Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
JLocke
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
|
Posted: January 07 2009 at 14:19 |
I honestly haven't heard enough Rush yet to make the call, but I will say this:
2112 and Zoso are both very good records, but I find myself skipping tracks more on the LZ4 record than on 2112. Same thing with the "Presence" record. Great couple of songs, but the rest sound like filler to my ears.
Based on that, I have to admit that Rush seems to have more quality, whileLed seems to be mopre about quantity.
But since neither band is near the top of my list, what do I know? 
|
 |
Philip
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 13 2007
Location: Porto, Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 413
|
Posted: January 07 2009 at 14:00 |
|
 |
Malve87
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 19 2005
Location: Genova, Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 252
|
Posted: January 07 2009 at 12:59 |
Zeppelin are so much more interesting.
|
]
|
 |
mrcozdude
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 25 2007
Location: Devon,UK.
Status: Offline
Points: 2078
|
Posted: January 06 2009 at 12:59 |
Zeppelin for me,didn't have a bad album in their discography where Rush certainly have.I really like Rush but i seem to think that most people are voting just cuz they think Zeppelin are overrated.Its not gonna be my most popular theory.
|
|
 |
crimhead
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: October 10 2006
Location: Missouri
Status: Offline
Points: 19236
|
Posted: January 06 2009 at 12:53 |
I've been lucky to see both Zeppelin w/Bonham and Rush. Both technically excellent bands but I have to go with Zeppelin.
|
 |
tamijo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 06 2009
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 4287
|
Posted: January 06 2009 at 10:59 |
Zepplin is basic, like Floyd Crims Yes Genesis
I like Rush, but they got no place near Zep.
|
 |
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
|
Posted: December 20 2008 at 12:18 |
|
 |
J-Man
Prog Reviewer
Joined: August 07 2008
Location: Philadelphia,PA
Status: Offline
Points: 7826
|
Posted: December 20 2008 at 09:58 |
rushfan4 wrote:
Still Rush for me. Now Led Zeppelin -vs- The Beatles is a tough call for me.  |
That would be tough for me too. However, this is Rush. No-brainer.
|
|
 |
J-Man
Prog Reviewer
Joined: August 07 2008
Location: Philadelphia,PA
Status: Offline
Points: 7826
|
Posted: December 20 2008 at 09:55 |
Rush
|
|
 |
Silhouette
Forum Groupie
Joined: August 17 2006
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 84
|
Posted: December 20 2008 at 08:02 |
Rush wins this for me, as they still produce quality material (yes, I like Snakes and Arrows very much).
That doesn't mean Led Zeppelin is not awesome, though. :)
Silhouette
|
|
 |
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
|
Posted: December 20 2008 at 07:53 |
Swan Song wrote:
Abrawang wrote:
I'm really surprised at Rush's popularity in a forum like this. They're a vaery talented band but it seems like some folks have them in their top 3 of all time. |
Well it's a prog site so it shouldn't surprise you at all. A decent prog band vs. the greatest band of all time. Rolling Stones for me.
|

|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
 |
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
|
Posted: December 20 2008 at 07:45 |
Abrawang wrote:
I'm really surprised at Rush's popularity in a forum like this. They're a vaery talented band but it seems like some folks have them in their top 3 of all time. |
Well it's a prog site so it shouldn't surprise you at all. A great prog band vs. the greatest band of all time. Zeppelin for me.
|
 |
Abrawang
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 29 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 112
|
Posted: December 18 2008 at 22:49 |
I'm really surprised at Rush's popularity in a forum like this. They're a vaery talented band but it seems like some folks have them in their top 3 of all time. I voted Zep who I think are quite good but somewhat overrated. I like to make mix/greatest hits CDs and I'd say that if you limit it to one CD per band (say, 60-75 mintes), Led Zep stacks up against anyone. But man, they sure put out a lot of noisy, repetitive dreck.
Rush? I only really like 2 of their songs (Subdivisions & Fly By Night). They have lots that aren't bad but for me they're barely prog and their best songs are nowhere near as good as Zep or many other bands. As a Canadian however, I'm still kind of pleased at their popularity.
|
Casting doubt on all I have to say...
|
 |
Sinner
Forum Newbie
Joined: November 01 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 27
|
Posted: December 18 2008 at 00:12 |
I vote Rush. I have seen both live more than once and have all both band's recordings. Zeppelin was brilliant for their first 5 years then they were pretty much done. You could hear Page going downhill with his drug problem starting with Houses Of The Holy, and Physical Graffiti was disappointing and uneven. Although Rush owes a lot to Zeppelin, they were (are) more consistent, professional, and innovative.
|
 |
Petrovsk Mizinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
|
Posted: November 21 2008 at 05:09 |
I can't remember if I posted here in this thread yet.
Anyway, I voted for Rush:P
|
|
 |
Alberto Muņoz
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
|
Posted: November 20 2008 at 09:34 |
The 70's albums of Rush are the best...
The Zepp albums ALL are great!!!!!
|
|
 |
Zargus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 08 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 3491
|
Posted: November 20 2008 at 08:57 |
HA! not even all the best rush albums put toghter as one comes close to the worst Zeppelin album.... IMO.
|
|
 |
BroSpence
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 05 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2614
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 21:49 |
This is disturbing! The band that started as a Zeppelin-lite, is beating the knights of rock rock rock?
I'm not a big fan of some of Zep's output (like II, and IV for the most part), but damn if I, III, Phys, Houses, Presence aren't great albums. The only Rush album I could maybe put on par with Zep is 2112. At least in terms of something interesting, and worth many repeated listens.
|
 |
Petrovsk Mizinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 20:21 |
Don't really listen to Led Zep anymore, and the few times I've tried to listen to them in recent times, it just hasn't interested me anymore to be honest.
I can listen to Rush, and feel genuinely excited by it and don't feel the need to turn it off halfway through a song.
|
 |
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32566
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 20:18 |
I can't locate a laughing smiley big enough, so here's this:

|
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.