Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - worst kate bush song..
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closedworst kate bush song..

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Message
jojim View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 27 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 155
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2005 at 20:14
I liked Kate Bush's music till the album "Aerial". As a male person she incorporated for me the eternal vamp and at the same time  the innocent young girl looking for love, emotions and  - perhaps - surrender. From her album "Red shoes" I liked "Song of Solomon". There she sings "... I don't want your bullsh*t, I just want your sexuality ...". That is obvious enough. The older song "Baboushka" is also treating the relationship between man and woman. - That was ok for me - as a male person.

The new album "Aerial" has a big flaw in my opinion. She is not seeking anymore, she has found. She has her little son whom she is loving  absolutely. -  This is a crucial problem in art. If you are satisfied, happy and well situated there is notihing you can contribute to art. Your senses are dull. They are blocked by your feelings of happyness. Kate is expressing her happyness on "Aerial". That is ok. But it does not meet my personal taste. It's a statement that cannot reach my ears. The music is flat, there are some birds ont the CD singing from time to time. Peaceful atmosphere. But this is not my situation. And perhaps not of many persons.

I would recommend this album to any new  mother and father, or, to mothers and fathers in general. And if your are able to make money with that - the better. And for her little boy it is the money he will spend in the future. That's ok.

Art is only fisable in a situation of pain, sorrow, hopelessness. This claim is not too bad. I have heard only very seldom, that the oppositehas been going to work. Tschaikowsky has written his last symphony in a kind of agony. And that's what makes it great. If he would have been happy like a jumping dog before dinner the work would have been flat. This does not claim that we all should be unhappy.

Flat  - that's my impression of the music of the totally happy mother Kate. I will make this record a gift to a girl that wants to have children soon. And for that purpose it's perfect. Happiness is a warm gun - the Beatles once told us. But does it help making good music?
YES - Close to the edge / UK - UK / GENESIS - The lamb lies down / KING CRIMSON - Discipline / MIKE OLDFIELD - Tubular bells / JETHRO TULL - Aqualung / GENTLE GIANT - Three friends / TMO - IMF
Back to Top
lucas View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 06 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 8138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2005 at 20:24

Originally posted by rockandrail rockandrail wrote:

Don't remember the title but the one song she "sings" (expires?) with Peter gabriel sucks a lot.

It's either "another day" (appearing on the 'Christmas special' TV show) or "don't give up", both songs bringing tears to my eyes. But I suppose you are not aware of the first song, so you are probably refering to "don't give up", and in this case I don't understand yiur feelings towards this song : it is pure beauty.

"Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)
Back to Top
Rashikal View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 07 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 546
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2005 at 21:22
i dont understand why everyone here likes kate bush. she is POP. and if she does do some prog, it's really unimpressive.
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28029
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2005 at 02:49

Originally posted by jojim jojim wrote:

I liked Kate Bush's music till the album "Aerial". As a male person she incorporated for me the eternal vamp and at the same time  the innocent young girl looking for love, emotions and  - perhaps - surrender. From her album "Red shoes" I liked "Song of Solomon". There she sings "... I don't want your bullsh*t, I just want your sexuality ...". That is obvious enough. The older song "Baboushka" is also treating the relationship between man and woman. - That was ok for me - as a male person.

The new album "Aerial" has a big flaw in my opinion. She is not seeking anymore, she has found. She has her little son whom she is loving  absolutely. -  This is a crucial problem in art. If you are satisfied, happy and well situated there is notihing you can contribute to art. Your senses are dull. They are blocked by your feelings of happyness. Kate is expressing her happyness on "Aerial". That is ok. But it does not meet my personal taste. It's a statement that cannot reach my ears. The music is flat, there are some birds ont the CD singing from time to time. Peaceful atmosphere. But this is not my situation. And perhaps not of many persons.

I would recommend this album to any new  mother and father, or, to mothers and fathers in general. And if your are able to make money with that - the better. And for her little boy it is the money he will spend in the future. That's ok.

Art is only fisable in a situation of pain, sorrow, hopelessness. This claim is not too bad. I have heard only very seldom, that the oppositehas been going to work. Tschaikowsky has written his last symphony in a kind of agony. And that's what makes it great. If he would have been happy like a jumping dog before dinner the work would have been flat. This does not claim that we all should be unhappy.

Flat  - that's my impression of the music of the totally happy mother Kate. I will make this record a gift to a girl that wants to have children soon. And for that purpose it's perfect. Happiness is a warm gun - the Beatles once told us. But does it help making good music?

Interesting but I suspect that is a deeply flawed argument.When musicians get together in a band for the first time they tend to be both happy and inspired..at the same time! As regards Kate Bush the latest album does show some settleness in the music but she has deliberately used this mood to create someting fascinatiing and slightly surreal (like the song about the Washing Machine!).You can only judge an album like this after a few years IMO.

Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2005 at 03:19

jojim

You raise some very interesting points there. There may be some truth in that an artist produces their best work when living with adversity.

I would have to disagree with you generally on Aerial though. I know it's all down to ones personal taste and I would agree that this is not exactly her best album, but I would say that it is better than Lionheart and The Red Shoes. Aerial has all the good KB trademarks throughout and I would say it is more progressive than the aforementioned albums.

I think also richardh is right about needing to allow these albums to sink in over a few years perhaps. I found that with both Hounds of Love and The Dreaming, I had to re-visit them a number of times to appreciate exactly how brilliant they were, especially The Dreaming which is very experimental.

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
jojim View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 27 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 155
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2005 at 05:13
Agreed. I just give it a try later on. Aerial means perhaps "not to catch" And that is what happens here with Kate.

On the other side: the new McCartney album fascinates me over the top. Ok it's POP. But in a way it has also some elements of Prog, or let me say, the feeling of Prog (e.g. "vanity faire"). This musical statement can touch me. It's weird. Paul reaches my ears. And he is as long in the business as Kate. But this is of course a personal feeling. And I'm a man.  I listened at least 100 times to the whole McCartney album "Chaos ...". Just to say.
YES - Close to the edge / UK - UK / GENESIS - The lamb lies down / KING CRIMSON - Discipline / MIKE OLDFIELD - Tubular bells / JETHRO TULL - Aqualung / GENTLE GIANT - Three friends / TMO - IMF
Back to Top
kenmeyerjr View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 30 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 235
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2005 at 13:11
Boy, for me, The Dreaming and Hounds hit me like a ton of bricks on the first listen and never let up (and I have a soft spot for Lionheart as well, as I think it was the first one I bought loooong ago). I need some time for Aerial to sink in, especially since it is a double album.
If you like art of musicians, check my site (the music section) and tell me what you think! http://www.kenmeyerjr.com
Back to Top
DEzerov View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 17 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 340
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2005 at 13:25
Originally posted by Rashikal Rashikal wrote:

i dont understand why everyone here likes kate bush. she is POP. and if she does do some prog, it's really unimpressive.



Funny, I've never heard Experiment IV, Houdini, Get Out of My House, Heads We're Dancing, Breathing, Sat In Your Lap, et al. played on top 40 pop radio...

In fact, I'd say that most of these titles are pretty god*amned impressive examples of prog. But just my humble opinion.
The moon is made by some lame cooper and you can see the idiot has no idea about moons at all - Nikolay Gogol
Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20030
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2005 at 14:03
Originally posted by DEzerov DEzerov wrote:

Originally posted by Rashikal Rashikal wrote:

i dont understand why everyone here likes kate bush. she is POP. and if she does do some prog, it's really unimpressive.



Funny, I've never heard Experiment IV, Houdini, Get Out of My House, Heads We're Dancing, Breathing, Sat In Your Lap, et al. played on top 40 pop radio...

In fact, I'd say that most of these titles are pretty god*amned impressive examples of prog. But just my humble opinion.

Well said Dezerov, nobody should confuse Kate Bush with the stuff that passes for "pop" these days. Westlife are pop, Kate Bush is not.
Back to Top
soundsweird View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: December 08 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 408
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 16 2005 at 02:24

 

       Worst song:  The song she does with Prince on "Red Shoes", "Why Should I Love You?"

       I have to agree somewhat with Jojim about "Aerial"; although I found several tracks to like, I think that the woman has lost her edge.  I also feel that her gift for melody has abandoned her; most of the songs get a groove going, and that's about it.  No "verse, chorus, verse, bridge, chorus" songs (with a few exceptions).  The song "Bertie" could have been great if not for the cloying lyrics.  But mostly, it's the fact that she never lets loose on this album.  It makes for a lack of contrast, chugging along at mid-tempo.  Moments of power or delicacy are missing in action.

 

                                                                        

 

 

Back to Top
Rashikal View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 07 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 546
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 16 2005 at 16:44
kate bush is horrid, get off her balls.
Back to Top
GTOMax View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: December 16 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 16 2005 at 16:55
This is probably not the best thing to post as my first message, but didn't anyone think that Hounds of Love was just a little too weird?  I mean, a few of those songs reminded me of a Listerine commercial or something -- and when she starts growling of a dog, well, I now know where they got the idea for Sigorney Weaver's character in Ghostbusters originally. 

I'm sure Kate is mostly sane, but most of her material is just too much for me -- I listen to some pretty weird stuff, too.  Hell, I own a whole bunch of Penderecki recordings and find them to be less weird (Magnificat, Threnody can't outcreep Hounds of Love).
Randall
Back to Top
kenmeyerjr View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 30 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 235
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 16 2005 at 17:04
Hhahhahaha, that is sorta funny, tho....posting that Kate Bush is a bit weird...and having a big Manson as your signature!
If you like art of musicians, check my site (the music section) and tell me what you think! http://www.kenmeyerjr.com
Back to Top
Dazo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 20 2005
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 178
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 16 2005 at 17:14

Originally posted by ranger ranger wrote:

 its too hard to choose most of her songs are awful

What a twat!

Can I say Twat?  

Call that an argument?
That was never an argument.
Back to Top
Dalex_61 View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: December 15 2005
Location: Pompeii - Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 34
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 16 2005 at 17:15

I read two or three highly interesing posts in this topic. I have to say that I like Kate Bush very much. Having said that, I really don't care if she makes prog music or not, but I don't think so. Let's say that Kate's music is a world apart. About her new CD, well... I read many different opinions and that's actually a peculiar album... the music seems to grow lighter and lighter... it's a sort of breeze passing by. I'm sure I'll have to listen to this CD more and more to make up my mind.

Should I add that all I said is just my opinion?

 

Back to Top
Dazo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 20 2005
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 178
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 16 2005 at 19:12

Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

I recently purchased 2 lps from her and couldn't get through them both. The music is tortuous to my ears I can tell that these will not be growers either. It's like quirky cliched 80's pop with this caterwauler of a singer that just grates on my nerves. I am sorry if this offends anyone, but hey...since the thread was brought up...why not.

Can I ask why you "purchased 2 lps from her"?

Were they recomended to you?

 

 

Call that an argument?
That was never an argument.
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28029
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 16 2005 at 19:24
Originally posted by Dazo Dazo wrote:

Originally posted by ranger ranger wrote:

 its too hard to choose most of her songs are awful

What a twat!

Can I say Twat?  

No!

Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 16 2005 at 19:55
Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

Originally posted by Dazo Dazo wrote:

Originally posted by ranger ranger wrote:

 its too hard to choose most of her songs are awful

What a twat!

Can I say Twat?  

No!

Not without backing it up! In what way is he a twat? Expand further!Geek

Back to Top
Forgotten Son View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 13 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1356
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 16 2005 at 20:07
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

Originally posted by Dazo Dazo wrote:

Originally posted by ranger ranger wrote:

 its too hard to choose most of her songs are awful

What a twat!

Can I say Twat?  

No!

Not without backing it up! In what way is he a twat? Expand further!Geek



He has the properties of femal genitalia?
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 16 2005 at 20:11
Originally posted by Forgotten Son Forgotten Son wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

Originally posted by Dazo Dazo wrote:

Originally posted by ranger ranger wrote:

 its too hard to choose most of her songs are awful

What a twat!

Can I say Twat?  

No!

Not without backing it up! In what way is he a twat? Expand further!Geek



He has the properties of femal genitalia?

..or maybe he has similarities to a pregnant fish?

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.211 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.