Judas Priest (Prog Metal) |
Post Reply | Page <1234 5> |
Author | ||
TheProgtologist
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: May 23 2005 Location: Baltimore,Md US Status: Offline Points: 27802 |
Posted: April 23 2008 at 15:34 | |
Metallica's possible inclusion was decided by M@x,and he very emphatically said NO.So any dicussion about the addition of Metallica is pointless,because it will never happen.
|
||
|
||
Avantgardehead
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 29 2006 Location: Dublin, OH, USA Status: Offline Points: 1170 |
Posted: April 23 2008 at 12:50 | |
It would be weird seeing "Turbo" here. Although it would be even weirder and more sickening to see "St. Anger"...
|
||
http://www.last.fm/user/Avantgardian
|
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35951 |
Posted: April 23 2008 at 12:31 | |
Long thread, and I've barely skimmed it...
From a compositional/ structural viewpoint, and approach to making music, just how similar is Judas Priest to Prog? How influenced was it by progressive rock? Do they blend genres and take an adventurous approach to making music? I seem to remember Judas Priest being considered quite groundbreaking and experimental in the early 80's, but since I wasn't into metal, I don't know. I don't think paving the way for progressive metal should be enough (there is no proto-metal category), or even expanding musical horizons (being progressive). I think it should similar attributes particular to progressive rock and metal. I just wonder if this was more influential to metal generally than to Progressive Metal specifically. I don't know about later albums or their career, but here's a little article I just found (I'll reprint an excerpt...) http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/album/5204515/review/6054044/metalogy
Edited by Logan - April 23 2008 at 12:32 |
||
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Posted: April 23 2008 at 05:05 | |
I think the problem lies with blind opinions such as this.
You could at least make your argument more direct and support your opinion with some reasoning rather than hurling around terms like "absurd" and "ridiculous".
I fail to see any reason for NOT including Priest in Prog-Related, as I think they did more than pave they way for Prog Metal, they opened the doors and stretched the boundaries. OK, like Metallica they over-simplified after a few albums - but so did Genesis
Check out "One for the Road" (from "Rocka Rolla"); Rodger Bain (Black Sabbath)'s production is so much better than on "Sad Wings" - and the song happens to be in 5/4 for much of it; http://youtube.com/watch?v=3zJ_J0NQKaM&feature=related - OK, it's pretty much a single riff with a few stops and starts, but it's hardly standard hard rock/metal.
I also fail, as I always have, to see why Metallica are not Prog Metal, when they have released no less than 3 Prog Metal albums, one of which is definitive of the genre.
But that's another discussion entirely. Edited by Certif1ed - April 23 2008 at 05:14 |
||
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
||
tuxon
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 21 2004 Location: plugged-in Status: Offline Points: 5502 |
Posted: April 23 2008 at 01:34 | |
Proto-prog metal would be Prog related, as it is related to prog metal.
personally i think Judas prieast aren't prog, and I wouldn't consider them for prog-related also, but if it's really the case they are proto-prog metal, I think they are elidgable for Prog-Related.
of course the problem with that is it basically means that Metallica again come into the equation as they can surely be considered proto prog.
my personal opinion is Judas Priest is an early metal band, pionering the metal genre, and by doing so paving the way for proto-prog metal (Iron Maiden and Metallica and 80's glam metal), so for me it's a no, but if their influence on prog-metal is really significant (which i can't judge, because i like metal, but hardly ever listen to progressive metal) it can be considered for Prog Related.
|
||
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
||
TheProgtologist
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: May 23 2005 Location: Baltimore,Md US Status: Offline Points: 27802 |
Posted: April 22 2008 at 23:12 | |
I think their early albums can be considered "proto prog metal",but we don't have that category here. Edited by TheProgtologist - April 22 2008 at 23:13 |
||
|
||
WaywardSon
Prog Reviewer Joined: April 23 2006 Location: Brazil Status: Offline Points: 2537 |
Posted: April 22 2008 at 23:03 | |
I would say their output up until "Stained Class" was quite progressive, although I wouldn´t say they are a Progressive Metal Band, but could easily fit in the same genre as Sabbath
|
||
micky
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46833 |
Posted: April 22 2008 at 22:30 | |
I didn't think so either... not by what constisutes PM by todays standards of course. but what may sort of throws the discussion off kilter is that .. at least for some including me till I sort of saw what PM was about and how you all are defining it... those early early years.. were definitely metal.. or could easily be called metal... and were quite prog. I do think Mark has a point... on the surface .. they were just as prog as a good many groups that occupy unquestioned spots here at the archives. ..such as Uriah Heep.
|
||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
||
TheProgtologist
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: May 23 2005 Location: Baltimore,Md US Status: Offline Points: 27802 |
Posted: April 22 2008 at 22:24 | |
I simply don't think Judas Priest are prog metal in the slightest.Great heavy metal,and they probably influenced many of today's prog metal musicians,but I don't see them as PM.
|
||
|
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65268 |
Posted: April 22 2008 at 20:24 | |
this discussion is (or has become) not about whether Priest should be considered a Prog band, but whether their music impacted other musicians who eventually developed true progessive metal
frankly I think Cert has a point even though I credit Maiden with a bigger influence on Voivod, Metallica's prog periods and bands as DT Edited by Atavachron - April 22 2008 at 20:33 |
||
Squonkman
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 08 2008 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Posted: April 22 2008 at 20:19 | |
Judas Priest as a prog band???? You have to be kidding. NO. That's absurd and ridiculous.
And therein lies the very crux of the problem with this way too generous profusion of "prog metal" bands on this site. Virtually anyone who ever performed a 3 chord riff and growled will be listed on here soon.
|
||
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer Joined: January 16 2008 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 15745 |
Posted: April 22 2008 at 18:22 | |
Yep, THE BATTLE RAGES ON!
|
||
micky
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46833 |
Posted: April 22 2008 at 18:22 | |
hahhaha.. me too... just put some in myself ....
|
||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
||
LinusW
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 27 2007 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 10665 |
Posted: April 22 2008 at 18:22 | |
^^ Love that one as well! Really need some Priest now
|
||
micky
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46833 |
Posted: April 22 2008 at 18:13 | |
or this classic Mark hahhaha...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFx_kcypAGU I'm no expert on Prog Metal... and I'll leave it to them to say... but it sure as hell sounds like prog metal to me hahhah. Oh wait .. no keys or tron... it can't be prog |
||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65268 |
Posted: April 22 2008 at 18:11 | |
what great old footage! seeing them on The Old Grey Whistle Test is just too much.. akin to the Doors on Sullivan
wonderful |
||
LinusW
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 27 2007 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 10665 |
Posted: April 22 2008 at 18:09 | |
^^ I just love that song. And the band. Especially the 70s album, with my favourite being Sad Wings Of Destiny-Sin After Sin-Stained Class .
I don't have a problem with them being added, and I don't have a problem with a big Prog-Related section. I am however worried about the fact that those bands are given as much credibility as the prog bands on the site. Don't know how to solve that problem though...I also think that the P-R and P-P sections are great in for attracting people to the site, and thus help them discover that they like a lot of the "pure" prog bands. The battle rages on I guess. |
||
micky
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46833 |
Posted: April 22 2008 at 18:01 | |
amen brother... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PI0iX2q4pw8 |
||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
||
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Posted: April 22 2008 at 17:19 | |
But as a Proto-Prog metal band, they dot all the i's and cross all the t's - more so than Iron Maiden. I'm not saying "If Maiden are here...", just pointing out that it would take a very long time to count the Prog Metal bands directly influenced by Priest (as opposed to indirect influence like, say, a particular Classical composer, where a PM band might quote a composer or write in the style for a few bars, but would never construct an entire piece that sounded like a classical composition).
"Rocka Rolla" is, to my ears at least, every bit as proggy as anything Uriah Heep released - just without the organ.
|
||
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
||
cuncuna
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 29 2005 Location: Chile Status: Offline Points: 4318 |
Posted: March 16 2008 at 00:57 | |
The problem of discussing Judas Priest is Judas Priest. Bowie is just a vehicle to say "¿you seriously consider Judas Priest and reject Bowie?". Now, I want to make this clear: I do not think David Bowie should be added. That goes also for Mercury Rev and other bands wich I won't list right now. Having said that, if someone says "Judas Priest", it forces me to reconsider my concepto of prog - prog related. And within that "acomodated" logic, David Bowie sounds more than reasonable. On Judas Priest itself, I'm pretty sure that, if asked, they would laugh at the idea of being considered a prog band. Mercury Rev would react the same. Edited by cuncuna - March 16 2008 at 12:28 |
||
¡Beware of the Bee!
|
||
Post Reply | Page <1234 5> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |