Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Suggest New Bands and Artists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Scorpions for Krautrock or prog related
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedScorpions for Krautrock or prog related

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 3456>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Alberto Muñoz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2009 at 13:05
Blackout!!! Blackout!!!!      i really have a Blackout!!
 
Smile




Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2009 at 12:53
Originally posted by fusionfreak fusionfreak wrote:

I know Uli Jon Roth and Michael Schenker are gifted musicians.Moreover I like Scorpions first three albums.It's just that I don't like when people who can make good music decide to play songs only for the money and it was the case in this children TV program.Moreover I'm not sure that musicians always respect their audiences.To conclude I think that going to concerts and buying cds is a proof of respect!


As far as I am concerned calling their music "bullsh*t" sounds disrespectful, no matter how many albums you own ... but I'm well aware that many other users don't mind swearing and calling artists names as much as I do.

BTW: I know that song very well ... personally I think that it's one of the best songs *ever*. It's simply very well crafted, and especially the vocals/guitar leads and the rhythm guitar arrangements are amazing. I honestly don't know a better metal ballad. I know that many people will find it "kitschy" and way over the top, but IMO that has nothing to do with how good it is objectively, from a musician's point of view. I also don't mind when artists try to please their listeners or to increase their album sales ... as long as the music is great. I honestly see no big difference to the other extreme, when bands try to be "non-conformist" at any cost.
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2009 at 12:31
So, the debate comes down to "started out with prog aspects (Lonesome Crow), Fly to the Rainbow has Suite length and structured song (Title song), include the fact that until Roth's departure, each album featured one or a few acoustic tunes that could be compared in style and setting to those found on Uriah Heep's first few releases (come away melinda).
Krautrock is a no-brainer. The Scorps were never that "pure" in their sound, ever. Heavy Prog might be a stretch, but should their validity here be based on the first 1/3 of their releases, or do we condemn them for their more radio friendly stylings on later albums. Although, if you listen to the song Animal Magnetism from that same album, that aspect of their music was part of their sound until the halfway point of their collection.
Prog Related is a good fit because Yes, they do have much in their music that would be of interest to prog fans. Not all prog fans. But then most if not all PR bands can't claim that either.
Forget "Still Loving You". Kansas was not judged based on "Play The Game". Miles Davis was not included becaude of "the Birth of Cool".
If you want to present a valid arguement against, you must know what music was on Lonesome Crow. At the very least, some the next 3-4 if you want to be fair.
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
CPicard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2009 at 12:22
@Fusionfreak: I saw the documentary you talked about and it was made clear by the commentary that Scorpions weren't part of the "Kraut-rock" movement. They were included just to show that SOME of the German bands of the 70's managed to encounter and keep commercial success.
Nothing more.

Back to Top
fusionfreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 23 2007
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 1317
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2009 at 12:04
Originally posted by Raff Raff wrote:

Sorry to contradict you, but if you don't like an album, you have the right not to buy it - just as the musicians have the right to play whatever music they see fit. I may dislike commercial music, but let's be honest for once - playing 'for the money' is certainly not the same as peddling drugs or weapons, or trafficking in human beings. 
Of course!Don't worry,I always buy cd's I will be able to enjoy.Moreover music is my main passion and when I think about commercial music I sometimes lose my temper.
I was born in the land of Mahavishnu,not so far from Kobaia.I'm looking for the world

of searchers with the help from

crimson king
Back to Top
johnobvious View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 11 2006
Location: Nebraska
Status: Offline
Points: 1361
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2009 at 08:25
Lonesome Crow is outstanding and Fly to the Rainbow could be included in the Prog Related discussion as well.  Both are great and worth checking out. In Trance is good as well but the beginning of their transformation to losing any prog influences.  I loved this band for a long time, favoring their early stuff.  Then they released Crazy World and that was the end.Dead  If that album ever got reviewed on here, I would probably throw up in my mouth a little.
Biggles was in rehab last Saturday
Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2009 at 08:09
Sorry to contradict you, but if you don't like an album, you have the right not to buy it - just as the musicians have the right to play whatever music they see fit. I may dislike commercial music, but let's be honest for once - playing 'for the money' is certainly not the same as peddling drugs or weapons, or trafficking in human beings. 
Back to Top
fusionfreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 23 2007
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 1317
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2009 at 07:58
I know Uli Jon Roth and Michael Schenker are gifted musicians.Moreover I like Scorpions first three albums.It's just that I don't like when people who can make good music decide to play songs only for the money and it was the case in this children TV program.Moreover I'm not sure that musicians always respect their audiences.To conclude I think that going to concerts and buying cds is a proof of respect!
I was born in the land of Mahavishnu,not so far from Kobaia.I'm looking for the world

of searchers with the help from

crimson king
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2009 at 07:02
Originally posted by fusionfreak fusionfreak wrote:

No!1st album is good with progressive moments(the 13 minute track is a proof) but Scorpions are not Krautrock at all:no psychedelic(and sometimes drug induced)jams,no electro acoustic effects,apparently no political commitment,moreover they seem to lack madness and don't feel like being visionary.I also would like to add that I recently watched a documentary about Krautrock where Scorpions were considered as being part of this movement.Sorry for saying that but Scorpions have nothing to do with the likes of Can,Ash Ra Tempel,Amon Duul 2,Guru Guru......By the way Scorpions took part in a french TV program(it was in the nineties)called Club Dorothée where they played part of their bullsh*t such as Still Loving You! 


Was the bullsh*t part really necessary? I wonder why some people simply can't show at least a minimum amount of respect for the musicians involved. Dead
Back to Top
Scratchy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 16 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 110
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2009 at 03:41
Lonesome Crow album period (1972)        -        psychodelic / space rock
 
1973 - 1978 period                                          -        heavy prog
 
1979 - 1981                                                       -        power metal / proto progressive metal
 
1981 - 2000's                                                    -        power metal
Back to Top
Scratchy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 16 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 110
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2009 at 03:18
I am a fan of the Scorpions.They are a very difficult group to classify really,even within each period.The Lonesome Crow album group was basically a different group than when Uli Jon Roth took over.When he took over the guitar duties the Scorpions had basically disbanded but emalgamated with Uli's Dawn Road group (3 members) with the 2 remaining Scorpion members.The sound changed from their hard Psychodelic sound with jazz/classical avant-garde guitar playing from 17 year old Michael Schenker to a hard progressive rock / rock & roll fusion (with Uli).Uli Jon Roth's guitar playing was absolutely oustanding however Eric Patrick Clapton, James Marshall Hendrix, John Dawson Winter III (johnny winter)
Jean-Baptiste Reinhardt , Jan Akkerman , Jeffery Arnold Beck , Andrés Segovia Torres
Jean-Baptiste Reinhardt, Jan Akkerman, Jeffery Arnold Beck, Andrés Segovia Torres Yehudi Menuhin (violin), Frédéric François Chopin being his influences.The rhythm playing of Rudolph Schenker & the percussion was basic hard rock.As time went on the group was influenced by the increasingly more popular metal sound developed by Judas Priest etc. which lead to Uli Jon Roth leaving the group in 1978.
The Lovedrive album actually has Uli Jon Roth & a returning Michael Schenker.This album had some tracks that would interest Progressive metal fans but also had basic 80's style power metal as well.They gradually developed a more commercial metal sound from there on.Which is the time I started to loose interest in them, although Animal Magnitism still had some adventurous musical elements on it , athough with a doom laden feel (Meine's vocal problems adding to the Doominess - range limited at top end).Since then my only real interest with them has been the superb vocals of Klaus Meine although lyrics are dumbed down since this period.
 
In 1973 Uli Jon Roth liked these albums :-
Back to Top
Queen By-Tor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 13 2006
Location: Xanadu
Status: Offline
Points: 16111
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 31 2009 at 12:49
German =/= Krautrock LOL



As for PR, I can't say. I've actually never heard an early scorpions record. Atavachron is right though - Schenker and Roth should definitely be evaluated - I would say that Roth's take on Neo-Classical definitely deserves to be here.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 31 2009 at 11:42
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:

I believe that the Scorpions achieved way too much success for too many here at PA to truly admit that they really haven't listened to the album(s) that are cited as supporting their candidacy (no matter the sub-genre).
True - I saw then in '77 and they were well on their way to being a successful hard rock band by then. I've never heard Lonesome Crow, but will if they are proposed for Prog Related.
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:


As for the "X is here, why not Y" arguement ... why is it acceptable to use comparisons and references to other bands already here when some bands are proposed, but not others ? It can be a valid way of supporting your case either way.
The IfXthenY argument is valid for highlighting a band for suggestion, but not for evaluation and subsequent addition. For example if band "X" is here then perhaps we should consider band "Y" for inclusion, however, once Band "Y" has been dentified as a contender they must be evaluated on their own merits without the association to band "X". To that end The Scorpions must be evaluated on their own, and not in relation to any bands already included, and using the albums from the appropriate era.
 
When it comes to Popular vs. Obscure I think the reasoning is self-evident - ifXthenYcan either be used positively or negatively - for most Popular artists it is often used in it's unhelpful negative form by comparing them with yet another well known and possibly controversial band, while for Obscure bands it is more often used in a helpful positive form to give the evaluator a reference point to compare them too.
 
It is sometimes the case that Band "X" is mentioned because the person proposing Band "Y" does not approve of the addition of Band "X" and sees Band "Y" as being more valid as a result. This is not a direct musical comparision, but more an emotional one - we tend not get this emotional comparision with Obscure bands.
 
Of course, if you mention two Popular bands you double your chances of getting a reaction because more people would have heard of one of them - mention two Obscure bands and you halve your chances because fewer people would have heard of both of them.
 
If both band "X" and band "Y" are already accepted and band "Y" scheduled for inclusion, then the IfXthenY argument can be used in the placing of band "Y" into an appropriate category.
 
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:


The worst part - it comes back to my first comment - if the group you propose is or was popular, then don't expect to be able defend your submission by mentioning other comparable bands already in PA.
Sad but true - then listen saying "this album is definitely no less progressive than the music of a LOT of bands on this site" is not really mentioning comparable bands and does need some deeper qualifiaction or additional verification.
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:

As this discussion progresses ( or regresses as with too many other commercially successful acts), ask each detractor is they have listened to Lonesome Crow, or the albums that the Scorpions made with Uli Roth. Then follow up with the question as to what albums have they actually heard from the Scorpions ...
Then wonder why frustrations abound with anyone but those who suggest the obscure for inclusion ...
Another sad fact is many suggestions for Obscure bands are overlooked completely - there have been 51 unanswered threads in Suggest New Bands and 66 in Unsigned Bands over the past year - that's before we start counting the number of suggestions that have replies but never made it to the evaluation stage. At least Popular bands have the head-start of having a ground-swell of opinion that results in discussion in the first place even if that means they are hampered by their reputation.
What?
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35951
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 31 2009 at 11:13
"Lonesome Crow" is a good song, anyway.



And "Leave Me"



It's really dated, though with a 60's sound.  I would have pegged them as earlier than 1972 recordings.





Back to Top
crimson87 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 03 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 1818
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 31 2009 at 10:40
No way! I don't think having a 13 min track is enough argument to get them here and even on Krautrock which will be totally out of context. The rolling stones also have an 11 minute track
Back to Top
fusionfreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 23 2007
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 1317
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 31 2009 at 08:49
No!1st album is good with progressive moments(the 13 minute track is a proof) but Scorpions are not Krautrock at all:no psychedelic(and sometimes drug induced)jams,no electro acoustic effects,apparently no political commitment,moreover they seem to lack madness and don't feel like being visionary.I also would like to add that I recently watched a documentary about Krautrock where Scorpions were considered as being part of this movement.Sorry for saying that but Scorpions have nothing to do with the likes of Can,Ash Ra Tempel,Amon Duul 2,Guru Guru......By the way Scorpions took part in a french TV program(it was in the nineties)called Club Dorothée where they played part of their bullsh*t such as Still Loving You! 
I was born in the land of Mahavishnu,not so far from Kobaia.I'm looking for the world

of searchers with the help from

crimson king
Back to Top
UMUR View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 3069
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 31 2009 at 08:32
Now that´s talk I can relate to debrewguy. Many people commenting on suggestions haven´t listened to anything but the MySpace songs ( if even that) and seldom the albums that the one suggesting the artist mentions as being their most progressive. This is particularly true in the case of famous artists IMO. It´s such a struggle to get anyone to evaluate artists like that. Personally I pick my fights and leave the hard ones alone ( with a few exceptions of course). I simply don´t have time to discuss for hours and hours if it´s not a band I feel something special for. It´s really a shame. Valuable collaborator time is wasted.
 
About the Scorpions I only know their eighties stuff so I won´t comment on their inclusion here but only hope that the ones evaluating this suggestion listens to that first album as the guy suggesting the artist suggests.
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2009 at 21:38
I believe that the Scorpions achieved way too much success for too many here at PA to truly admit that they really haven't listened to the album(s) that are cited as supporting their candidacy (no matter the sub-genre).

As for the "X is here, why not Y" arguement ... why is it acceptable to use comparisons and references to other bands already here when some bands are proposed, but not others ? It can be a valid way of supporting your case either way.

The worst part - it comes back to my first comment - if the group you propose is or was popular, then don't expect to be able defend your submission by mentioning other comparable bands already in PA.

As this discussion progresses ( or regresses as with too many other commercially successful acts), ask each detractor is they have listened to Lonesome Crow, or the albums that the Scorpions made with Uli Roth. Then follow up with the question as to what albums have they actually heard from the Scorpions ...
Then wonder why frustrations abound with anyone but those who suggest the obscure for inclusion ...


Edited by debrewguy - January 30 2009 at 21:41
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65268
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2009 at 18:54
At the moment I don't support the Scorps for inclusion to ProgRelated, however;  their material with Michael Schenker and particularly Uli Roth is among the most important in progressing metal, especially the guitar-oriented tech forwarded by Randy Rhoads, Brian May, Schenker's solo work, EVH, and Yngwie.  The Scorps were doing very high-end hard rock for the time, and their impact should not be underestimated.  
Back to Top
MovingPictures07 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Beasty Heart
Status: Offline
Points: 32181
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2009 at 18:21
Originally posted by listen listen wrote:

Originally posted by MovingPictures07 MovingPictures07 wrote:

No.

That's all that needs to be said.

Have you listened to it? To my ears, this album is definitely no less progressive than the music of a LOT of bands on this site


I despise the "If X is here, then Y must be" argument.

We've made mistakes before (IMO), and the collabs at this try their best (yet I'm still entitled to my opinion). That does not justify more mistakes.

I'm beginning to think that many people are considering anything above average pop music to be prog or progressive, and that's simply not the case. There's plenty of music in between art and pop music that does not belong here, even in Related.

And yes, I heard it. I stand by my opinion.


Edited by MovingPictures07 - January 30 2009 at 18:22
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 3456>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.148 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.