Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > I Have A Question For You......?
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - What is the average album rating?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWhat is the average album rating?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Topic: What is the average album rating?
    Posted: June 30 2008 at 22:25
What's the average rating for an album on the site? Is the data for this available?
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 01 2008 at 03:49
Could you clarify, are you asking how it is caculated?
Back to Top
Abstrakt View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 18 2005
Location: Soundgarden
Status: Offline
Points: 18292
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 01 2008 at 13:51
I think he's wondering what rating the average PA album has. (Or what the average rating of an album on PA is)


Edited by Abstrakt - July 01 2008 at 13:54
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 02 2008 at 08:30
^Exactly. If we took every album and averaged their ratings together, what would we have.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Passionist View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 14 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 1119
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 02 2008 at 08:50

I think 3 would be a fair guess I'll put 5€ on it!

Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 02 2008 at 09:08
There are two averages inthis case:
 
  1. The average rating: 3 stars, we have five ooptions, so the third one is the average.
  2. The average number of stars given to an album: In this case we take all the ratings, add the number of stars given  and divide them among the number of ratings, probably is 4 stars or maybe a little higher, being that people tends to rate more the albums they like.

Iván

 
 
            
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21156
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 02 2008 at 09:30
^ that would be the arithmetical mean ... but M@x also implemented weights for the user status (user/collab) and on top of that there's also the weighted average algorithm

I remember from previous threads that the average was somewhere in the 3.5 area ...


Edited by MikeEnRegalia - July 02 2008 at 09:31
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 02 2008 at 11:34
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

There are two averages inthis case:
 


  1. The average rating: 3 stars, we have five ooptions, so the third one is the average.

  2. The average number of stars given to an album: In this case we take all the ratings, add the number of stars given  and divide them among the number of ratings, probably is 4 stars or maybe a little higher, being that people tends to rate more the albums they like.

Iván


 

 


Well Ivan I would hope that I could figure 1. out by myself.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 02 2008 at 11:34
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:


^ that would be the arithmetical mean ... but M@x also implemented weights for the user status (user/collab) and on top of that there's also the weighted average algorithmI remember from previous threads that the average was somewhere in the 3.5 area ...


Specifically I was wondering about the average without the weightings.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21156
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 02 2008 at 11:38
actually 3/5 is the *typical* rating ... the mathematical average would be 2.5.Wink
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 02 2008 at 11:44
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

actually 3/5 is the *typical* rating ... the mathematical average would be 2.5.Wink


Actually it's 3...the range is between 1 and 5.  Think of the average between numbers uniformly distributed between 0 and 4, and then add 1.

Or look up the definition of the mean of a uniform distribution.  Wink


Edited by NaturalScience - July 02 2008 at 11:47
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21156
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 02 2008 at 11:47
^ can't argue with that, mathematically. But I still think of a rating scale from 0 to 5, it's just the the 0 was "outlawed".LOL
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 02 2008 at 11:49
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

the 0 was "outlawed".LOL


Odd - does it matter what we call the lowest possible rating?
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 02 2008 at 20:35
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:


^ that would be the arithmetical mean ... but M@x also implemented weights for the user status (user/collab) and on top of that there's also the weighted average algorithmI remember from previous threads that the average was somewhere in the 3.5 area ...


Specifically I was wondering about the average without the weightings.
Eek! Shocked
 
That's not something you can glean from the site without a lot of hard graft (manually adding up all the individual ratings for each album).
 
From what I can gather the site actually uses two weighted algorithms:
 
1) The user/collab weighting algorithm is used to display the average rating for each album based upon weightings for ratings without review, user ratings with review and collab ratings with review. This is the value shown on the album page and in the top-100 charts.
 
2) The weighted-average algorithm is used to calculate chart position and employs user/collab weighting and weightings for site-average rating per album and site-average-number of ratings per album.
 
In theory it should be possible to back-calculate the site-average from the weighted-average algorithm, but the result of the algorithm is not displayed as a value.


Edited by Dean - July 02 2008 at 20:41
What?
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 02 2008 at 22:40
^ I figured that would be the case. Thought I'd take a shot though. The numerical rating of an album is rather worthless without it I think.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 02 2008 at 23:53
Give me a second and i'll calculate it.
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2008 at 00:38
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

There are two averages inthis case:
 


  1. The average rating: 3 stars, we have five ooptions, so the third one is the average.
  2. The average number of stars given to an album: In this case we take all the ratings, add the number of stars given  and divide them among the number of ratings, probably is 4 stars or maybe a little higher, being that people tends to rate more the albums they like.

Iván


 

 


Well Ivan I would hope that I could figure 1. out by myself.
 
Not necesarilly, because some people consider 3 stars a bad rating bellow the average despite the numbers..
 
Iván
            
Back to Top
rileydog22 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 24 2005
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 8844
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2008 at 00:53
Originally posted by tuxon tuxon wrote:

Give me a second and i'll calculate it.


Beatcha to it.  It's 3.1415926535.

Back to Top
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2008 at 02:18

total albums with rating

14280

average rating

3,419583333

total nr of ratings

160028

average nr of ratings per album

11,20644258

nr of albums currently in Dbase

18107

nr albums without rating (aprox)

3827

 
 
I probably missed some albums, but this is pretty much it.
 
have to ask M@X for more precise nrs.
 
I would like to calculate the average's by subgenre aswell, but I don't feel like it.
 
was fun to do btw.
 
edit: I missed the various artist albums, so that's 275 albums I didn't use, only makes up for some 2% so shouldn't skew the averages too much.


Edited by tuxon - July 03 2008 at 02:26
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
Back to Top
Queen By-Tor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 13 2006
Location: Xanadu
Status: Offline
Points: 16111
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2008 at 02:19
Originally posted by Tuxon Tuxon wrote:


total albums with rating

14280

average rating

3,419583333

total nr of ratings

160028

average nr of ratings per album

11,20644258

nr of albums currently in Dbase

18107

nr albums without rating (aprox)

3827


Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ that would be the arithmetical mean ... but M@x also implemented weights for the user status (user/collab) and on top of that there's also the weighted average algorithm

I remember from previous threads that the average was somewhere in the 3.5 area ...


Mike wins the prize! Big%20smile


Edited by King By-Tor - July 03 2008 at 02:20
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.180 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.