![]() |
Rearrange PA top 20 to your personal tastes |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 78910> |
Author | |||
progaardvark ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Crossover/Symphonic/RPI Teams Joined: June 14 2007 Location: Sea of Peas Status: Offline Points: 52608 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I'm also a big fan of the site. I've been using it for years to catalog my collection (still not finished) and love that I'm able to catalog it based on which issue of an album I own. I don't really bother looking at their charts as I tend to be an outlier. I wish the process of getting an artist profile approved, release correction approved, or cover art approved would be quicker, but alas, it's a volunteer site like here, so I wholly understand why this is so. Crowd-sourced genre assignment based on album is also a plus.
|
|||
----------
i'm shopping for a new oil-cured sinus bag that's a happy bag of lettuce this car smells like cartilage nothing beats a good video about fractions |
|||
![]() |
|||
jamesbaldwin ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: September 25 2015 Location: Milano Status: Offline Points: 6052 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
@Logan @Lewian I try to answer you. I don't expect you to share my position - I just hope you understand it better. On a theoretical level, as Christian says, a ranking of quality (ie the beauty of the art-work, regardless of its popularity and its historical importance) could contain many records by the same band. But on a level, how can I say? Empirical, it cannot happen. We are not in such a narrow artistic field where only a few artists stand out over the others. Furthermore, if the most present artists correspond to the most popular ones, it follows, I would say almost mathematically, that we are facing a ranking of popularity, not of quality. RYM both in the general chart and in the prog chart has clear preferences for certain artists with many fans, especially in America. You notice this from the big names and form some recent names, with few reviews, which are not even considered in Europe. Pink Floyd, that is the most famous prog group (which is actually much less prog than the other famous ones) TOTALLY DOMINATE the prog top 10. Four titles out of seven, 4/7. For me this is enough to say that the RYP ranking counts as ZERO. Not even the Beatles in The Rolling Stones chart have 4 discs in the top 7. Then there are 3 KC discs: 4 + 3 = 7 discs out of 10 for only two bands. It is not serious. And in fact, as Christian says, it is only the sum of the votes given by RYP members. This ranking tells us who attends RYP, it does not help us to draw conclusions about the quality of the music, it helps us to understand musical trends, the activity on the internet of fans of various musical groups, the popularity of some artists in the Anglo-Saxon world, etc. I'm sorry that some forumists were disappointed with my tranchant judgment, but it was only aimed at that ranking, I dont talk about the RYP site - it is an excellente database to discover new artists. It's true, Greg, in RYP Rock Bottom and Soft Machine III they are in a higher position than in progarchives, and EL&P are in a lower position: I appreciate these aspects, but I think they depend on casualities, perhaps due to the fact that Wyatt is now become an idol of rock connoisseurs in general, he has gone beyond the confines of prog, while EL&P are not very popular outside prog fans. Anyway, I could say that on RYP Rush surpass Van der Graaf - and PFM and Banco are absent from the Top 50. In my opinion, the Progarchives ranking is much more balanced and studied than that of RYP: In the first 10 places no band prevails. PFs have 3 discs, but starting from the third position. Genesis have 2 discs starting from the second position. KCs have 2 discs starting from the fourth position. Yes hold the first position and the eleventh. Immediately after the tenth position come two VdGG albums (thank God before Rush: I would put Pawn Hearts and From H to He in the top 10 instead of Genesis or Yes or Animals). On Progarchives the contributors with their reviews can influence the ranking more than the simple forumists, and this seems smart to me. Here I could talk about what I think about the Progarchives ranking. But the discussion would be long. I will limit myself to saying that there are 4 categories of prog music with a heavy metal matrix: too many, in my opinion, and there are too many artists included, according to a definition of prog that is, in my opinion, very expanded (too expanded). In the first 100 albums there are 3 by Miles Davis, one of the greatest jazz players (including one from 1959): but would it make sense if those records were in the Top 10 of a prog chart? It wouldn't make sense to me. Yet, if we evaluated only the quality of the music they could be in the top 10 ... because as jazz music we are at the top: jazz, or jazz-rock at the most but not prog. All this musical matter determines a very dispersive ranking, and so it happens that Rock Bottom comes after Rush, some heavy metal groups and Miles Davis or other jazz-rock fusion artists who are actually jazz musicians. (This does not happen on RYM.) I would be in favor of a ranking made by the Progarchives collaborators, based on a narrower range of genres, and divided by decade. The rankings then must have a clear criterion. If only the beauty of the music is judged, some historical formations could remain out of the first places. This is the criterion I use in my reviews, taking it from Scaruffi. Piero Scaruffi does not look at the popularity or the history importance of the albums, he only gives a vote to the beauty and in this way he crushes some historical bands and exalts some little known bands. I often diverge from his evaluations, he crushes some bands I love in a severe, almost sarcastic way (his most famous criticism is the Beatles one), but I recognize that he has his own criterion, his own consistency. His ranking is serious. Two years ago I posted the Ondarock editorial team's ranking here on Progarchives, an Italian site, where, for example, Close to the Edge was in the first place, Pawn Hearts on the second place and In The Court of on the third place. Rock Bottom is the 6th album and Soft Machine IIi the ninth album. In my opinion this is a ranking based on quality done in a serious way, and in fact the editors of the magazine did it, not the readers. Four years ago I posted another ranking, made by the classic rock magazine Mucchio Selvaggio (The Wild Bunch, title taken from the Peckinpah movie) where a compromise was made between beauty and historical importance of prog albums. The ranking was made by the editors, not by the readers. They considered only the prog albums of the seventies, not counting jazz-rock or krautrock or electronic music. If you restrict the range of prog action it is also easier to evaluate a record because here on Progarchives it often happens to be faced with beautiful records, which deserve 5 stars, but which no one would put in the first places of a prog ranking, because they are not so much prog. (For example, I decided to evaluate only the beauty, without looking at whether I consider that record prog or not prog.) In my opinion the chart of Mucchio Selvaggio is a serious ranking. And it wasn't even a real chart: there were (if I remember correctly) three levels: the first 10 albums, the essential ones, the best, then another 15 albums (beautiful and important to have for a collector) and then the last 25, often minor albums, or beautiful but extreme albums, which not everyone likes. This also seems to me a good way to make a ranking, which also avoids putting all the albums in a row, it is limited to grouping them into levels. These are my thoughts on the charts. Edited by jamesbaldwin - October 18 2021 at 15:03 |
|||
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Nogbad_The_Bad ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() RIO/Avant/Zeuhl & Eclectic Team Joined: March 16 2007 Location: Boston Status: Online Points: 21320 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I'd be interested in a collaborators ranking, sounds fun.
|
|||
Ian
Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/ |
|||
![]() |
|||
TheLionOfPrague ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: March 08 2011 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 1066 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Because people rating on RyM or ProgArchives is just a niche group. Look at the ratings of Eagles' albums at RyM, they don't have a single album in the TOP 500 of their respective year, let alone top 500 of all time. Would you doubt they are on of the most popular bands on the planet? Or far more popular than tons of artists that are better rated? ELP are more popular than some artists that are rated better on RyM/PA like Van der Graaf Generator and Gentle Giant. And I'm not talking about the '70s, right now too. When they did that reunion show in 2010 they were headlining a festival playing for +30.000 people. I don't think Gentle Giant or VDGG are headlining any festivals (I wouldn't complain if they did, VDGG are definitely amazing and much better than other artists that are).
|
|||
I shook my head and smiled a whisper knowing all about the place
|
|||
![]() |
|||
siLLy puPPy ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic Joined: October 05 2013 Location: SFcaUsA Status: Offline Points: 15344 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
^ what many fail to understand is that some artists just don't stand up over the test of time. If i had been around during the ELP days and seen them live and lived through the initial prog scene then they might rate much higher. However
as someone who has come to all classic prog well after its time, i have
to say that the more cutting edge experimental bands are more
interesting to me. That means Gentle Giant,
Gnidrolog, Van der Graaf Generator, Comus etc are much more interesting
than the more crossover sounds of Pink Floyd, ELP, Genesis etc. However
that doesn't mean i don't like those bands either, it just means they
won't rank high in my own personal world. |
|||
![]() https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy |
|||
![]() |
|||
TheLionOfPrague ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: March 08 2011 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 1066 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Of course, it's subjective. I wasn't around at the time these bands were either but I love Floyd, Genesis, Yes and ELP who were among the most popular (as well as Mike Oldfield or Moody Blues) and some of the not so popular like Magma, Soft Machine, Faust, Solaris, Dixie Dregs. But I tend to prefer the symphonic ones over the krautrock, zehul, RIO, etc. ones. I gravitate towards more song-orianted music than experimental, even if I like both.
|
|||
I shook my head and smiled a whisper knowing all about the place
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Logan ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 37233 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
^^^ I honestly don't know how popular The Eagles are now amongst modern audiences generally, with a wide variety of ages, and across different music genre fans around the world as I never liked the band and haven't delved into such things. I do know that it has been very popular and has sold a lot and I expect it could sell out a large or very large venue in various regions. I don't know how relevant to the average person the Eagles is considered now-- don't know if it they are even still making albums. The only Eagles song I even can think of is "Hotel California". Would you say that it's as big as BTS right now? BTS doesn't do well either at RYM despite the huge popularity.
Yes one can say that rateyourmusic, PA etc. etc. are niche music sites. PA I would think is more niche than RYM and I would say that both sites have niches within them. With ELP's popularity now, I don't know how much of that is from old nostalgic fans. We are both too young to know it at its height. If I saw the concert goers I'd get some idea if it's appealing to a wide range of ages and ethnicities. I don't know how relevant it is to cross-sections of society around the world. I'm not saying that ELP is not popular, although I doubt it's very popular still or a household name as it once was, and I doubt that it will be very popular with a diverse audience let alone with "niche" sites such as RYM. Maybe it remains more of a household name and hip with general audiences of all ages in some places. I asked my kids (both teenagers) and neither of them had heard of ELP or The Eagles. They do know about classics such as Pink Floyd and not just from me. I think a band which Lorenzo dislikes seeing four of in RYM's top ten prog chart (and it has three in PA's top ten) remains more relevant to audiences of all ages and across music likes. It's more iconic generally. I prefer Pink Floyd to Genesis, Yes, Rush, Jethro Tull and many other popular names in Prog myself. I suspect ELP audiences generally to be more the older Facebook crowd. Grandpa music, but of course it has fans of all ages. By the way, interesting read Lorenzo, thanks for sharing. Although we disagree on various things, it's cool to have different opinions.
Edited by Logan - October 18 2021 at 21:17 |
|||
![]() |
|||
siLLy puPPy ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic Joined: October 05 2013 Location: SFcaUsA Status: Offline Points: 15344 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
^ the problem with ELP is that they sound dated bands like Pink Floyd, Jethro Tull, Yes etc are timeless i think that's why ELP hasn't held up as well as the others just my take on sheet
|
|||
![]() https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy |
|||
![]() |
|||
Logan ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 37233 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
^ I made the dated comment too before methinks, but I like some music that has dated (of its era, has nostalgia value and sentimental qualities even if I was not alive at the time). ELP has not dated well for me. I agree that others seem more timeless. I love the dated feel of kinds of loungey music and exotica/tropica and those retro sounds are being used by modern bands, often by ones into neo-psychedelia and art pop and jazzy music, in I think lovely and interesting ways. ELP is kitschy I feel, and I like plenty of kitschy things, but it feels tacky to me too often and kind of yobish. I can't easily relate to ELP's music, and I don't think that its general audience would suit me or my personality. I would not expect modern audiences generally to appreciate ELP much no matter how popular it has been. I don't know how many new fans it is generating or how much it is still influencing popular music. It doesn't have the cool cachet of a lot of vintage stuff that has been re-visited in music. It didn't age as well as other things that do feel of their time, one might say.
Edited by Logan - October 18 2021 at 22:11 |
|||
![]() |
|||
siLLy puPPy ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic Joined: October 05 2013 Location: SFcaUsA Status: Offline Points: 15344 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
^ totally agree with you regarding ELP however the last time i went on a marathon and listened to the first four albums i actually liked them better than i ever had in the past. They were clearly prog innovators and their popularity surely made prog bigger than it may have been otherwise but they just don't rank high for me on my personal charts and i suspect many others feel the same hence the lower ranking of albums on charts compared to their contemporaries. Personally i think too many put too much energy into caring what those charts reflect!
|
|||
![]() https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy |
|||
![]() |
|||
Logan ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 37233 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
^ Maybe I should try again. I do like the debut and various other ELP music (hardly a hater -- I was very into Trilogy at one time). A big yes on your opinion regarding people caring so much about what the charts reflect, and too often it seems that people don't understand what it reflects or is intended to reflect. It's a rather silly rabbit hole I have often gone down in discussion -- spend too much time arguing about things I don't care about sometimes.
![]() I love this ELP cover: |
|||
![]() |
|||
Rick1 ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: April 14 2020 Location: Loughborough UK Status: Offline Points: 2925 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Well, Danny Baker made the case for ELP in last year's Prog magazine much more eloquently than I ever could.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Cristi ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Crossover / Prog Metal Teams Joined: July 27 2006 Location: wonderland Status: Online Points: 45690 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
this has become an ELP thread
![]() kinda off topic already, there are other bands and albums...
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Lewian ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: August 09 2015 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 15151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
@Lorenzo: I agree with most of your concerns about "popularity rankings", be they on rateyourmusic or here. However I'm wary of an assumption that seems to be underlying your arguments, which is that objectivity in rankings is possible, at least to the extent that somehow rankings could be assessed as better ("more serious") or worse in any objective manner. I don't buy that. I think that with rateyourmusic we get problems, with "good experts only" we get other problems. It's all more of a game really, which of course has some use and some justification, but we'd be well advised to not take it too seriously..
|
|||
![]() |
|||
jamesbaldwin ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: September 25 2015 Location: Milano Status: Offline Points: 6052 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
When I say that a ranking is "serious" I don't mean that it is objective. In fact, I wrote that I think the rankings of Scaruffi, Ondarock and Mucchio Selvaggio are serious: but they are very different from each other! I consider serious what is done according to a criterion, for example: 1) the beauty of music, 2) the historical importance 3) a compromise between the two previous ones. But I know well that, for example, establishing the beauty of music is a subjective operation, which also depends on the personality of the person who evaluates it, on his propensity for certain emotions and not others. And this is where the different evaluations of music critics come from. In addition, I consider serious or not a ranking afterwards: if a prog ranking has 4 albums of PF (or Genesis, to say the best known bands) in the first 7 places I do not consider it serious. If it already had 4 albums (for example) by Henry Cow in the first 7, it would already deserve some study to understand the logic. I prefer the rankings made by the editors/collaborators of a site to those of anonymous voters who pass by. I consider them more thoughtful, more serious, especially if clear criteria are established. The ranking of the editorial staff of a site is not OBJECTIVE, it is the average of personal judgments. Then it's strange that on this site, where rankings matter a lot, collaborators say they don't care about rankings. For example, in the last t ten years the rankings have increased: every year the collaborators make a ranking of the best albums or rather, I correct myself: a ranking of their FAVORITE albums, if I understand correctly. Above this thread we find the Collaborators' Top Album Archive which includes the collaborators' rankings o of the fave albums of the last 10 years, and above again the Collaborators' Top Album of 2020. (here, in my opinion, the criterion of "favorite" is rather vague, and I would not know how to interpret it) And in this ranking the first 10 albums are highlighted, so it is a ranking baed on different levels like that of the Italian magazine Mucchio Selvaggio that I have already mentioned. So in the last 10 years the collaborators have decided to make rankings year by year (so far I have not participated because I listen to few contemporary prog records). The ranking of collaborators for the decade 2011-2020 could already be published on the site, if collaborators wanted. Edited by jamesbaldwin - October 19 2021 at 05:46 |
|||
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Logan ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 37233 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
We've been discussing a variety of issues. One might think of ELP as having become a sort of nexus when it comes to issues around ratings and rankings. There are indeed other bands and albums, there are also other threads if people aren't appreciating the discussion here. And people can still post their rearrangement of the top 20 if they like (I already did a bit of what little of the top 20 I tend to play, which is really only Pawn Hearts over the last decade). I like it often when conversation doesn't just try to stick narrowly to one topic but twists, digresses, changes and evolves as seems natural to me when people get together socially. Some people seem very keep-on-topic as a principal, even when it comes to fizzling out topics by other people where the OP hasn't expressed concern, and even when the OP has switched gears due to conversation in the thread I've seen complaints about moving off-topic. I have enjoyed taking part in the discussion with people here very much, much more than I would arranging and re-arranging that list. My two cents.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Cristi ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Crossover / Prog Metal Teams Joined: July 27 2006 Location: wonderland Status: Online Points: 45690 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
ok, was just wondering, no harm done, I even put that LOL emoticon to point out I am kidding (little bit)
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Nogbad_The_Bad ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() RIO/Avant/Zeuhl & Eclectic Team Joined: March 16 2007 Location: Boston Status: Online Points: 21320 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Gnosis has a ranking system where their 110 or so 'experts' rate albums so you get more of a curated ranking. If I filter that down to the top prog albums with lots of ratings (>30) I get a top 20 of:-
1. King Crimson - Larks Tongues In Aspic 2. PFM - Per Un Amico 3. Banco - Darwin! 4. Hatfield & The North - Rotters Club 5. Anglagard - Hybris 6. VDGG - Pawn Hearts 7. Yes - CTTE 8. Banco - Io Sono Nato Libero 9. Hatfield & The North - s/t 10. National Health - Of Queues & Cures 11. PFM - Storia Di Un Minuto 12. Genesis - Foxtrot 13. Magma - HHai 14. Jethro Tull - Thick As A Brick 15. Gentle Giant - In A Glass House 16. Area - Arbeit Macht Frei 17. Gentle Giant - Octopus 18. Banco - s/t 19. Caravan - In The Land Of Grey & Pink 20. Il Balletto di Bronzo - Ys Interesting list, they sure like their Italians
|
|||
Ian
Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/ |
|||
![]() |
|||
Logan ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 37233 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
^ thanks for the list. Been ages since I visited Gnosis. That list definitely is much more interesting to me than PA's and RYM's. So much on it that I value very highly. I wonder how ELP fares?
![]() My favourite Prog reviews site was Ground & Sky. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Sacro_Porgo ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: July 15 2019 Location: Cygnus Status: Offline Points: 2062 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Incredibly interesting list! I dare say that's a great list for anyone looking to seriously get in to prog, who maybe knows some of the most popular classics already. I will also say, it pains me to see Larks Tongues at the top when Red is no where in sight! I love both, mind you.
|
|||
Porg for short. My love of music doesn't end with prog! Feel free to discuss all sorts of music with me. Odds are I'll give it a chance if I haven't already! :)
|
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 78910> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |