Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Top 10s and lists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Rearrange PA top 20 to your personal tastes
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Rearrange PA top 20 to your personal tastes

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 78910>
Author
Message
progaardvark View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover/Symphonic/RPI Teams

Joined: June 14 2007
Location: Sea of Peas
Status: Offline
Points: 52608
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote progaardvark Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2021 at 05:54
Originally posted by siLLy puPPy siLLy puPPy wrote:

Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:

Rate your music is that site that has in its chart of the best albums ever, 2 Radiohead albums and 2 Pink Floyd albums (2 + 2 = 4) in the first 7 places (4 on 7). And that has, in its top 20 albums, 2 albums of Kendrick Lamar, one Madvillain album and another Radiohead album (and that's three). And I stop here.

My rating, from 1 to 10, of the Rate Your Music ranking (and therefore of its ratings in general) is ZERO.


You sound like a cranky old man. You write reviews here about music you just don't get.
So what if other people like other things? I love RYM a lot. I have discovered infinite amounts of new music on that site. Sure the charts don't reflect my tastes either but who cares really.

I'm also a big fan of the site. I've been using it for years to catalog my collection (still not finished) and love that I'm able to catalog it based on which issue of an album I own. I don't really bother looking at their charts as I tend to be an outlier. I wish the process of getting an artist profile approved, release correction approved, or cover art approved would be quicker, but alas, it's a volunteer site like here, so I wholly understand why this is so. Crowd-sourced genre assignment based on album is also a plus.
----------
i'm shopping for a new oil-cured sinus bag
that's a happy bag of lettuce
this car smells like cartilage
nothing beats a good video about fractions
Back to Top
jamesbaldwin View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 25 2015
Location: Milano
Status: Offline
Points: 6052
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jamesbaldwin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2021 at 15:01
@Logan

@Lewian


I try to answer you. I don't expect you to share my position - I just hope you understand it better.

On a theoretical level, as Christian says, a ranking of quality (ie the beauty of the art-work, regardless of its popularity and its historical importance) could contain many records by the same band.

But on a level, how can I say? Empirical, it cannot happen. We are not in such a narrow artistic field where only a few artists stand out over the others. Furthermore, if the most present artists correspond to the most popular ones, it follows, I would say almost mathematically, that we are facing a ranking of popularity, not of quality.

RYM both in the general chart and in the prog chart has clear preferences for certain artists with many fans, especially in America. You notice this from the big names and form some recent names, with few reviews, which are not even considered in Europe.

Pink Floyd, that is the most famous prog group (which is actually much less prog than the other famous ones) TOTALLY DOMINATE the prog top 10. Four titles out of seven, 4/7. For me this is enough to say that the RYP ranking counts as ZERO.
Not even the Beatles in The Rolling Stones chart have 4 discs in the top 7. Then there are 3 KC discs: 4 + 3 = 7 discs out of 10 for only two bands. It is not serious.
And in fact, as Christian says, it is only the sum of the votes given by RYP members. This ranking tells us who attends RYP, it does not help us to draw conclusions about the quality of the music, it helps us to understand musical trends, the activity on the internet of fans of various musical groups, the popularity of some artists in the Anglo-Saxon world, etc.
I'm sorry that some forumists were disappointed with my tranchant judgment, but it was only aimed at that ranking, I dont talk about the RYP site - it is an excellente database to discover new artists.

It's true, Greg, in RYP Rock Bottom and Soft Machine III they are in a higher position than in progarchives, and EL&P are in a lower position: I appreciate these aspects, but I think they depend on casualities, perhaps due to the fact that Wyatt is now become an idol of rock connoisseurs in general, he has gone beyond the confines of prog, while EL&P are not very popular outside prog fans.
Anyway, I could say that on RYP Rush surpass Van der Graaf - and PFM and Banco are absent from the Top 50.

In my opinion, the Progarchives ranking is much more balanced and studied than that of RYP:
In the first 10 places no band prevails.
PFs have 3 discs, but starting from the third position.
Genesis have 2 discs starting from the second position.
KCs have 2 discs starting from the fourth position.
Yes hold the first position and the eleventh. Immediately after the tenth position come two VdGG albums (thank God before Rush: I would put Pawn Hearts and From H to He in the top 10 instead of Genesis or Yes or Animals). On Progarchives the contributors with their reviews can influence the ranking more than the simple forumists, and this seems smart to me.

Here I could talk about what I think about the Progarchives ranking. But the discussion would be long. I will limit myself to saying that there are 4 categories of prog music with a heavy metal matrix: too many, in my opinion, and there are too many artists included, according to a definition of prog that is, in my opinion, very expanded (too expanded). In the first 100 albums there are 3 by Miles Davis, one of the greatest jazz players (including one from 1959): but would it make sense if those records were in the Top 10 of a prog chart? It wouldn't make sense to me. Yet, if we evaluated only the quality of the music they could be in the top 10 ... because as jazz music we are at the top: jazz, or jazz-rock at the most but not prog. All this musical matter determines a very dispersive ranking, and so it happens that Rock Bottom comes after Rush, some heavy metal groups and Miles Davis or other jazz-rock fusion artists who are actually jazz musicians. (This does not happen on RYM.)

I would be in favor of a ranking made by the Progarchives collaborators, based on a narrower range of genres, and divided by decade. The rankings then must have a clear criterion. If only the beauty of the music is judged, some historical formations could remain out of the first places. This is the criterion I use in my reviews, taking it from Scaruffi. Piero Scaruffi does not look at the popularity or the history importance of the albums, he only gives a vote to the beauty and in this way he crushes some historical bands and exalts some little known bands. I often diverge from his evaluations, he crushes some bands I love in a severe, almost sarcastic way (his most famous criticism is the Beatles one), but I recognize that he has his own criterion, his own consistency. His ranking is serious.
Two years ago I posted the Ondarock editorial team's ranking here on Progarchives,
an Italian site, where, for example, Close to the Edge was in the first place, Pawn Hearts on the second place and In The Court of on the third place. 
Rock Bottom is the 6th album and Soft Machine IIi the ninth album. 
In my opinion this is a ranking based on quality done in a serious way, and in fact the editors of the magazine did it, not the readers.

Four years ago I posted another ranking, made by the classic rock magazine Mucchio Selvaggio (The Wild Bunch, title taken from the Peckinpah movie) where a compromise was made between beauty and historical importance of prog albums. The ranking was made by the editors, not by the readers. They considered only the prog albums of the seventies, not counting jazz-rock or krautrock or electronic music. If you restrict the range of prog action it is also easier to evaluate a record because here on Progarchives it often happens to be faced with beautiful records, which deserve 5 stars, but which no one would put in the first places of a prog ranking, because they are not so much prog. (For example, I decided to evaluate only the beauty, without looking at whether I consider that record prog or not prog.)

In my opinion the chart of Mucchio Selvaggio is a serious ranking. And it wasn't even a real chart: there were (if I remember correctly) three levels: the first 10 albums, the essential ones, the best, then another 15 albums (beautiful and important to have for a collector) and then the last 25, often minor albums, or beautiful but extreme albums, which not everyone likes. This also seems to me a good way to make a ranking, which also avoids putting all the albums in a row, it is limited to grouping them into levels.



These are my thoughts on the charts.


Edited by jamesbaldwin - October 18 2021 at 15:03
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
Back to Top
Nogbad_The_Bad View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl & Eclectic Team

Joined: March 16 2007
Location: Boston
Status: Offline
Points: 21320
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nogbad_The_Bad Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2021 at 15:36
I'd be interested in a collaborators ranking, sounds fun.
Ian

Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com

https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/
Back to Top
TheLionOfPrague View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2011
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 1066
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TheLionOfPrague Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2021 at 18:56
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

I forgot this conversation I had with Lorenzo about RYM which does mention the progressive rock charts (those vary depending on if its genre or influence or both) CLICK

Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

1) I have found it interesting how at the Rate Your Music chart, using progressive rock as a filter, Thick as a Brick is at number 14 and three Can albums are in the top 10. As someone posted in Prog Archive's forum, RYM tends to appeal to hipsters. At PA, not only do no Can albums appear in the top 250 "all categories" albums chart, but neither does any Krautrock (the PA chart seems rather too "vanilla" to me to be of much personal interest). 

2) I personally like how Robert Wyatt's Rock Bottom makes the top 20 at Rate Your Music (that could be my number one album), and Soft Machine's Third, Faust's IV and two Neu! albums make RYM's top 30. My tastes are not very conventional by Prog standards. 

3) I'm not big on much symphonic prog (I hardly ever listen to Genesis or Yes), my favourite Pink Floyd albums tend to be pre-Dark Side of the Moon, and regarding Rush, while I liked the band as a teenager, I haven't really been into it since (a Rush-head friend got me into it then put me off it). 

4) My favourite album in PA's top 20 is Pawn Hearts, and seeing Wobbler in the top 20 looks weird to me (a 2017 album up against all those classics sticks out like sore thumb to me, and I haven't heard it in full so I can't judge the music for myself).

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

5) My personal list would be very different from the top 250 albums at PA. I don't think people are wrong to enjoy Thick as Brick more than I do anymore than I think it's wrong for some people not to enjoy the RIO, Canterbury, Zeuhl, Acid Folk, Krautrock, Progressive Electronic and Indo-Prog/ Raga Rock "sub-genres" as much as I do. If I believed that my tastes represented some kind of greater objective reality, then I would think that Close to the Edge is highly overrated. That album has never personally struck me as "great". 

xxxxxxxx

6) Perhaps I'd give Thick as Brick maybe a 3 or 3.5 right now based on memory. It's not an album that I was ever wowed by, but it's been decades since I last listened to it in full (I used to find it a slog, though I loved parts of it) and so I wouldn't consider rating it for the site without listening to it in full again. 


7) My favourite Jethro Tull may be Stand Up, which would get 4 stars from me, but still wouldn't crack my personal top 250 albums (and I still like Jethro Tull, but just rarely gets listened to at all as I'm more into other music).


Logan, you're not alone.

I've highlighted some of the points in your talk, where you take a clear position on the records chart. I agree on all these points, except for these small variations:

1) I totally agree - anyway, three Can albums in the top 10 are too many.
2) Rock Bottom is surely in my top ten. i know too little Neu and Faust to express an evaluation, but possibly they are not inclused in my top 50. I prefer eclectic prog.
3) I like expecially The Piper and Saucerful and Wish You Were Here and Animals. But it's not easy to me to find a great masterpiece in these album... My ideas on PF are not clear.
4) I totally agree, even for me Pawn Herts is my fave in the top 20.
5) I totally agree: I dont consider CTTE a real masterpiece, It's close to a masterpiece only the first side. I prefer CTTE over TAAB, but CTTE is surely not in my top 10 or 20 or... I dont know his position. 
6) I totally agree, I've put three stars to TAAB in my review.
7) My fave JT album possibly is Aqualung, then Songs from the Wood, Minstrel, Stand Up etc.


PS PROG CHART ON RYM is very very bad!

in the top 10 there are 
4 Pink Floyd
3 Can
2 King Crimson
1 Yes.

How is possible? only three groups?? PF + Can 7 album /10? It's not serious. 

But I'm with sillypuppy, I actually don't really care that much about how things are ranked at PA or RYM (it's just a mild interest when it relates to something else I'm interested in).  That said, I have discovered many great for me albums when using multiple filters at RYM (I don't use it so much for looking for prog). Like in this case,  I was just using RYM as  a comparison point for how PA ranks ELP albums. I've heard people complain about how unfair ELP's ranking is at PA, and I'm showing that ELP fares worse still at RYM in the progressive rock as genre chart. I don't know how well it ranks at other sites that have user-based music charts.  It was just meant as an example.  I really don't care much at all about PA's or RYM's top 20.


Because people rating on RyM or ProgArchives is just a niche group. Look at the ratings of Eagles' albums at RyM, they don't have a single album in the TOP 500 of their respective year, let alone top 500 of all time. Would you doubt they are on of the most popular bands on the planet? Or far more popular than tons of artists that are better rated?

ELP are more popular than some artists that are rated better on RyM/PA like Van der Graaf Generator and Gentle Giant. And I'm not talking about the '70s, right now too. When they did that reunion show in 2010 they were headlining a festival playing for +30.000 people. I don't think Gentle Giant or VDGG are headlining any festivals (I wouldn't complain if they did, VDGG are definitely amazing and much better than other artists that are).  
I shook my head and smiled a whisper knowing all about the place
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 15344
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote siLLy puPPy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2021 at 19:46
^ what many fail to understand is that some artists just don't stand up over the test of time.

If i had been around during the ELP days and seen them live and lived through the initial prog scene then they might rate much higher.

However as someone who has come to all classic prog well after its time, i have to say that the more cutting edge experimental bands are more interesting to me.

That means Gentle Giant, Gnidrolog, Van der Graaf Generator, Comus etc are much more interesting than the more crossover sounds of Pink Floyd, ELP, Genesis etc. However that doesn't mean i don't like those bands either, it just means they won't rank high in my own personal world.

I suspect many others share my sentiment and prefer the more complex sounds of bands that really went for the prog jugular.

https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
TheLionOfPrague View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2011
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 1066
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TheLionOfPrague Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2021 at 20:44
Originally posted by siLLy puPPy siLLy puPPy wrote:

^ what many fail to understand is that some artists just don't stand up over the test of time.

If i had been around during the ELP days and seen them live and lived through the initial prog scene then they might rate much higher.

However as someone who has come to all classic prog well after its time, i have to say that the more cutting edge experimental bands are more interesting to me.

That means Gentle Giant, Gnidrolog, Van der Graaf Generator, Comus etc are much more interesting than the more crossover sounds of Pink Floyd, ELP, Genesis etc. However that doesn't mean i don't like those bands either, it just means they won't rank high in my own personal world.

I suspect many others share my sentiment and prefer the more complex sounds of bands that really went for the prog jugular.


Of course, it's subjective. I wasn't around at the time these bands were either but I love Floyd, Genesis, Yes and ELP who were among the most popular (as well as Mike Oldfield or Moody Blues) and some of the not so popular like Magma, Soft Machine, Faust, Solaris, Dixie Dregs. But I tend to prefer the symphonic ones over the krautrock, zehul, RIO, etc. ones. I gravitate towards more song-orianted music than experimental, even if I like both.
I shook my head and smiled a whisper knowing all about the place
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 37232
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2021 at 20:48
^^^ I honestly don't know how popular The Eagles are now amongst modern audiences generally, with a wide variety of ages, and across different music genre fans around the world as I never liked the band and haven't delved into such things.  I do know that it has been very popular and has sold a lot and I expect it could sell out a large or very large venue in various regions.  I  don't know how relevant to the average person the Eagles is considered now-- don't know if it they are even still making albums.  The only Eagles song I even can think of is "Hotel California".  Would you say that it's as big as BTS right now?  BTS doesn't do well either at RYM despite the huge popularity.

Yes one can say that rateyourmusic, PA etc. etc. are niche music sites.  PA I would think is more niche than RYM and I would say that both sites have niches within them.  With ELP's popularity now, I don't know how much of that is from old nostalgic fans.  We are both too young to know it at its height. If I saw the concert goers I'd get some idea if it's appealing to a wide range of ages and ethnicities. I don't know how relevant it is to cross-sections of society around the world.

I'm not saying that ELP is not popular, although I doubt it's very popular still or a household name as it once was, and I doubt that it will be very popular with a diverse audience let alone with "niche" sites such as RYM.  Maybe it remains more of a household name and hip with general audiences of all ages in some places.  I asked my kids (both teenagers) and neither of them had heard of ELP or The Eagles.  They do know about classics such as Pink Floyd and not just from me. I think a  band which Lorenzo dislikes seeing four of in RYM's top ten prog chart (and it has three in PA's top ten) remains more relevant to audiences of all ages and across music likes.  It's more iconic generally. I prefer Pink Floyd to Genesis, Yes, Rush, Jethro Tull and many other popular names in Prog myself.

I suspect ELP audiences generally to be more the older Facebook crowd. Grandpa music, but of course it has fans of all ages.

By the way, interesting read Lorenzo, thanks for sharing.  Although we disagree on various things, it's cool to have different opinions.


Edited by Logan - October 18 2021 at 21:17
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 15344
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote siLLy puPPy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2021 at 21:49
^ the problem with ELP is that they sound dated

bands like Pink Floyd, Jethro Tull, Yes etc are timeless

i think that's why ELP hasn't held up as well as the others

just my take on sheet

https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 37232
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2021 at 22:05
^ I made the dated comment too before methinks, but I like some music that has dated (of its era, has nostalgia value and sentimental qualities even if I was not alive at the time).  ELP has not dated well for me. I agree that others seem more timeless.  I love the dated feel of kinds of loungey music and exotica/tropica and those retro sounds are being used by modern bands, often by ones into neo-psychedelia and art pop and jazzy music, in I think lovely and interesting ways.  ELP is kitschy I feel, and I like plenty of kitschy things, but it feels tacky to me too often and kind of yobish. I can't easily relate to ELP's music, and I don't think that its general audience would suit me or my personality.  I would not expect modern audiences generally to appreciate ELP much no matter how popular it has been.  I  don't know how many new fans it is generating or how much it is still influencing popular music.  It doesn't have the cool cachet of a lot of vintage stuff that has been re-visited in music. It didn't age as well as other things that do feel of their time, one might say.

Edited by Logan - October 18 2021 at 22:11
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 15344
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote siLLy puPPy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2021 at 22:37
^ totally agree with you regarding ELP however the last time i went on a marathon and listened to the first four albums i actually liked them better than i ever had in the past.

They were clearly prog innovators and their popularity surely made prog bigger than it may have been otherwise but they just don't rank high for me on my personal charts and i suspect many others feel the same hence the lower ranking of albums on charts compared to their contemporaries.

Personally i think too many put too much energy into caring what those charts reflect!

https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 37232
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2021 at 22:57
^  Maybe I should try again.  I do like the debut and various other ELP music (hardly a hater -- I was very into Trilogy at one time).  A big yes on your opinion regarding people caring so much about what the charts reflect, and too often it seems that people don't understand what it reflects or is intended to reflect.  It's a rather silly rabbit hole I have often gone down in discussion -- spend too much time arguing about things I don't care about sometimes.  LOL I respect ELP more than I appreciate it and still think of it as the quintessential Prog act -- warts and all. ;) They made some lovely and fun music.

I love this ELP cover:

Back to Top
Rick1 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 14 2020
Location: Loughborough UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2925
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rick1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2021 at 04:06
Well, Danny Baker made the case for ELP in last year's Prog magazine much more eloquently than I ever could.  
Back to Top
Cristi View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams

Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Offline
Points: 45689
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Cristi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2021 at 04:27
this has become an ELP thread LOL
kinda off topic already, there are other bands and albums... 
Back to Top
Lewian View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 09 2015
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 15151
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lewian Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2021 at 04:51
@Lorenzo: I agree with most of your concerns about "popularity rankings", be they on rateyourmusic or here. However I'm wary of an assumption that seems to be underlying your arguments, which is that objectivity in rankings is possible, at least to the extent that somehow rankings could be assessed as better ("more serious") or worse in any objective manner. I don't buy that. I think that with rateyourmusic we get problems, with "good experts only" we get other problems. It's all more of a game really, which of course has some use and some justification, but we'd be well advised to not take it too seriously..
Back to Top
jamesbaldwin View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 25 2015
Location: Milano
Status: Offline
Points: 6052
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jamesbaldwin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2021 at 05:41
Originally posted by Lewian Lewian wrote:

@Lorenzo: I agree with most of your concerns about "popularity rankings", be they on rateyourmusic or here. However I'm wary of an assumption that seems to be underlying your arguments, which is that objectivity in rankings is possible, at least to the extent that somehow rankings could be assessed as better ("more serious") or worse in any objective manner. I don't buy that. I think that with rateyourmusic we get problems, with "good experts only" we get other problems. It's all more of a game really, which of course has some use and some justification, but we'd be well advised to not take it too seriously..


When I say that a ranking is "serious" I don't mean that it is objective. In fact, I wrote that I think the rankings of Scaruffi, Ondarock and Mucchio Selvaggio are serious: but they are very different from each other!

I consider serious what is done according to a criterion, for example: 1) the beauty of music, 2) the historical importance 3) a compromise between the two previous ones. 

But I know well that, for example, establishing the beauty of music is a subjective operation, which also depends on the personality of the person who evaluates it, on his propensity for certain emotions and not others. And this is where the different evaluations of music critics come from. 

In addition, I consider serious or not a ranking afterwards: if a prog ranking has 4 albums of PF (or Genesis, to say the best known bands) in the first 7 places I do not consider it serious. If it already had 4 albums (for example) by Henry Cow in the first 7, it would already deserve some study to understand the logic.

I prefer the rankings made by the editors/collaborators of a site to those of anonymous voters who pass by. I consider them more thoughtful, more serious, especially if clear criteria are established. The ranking of the editorial staff of a site is not OBJECTIVE, it is the average of personal judgments.

Then it's strange that on this site, where rankings matter a lot, collaborators say they don't care about rankings.
For example, in the last t ten years the rankings have increased: every year the collaborators make a ranking of the best albums or rather, I correct myself: a ranking of their FAVORITE albums, if I understand correctly. Above this thread we find the Collaborators' Top Album Archive which includes the collaborators' rankings o of the fave albums of the last 10 years, and above again the Collaborators' Top Album of 2020.

(here, in my opinion, the criterion of "favorite" is rather vague, and I would not know how to interpret it)

And in this ranking the first 10 albums are highlighted, so it is a ranking baed on different levels like that of the Italian magazine Mucchio Selvaggio that I have already mentioned.
So in the last 10 years the collaborators have decided to make rankings year by year (so far I have not participated because I listen to few contemporary prog records).

The ranking of collaborators for the decade 2011-2020 could already be published on the site, if collaborators wanted. 



Edited by jamesbaldwin - October 19 2021 at 05:46
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 37232
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2021 at 08:23
Originally posted by Cristi Cristi wrote:

this has become an ELP thread LOL
kinda off topic already, there are other bands and albums... 

We've been discussing a variety of issues.  One might think of ELP as having become a sort of nexus when it comes to issues around ratings and rankings.  There are indeed other bands and albums, there are also other threads if people aren't appreciating the discussion here. And people can still post their rearrangement of the top 20 if they like (I already did a bit of what little of the top 20 I tend to play, which is really only Pawn Hearts over the last decade).  I like it often when conversation doesn't just try to stick narrowly to one topic but twists, digresses, changes and evolves as seems natural to me when people get together socially. Some people seem very keep-on-topic as a principal, even when it comes to fizzling out topics by other people where the OP hasn't expressed concern, and even when the OP has switched gears due to conversation in the thread I've seen complaints about moving off-topic. I have enjoyed taking part in the discussion with people here very much, much more than I would arranging and re-arranging that list.  My two cents.
Back to Top
Cristi View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams

Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Offline
Points: 45689
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Cristi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2021 at 08:31
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Originally posted by Cristi Cristi wrote:

this has become an ELP thread LOL
kinda off topic already, there are other bands and albums... 

We've been discussing a variety of issues.  One might think of ELP as having become a sort of nexus when it comes to issues around ratings and rankings.  There are indeed other bands and albums, there are also other threads if people aren't appreciating the discussion here. And people can still post their rearrangement of the top 20 if they like (I already did a bit of what little of the top 20 I tend to play, which is really only Pawn Hearts over the last decade).  I like it often when conversation doesn't just try to stick narrowly to one topic but twists, digresses, changes and evolves as seems natural to me when people get together socially. Some people seem very keep-on-topic as a principal, even when it comes to fizzling out topics by other people where the OP hasn't expressed concern, and even when the OP has switched gears due to conversation in the thread I've seen complaints about moving off-topic. I have enjoyed taking part in the discussion with people here very much, much more than I would arranging and re-arranging that list.  My two cents.

ok, was just wondering, no harm done, I even put that LOL emoticon to point out I am kidding (little bit) Tongue
Back to Top
Nogbad_The_Bad View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl & Eclectic Team

Joined: March 16 2007
Location: Boston
Status: Offline
Points: 21320
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nogbad_The_Bad Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2021 at 12:24
Gnosis has a ranking system where their 110 or so 'experts' rate albums so you get more of a curated ranking. If I filter that down to the top prog albums with lots of ratings (>30) I get a top 20 of:-

1. King Crimson - Larks Tongues In Aspic
2. PFM - Per Un Amico
3. Banco - Darwin!
4. Hatfield & The North - Rotters Club
5. Anglagard - Hybris
6. VDGG - Pawn Hearts
7. Yes - CTTE
8. Banco - Io Sono Nato Libero
9. Hatfield & The North - s/t
10. National Health - Of Queues & Cures
11. PFM - Storia Di Un Minuto
12. Genesis - Foxtrot
13. Magma - HHai
14. Jethro Tull - Thick As A Brick
15. Gentle Giant - In A Glass House
16. Area - Arbeit Macht Frei
17. Gentle Giant - Octopus
18. Banco - s/t
19. Caravan - In The Land Of Grey & Pink
20. Il Balletto di Bronzo - Ys

Interesting list, they sure like their Italians
Ian

Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com

https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 37232
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2021 at 12:43
^ thanks for the list. Been ages since I visited Gnosis. That list definitely is much more interesting to me than PA's and RYM's. So much on it that I value very highly. I wonder how ELP fares?

My favourite Prog reviews site was Ground & Sky.
Back to Top
Sacro_Porgo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 15 2019
Location: Cygnus
Status: Offline
Points: 2062
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sacro_Porgo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2021 at 12:46
Originally posted by Nogbad_The_Bad Nogbad_The_Bad wrote:

Gnosis has a ranking system where their 110 or so 'experts' rate albums so you get more of a curated ranking. If I filter that down to the top prog albums with lots of ratings (>30) I get a top 20 of:-

1. King Crimson - Larks Tongues In Aspic
2. PFM - Per Un Amico
3. Banco - Darwin!
4. Hatfield & The North - Rotters Club
5. Anglagard - Hybris
6. VDGG - Pawn Hearts
7. Yes - CTTE
8. Banco - Io Sono Nato Libero
9. Hatfield & The North - s/t
10. National Health - Of Queues & Cures
11. PFM - Storia Di Un Minuto
12. Genesis - Foxtrot
13. Magma - HHai
14. Jethro Tull - Thick As A Brick
15. Gentle Giant - In A Glass House
16. Area - Arbeit Macht Frei
17. Gentle Giant - Octopus
18. Banco - s/t
19. Caravan - In The Land Of Grey & Pink
20. Il Balletto di Bronzo - Ys

Interesting list, they sure like their Italians

Incredibly interesting list! I dare say that's a great list for anyone looking to seriously get in to prog, who maybe knows some of the most popular classics already.

I will also say, it pains me to see Larks Tongues at the top when Red is no where in sight! I love both, mind you.
Porg for short. My love of music doesn't end with prog! Feel free to discuss all sorts of music with me. Odds are I'll give it a chance if I haven't already! :)
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 78910>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.303 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.