Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Suggest New Bands and Artists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Steve Miller Band would be @ PA?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSteve Miller Band would be @ PA?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Poll Question: Whats yr opinion?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
3 [16.67%]
15 [83.33%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
ko View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 314
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Steve Miller Band would be @ PA?
    Posted: January 07 2010 at 18:49
That really seems extremly nonsense that one of THE first prog musicans, a pretty good composer (he composed "Shine you crazy diamond" in '68 - much before "original" prog superhit!Wink) and  an unique  guitarist is NOT (!) @PA!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTMZS8WWM6I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McSPd3aVXNk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjlFkqMNxcY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAcZC6zs-y0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwJGN-T4kaM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1iFTE-u7Gg

Edited by ko - January 07 2010 at 19:11
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 18:56
Much as I like the Steve Miller Band...um...no.
Back to Top
ko View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 314
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 19:01
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

...um...no.
Can you tell me why?
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 19:08
Originally posted by ko ko wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

...um...no.
Can you tell me why?


Because the Steve Miller Band is largely a blues rock outfit.  Can you name one progressive rock album they've made?

The first Youtube sample is kinda progish, but many bands in the 1970s dabbled around with this sort of experimentation.  The second Youtube sample is a live version of this.

The third Youtube sample...I'm sorry, but that's one of the most ordinary chord progressions in modern music.  It's a nice song, but not progressive rock in the least.

The fourth Youtube sample is a bit more complex, but still not progressive rock.  It could be likened to Uriah Heep a bit, but still-

Can you name one album that is progressive rock?


Back to Top
ko View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 314
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 19:13
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by ko ko wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

...um...no.
Can you tell me why?


Because the Steve Miller Band is largely a blues rock outfit.  Can you name one progressive rock album they've made?

The first Youtube sample is kinda progish, but many bands in the 1970s dabbled around with this sort of experimentation.  The second Youtube sample is a live version of this.

The third Youtube sample...I'm sorry, but that's one of the most ordinary chord progressions in modern music.  It's a nice song, but not progressive rock in the least.

The fourth Youtube sample is a bit more complex, but still not progressive rock.  It could be likened to Uriah Heep a bit, but still-

Can you name one album that is progressive rock?


What about Sailor?
PS Ought to say why you dont accept him, in my opinion. TBH, I think that reason is because he's American. OK, call me crazy but I saw that so many these bs pop bands/artists from East Europe are more welcome here than those great PROG acts from USA (as Mr. Steve Miller as well !).


Edited by ko - January 07 2010 at 19:26
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 19:31
Originally posted by ko ko wrote:

[
PS Ought to say why you dont accept him, in my opinion. TBH, I think that reason is because he's American.


Yes, an American whose favorite band is Kansas is clearly biased in this regard.  Ermm
Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 20:09
I love me some early-Steve Miller Band.  Children of the Future is a fantastic, well-conceived album, with a couple of songs that certainly fall into the proto-prog realm.  Unfortunately, prog-wise, any album that has a cover version of Key to the Highway probably is not going to gain admission here.  Sailor is also a good album.  But what's the high point?  Living in the U.S.A., which is pure blues-rock if I've ever heard it.
 
Me?  I have a tendency to confuse really good, atmospheric rock albums that contain some prog elements with actual prog albums.  Happens all the time.  See my Richard Thompson suggestion from a couple of days ago.
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Back to Top
Chris S View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 20:21
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Much as I like the Steve Miller Band...um...no.
I would be bias but have to agree......Book of Dreams as an album comes close many times and ' Song for our Ancestors' would be a no brainer even with the bluesy breaks.
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10680
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 21:07
I think a lot of people would be surprised at how proggy a lot of early Steve Miller is, but if you look at bands from that time and place, I think they are beat out by Quicksilver Messenger Service.

Although QMS is known for being a blues-rock jam band, they also have some great proto-prog multi-sectional Medevial sounding tracks. They also, from what I understand, made an important tour of the UK early on that had a big impact on the early UK psyche proto-prog scene.
Back to Top
ko View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 314
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2010 at 02:30
I own an old book printed in 1976/1977, The Ilustrated New Musical Express Encyclopedia of Rock, (Salamander Books Ltd, London), where Nick Logan and Bob Woffingen wrote about early SMB as very important one of early progressive rock bands. It seems that general view about "what's prog" have to have drastically changes from that time. 
 
i.e. The Who is one of my fav bands. I own everything officialy issued by them (including solo albums; I'v been on the gigs so many times) and it results that I'v been really suprised when I saw The Who here!  TBH, I don't care, on the contrary I'm happy because I'm "diehard" fan but objectively speaking - this is a funny thing! As you said -The Who is proto prog, because of "they made prog possible". Ok, I suposed that many people are thinking on that way, so I'm not against that. But if we're following to this, how it could be even possible that Steve Miller Band with late 60's albums like Children of Future and Sailor is not deserved that proto prog status but The Who with their music from the same year is deserved to become proto prog ? Tommy as original 1969 album, as the rock opera with lack of electric guitar maybe qualified them for proto prog. But if you're listening to their live records(i.e. Woodstock perfomance, Live at Leeds or London Coliseum) from the time when Tommy went to the shops, it should be proto metal not proto prog.
(Btw, I think that Who Are You is THE album which could be "prog related" /if you loved to put them here/ because one prog musician -Rod Argent plays alot of synths on it and because of that kind of production.)
 
PS Above mentioned things are not my effort to argue with you guys! I'v telling you about my point of view honestly - nothing else!
 
 


Edited by ko - January 08 2010 at 03:18
Back to Top
ko View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 314
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2010 at 03:55
Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:

Originally posted by ko ko wrote:

[
PS Ought to say why you dont accept him, in my opinion. TBH, I think that reason is because he's American.


Yes, an American whose favorite band is Kansas is clearly biased in this regard.  Ermm
Good one lol
 
When I said "because he's American" I wasn't thinking politicaly. I think that American prog is disregarded because American prog is to compare with that  British prog rock movement of late 60s/early70's - what was great and unique - but couldnt be pattern for the bands/artists who did do progressive music in States. That's something wrong and even impossible in my opinion. So you have huge mess here. (i.e. many of those silly questions like: " what Frank Zappa have in common with prog bands as Genesis, Yes, King Crimson, ELP and Jethro Tull ?")
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 37424
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2010 at 13:18
For anyone to discount the impact of American musicians/ bands on progressive rock/music would be sheer ignorance.  Particularly look to the US Psyche scene and Fusion.  And the US continues to produce so much fantastic progressive music.   Not to mention rock and roll/ rock, and jazz specific....

I'm not that familiar with the Steve Miller Band, but what I've heard of the 60's recording are really good and so, without being knowledgeable enough yet to fully endorse it, I would think Proto-Prog or Prog-Related.

I'm not much of one for what is sometimes called Pomp Rock and AOR albums (that have a relation to Prog), which doesn't mean I don't support them in the archives because that would extreme narcissism to think that what I like is what is PA-worthy, though, of course I'm more enthusiastic about ones I like.  I do like what I've heard of Steve Miller Band.

Personally, I think there's too much of a bias against those who did blues-rock (blues-rock being a very Amercian form of music).

Zappa is one of the most respected musicians in the archives (as well as people such as Miles Davis and Herbie Hancock).

Anyway, most of that is pretty unnecessary.

This is a great track:


Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 09 2010 at 14:26
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

For anyone to discount the impact of American musicians/ bands on progressive rock/music would be sheer ignorance.  Particularly look to the US Psyche scene and Fusion.  And the US continues to produce so much fantastic progressive music.   Not to mention rock and roll/ rock, and jazz specific....

I'm not that familiar with the Steve Miller Band, but what I've heard of the 60's recording are really good and so, without being knowledgeable enough yet to fully endorse it, I would think Proto-Prog or Prog-Related.

I'm not much of one for what is sometimes called Pomp Rock and AOR albums (that have a relation to Prog), which doesn't mean I don't support them in the archives because that would extreme narcissism to think that what I like is what is PA-worthy, though, of course I'm more enthusiastic about ones I like.  I do like what I've heard of Steve Miller Band.

Personally, I think there's too much of a bias against those who did blues-rock (blues-rock being a very Amercian form of music).

Zappa is one of the most respected musicians in the archives (as well as people such as Miles Davis and Herbie Hancock).

Anyway, most of that is pretty unnecessary.

This is a great track:


For me, I don't deny the progressive aspects of early Steve Miller.  My point of view is that Children of the Future is the finest of the 'San Francisco' bands debut albums (poor old Moby Grape a distant second).  Obviously In My First Mind fits the bill.  From that album, so do many other tracks, notably Baby's Calling Me Home, with its harpsichord and jazzy changes.  From Sailor, again a number of progressive tracks.  But I thought the rule here is there has to be a progressive album?  And any album that ends with what is essentially a blues medley of Junior Saw It Happen, Fanny Mae, and Key to the Highway doesn't fit the bill.  I'm just saying, if we are going to be consistent then Steve Miller Band probably shouldn't be included.  If they are to be included based on a few songs, then I've just seen a great Dire Straits video (see Police vs. Dire Straits thread over in that other forum) that seals the deal for DS. 


Edited by jammun - January 09 2010 at 14:30
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 37424
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 09 2010 at 15:08
Originally posted by jammun jammun wrote:

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

For anyone to discount the impact of American musicians/ bands on progressive rock/music would be sheer ignorance.  Particularly look to the US Psyche scene and Fusion.  And the US continues to produce so much fantastic progressive music.   Not to mention rock and roll/ rock, and jazz specific....

I'm not that familiar with the Steve Miller Band, but what I've heard of the 60's recording are really good and so, without being knowledgeable enough yet to fully endorse it, I would think Proto-Prog or Prog-Related.

I'm not much of one for what is sometimes called Pomp Rock and AOR albums (that have a relation to Prog), which doesn't mean I don't support them in the archives because that would extreme narcissism to think that what I like is what is PA-worthy, though, of course I'm more enthusiastic about ones I like.  I do like what I've heard of Steve Miller Band.

Personally, I think there's too much of a bias against those who did blues-rock (blues-rock being a very Amercian form of music).

Zappa is one of the most respected musicians in the archives (as well as people such as Miles Davis and Herbie Hancock).

Anyway, most of that is pretty unnecessary.

This is a great track:


For me, I don't deny the progressive aspects of early Steve Miller.  My point of view is that Children of the Future is the finest of the 'San Francisco' bands debut albums (poor old Moby Grape a distant second).  Obviously In My First Mind fits the bill.  From that album, so do many other tracks, notably Baby's Calling Me Home, with its harpsichord and jazzy changes.  From Sailor, again a number of progressive tracks.  But I thought the rule here is there has to be a progressive album?  And any album that ends with what is essentially a blues medley of Junior Saw It Happen, Fanny Mae, and Key to the Highway doesn't fit the bill.  I'm just saying, if we are going to be consistent then Steve Miller Band probably shouldn't be included.  If they are to be included based on a few songs, then I've just seen a great Dire Straits video (see Police vs. Dire Straits thread over in that other forum) that seals the deal for DS. 


A progressive album -- depends what you mean by that.  I don't know that the first album is that progressive (as in innovative) because I suspect that Steve Miller Band was jumping on the Psyche bandwagon; however, it has a fusion of genres which is a very important trait of Progressive Rock.  I certainly don't expect a Prog album from one in Proto-Prog or Prog-Related (though it has happened -- and of course it partially depends on what one thinks is Progressive Rock or progressive music).  If you look at the Proto-Prog definition then I think that the debut and to a lesser extent the follow-up fits Proto-Prog quite well stylistically (there are other considerations to take into account).  Music off other albums have Prog-Related merits.  I don't think in terms of consistency that much, I approach each suggestion quite independently (there is of course the if so-and-so is here then so-and-so should be here too argument which is valid when enough comparisons can be drawn, but I avoid the, if so-and-so isn't in then so-and-so shouldn't be in arguments).  I don't know Dire Straits that well, but it doesn't have any Proto-Prog merits.  I'm of a much more inclusive mind-set when it comes to acts that have albums considerable for Proto-Prog than ones that only have albums considerable for Prog-Related.

Not only do I not think that an act should have a full-blown "progressive" album to be includable in either Proto-Prog or Prog-Related, if that's the case, I think it's better highlighted ina Prog category for the album though I would like an album-based category for specific albums inclusion rather than bands/artists, but I don't see why ending with a blues track would make any difference -- a hallmark of progressive rock is variety.  I'm sure no one would complain with a  band being in Prog of an album if the last piece was pure classical (to use the term loosely).

Like I said, I don't know Steve Miller Band well enough to offer full-support but see how well you think the early albums fit Proto-Prog (at least from a sound perspective and not influence or importance):

Quote

Proto-Prog definition

The denomination Proto Prog comes from the combination of two words, Proto from the Greek The earliest,. and Prog which as we know is a short term for Progressive Rock, so as it's name clearly indicates, refers to the earliest form of Progressive Rock or Progressive Rock in embryonary state.

These bands normally were formed and released albums before Progressive Rock had completely developed (there are some rare Proto Prog bands from the early 70's, because the genre didn't expanded to all the Continents simultaneously

The common elements in all these bands is that they developed one or more elements of Prog, and even when not completely defined as part of the genre, they are without any doubt, an important stage in the evolution of Progressive Rock.

Generally, Proto Prog bands are the direct link between Psyche and Prog and for that reason the Psychedelic components are present in the vast majority of them, but being that Progressive Rock was born from the blending of different genres, we have broadened the definition to cover any band that combined some elements of Progressive Rock with other genres prior to 1970.

Some of these bands evolved and turned into 100% Prog, while others simply choose another path, but their importance and contribution in the formative period of Prog can't be denied, for that reason no Prog site can ignore them.

Iván Melgar - Morey
Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 09 2010 at 15:25
^^
 
Fair enough.  If Proto- doesn't require the full album to be 'progressive', I'd have no problem with Steve Miller Band being here in Proto- on the basis of their first two albums, regardless of anything said previously.  
 
   
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Back to Top
snobb View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: August 20 2009
Location: Vilnius,LT,EU
Status: Offline
Points: 3584
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 09 2010 at 15:45
I haven't listen all SMB albums, but their middle-late period is kind of blues-rock, pop-rock and pure pop for me. Minimum progressive feel. For sure, I can't decide on this basis only.
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 37424
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 09 2010 at 16:16
From what I've heard, I expect that those first two albums should be the crux.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 10 2010 at 07:59
Only when I can fly like an eagle. Tongue
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
The Doctor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 23 2005
Location: The Tardis
Status: Offline
Points: 8543
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 10 2010 at 08:33
Just say "abra-abra-cadabra"
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
Back to Top
ko View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 314
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 11 2010 at 05:26
Originally posted by The Doctor The Doctor wrote:

Just say "abra-abra-cadabra"
...Ought to be careful because it may take you to the Land of Confusion ... better to say I Can't Dance, or Jesus He Knows Me - that's more safety. LOL

Edited by ko - January 11 2010 at 05:28
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.730 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.