Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
TheSubhuman
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 19 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 24
|
Topic: Why isn't progressive trance on this site? Posted: August 23 2009 at 09:59 |
Why? Because far too many members of this site can't act like the adults they are whenever something out of their personal comfort zone is suggested. Most people don't care about genuinely progressive music, but about how much band X or artist Y sounds like the classic Seventies acts - cue the proliferation of threads about how post-rock is not prog, or anything to that effect.
Now, I have no experience of progressive trance (which I regret), but I have experience of listening and reviewing stuff that would probably never set foot on PA, in spite of being a damn sight more interesting (and yes, PROGRESSIVE) than the plethora of sub-par imitators of Yes, Genesis, ELP and what not.
|
 |
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: August 23 2009 at 05:01 |
russellk wrote:
Atavachron wrote:
mickstafa is right about 'progressive' having a somewhat different meaning in trance music, I would add that if a music has no detectable or musicologic connection to rock - as opposed to much electronic prog which does - it probably doesn't belong here
|
You might want to revisit the prog electronic albums listed on this site, the vast majority of which have at best a tenuous connection to rock music. Far, far less than does 90s electronica.
Look, it's as simple as this. There's no logical reason to keep 90s prog electronica out of PA. It's not here because the team responsible for progressive electronic music don't want it here. Remember that this team relegated Jean Michel Jarre and Vangelis to prog-related so as not to sully their concept of what progressive electronic is. If that could be widely disseminated we'd avoid these continued requests for popular electronic acts to be considered.
|
Seems that prog related has become sort of a ghetto like art rock used to be. Lots of artists are there that might fit better into other sub-genres if the folks that are on those teams accept them. Far be it for me to bitch about that. This site is flexible and if you make a convincing argument for a change of category or an addition, it can happen. Personally I'd move Jarre and Vangelis and Synergy into progressive electronic. It's not my call though.
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
 |
russellk
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 28 2005
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 782
|
Posted: August 23 2009 at 02:20 |
Atavachron wrote:
mickstafa is right about 'progressive' having a somewhat different meaning in trance music, I would add that if a music has no detectable or musicologic connection to rock - as opposed to much electronic prog which does - it probably doesn't belong here
|
You might want to revisit the prog electronic albums listed on this site, the vast majority of which have at best a tenuous connection to rock music. Far, far less than does 90s electronica. Look, it's as simple as this. There's no logical reason to keep 90s prog electronica out of PA. It's not here because the team responsible for progressive electronic music don't want it here. Remember that this team relegated Jean Michel Jarre and Vangelis to prog-related so as not to sully their concept of what progressive electronic is. If that could be widely disseminated we'd avoid these continued requests for popular electronic acts to be considered.
|
 |
A Person
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 10 2008
Location: __
Status: Offline
Points: 65760
|
Posted: August 22 2009 at 20:19 |
mrcozdude wrote:
StrengthandWisdom wrote:
Aphex Twin isn't prog electronic.
|
Regardless if that is the genre of not.He's certainly progressive and electronic,that can't be denied.
|
He is fairly eclectic too. He has made piano only songs.
|
 |
mrcozdude
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 25 2007
Location: Devon,UK.
Status: Offline
Points: 2078
|
Posted: August 22 2009 at 14:15 |
StrengthandWisdom wrote:
Aphex Twin isn't prog electronic.
|
Regardless if that is the genre of not.He's certainly progressive and electronic,that can't be denied.
|
|
 |
A Person
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 10 2008
Location: __
Status: Offline
Points: 65760
|
Posted: August 21 2009 at 21:30 |
Hmm, from the only Mind in a box song I've heard they kind of remind me of Depeche Mode. Interesting, but I don't know why it should be on PA. The electronic music already on here is completely different, I've been surreptitiously bumping the IDM thread to try to get more interest, but it seems futile. I'm happy with the genres the way they are right now, and they probably aren't going to change any time soon, otherwise I'd like to see some more modern prog electronic additions on PA.
|
 |
g0rd0nb0mbay
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 21 2009
Location: London,England
Status: Offline
Points: 119
|
Posted: August 21 2009 at 21:21 |
sorry man,i dont mean to come across as pedantic, its just a pet hate of mine along with people who call aphex "the aphex twins".
|
|
 |
mrcozdude
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 25 2007
Location: Devon,UK.
Status: Offline
Points: 2078
|
Posted: August 21 2009 at 21:18 |
I would like to see Aphex and squarepusher on here.There's so many good progressive dance bands but I imagine the shymphonic prog fans would throw a fit.
|
|
 |
Henry Plainview
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
|
Posted: August 21 2009 at 21:18 |
g0rd0nb0mbay wrote:
Aphex Twin isnt a band but him,squarepusher.autechre,boards of canada etc.. would certainly be welcome additions to the prog-electronic family!!
|
A one man band is still a band, I don't know why people get so pedantic over this. Yes, you shouldn't say Aphex Twin are, but singling that out just makes things inconvenient to talk about.
|
if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
 |
g0rd0nb0mbay
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 21 2009
Location: London,England
Status: Offline
Points: 119
|
Posted: August 21 2009 at 21:15 |
|
|
 |
StrengthandWisdom
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 19 2009
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 104
|
Posted: August 21 2009 at 20:58 |
g0rd0nb0mbay wrote:
StrengthandWisdom wrote:
Aphex Twin isn't prog electronic.
|
no but "mind in a box" are :\ , is anyone else starting to think this is a joke poster?
|
You moron. Aphex Twin are Ambient/IDM. Mind in a Box are progressive trance/futurepop.
|
 |
g0rd0nb0mbay
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 21 2009
Location: London,England
Status: Offline
Points: 119
|
Posted: August 21 2009 at 20:41 |
StrengthandWisdom wrote:
Aphex Twin isn't prog electronic.
|
no but "mind in a box" are :\ , is anyone else starting to think this is a joke poster?
|
|
 |
StrengthandWisdom
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 19 2009
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 104
|
Posted: August 21 2009 at 20:09 |
Aphex Twin isn't prog electronic.
|
 |
StrengthandWisdom
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 19 2009
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 104
|
Posted: August 21 2009 at 20:08 |
I think we should at LEAST add Mind in a Box on this site. They are labeled as futurepop but are a lot closer to Progressive Trance. Thus they are a Prog electronic band.
Our prog electronic section is mostly ambient music. Or perhaps, we should add an electronic archives site for all electronic music including IDM and 90's industrial.
|
 |
WalterDigsTunes
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 11 2007
Location: SanDiegoTijuana
Status: Offline
Points: 4373
|
Posted: August 21 2009 at 20:01 |
Henry Plainview wrote:
frbassdevil wrote:
If we were to add progressive trance to Prog Archives, we should add progressive house, progressive breaks and progressive drum & bass subgenres, as well.
I think that artists belonging to these subgenres may fall in the already existing Progressive Electronic subgenre here in the archives, even though they may not sound like the traditional progressive electronic.
|
I would agree, but the Prog Electronic team doesn't like '90s electronica so it's not happening. Not even for Aphex Twin! |
I wonder why...
Lota wrote:
Trance Music, isn't music. Sorry.!!!! |
Darn right. Say "NO!" to new music.
|
 |
g0rd0nb0mbay
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 21 2009
Location: London,England
Status: Offline
Points: 119
|
Posted: August 21 2009 at 19:56 |
Aphex Twin isnt a band  but him,squarepusher.autechre,boards of canada etc.. would certainly be welcome additions to the prog-electronic family!!
|
|
 |
StrengthandWisdom
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 19 2009
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 104
|
Posted: August 21 2009 at 19:53 |
I got some sampled up if anyone is interested.
The 3 albums in the discography together form a story set in an Orwellian futuristic society. The albums have high emphasis on the concept. The protagonist, Black, is a hacker. I recommend listening to all 3 albums in order at once, because its all about the flow and feel of emotions. Here are some sample tracks. I'm pretty hooked on Identity, and Redefined gives a very chilling feeling.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcuB3jmIqmU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocMgdP177AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqj6f8iGjfA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJNUpZyaqx0
|
 |
J-Man
Prog Reviewer
Joined: August 07 2008
Location: Philadelphia,PA
Status: Offline
Points: 7826
|
Posted: August 21 2009 at 08:19 |
Because there already is progressive electronic
|
|
 |
KingCrimson250
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 29 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 573
|
Posted: August 21 2009 at 01:16 |
^^Yeah, that's probably the best answer. If we were to start throwing in everything that was progressive, rather than just rock and rock-related, then this site would become so broad and open that it would completely lose focus and wouldn't be very useful at all.
Mozart was creative, innovative, and extremely influencial, but it would be a bit silly to have him listed as "Proto-Prog," don't you think?
Maybe consider forming TranceArchives
|
 |
progkidjoel
Prog Reviewer
Joined: March 02 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 19643
|
Posted: August 21 2009 at 01:14 |
Atavachron wrote:
mickstafa is right about 'progressive' having a somewhat different meaning in trance music, I would add that if a music has no detectable or musicologic connection to rock - as opposed to much electronic prog which does - it probably doesn't belong here
|
Perfectly put!
|
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.