Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
Posted: January 18 2010 at 12:00
ExittheLemming wrote:
BaldJean wrote:
hey, wait a minute. what's gone itno you all? some people are actually behaving as if there was some substance to these accusations
I don't believe that's the case at all, it's just that the (published) responses to date from those currently purporting to be within Magma do not contain an unequivocal denial.
well, I am not sure what you would call a denial. if I held a speech somewhere and you'd accuse me it was about racism and anti-semitism and I pointed out that it rather was about ecology I'd take that for a perfect rebuttal
A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
Joined: June 14 2006
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
Posted: January 18 2010 at 12:16
Hmmmm...hmm.
That was a good post from a German fan, and touching at that.
A few thoughts of mine:
Lot's of contemporary artists, coming from metal, punk, prog, gothic, industrial etc. are somehow resembling a certain...'Nazi kunst' spleen to their artist identification, be it musical, visual, or both. Many of them are NOT sharing the seemingly sinister (actualy ultra-right winged, excuse the pun) political ideas and motivations - Laibach springs to mind, with their lobotomized visual aesthetics, military uniforms, album titles such is 'Occupied Europe Tour' etc. They were often being accused for embracing Nazi ideology, while the situation is exactly the opposite - they are using the tools for provocations - while deeply behind their artistic statement is nested a political and philosophical one, which is opposite, criticism and warning. There are many artists sharing the same sharp and penultimate provocative aesthetics, and tagging them as Nazis is equally narrow-minded - or at least hasted - as calling 99% of metal artist 'Satanists'. Of course, there are bands that are actually wallowing in Nazi ideology and believing in it, but that's beside the point and I won't talk about them.
I'm not defending Magma, and I'm not accusing them neither.
I utterly despise Nazi ideology - I consider myself a humanist, but, as far as the art goes, I don't mind anyone to shout their angst in the most pervert way as possible: call for hatred, call for murders, rape, defecate on stage if you want. Make people sick and uncomfortable. Call for every shocking and horrifying thing that humanity, unfortunately, did experienced and still does. As long as there's an explicit line between what are you doing in the name of art and your private life and beliefs. Such an artistic exposure could be irony, parody, allegory, provocation, shock for the sake of shock. But if someone believes and defends all that off the stage, then I do pity such an individual.
Speaking of Magma, it seems the band members are intelligent individuals, sharp and bitter about dull and dumb everyday life and establishment surrounding. But it's true, they hadn't explicitly answered 'yes' or 'n' to accusations directed towards them. I hope that's for the sake of keeping the provocative edge sharp rather than hiding what Vander & co. actually think about such ideology, if it's true.
And if it's true, well...I don't know. Here's an example I'm familiar with: during the political storms of Yugoslav wars, madness and hatred, many Croatian, Bosnian, Serbian rock fans experienced too radical statements from certain artists (no matter the side) - some of theme continued to listen the music, some just stopped listening to artist(s) altogether, some embraced the 'they're a****les, but they make good music' attitude. You can't predict it unless it actually happens.
Joined: March 08 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2459
Posted: January 18 2010 at 12:18
Raff wrote:
I'd like to bring up the case of one of my favourite writers - HP Lovecraft. He was openly racist (and a lot of his work, as well as his letters, support this fact), and for a time he was a keen admirer of Hitler. Knowing this, I still manage to enjoy reading Lovecraft's stories, though obviously the more racist passages make me cringe.
Or take Céline. In spite of his disgusting anti-semitism he wrote one of the greatest French novels of the twentieth century. Or Ezra Pound. His support for Italian Fascism was plain stupid - but he wrote a great deal of highly enjoyable poetry!
Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Posted: January 18 2010 at 12:21
d.o.k wrote:
The saddest part is that there is NO answers from Magma members rejecting and denying whats been said before.
Some rumors aren't worth addressing. Of course, that only makes some people believe in them more (WHERE'S OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE!!??), but responding to the rumor that you're a Nazi will only perpetuate the belief that you're a Nazi. And it won't convince the people who want to believe otherwise.
hey, wait a minute. what's gone itno you all? some people are actually behaving as if there was some substance to these accusations
I don't believe that's the case at all, it's just that the (published) responses to date from those currently purporting to be within Magma do not contain an unequivocal denial.
well, I am not sure what you would call a denial. if I held a speech somewhere and you'd accuse me it was about racism and anti-semitism and I pointed out that it rather was about ecology I'd take that for a perfect rebuttal
Agreed, if you alone were identified as the speech's author. It's only Vander who is being accused of anything here, and he has not seen fit (perhaps with some justification) to respond. I can understand this to an extent, as if the accusations are baseless and false, why dignify and legitimatise them with a reaction ? However, hiding behind the 'united front' of the Magma moniker probably won't douse the flames quickest. Similarly, when your lyrics are entirely in a manufactured language of your own invention, how surprised can you be when you're 'misquoted out of context ?' etc
Edited by ExittheLemming - January 18 2010 at 12:28
Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
Posted: January 18 2010 at 12:44
fuxi wrote:
Raff wrote:
I'd like to bring up the case of one of my favourite writers - HP Lovecraft. He was openly racist (and a lot of his work, as well as his letters, support this fact), and for a time he was a keen admirer of Hitler. Knowing this, I still manage to enjoy reading Lovecraft's stories, though obviously the more racist passages make me cringe.
Or take Céline. In spite of his disgusting anti-semitism he wrote one of the greatest French novels of the twentieth century. Or Ezra Pound. His support for Italian Fascism was plain stupid - but he wrote a great deal of highly enjoyable poetry!
we should also keep in mind that history is always the history of the winners. which means they usually depict themselves as choirboys and the losers as black as they can. mark that I am not denying the Nazi crimes. but I am an historian and know too well that the hands of the winners are blood-stained as well
A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
Joined: April 29 2005
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 427
Posted: January 18 2010 at 12:58
Actually this is rather old news....the truth is not easy to determine, the main argument against the accusations seem to always be that Vander was/is a huge follower of Coltraine and that "coloured" and Nazism don't mix....go figure....Personally, I tend to always focus on the music and not on the personality/beliefs of the artist, although I must admit it's not always easy.
Joined: March 08 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2459
Posted: January 18 2010 at 13:02
toroddfuglesteg wrote:
BaldJean wrote:
but I am an historian and know too well that the hands of the winners are blood-stained as well
That's why I am sceptic towards the ones who glorify Mao and Stalin too. A view I expressed in my review of Little Red Record by Matching Mole.
I've always wondered if the sleeve of Little Red Record wasn't meant as parody. After all, Mao's Red Guards never approved of long-haired proggers, and perhaps Wyatt & Co were aware of this.
On the other hand, Wyatt actually went on to join the British Communist Party and he recorded a song in praise of Stalin. Now THAT's where I don't go along with him.
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
Posted: January 18 2010 at 13:23
I'm not sure yet...
As I see it.
Mekanik Destruktiw Kommandoh = M.D.K. (the ultimate weapon) = Murder, Death, Kill. Coincidence? Perhaps but I don't think so.
If you listen to the beginning of the Retrospektiw I-II version of M.D.K., you'll notice it is different to the studio version. In fact, I can imagine the crowd pumping their fists in the air and yes, it does kind of remind me of Nazism.
However, this could just be an ideology and he's using it as an example of how "evil" the Kobaians are.
For those who may not know. M.D.K. is the third part of the Theusz Hamtaahk Trilogie and is the story of the prophet Nebehr Güdahtt who tries to tell the people of earth to cleanse themselves by singing the "Zeuhl Wortz" (in worship of Kreuhn Kohrmahn) to save themselves (the first part, Theusz Hamtaahk narrates the war between Earth and Kobaia). Some don't believe him and march against him. Whilst some do believe him and march for him.
Unfortunately, Vander has not made clear whether the Kobaians destroy Earth. If this is the case, then there could be a slight case of Fascism here.
However, many novelists write about subjects they don't necessarily agree with. Was Nabokov a dodgy guy for writing Lolita?
Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
Posted: January 18 2010 at 13:33
James wrote:
I'm not sure yet...
As I see it.
Mekanik Destruktiw Kommandoh = M.D.K. (the ultimate weapon) = Murder, Death, Kill. Coincidence? Perhaps but I don't think so.
If you listen to the beginning of the Retrospektiw I-II version of M.D.K., you'll notice it is different to the studio version. In fact, I can imagine the crowd pumping their fists in the air and yes, it does kind of remind me of Nazism.
However, this could just be an ideology and he's using it as an example of how "evil" the Kobaians are.
For those who may not know. M.D.K. is the third part of the Theusz Hamtaahk Trilogie and is the story of the prophet Nebehr Güdahtt who tries to tell the people of earth to cleanse themselves by singing the "Zeuhl Wortz" (in worship of Kreuhn Kohrmahn) to save themselves (the first part, Theusz Hamtaahk narrates the war between Earth and Kobaia). Some don't believe him and march against him. Whilst some do believe him and march for him.
Unfortunately, Vander has not made clear whether the Kobaians destroy earth. If this is the case, then there could be a slight case of Fascism here.
However, many novelists write about subjects they don't necessarily agree with. Was Nabokov a dodgy guy for writing Lolita?
oh, come on, James. MDK can stand for ANYTHING, if you argue like that. how about "Mango, Dattel, Kokosnuss" (German for "mango, date, coconut"), 3 exotics fruits?
A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
Posted: January 18 2010 at 13:40
BaldJean wrote:
James wrote:
I'm not sure yet...
As I see it.
Mekanik Destruktiw Kommandoh = M.D.K. (the ultimate weapon) = Murder, Death, Kill. Coincidence? Perhaps but I don't think so.
If you listen to the beginning of the Retrospektiw I-II version of M.D.K., you'll notice it is different to the studio version. In fact, I can imagine the crowd pumping their fists in the air and yes, it does kind of remind me of Nazism.
However, this could just be an ideology and he's using it as an example of how "evil" the Kobaians are.
For those who may not know. M.D.K. is the third part of the Theusz Hamtaahk Trilogie and is the story of the prophet Nebehr Güdahtt who tries to tell the people of earth to cleanse themselves by singing the "Zeuhl Wortz" (in worship of Kreuhn Kohrmahn) to save themselves (the first part, Theusz Hamtaahk narrates the war between Earth and Kobaia). Some don't believe him and march against him. Whilst some do believe him and march for him.
Unfortunately, Vander has not made clear whether the Kobaians destroy earth. If this is the case, then there could be a slight case of Fascism here.
However, many novelists write about subjects they don't necessarily agree with. Was Nabokov a dodgy guy for writing Lolita?
oh, come on, James. MDK can stand for ANYTHING, if you argue like that. how about "Mango, Dattel, Kokosnuss" (German for "mango, date, coconut"), 3 exotics fruits?
Indeed.
But if it does correlate with Murder, Death, Kill it doesn't matter anyway as I don't think Vander's a Nazi or a Fascist.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.117 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.