Pink Floyd v Genesis

Can't believe I missed this poll before now! It appears that Genesis is a lost cause... darn. Well anyway, I choose Genesis simply because their music had mellotron and Pink Floyd didn't!

akin wrote: Pink Floyd, because Genesis isn't that good if you consider their whole career.

I can see from this incredibly silly comment why you don't like Genesis!

Genesis, I own all of these two bands albums, but find myself listeing to Duke more than Momentay Lapse of Reason.  Moreover, Phil Collins did a considerably better job replacing Gabriel, than Gilour did with Waters.

It hurts to see PF winning here from Genesis. PF is/was a great band. But c'mon Genesis in the '70 was pure genious! Where's the quality of Firth of Fifth, Cinema Show or Supper's Ready in the work of PF? I hear you muttering..Shine On You Crazy Diamond...or Dogs...and I have to admit they are good...but not as good as the allready mentioned Genesis tracks.  So for me it's clear: Genesis by a mile (did I mention The Musical Box, Fountain of Salmacis, The Knife......????)

^I really don't want to get into a "song for song" contest here. What I'm trying to say is that to me (and ofcourse this is subjective) the Genesis songs are on a much higher standard than the PF songs. Therefore I vote for Genesis, and also am somewhat sad to see that Genesis loses this "beauty contest" to PF

At the end of the day the result of this poll has little to do with who is the better band. There is no such thing as one piece of music being beter than another. It is just a matter of taste. I have seen polls where the result was the opposite and Genesis won over PF. There are always factors that play a part in swaying opinion and PF do have one major advantage over Genesis and that is that their sound does not date as much. However, if you asked me which complete range of albums I would prefer to be stranded on a dessert island with, then Genesis wins hands down.

Genesis are he all round package. Their songs are more complex and as such have more staying power in retaining my interest. They have more light and shade, mood changes, tempo changes, and emotion, and as such are more interesting. I could go on here but you get the picture. I'm not a fan of the 'pop' era, but even that would make a pleasant change on a dessert island...another string to their bow and I never thought I'd say that about the 'pop' era!

Another reason for PF leading in this poll could be that they did renew a lot of people's interest with a first class set at Live 8 last year. Perhaps the story will be differant if Genesis do get this reunion thing going!


Edited by BilboBaggins - August 26 2006 at 07:15

Dirk wrote: Well in terms of pure musicianship Genesis might well be more interesting. Pink Floyd's songs are generally more simple in structure leaning quite a bit on Gilmours guitar playing. I think the real strength of Pink Floyd lies in the songwriting , their melodies are just amazing, Genesis doesn't quite match that IMO.

I like what you are saying about song structure, but I can't agree with you on melody, either instrumentally or vocally.

PF's melodies and phrasing are nowhere near as wonderfully right as with Genesis. Genesis have provided far more in the way of 'feel good moments' for me, and are more interesting. Don't get me wrong I like PF too, quite a bit...smiles.

Pink Floyd, but I've been listening to them for a lot longer. I've just picked up 2 Genesis albums in the past few weeks and it's really good but I don't think it matches Pink Floyd at their peak.

genisis has maybe 2 good songs

This poll wasn't as close as the YES v PINK FLOYD one & I have to say PINK FLOYD were/are much greater than GENESIS.