2022 at 06:41
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15122
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 13 2022 at 06:50
Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:

When working out a list like this one, many decisions about what to include must be taken, as RYM's definition of Progressive Rock is very different from PA's. On RYM for instance, To Be Kind is not considered to be Prog.
But it makes little-or no sense to me as Swans are in the Progarchives and Post Rock is a well established Sub-genre here.

It's not that simple, as I see it, because the number of ratings on PA was very small comparing to the one on RYM, so To Be Kind would absolutely not come on this top list if only counting PA ratings.

                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
Saperlipopette! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 11621
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Saperlipopette! Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 13 2022 at 06:54
Lol, really feels that simple to me, but you just don't want Swans on your list, do you:) Or did it factually not "qualify"?


Edited by Saperlipopette! - May 13 2022 at 07:30
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35808
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 13 2022 at 09:13
^^ The point of this is that it's about combined chart lists, though isn't it? So I would have thought that "To Be Kind would absolutely not come on this top list if only counting PA ratings" was not a particularly relevant comment. I find it interesting seeing the differences between the two sites and have done topics on that before. I know, David, from your comment in your Eclectic Prog themed topic that you don't consider Swans to be Prog according to your definition, and from this topic that you don't consider To Be Kind to be a Prog album.

Have you listened to To Be Kind in full and all the albums in your top 50 to see how well they fit your definition? I would think that this would be a better exercise if you tried your best to limit your personal biases when making the list, but I am interested in the specifics of why this album does not meet your criteria as well (even if I think it should be more of an aside and I would rather approach such things in a way that is more inclusive and not exclusive according to my biases).

I understand that because RYM does not list Swans as Prog it may have been missed for the list, not that you have this is a reason -- they use Experimental Rock/ Post Rock for the album, but experimental post-rock comes under the Prog umbrella at PA and it has relations with other music deemed Prog in PA -- and especially easy to miss because PA does not list the album nearly as high.

That said, if I were making such lists I would like to be updating and amending them and taking on suggestions (I mentioned before that I love synthesis). I suggest calculating that album from the PA and RYM ratings and seeing how it fits in the list, and maybe adding it. To me it would be applicable to the list. That said, I am interested in the details of why you or another don't think a specific album applicable to a Prog list. Debating what is and isn't Prog has been a lifeblood of PA even if it can get tiresome after all these years as it seems there is rarely much progress and we don't as a community achieve consensus.

Late edit for bad typo.

Edited by Logan - May 13 2022 at 16:36
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15122
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 13 2022 at 16:46

Regarding To Be Kind, there're many very relevant questions to relate to, and it would be too complicated and difficult for me
to describe how I look at it. But let me just tell that I consider this list to be a historical document, one can't just change.







Edited by David_D - May 14 2022 at 01:07
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35808
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 13 2022 at 17:00
^ Then maybe this "historical document" made in January 2020 should have remained in the past. Just a thought.
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15122
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2022 at 01:51
Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:

Regarding To Be Kind, there're many very relevant questions to relate to, and it would be too complicated and difficult for me
to describe how I look at it. But let me just tell that I consider this list to be a historical document, one can't just change.

By "historical document" I mean, among other things, that this list is made on basis of the ratings in January 2020, and if it should be "corrected", it should be on basis of these ratings.
- I can tell that the number of the ratings on RYM increases with much higher speed than the one on PA, so the number of ratings in January 2020 was much smaller than the one today. How much smaller, it varies very much for different bands and different albums, so what it was for To Be Kind can be a very good question.

- But anyway, it's still just one of many questions, when talking about adding To Be Kind to the list today - which by the way makes me curious and wanting to give this album a new listen, even the cover alone already predicts problems.


Edited by David_D - May 14 2022 at 03:29
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15122
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2022 at 14:23
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Have you listened to To Be Kind in full and all the albums in your top 50 to see how well they fit your definition? I would think that this would be a better exercise if you tried your best to limit your personal biases when making the list,....

My general method for deciding which albums to include was as the first thing RYM's and PA's classifications. If both sites agreed to consider an album as Progressive Rock, I very rarely, if at all, opposed. If only PA did, I decided it on the basis of my definition and knowledge of the album in question.

In general, I can tell that my definition is much more including than RYM's but less including than what has become a part of PA's database. 


Edited by David_D - May 15 2022 at 14:27
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15122
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 16 2022 at 15:55
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

I know, David, from your comment in your Eclectic Prog themed topic that you don't consider Swans to be Prog according to your definition, and from this topic that you don't consider To Be Kind to be a Prog album.

But what is your opinion, Greg, would you say that To Be Kind meets the requirements of my Prog definition?
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
Saperlipopette! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 11621
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Saperlipopette! Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 16 2022 at 23:45
Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

I know, David, from your comment in your Eclectic Prog themed topic that you don't consider Swans to be Prog according to your definition, and from this topic that you don't consider To Be Kind to be a Prog album.

But what is your opinion, Greg, would you say that To Be Kind meets the requirements of my Prog definition?
Letting the genre tags at RYM decide for you hardly qualifies as having an actual prog definition. So you're ok with Kayo Dot - Hubardo and that Blood Incantation-album with the long title, but not To Be Kind? I like those albums as well, but this makes little sense to me.

Btw: I'm quite certain Vektor - Terminal Redux with their 3:82 average from 5505 ratings, 86 reviews and Progressive Metal-tag on RYM (16th for 2014, all genres included) + 3:93 from 142 ratings and 9 reviews on PA is missing from your list as well.
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15122
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 17 2022 at 02:30
Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

Letting the genre tags at RYM decide for you hardly qualifies as having an actual prog definition.

Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:

My general method for deciding which albums to include was as the first thing RYM's and PA's classifications. If both sites agreed to consider an album as Progressive Rock, I very rarely, if at all, opposed. If only PA did, I decided it on the basis of my definition and knowledge of the album in question.

In general, I can tell that my definition is much more including than RYM's but less including than what has become a part of PA's database. 
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15122
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 17 2022 at 05:46
Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

Btw: I'm quite certain Vektor - Terminal Redux with their 3:82 average from 5505 ratings, 86 reviews and Progressive Metal-tag on RYM (16th for 2014, all genres included) + 3:93 from 142 ratings and 9 reviews on PA is missing from your list as well.

Yes, that must have been a miss, but RYM's main label for the band and for this album is Technical Trash Metal which can be the explanation for the miss, as it wasn't on PA's top list.

I'll mention it at the end of the list. 


Edited by David_D - May 17 2022 at 08:47
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15122
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 17 2022 at 15:39

regretted








Edited by David_D - December 11 2022 at 09:47
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15122
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2022 at 06:07

refresh

                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
DreamTechPlus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 12 2015
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 165
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DreamTechPlus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 21 2022 at 03:54
Originally posted by BrufordFreak BrufordFreak wrote:

I still don't understand the purpose of lists like this if and when one skews it away from the whole! (That is, the self-imposed "1 [one] studio album per band" limitation.) It automatically discounts its value by excluding some of the greatest/highest rated albums from the very period you're sampling. What's the point???ConfusedDisapprove

You're just recognizing and applauding 50 bands instead of the 50 "best/highest rated" albums, so why even include album titles? Just list the artist names and be done with it. Silliness…


Precisely to avoid that which you fear. Some artists have greater clout and exposure and, by limiting it to one per artist, we're better able to highlight works and not just prop up some artist's whole discography.

Love, DreamTechPlus.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.488 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.