Scorpions for Krautrock or prog related |
Post Reply | Page <1 3456> |
Author | |||||
Trianium
Forum Groupie Joined: October 03 2009 Location: Moaņa - Spain Status: Offline Points: 91 |
Posted: October 19 2009 at 16:37 | ||||
I think Scorpions should be in Prog Related. In the Seventies they were really an interesant an original band, 'Lonesome Craw' has some Krautrock, Purple, Floyd and Hendrix elements. 'Fly to the Rainbow' and 'In Trance' are pure psychodelic-hard rock and in 'taken by force' songs like 'we'll burn sky' or 'polar nights' are big influence to Progressive metal....ok, in the 80's Scorpions are sh*t...but they were great in the seventies.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tfn6z6HYZj8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iphAa0PiCbI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnlKXzVw1RA In these songs i found some prog elements. Edited by Trianium - October 19 2009 at 16:42 |
|||||
Marty McFly
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2009 Location: Czech Republic Status: Offline Points: 3968 |
Posted: October 26 2009 at 06:36 | ||||
It's funny this "When X is here, then Y should be here too. And Y deserves it even more" argument. Have you ever considered why X managed to get here in first place ? If there are less progressive bands than for example Scorpions, why they are here ? From what reason. Anyway, it's like Pearl Jam. Good, legend, but it's not here yet, is it ? Edited by MartyMcFly89 - October 26 2009 at 06:37 |
|||||
There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless,"
-Andyman1125 on Lulu Even my |
|||||
infandous
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 23 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2447 |
Posted: October 27 2009 at 13:57 | ||||
While I have to say that Lonesome Crow on it's own (and possibly Fly To The Rainbow) would fit in this site, I would generally be against their inclusion. But then, I would also be against Zeppelin, The Door, And Sabbath being included as well, but they are here
Honestly, if prog related is supposed to be non-prog music that might be of interest to prog fans, the Scorpions 70's material (at least) fits that perfectly. |
|||||
Wiktor Hatif
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 09 2008 Location: Poland Status: Offline Points: 159 |
Posted: July 13 2010 at 17:43 | ||||
exactly, and you can find such artists on PA, example: one album of Jose Cid http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=669 and now look at his full discography: http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jos%C3%A9_Cid#Discos_.28selec.C3.A7.C3.A3o.29 exactly ;) I just started a similar case, where the two first albums of the band are progressive, but I guess in my case the progressivity is much more clear http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=69166 |
|||||
"Ffffaaahhh, seeko baaaaaa
Neeeeee toe, kare lo yeahhh Sa sa sa sa saa! Fssss Drrrrrrrrr bo ki! Rapateeka! do go taaaam Rapateeka! do go tchaa" - "Atom Heart Mother" Pink Floyd/Ron Geesin |
|||||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17847 |
Posted: July 13 2010 at 19:59 | ||||
I don't know about krautrock, maybe prog related.....Certainly not heavy prog. Lonesome Crow is a fantastic, artistic album......When I first heard Lovedrive, that got me hooked on Scorpions. I then purchased Tokyo Tapes, their first live album. That included "In Search of the Peace of Mind"....mystical performance.....thru research found out it was on the first album. I spent a few months looking for Lonesome Crow at Tower Records (back in the day that's where I found all my import vinyl).
Then I read (internet did not exist...) that Lonesome Crow was released under a different label and title in the US as "Action". Ahhaaa!! Finally found it...the cover has a girl driving a Jeep wearing ski goggles stuck in a sand pit...WHAT????
Anyhow...That album is so psychadelic, art rock, jazzy.....The first few songs Klaus is merely "rapping" and not singing, he sings very little in those first songs.
The title track is an amazing journey of strange sounds, the guitar work of the Schenker brothers is mind boggling......I also think Wolfgang Dziony and Lothar Heimberg do a fantastic job on drums and bass work.
It certainly is Scorpions most ambitious work IMO.....and don't forget the album was actually used as a soundtrack for some German movie, I don't recall the title.
Once Michael left for UFO...Uli Jon Roth joined and the sound and style continued with his amazing orchestral guitar work.....Although its not where Klaus and Rudolf wanted to go....Their ultimate goal was to conquer the USA......So heavy metal guitar based sound is what they shot for, hence all the member changes in those early years....and of course they did along with conquering the rest of the world.
Scorpions changed their sound quite a bit over their career....and I do agree their work up to Taken By Force is some of their best and certainly includes the most progy elements. After that it was heavy metal/hard rock........reason why Lovedrive and Animal Magnetism were big hits in the US, their heavy US touring schedule helped a lot too back in the late 70's.
Anyhow....I struggle with the inclusion of Scorpions to PA......Although I 100% agree the early Scorpions years could be considered.
So please, do yourself a favor and take a listen to Lonesome Crow......its a great album...and its far from the recent albums. The only other song that comes to mind where they came close to that early style was a song called "China White" on the Blackout album.......for that matter the title track "Animal Magnetism"...same vein.
I think it all points to that Scorpions took their sound and changed it quite a bit from begining to where they are now......sounds progressive to me.
Regardless Scorpions
Cheers everyone!!
|
|||||
|
|||||
listen
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 05 2007 Location: Portland OR Status: Offline Points: 352 |
Posted: May 09 2011 at 04:42 | ||||
I'm not making an "If X is here, then Y must be" argument at all. The fact that bands with similar levels of progressiveness exist across this site warrants and even motivates the consideration of this band. And remember, "progressiveness" is a subjective and multifaceted quality, if progressiveness is a contiguous and coherent concept at all. And of course, the concept exists on a continuum and where the line between "progressive" and non-"progressive" exists is subjective. By and large, the Scorpions played formulaic, simple stadium hard rock. But, in case anyone didn't read my first post, I am suggesting Scorpions for inclusion solely because of their first album, Lonesome Crow. And let's remember: There is no requirement on this site for how many "progressive" albums a band must have produced in order to be listed (there are many artists on this site that only ever released one album, and many who only released one or a few progressive albums [for instance only one of Jose Cid's 20-something albums is listed in the archives, so it seems the objection on the basis of not wanting to add the bulk of non-progressive Scorpions' albums is potentially void]), and no requirement for progressiveness across their entire catalog, especially if the members changed, as is the case with the Scorpions (by the way, what were many of the prog "greats" doing around the same time as the rest of many of the Scorpions albums? ELP? Genesis? Camel? Yes?). And of course Progarchives intends to be the "most complete and powerful prog-rock resource". So, if Lonesome Crow is deemed to be progressive, Scorpions should be listed in the archives. I rescind my proposal of the Krautrock category; I don't think their first album is quite krautrock (although bands like Arktis, Dschinn, Jeronimo, Pacific Sound, etc are no more krautrock or progressive to my ears). But I do think that Lonesome Crow is progressive, if only to the degree seemingly required (from my subjective observation) to be listed as Prog-related or Crossover Prog. The most progressive track is the final, title track, "Lonesome Crow," although there is progressiveness throughout the album. You can listen to it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch? Lonesome Crow was produced by the krautrock-affiliated Conny Plank (Can, Cluster, Harmonia, Kluster, Kraan, Guru Guru, Neu!, Organisation, Os Mundi) for Brain records. While it is probably likely that Plank's seeming krautrock aesthetic had some amount of an influence on the sound on Lonesome Crow, there is definite progressiveness in the music to my ears. And lets remember to consider progressiveness in a krautrock light here. Edited by listen - May 09 2011 at 05:59 |
|||||
Now is all there is. Be before you think!
|
|||||
listen
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 05 2007 Location: Portland OR Status: Offline Points: 352 |
Posted: May 09 2011 at 04:49 | ||||
NOTE: the version of "Lonesome Crow" here is edited--it is 4 minutes too short. FOR THE FULL VERSION, LISTEN HERE: http://www.youtube.com/watch? Edited by listen - May 09 2011 at 06:02 |
|||||
Now is all there is. Be before you think!
|
|||||
listen
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 05 2007 Location: Portland OR Status: Offline Points: 352 |
Posted: May 09 2011 at 04:55 | ||||
Well said. |
|||||
Now is all there is. Be before you think!
|
|||||
Bonnek
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 01 2009 Location: Belgium Status: Offline Points: 4515 |
Posted: May 09 2011 at 05:46 | ||||
Now I really am intrigued to listen to Lonesome Crow. It's the only one from their 70's stuff that I don't have. You could say their second album "Fly To The Rainbow" is "proto Prog Metal", like Judas Priest's first two albums. Is that enough for Prog-Related? Not my call to make but it's not an absurd suggestion neither. |
|||||
toroddfuglesteg
Forum Senior Member Retired Joined: March 04 2008 Location: Retirement Home Status: Offline Points: 3658 |
Posted: May 09 2011 at 05:58 | ||||
Bizarre........... I did the review of the first Saris album one week ago where I more than once commented how similar sounding they are to The Scorpions. A band I once liked and which played a reasonable big part of my life 20 years ago. I may be tempted to like them again when I get a room & a rocking chair in the local retirement home. We all return back to past crimes when we get old. |
|||||
listen
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 05 2007 Location: Portland OR Status: Offline Points: 352 |
Posted: May 09 2011 at 06:06 | ||||
I'm not making an "If X is here, then Y must be" argument at all. The fact that bands with similar levels of progressiveness exist across this site warrants and even motivates the consideration of this band. And remember, "progressiveness" is a subjective and multifaceted quality, if progressiveness is a contiguous and coherent concept at all. And of course, the concept exists on a continuum and where the line between "progressive" and non-"progressive" exists is subjective. By and large, the Scorpions played formulaic, simple stadium hard rock. But, in case anyone didn't read my first post, I am suggesting Scorpions for inclusion solely because of their first album, Lonesome Crow. And let's remember: There is no requirement on this site for how many "progressive" albums a band must have produced in order to be listed (there are many artists on this site that only ever released one album, and many that only released one or a few progressive albums [for instance only one of Jose Cid's 20-something albums is listed in the archives, so it seems the objection on the basis of not wanting to add the bulk of non-progressive Scorpions' albums is potentially void]), and no requirement for progressiveness across their entire catalog, especially if the members changed, as is the case with the Scorpions, for which only 2 of the 5 musicians on Lonesome Crow continued on after that album (and by the way, what were many of the prog "greats" doing around the same time as the rest of many of the Scorpions albums? ELP? Genesis? Camel? Yes?). And of course Progarchives intends to be the "most complete and powerful prog-rock resource". So, if Lonesome Crow is deemed to be progressive, Scorpions should be listed in the archives. I rescind my proposal of the Krautrock category; I don't think their first album is quite krautrock (although bands like Arktis, Dschinn, Jeronimo, Pacific Sound, Orange Peel, etc are no more krautrock or progressive to my ears). But I do think that Lonesome Crow is progressive, if only to the degree seemingly required (from my subjective observation) to be listed as Prog-related or Crossover Prog. The most progressive track is the final, title track, "Lonesome Crow," although there is progressiveness throughout the album. You can listen to it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch? The song "In Search of the Peace of Mind" also has some progressive elements, mostly with its tangential structure (as does the song "Action," for which I did not find a video): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osuvkwVzKrk Lonesome Crow was produced by the krautrock-affiliated Conny Plank (Can, Cluster, Harmonia, Kluster, Kraan, Guru Guru, Neu!, Organisation, Os Mundi) for Brain records. While it is probably likely that Plank's seeming krautrock aesthetic had some amount of an influence on the sound on Lonesome Crow, there is definite progressiveness in the music to my ears. And lets remember to consider progressiveness in a krautrock light here. Edited by listen - May 09 2011 at 13:52 |
|||||
Now is all there is. Be before you think!
|
|||||
AtomicCrimsonRush
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 02 2008 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 14258 |
Posted: May 09 2011 at 06:31 | ||||
I am a Scorpions fan and never thought of them as prog at all. I have the first few albums and the huge World Wide Live album. Love at First Sting is their best I think. 'Lonesome Crow' is very different and is a one off really. It is proggish but can a whole band be included here over one proggish album? This may be the case but it poses problems.I am not saying Scorpions are not a chance as prog related but it opens iup doors for other dubious entries.
If this were the case we would need to include the following:
Helloween - 'Keeper of the 7 Keys saga' and others
Judas Priest - 'Nostradamus' (concept album with proggish musicianship)
Kiss - 'The Elder' (conceptual, prog time sigs)
Wasp - 'Babylon' (conceptual, PR music)
Megadeth - 'So far So Good So What?' (PR music)
Gary..... oh forget it!
|
|||||
|
|||||
toroddfuglesteg
Forum Senior Member Retired Joined: March 04 2008 Location: Retirement Home Status: Offline Points: 3658 |
Posted: May 09 2011 at 06:47 | ||||
Scorpions is German hard rock and that's it. They are a good band and perhaps underrated due to that horrible whistle tune Winds Of Change and a very cheesy image which does not cut it in 2011. But progressive rock or even prog related ? No !!!!!!!
|
|||||
AtomicCrimsonRush
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 02 2008 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 14258 |
Posted: May 09 2011 at 06:53 | ||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
listen
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 05 2007 Location: Portland OR Status: Offline Points: 352 |
Posted: May 09 2011 at 07:00 | ||||
Remember! We are evaluating on the basis of their debut, which wasn't even the same band as later albums (only 2/5 of the members on that album remained after that album was released)! This is *NOT* a discussion of whether Scorpions' music as a whole is progressive. |
|||||
Now is all there is. Be before you think!
|
|||||
Slaughternalia
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 17 2011 Status: Offline Points: 901 |
Posted: May 09 2011 at 19:19 | ||||
I think a band's inclusion in the archives as full fledged prog should be based on their creative peak. If a band had some proggy albums at some point (such as Queen), prog related works fine.
|
|||||
progrockfreak
Forum Groupie Joined: January 18 2010 Status: Offline Points: 62 |
Posted: May 09 2011 at 21:13 | ||||
I think it's time you guys added a new category to the site, "Almost But Not Quite", "The Ones That Got Away", or some similarly descriptive name, where you can bundle all these bands that aren't immediately recognisable to the world as genuine prog artists, but do have the occasional flash of inspiration that rises beyond the normal territory of hard rock, pop or whatever it is that they usually play.
No need to list albums, or provide a thorough biography - just a reference to them, the fact that they were proposed, evaluated and rejected, and the reason for their rejection. The site aims to be the ultimate prog resource, so the fact that these contentious bands are missing completely as things stand is actually preventing this from being achieved.
I don't suppose it would stop the discussions and arguments such as this one, but at least when a search was done for a "borderline" artist like The Scorpions, a result would then be forthcoming, and the reason why the band was not included in the site proper would be there for all to see.
|
|||||
listen
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 05 2007 Location: Portland OR Status: Offline Points: 352 |
Posted: May 10 2011 at 00:52 | ||||
You can always do a search of this "suggest new bands and artists" forum. |
|||||
Now is all there is. Be before you think!
|
|||||
Bonnek
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 01 2009 Location: Belgium Status: Offline Points: 4515 |
Posted: May 10 2011 at 01:56 | ||||
That is a bit deceptive. Scorpions is a hard-rock band with more then 15(?) albums. With such an extensive discography, the evaluation won't be done on just one or two initial albums that are entirely different from what came after. Unless of course those two albums were very influential on later prog-rock. Then they might fir for Prog-Related. So you'd better put your energy in making a list of established prog rock acts that claim (themselves) to have be influenced by the Scorpions' first two albums, which I don't think will fly as Scorpions were just absorbing influences from existing UK heavy rock (Uriah Heep for instance). |
|||||
progrockfreak
Forum Groupie Joined: January 18 2010 Status: Offline Points: 62 |
Posted: May 10 2011 at 06:39 | ||||
Yes you can. And find five pages with nigh on 100 posts to wade through. What I'm talking about here is a simple definitive conclusion when the collaborators have all had their say, and the band has been rejected. Something that will show up in a normal google search for a band, and that will lead the reader to a single summarial entry saying what the band were (or are) about, and why they were considered unsuitable for inclusion in the site proper. It would make things a whole lot easier for the casual user just looking up a band they were interested in, and add to the functionality of the site in my opinion.
Edited by progrockfreak - May 10 2011 at 06:50 |
|||||
Post Reply | Page <1 3456> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |