Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Best remaster series of classic prog bands
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedBest remaster series of classic prog bands
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Poll Question: Which have the best packaging/sound in their reissues?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
6 [9.68%]
23 [37.10%]
5 [8.06%]
15 [24.19%]
4 [6.45%]
1 [1.61%]
7 [11.29%]
0 [0.00%]
1 [1.61%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Forkface View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 243 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 16:58
Of the choices given I would say the YES remasters are the best. Although I think the MOODY BLUES, KLAUS SCHULZE, and HAWKWIND have had the best remasters in recent years. 
Back to Top
Fassbinder View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 27 2006
Location: My world
Status: Offline
Points: 3497 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 16:58
Originally posted by Ghost Rider Ghost Rider wrote:


 out of this list the best remasters are those by JT and VDGG, at least as far as bonus material is concerned. I'd also like to add the Caravan remasters, which are probably the best around.
 
ClapClapClap, speaking of Jethro Tull and Van der Graaf Generator remasters.
 
I haven't yet Caravan remasters though... Hopefully I'll get them sometime... as well as Peter Hammill solo remasters...
Back to Top
Fishy View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: November 26 2004
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 257 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 18:30
I would defintely go for the KC remasters. The press articles  are really interesting  and the dics sound aweome too. I also like the VDGG remasters because of the sound which benefits the most from this series of the remastering process. The packaging of the Yes remasters are obviously the best, containing lots os info and pictures but the bonus tracks are not essential and the sound of their previous remaster series is sometimes even better ; previous versions of tracks are good to hear once but I never give it a second spin... The Genesis and PF remasters are allright but there's no bonus tracks or bonus  information whatsoever...
Back to Top
Leningrad View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 15 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 7991 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 18:45
Tull!
 
Yes are a close second. Then Floyd.
Back to Top
kermit the prog View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: August 21 2006
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 20 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 20:01
How can Yes be winning? Some of their bonus tracks are pretty bad. Tulls remasters are miles above the rest. Tulls remasters are full of many many bonus tracks of very high quality. My only disappointment is that the 1971 songs from LITP were not included on the Aqualung remaster, while Broadsword did not include 8 additional bonus tracks(It could have had a total of 26 songs). Other songs such as Blues instrumental and Bungle in the jungle remix were also missing from remasters.
Back to Top
Leningrad View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 15 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 7991 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 20:52
Originally posted by kermit the prog kermit the prog wrote:

How can Yes be winning? Some of their bonus tracks are pretty bad. Tulls remasters are miles above the rest. Tulls remasters are full of many many bonus tracks of very high quality. My only disappointment is that the 1971 songs from LITP were not included on the Aqualung remaster, while Broadsword did not include 8 additional bonus tracks(It could have had a total of 26 songs). Other songs such as Blues instrumental and Bungle in the jungle remix were also missing from remasters.
 
Dude. Your name owns.
Back to Top
kermit the prog View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: August 21 2006
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 20 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2006 at 05:11
Originally posted by Chameleon Chameleon wrote:

 
Dude. Your name owns.
 
what does it own? ;)
Back to Top
kermit the prog View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: August 21 2006
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 20 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2006 at 05:13

The only Yes remasters which are worth making a deal over are the Tormato and Drama ones. They have a good amount of bonus tracks. But half of those tracks do sound pretty unfinished and Jons voice sounds pretty bad in some. Ouch



Edited by kermit the prog - September 10 2006 at 05:16
Back to Top
el böthy View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 27 2005
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 6336 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2006 at 13:24
I love the KC remasters, almoust all my KC cds are remastered...
And I absolutly dont like the Jethro Tull remasters...there are more bonus tracks that the actual album songs...Confused
"You want me to play what, Robert?"
Back to Top
tdreamer View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 03 2006
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 267 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2006 at 16:05
YES are well done with great liner notes. The worst remasters ar the Floyd ones my old vinyls sound better.
Back to Top
MustShaveBeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 20 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 366 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2006 at 22:07

Yes shoyld not be winning, if only for the TFTO remaster. Why would they have 75% of the actual album on disc one and only 25% on disc two? They could have easily put one of the bonus tracks on disc one and the other on disc two. It almost ruins the flow of the album.

I voted for VDGG, BTW.


Edited by MustShaveBeard - September 10 2006 at 22:08
Your life or your lupins!!!
Back to Top
Rocktopus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 4202 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2006 at 11:02
Van Der Graaf Generator (exept Godbluff's two very annoying bootleg sounding bonus tracks) and Caravan. Great sound and some fantastic unreleased stuff.

Klaus Schulze's bonus tracks on the (and Jethro Tull, but I'm not an obsessive fan) remasters look very interesting, though.
Over land and under ashes
In the sunlight, see - it flashes
Find a fly and eat his eye
But don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Back to Top
eugene View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 30 2005
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 2703 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2006 at 17:25
VdGG remasters are the best IMO.
carefulwiththataxe
Back to Top
Zargus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 08 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 3491 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2006 at 20:05
1. VDGG
2. YES
3. KING CRIMSON
4. ELP
5. JETHRO TULL
Back to Top
sleeper View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2005
Location: Entropia
Status: Offline
Points: 16449 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2006 at 20:35
I have to go with VDGG, they have lots of cool extras tracks as well as the album itself.
Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005

Back to Top
Phil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 17 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1881 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2006 at 07:00
Have to go with the Yes Rhino re-masters - they did justice to the original art-work (within the constraints of the CD format!), included some interesting blog,  the re-mastering was 1st rate, and the bonus tracks, although mostly for completionists, did include a few gems.
 
Worst re-masters are ELP's - my big complaint being that different peices were run into one track on a CD (eg Emo's piano concerto in 3 movements becomes 1 single track); Tarkus live on Welcome back - including Aquatarkus - ditto - which is a real pain sometimes.
Back to Top
kermit the prog View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: August 21 2006
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 20 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2006 at 07:34
Originally posted by el böthy el böthy wrote:

I love the KC remasters, almoust all my KC cds are remastered...
And I absolutly dont like the Jethro Tull remasters...there are more bonus tracks that the actual album songs...Confused
 
that's why you get remasters because of bonus tracks. The sound difference on remasters is barely noticeable unless you have bionic ears. All the bands do is turn up the high and low frequencies a bit, but I can do that with Nero and burn it like that too. Would you rather Three of a perfect pair with it's several dance mixes of sleepless(which is a crappy song anyway) or would you want a Warchild remaster with 7 bonus tracks which are all better songs than most of the original 10 tracks. Big smile


Edited by kermit the prog - September 12 2006 at 07:34
Back to Top
blbx93 View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: July 27 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 92 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2006 at 11:19
I have listened to Fragile and Closer to the Edge on my studio headphones, and the quality is amazing.  The livliness of the albums beats albums that have came out in the last year.  YES remastered is brilliant.
Back to Top
Taril View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: August 14 2006
Location: St.Augustine,FL
Status: Offline
Points: 30 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2006 at 21:50
I vote for the Genesis remasters. They really improved the sound.
Bright Ambassadors of Morning
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.260 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.