Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Dayvenkirq
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
|
Posted: January 28 2013 at 03:15 |
^ Throw in that motif (the "chorus riff" on the guitar) on "LTIA, pt. 1". It's like rending to the bones.
Edited by Dayvenkirq - January 28 2013 at 03:15
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: January 28 2013 at 11:27 |
HarbouringTheSoul wrote:
ProgMetaller2112 wrote:
HarbouringTheSoul wrote:
So your argument is "It has one riff that reminds me of Black Sabbath, therefore it's heavier than King Crimson."?
|
Nope, the Knife is a really violent song musically and conceptually that no King Crimson track has ever matched it
|
Honestly, I wouldn't describe a song with such a cheerful vocal melody as violent. It's about violence, sure, but compared to its subject matter it's fairly light musically. Now a song like LTIA2 is just bludgeoning. Even its softer sections are built around eerie harmonies and gradually build up tension. And I've never heard anything in music that matches the trauma of the 'loud' sections. It's the musical equivalent of somebody punching you in the face.
|
Ditto. I am not looking for just volume or even intensity. I am looking for violence and tension. I really don't feel much any in Knife or most Genesis songs. Actually, Lamia has a kind of slow, slithering tension without being heavy but the ones where they use something that sounds like heavy guitar, I wouldn't characterize as heavy in the metal sense of the word. Wetton KC has that industrial quality and no wonder Fripp returned to it in the THRAK formation as well. By the way, building on a reply I had made earlier to Hackettfan, because many of KC"s loud sections are preceded by almost silent passages, the heavy moments hit harder...AND, that is a pretty important aspect of heavy music. It's one of the reasons why death metal feels heavier than thrash metal/speed metal. To begin with, it is simply heavier but it is also a bit stop start and has breakdowns while thrash metal is more steady and unrelenting so the listener gets used to it while death metal can surprise him with a sudden surge in intensity.
|
|
HackettFan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 7951
|
Posted: January 28 2013 at 18:36 |
rogerthat wrote:
HackettFan wrote:
where there are a couple guitar chords that really crunch, but they don't come out favorably in the mix unless you listen to Genesis Revisited II. I don't think it's a hands down case that Red is heavier than Lillywhite Lilith. However, perhaps it is more clearly so in the case of LTIA pt. 2. This is something of an outlier for Crimson, though (aside from for pt. 3). Anyway, I agree with your point about Fripp being more non-melodic. |
I am not sure Genesis Revisited II is a good exhibit for this because it is not representative of how the band wanted the composition to sound, only what Hackett wanted it to be like. Is it about Hackett getting drowned in the mix or is it just the way Banks wanted it to be? |
Banks was not exactly band leader. It could be that it wasn't even as Banks wanted it to be so much as what the sound engineer did with it. I can't personally say. It's agreed that Revisited II is not by itself a good exhibit, but more because it's a current day release, and not from the bygone era we're discussing. Nevertheless, the electric guitar in Musical Box on Revisited II is more like the electric guitar in the live versions we currently have as opposed to the studio version.
rogerthat wrote:
I don't think Genesis were really interested in sounding very heavy at that time and that is a clear distinction from the Wetton-KC lineup, which Fripp fully intended as heavy music. |
On balance you may be right, but they both had their hard and soft side. Any disparity on this front I think can be easily exaggerated. Gabriel was interested bringing some "balls" to the group. Hackett was interested in the same. They were all surely interested in sounding heavy, possibly at different times and as the mood struck them maybe. Anyway, if you compare live performances of the two groups. There is no disparity apparent between how heavy the live versions of Musical Box were versus the live version of LTIA pt. 1. Musical Box had enormous energy live. We do not have as many versions of LTIA pt.1 live to use in the comparison (I only know of one), but what we have certainly does not place them in different leagues. LTIA pt. 1 does pack a concussive punch on record in one place, but the whole LTIA album is a better quality recording than Nursery Cryme anyway. I also tend to think (because it's apparent) Genesis backed off a little after the poor sound quality they got in recording The Return of the Giant Hogweed.
I think the real difference was that Crimson (depending on the line up) were better players on some level. Genesis was made up of better song writers on some level.
rogerthat wrote:
LTIA 2 is not really an outlier either because LTIA 1 too has a heavy riff and so does Fracture. |
I'm sure we have Genesis albums with more than one heavy riff. The heavy riff on LTIA pt.1 is rather brief, I should say too. (BTW, I don't actually care for LTIA 2, but LTIA 1 is very special. Exiles is extra special. LTIA, Lizard and Discipline are my favorite albums. I like but don't love ITCOCK. I really don't care for Islands and most of Red aside from Providence. Providence appeals to me the same as Genesis' The Waiting Room. I don't find Providence any heavier than the Waiting Room either, I might add. - Random info on my preferences)
Edited by HackettFan - January 28 2013 at 18:37
|
|
HackettFan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 7951
|
Posted: January 28 2013 at 19:01 |
rogerthat wrote:
Wetton KC has that industrial quality and no wonder Fripp returned to it in the THRAK formation as well. |
True. This is the non-melodic quality mentioned earlier. THRAK has even more of it. When Crimson goes loud, they're looking to create impact. When Genesis goes loud, they're taking you on an adventure.
Fripp tends to be more jazzy. Hackett tended to be more bluesy. The non-melodic and non-bluesy aspect of metal did not arise right away. It took a little while to develop and was more commonplace in the US (California) to start with, as I recall.
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: January 28 2013 at 19:30 |
HackettFan wrote:
Banks was not exactly band leader. It could be that it wasn't even as Banks wanted it to be so much as what the sound engineer did with it. I can't personally say. It's agreed that Revisited II is not by itself a good exhibit, but more because it's a current day release, and not from the bygone era we're discussing. Nevertheless, the electric guitar in Musical Box on Revisited II is more like the electric guitar in the live versions we currently have as opposed to the studio version. |
I tend to 'blame' Banks more than the recording itself (which no doubt was not optimal on Nursery Cryme) because even much later on Ripples, by when their recordings had improved a lot, Banks still drowned out Hackett. It could be one of the reasons Hackett had to go.
HackettFan wrote:
On balance you may be right, but they both had their hard and soft side. Any disparity on this front I think can be easily exaggerated. Gabriel was interested bringing some "balls" to the group. Hackett was interested in the same. They were all surely interested in sounding heavy, possibly at different times and as the mood struck them maybe. Anyway, if you compare live performances of the two groups. There is no disparity apparent between how heavy the live versions of Musical Box were versus the live version of LTIA pt. 1. Musical Box had enormous energy live. We do not have as many versions of LTIA pt.1 live to use in the comparison (I only know of one), but what we have certainly does not place them in different leagues. LTIA pt. 1 does pack a concussive punch on record in one place, but the whole LTIA album is a better quality recording than Nursery Cryme anyway. I also tend to think (because it's apparent) Genesis backed off a little after the poor sound quality they got in recording The Return of the Giant Hogweed.
I think the real difference was that Crimson (depending on the line up) were better players on some level. Genesis was made up of better song writers on some level. |
I don't really want to judge with one live recording and if we are speaking of the same one, it's rather quiet. I tend to think that is on account of problems in recording itself because at the time, Cross used to complain that Wetton and Bruford drowned him out with their wall of heaviness. The Wetton-KC live recordings lack the richness and meat of the studio versions and fail to do justice to them. I think the live recordings with Gabriel are relatively good for their era - don't know how that works! But yeah, as I said later and you also seem to agree, going by the essential character of KC that came to be from around 1973-74, I regard them as overall the heavier band because they were much more biased in favour of heavy music than Genesis. I agree with the last statement for the most part as well.
HackettFan wrote:
I'm sure we have Genesis albums with more than one heavy riff. The heavy riff on LTIA pt.1 is rather brief, I should say too. (BTW, I don't actually care for LTIA 2, but LTIA 1 is very special. Exiles is extra special. LTIA, Lizard and Discipline are my favorite albums. I like but don't love ITCOCK. I really don't care for Islands and most of Red aside from Providence. Providence appeals to me the same as Genesis' The Waiting Room. I don't find Providence any heavier than the Waiting Room either, I might add. - Random info on my preferences) |
I think there's hardly any heavy riff in the whole of A Trick of the Tail and likewise in Wind and Wuthering (barring some passages of Quiet Earth). That makes me believe even more that Banks didn't want too much heaviness in the mix. I think Hackett and Gabriel's solo careers bear out their fondness for heaviness or menace and I don't think Gabriel could ever convert the band completely to that side.
|
|
HackettFan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 7951
|
Posted: January 29 2013 at 14:21 |
rogerthat wrote:
HackettFan wrote:
Banks was not exactly band leader. It could be that it wasn't even as Banks wanted it to be so much as what the sound engineer did with it. I can't personally say. It's agreed that Revisited II is not by itself a good exhibit, but more because it's a current day release, and not from the bygone era we're discussing. Nevertheless, the electric guitar in Musical Box on Revisited II is more like the electric guitar in the live versions we currently have as opposed to the studio version. |
I tend to 'blame' Banks more than the recording itself (which no doubt was not optimal on Nursery Cryme) because even much later on Ripples, by when their recordings had improved a lot, Banks still drowned out Hackett. It could be one of the reasons Hackett had to go.
HackettFan wrote:
On balance you may be right, but they both had their hard and soft side. Any disparity on this front I think can be easily exaggerated. Gabriel was interested bringing some "balls" to the group. Hackett was interested in the same. They were all surely interested in sounding heavy, possibly at different times and as the mood struck them maybe. Anyway, if you compare live performances of the two groups. There is no disparity apparent between how heavy the live versions of Musical Box were versus the live version of LTIA pt. 1. Musical Box had enormous energy live. We do not have as many versions of LTIA pt.1 live to use in the comparison (I only know of one), but what we have certainly does not place them in different leagues. LTIA pt. 1 does pack a concussive punch on record in one place, but the whole LTIA album is a better quality recording than Nursery Cryme anyway. I also tend to think (because it's apparent) Genesis backed off a little after the poor sound quality they got in recording The Return of the Giant Hogweed.
I think the real difference was that Crimson (depending on the line up) were better players on some level. Genesis was made up of better song writers on some level. |
I don't really want to judge with one live recording and if we are speaking of the same one, it's rather quiet. I tend to think that is on account of problems in recording itself because at the time, Cross used to complain that Wetton and Bruford drowned him out with their wall of heaviness. The Wetton-KC live recordings lack the richness and meat of the studio versions and fail to do justice to them. I think the live recordings with Gabriel are relatively good for their era - don't know how that works! But yeah, as I said later and you also seem to agree, going by the essential character of KC that came to be from around 1973-74, I regard them as overall the heavier band because they were much more biased in favour of heavy music than Genesis. I agree with the last statement for the most part as well.
HackettFan wrote:
I'm sure we have Genesis albums with more than one heavy riff. The heavy riff on LTIA pt.1 is rather brief, I should say too. (BTW, I don't actually care for LTIA 2, but LTIA 1 is very special. Exiles is extra special. LTIA, Lizard and Discipline are my favorite albums. I like but don't love ITCOCK. I really don't care for Islands and most of Red aside from Providence. Providence appeals to me the same as Genesis' The Waiting Room. I don't find Providence any heavier than the Waiting Room either, I might add. - Random info on my preferences) |
<div id="_dyhb23rg4374"> <div id="_dyhb23rg4374">I think there's hardly any heavy riff in the whole of A Trick of the Tail and likewise in Wind and Wuthering (barring some passages of Quiet Earth). That makes me believe even more that Banks didn't want too much heaviness in the mix. I think Hackett and Gabriel's solo careers bear out their fondness for heaviness or menace and I don't think Gabriel could ever convert the band completely to that side. |
All well said, truly.
|
|
hinafu
Forum Newbie
Joined: May 15 2012
Location: Lima
Status: Offline
Points: 20
|
Posted: January 29 2013 at 14:24 |
Yes Genesis/King Crimson King Crimson/Genesis
|
|
The Mystical
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 20 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 604
|
Posted: February 16 2013 at 08:02 |
1. Floyd 2. Yes 3. My job here is done.
|
I am currently digging:
Hawkwind, Rare Bird, Gong, Tangerine Dream, Khan, Iron Butterfly, and all things canterbury and hard-psych. I also love jazz!
Please drop me a message with album suggestions.
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.