Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: September 28 2010
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 223
Posted: January 21 2011 at 07:36
Formentera Lady wrote:
Currently I quite like the sound of Timbaland and his productions. I especially like the album "Loose" of Nelly Furtado which is primarily produced by Timbaland. I blame the specific synth drum beat sound on him. I think, this is quite a "new" and interesting sound.
I was a big Neptunes fan in high school. They don't get nearly enough cred as pop producers.
It's funny how the colors of the real world only seem really real when you viddy them on the screen.
Pop music is at its best when it's being smart/clever/erudite/witty/provocative - anything that shows there is a brain and a personality (however prefabricated) at work behind the glitz and the gloss - of the modern era, artists like Tinie Tempah, Lily Allen, Biffy Clyro, Florence & the Machine, Kate Nash, Katy Perry, Gorillaz and (to some extent) Lady Gaga and Eminem, while not being stunningly profound or earth-shattering, are demonstrating that ti still takes talent and skill to produce Pop music as an art form rather than just a product.
I sort of agree with this (but haven't even heard of the artists cited apart from Lady Gaga, Eminem and Gorrillaz)
Casting your line further outside the goldfish bowl of celebrity however, we do reel in a former school of pop music that is intelligent , witty, thought provoking and occupies very familiar mainstream waters e.g. Bob Dylan, Madness, the Go-Betweens, Blondie, The Kinks, Pretenders, The Stranglers (the list goes on)
The foregoing all write very conservative music using the types of structures (verse, chorus, middle eight etc) still endemic in contemporary popular song writing styles. Notwithstanding audio and computer software developments, technological aides become irrelevant if they do not engender new forms and structures after all. The only real difference I can hear see between Lady Gaga and my examples is that of the lowest common denominator scaling the top of the totem pole i.e. sexuality masquerading as innovation/non conformity ( a marketing guru's wet dream to be sure)
It would of course be naive to claim that record executives did not exploit Debbie Harry and Chrissie Hynde's obvious sex appeal to shift more units, but neither stooped to conquer success as women playing the industry 'man's game' c/f Madonna, Lady Gaga. I wouldn't imagine Gaga's fan base has sufficient nous to intuit their heroine's ironic embrace of a patriarchal mindset she is exploiting for her own mercenary ends. (Good luck to her I say, but she is even more of an unwitting staunch reactionary than Madonna)
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Posted: January 21 2011 at 09:57
ExittheLemming wrote:
Dean wrote:
Pop music is at its best when it's being smart/clever/erudite/witty/provocative - anything that shows there is a brain and a personality (however prefabricated) at work behind the glitz and the gloss - of the modern era, artists like Tinie Tempah, Lily Allen, Biffy Clyro, Florence & the Machine, Kate Nash, Katy Perry, Gorillaz and (to some extent) Lady Gaga and Eminem, while not being stunningly profound or earth-shattering, are demonstrating that ti still takes talent and skill to produce Pop music as an art form rather than just a product.
I sort of agree with this (but haven't even heard of the artists cited apart from Lady Gaga, Eminem and Gorrillaz)
Casting your line further outside the goldfish bowl of celebrity however, we do reel in a former school of pop music that is intelligent , witty, thought provoking and occupies very familiar mainstream waters e.g. Bob Dylan, Madness, the Go-Betweens, Blondie, The Kinks, Pretenders, The Stranglers (the list goes on)
The foregoing all write very conservative music using the types of structures (verse, chorus, middle eight etc) still endemic in contemporary popular song writing styles. Notwithstanding audio and computer software developments, technological aides become irrelevant if they do not engender new forms and structures after all. The only real difference I can hear see between Lady Gaga and my examples is that of the lowest common denominator scaling the top of the totem pole i.e. sexuality masquerading as innovation/non conformity ( a marketing guru's wet dream to be sure)
It would of course be naive to claim that record executives did not exploit Debbie Harry and Chrissie Hynde's obvious sex appeal to shift more units, but neither stooped to conquer success as women playing the industry 'man's game' c/f Madonna, Lady Gaga. I wouldn't imagine Gaga's fan base has sufficient nous to intuit their heroine's ironic embrace of a patriarchal mindset she is exploiting for her own mercenary ends. (Good luck to her I say, but she is even more of an unwitting staunch reactionary than Madonna)
Interesting point, and one that shouldn't be over looked since a huge proportion of Pop Music is all image and marketing, but I was referring to the "quality" of the song-writing itself, (music and lyrics), where it is possible to be "artistic" within those limited AABA structures. The parallels between Mad Donna and Ladygagagaga more than just surface dressing of imagery and sexuality - both have an ear for tunemanship and can use lyric to be provocative, satirical and witty.
Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166178
Posted: January 21 2011 at 13:12
Forgive me if this question has been raised, I didn't read everything...
Was Pop music ever innovative? I mean, yeah it evolved and changed over the years, but I wouldn't really consider that innovative. I would think that the most innovative pop (even if that percentage is very small amount of innovation) would move outside the realms of pop alittle too much for it to be pure pop.
Good is obviously subjective. I do think pop music is as bad as it ever was in todays age (90s-00s), but I do have a soft spot for 80s pop.
So to answer the question...no and no IMO.
Dig me...But don't...Bury me I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166178
Posted: January 21 2011 at 14:17
To start yes. But they were clearly more than that, at least in the period I assume you are referring to.
But that is a good point nonetheless. Their base genre was pop.
Dig me...But don't...Bury me I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Posted: January 21 2011 at 14:24
Man With Hat wrote:
To start yes. But they were clearly more than that, at least in the period I assume you are referring to.
But that is a good point nonetheless. Their base genre was pop.
I'm referring to all their career, and I call all of it pop because no matter how sophisticated, witty etc. it was, it was also highly accessible, melodic, ergo the huge sales, larger than life impact on the masses, etc.
Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Posted: January 21 2011 at 22:26
Slarti, who knows? I have no idea what's going on with pop music these days. My kids are grown up. I'm approaching senescense.
I used to pride myself on listening to the latest. Hey, I bought some Prince in the 80's. I bought grunge in the 90's (whatever, Iive in Seattle). I just don't listen to the radio anymore, nor do I watch MTV. My kids buy a new Tool CD. I, old fart that I am, hang out on the web. Some dude at some web site mentions Mars Volta. Someone on this site mentions Decemberists. I go prowling Amazon and am blown away.
The 80's were the last and final stand of pop/rock music as I know it at least over the public airwaves. It's all retreads and garbage now. Lady Gaga, who I think from what I've read has some redeeming qualities and I might even enjoy, is unknown to me. How would I hear it? Ain't listening to no radio. Ain't watching no MTV. The 80's. My Sharona. Devo. The Cars. Our beloved XTC. f**kin' Kim Wilde The Kids of America, not to mention Marshall Crenshaw. Wall of Voodoo. Missing Persons (Zappa connection there). Hell I don't know, Spandau Ballet and Human League. sh*t, play me some Flock of Seagulls, I don't care. They did.
Pop used to stand for something. I ain't heard it lately, not for a decade, but I'm guessing it now stands for nothing.
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166178
Posted: January 21 2011 at 22:45
harmonium.ro wrote:
Man With Hat wrote:
To start yes. But they were clearly more than that, at least in the period I assume you are referring to.
But that is a good point nonetheless. Their base genre was pop.
I'm referring to all their career, and I call all of it pop because no matter how sophisticated, witty etc. it was, it was also highly accessible, melodic, ergo the huge sales, larger than life impact on the masses, etc.
We may have different definitions of pop music.
And as an aside from this conversation...I can't see pop music being that way again. Perhaps its unfair to hold pop groups to the beatles standards, but even still...half of it would be a massive improvment over todays pop.
Dig me...But don't...Bury me I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Posted: January 22 2011 at 10:44
On a somewhat related note, in the 60s there weren't also so many labels and genre-tags. So a lot of music that might be pop in some sense is today already classified as something else. For example, Brand New Heavies are classified as acid jazz but it seems reasonable to call this track pop:
Joined: May 16 2009
Location: Blighty
Status: Offline
Points: 6797
Posted: January 22 2011 at 16:14
^ There are some folks who think anything that is not prog is pop oh well they haven't heard 'Those f**king c**ts treat us like pricks' by Flock of Pink Indians. Myabe that was innovative?
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Posted: January 22 2011 at 16:28
lucas wrote:
Joanna Newsom is not pop , she is, according to Roy Harper's own words "a pioneer of folk rock music like him".
Yeah, if you want to use the most precise tags and descriptors, then nothing's pop. But even so, Joanna Newsom is folk rock in the same universe where Jethro Tull is atmospheric black metal If we're into precise tagging, I'd say that what Joanna plays is acoustically supported vocal music, with a great emphasis on both composition and melody. Pop, in my book.
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Posted: January 22 2011 at 16:30
akamaisondufromage wrote:
^ There are some folks who think anything that is not prog is pop oh well they haven't heard 'Those f**king c**ts treat us like pricks' by Flock of Pink Indians. Myabe that was innovative?
Many people here think that if it's good, sophisticated, artistic, etc., then it can't be pop.
Joined: February 06 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 8138
Posted: January 22 2011 at 16:38
harmonium.ro wrote:
lucas wrote:
Joanna Newsom is not pop , she is, according to Roy Harper's own words "a pioneer of folk rock music like him".
Yeah, if you want to use the most precise tags and descriptors, then nothing's pop. But even so, Joanna Newsom is folk rock in the same universe where Jethro Tull is atmospheric black metal If we're into precise tagging, I'd say that what Joanna plays is acoustically supported vocal music, with a great emphasis on both composition and melody. Pop, in my book.
I remember a guy at a jazz gig, who told me that he hates pop when I was talking about ELP You are right, generally speaking every artist/band from the Beatles to Cradle of Filth can be regarded as pop. Only jazz and classical music would escape this tagging
"Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.199 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.