key transposition |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Topic: key transposition Posted: May 03 2005 at 04:01 |
A modulation occurs when a piece is trundling along in a particular key (e.g. D minor), and the composer takes the piece to a different key (e.g. G minor). The composer can use a variety of devices to move the piece into the new key (cadence, sequence, etc.) and the point at which the piece changes is where it modulates. This may be the bar in which the cadence occurs, or the phrase that contains the sequence. It's a nice trick to string out the modulation as long as possible, so that the tonal base of the previous section is all but lost, in order to move to a remote key smoothly - but it can be very dramatic to perform a sudden modulation into a remote key. Moving a piece from one key into another is not modulation - it's transposition, and transposing the key of a piece will change the whole character of a song, with one exception; If you are playing a piece on the piano (or other instrument with fixed pitch ratios) and decide not to play it in Eb, but in D# instead, then it will not take on a new character - it cannot, as the notes are the same. However, on a violin (or other instrument with variable pitch ratios), as has been pointed out, the sound (and hence) character will be subtly different.
|
|
Inferno
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 30 2004 Status: Offline Points: 152 |
Posted: May 01 2005 at 15:16 |
Of course there is a difference Between Modulations
Heres an exemple. I'm working on a Ozzy Osbourne Tribute band and we work with Live tapes and Studio tapes to re-work the songs. Ozzy studio songs are usually in the E minor or A minor key but on the live songs, the guitars are tuned in Drop Eb so those songs becomes in Eb minor and Ab minor. Altought it's only a second minor, the difference is really there!!! The song sounds much more Deep and Darker then the studio. Althought, this is not the reason why they done this but mostly because Ozzy's voice sounds like sh*t and can't sing that high anymore |
|
goose
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 20 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4097 |
Posted: May 01 2005 at 09:05 |
Only because it's such a tiny difference, I should think. And perhaps (subconciously) the violinist would make the difference even smaller when a pianist was playing. |
|
Guests
Forum Guest Group |
Posted: May 01 2005 at 08:46 |
there is no way to explain the truth to have it understood and not be believed....i love people who tell you you are ignorant, but then cant be bothereed to share their own wisdom on the subject, that is why many of us remain ignorant....questioning to better understand something isnt arguing, and rather i believe i do understand what you are saying .....this is what i dont undederstand :how can a violinist playing c sharp a little lowere than d flat in the same octave jive with a pianist playing the same note for both ?
Edited by hopelevre |
|
goose
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 20 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4097 |
Posted: May 01 2005 at 06:06 |
Even on an instrument where you can't differentiate between C# and Db (like a piano, obviously), I would think someone reading the music would get a different "feel" from seeing flats than sharps?
|
|
Beau Heem
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 12 2005 Location: Finland Status: Offline Points: 227 |
Posted: May 01 2005 at 04:41 |
i will not start an argument about this, but enharmonic instruments,
the so-called well-tempered instruments indeed make no difference
between D# and Eb, but that does not mean that there isn't one.
D# and Eb are enharmonically the same, but they are not the same harmonically. If there is a musician who cannot understand this, then he/she has chosen the wrong occupation. Cheers -Beau |
|
--No enemy but time--
|
|
James Lee
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 05 2004 Status: Offline Points: 3525 |
Posted: April 30 2005 at 23:05 |
I always confuse those two...just like Lennon and McCartney. |
|
Reed Lover
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 16 2004 Location: Sao Tome and Pr Status: Offline Points: 5187 |
Posted: April 30 2005 at 17:59 |
Like the piano it fell "b"
|
|
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Posted: April 30 2005 at 17:50 |
D minor is typical for Requiem masses, as it is associated with death. Mozart used it masterfully in the sections of his requiem that he actually completed. It was in fact Nigel Tufnell, not Derek Smalls who made the same observation in his piece, inspired by Mozart and Bach - a kind of "Mach" piece, with sad, intertwining lines, that D minor is the saddest of all keys - everyone cries when you play a D minor -> Bb Major -> A major progression... He called the piece "Lick My Love Pump". Likewise, other keys have deep historical associations - Eb Major, the most pastoral of all keys is what Beethoven used for his "Pastoral" symphony. When you drop a piano down a mine shaft, you get Ab minor - you really need to watch out for falling pianos, because if you don't C#, you will Bb... Well... it is Saturday night |
|
Man Overboard
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 07 2004 Location: Austin, TX Status: Offline Points: 3830 |
Posted: April 30 2005 at 17:22 |
A Favor House Pacific
<--I took a song and digitally edited it to be in a lower key, and
slowed the song down too... it has an incredibly different feel
now even if it's an incredibly stupid edit.
|
|
goose
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 20 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4097 |
Posted: April 30 2005 at 15:45 |
That's not the same at all - it's changed from a minor to a major key (i.e. the intervals between each note are changed, rather than the whole thing being transposed). |
|
Moribund
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 21 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 210 |
Posted: April 30 2005 at 15:35 |
There is also a significant psychological effect - a piece in C# Major will have a different 'feel' to a pianist to a piece in Db Mafor despite being enharmonically identical.
|
|
New Progressive Rock Live show now touring UK theatres!
www.masterpiecestheconcert.co.uk |
|
Guests
Forum Guest Group |
Posted: April 30 2005 at 12:44 |
ahhh i see what yu meant now, sorry for taking it wrong, and thank you for taking the time to think about the question and answer it thoughtfully
Edited by hopelevre |
|
James Lee
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 05 2004 Status: Offline Points: 3525 |
Posted: April 30 2005 at 12:40 |
Of course I understand that the intervalic relationship between notes is supported by mathematical ratios. I'm saying that the keys themselves were created to facilitate understanding of musical principles. There is no Db harmonic minor scale in nature; there are only various wavelengths that compliment each other in a musical sense better than others. An inch does not have any real meaning before you make a ruler to measure it...no matter how specific you are about how many of them go into a yard. 440hz is not naturally any less of a 'real note' than 442hz, or 438hz, so therefore the keys and scales (deriving from the fundamental note) are based on human standards. On an instrument without set temperament, one can transpose a song by minute amounts, and sooner or later it's going to have an effect on the overall sense of the piece.
|
|
Guests
Forum Guest Group |
Posted: April 30 2005 at 11:47 |
james the keys are a very natural phenomena, based on very real frequency ratios, this is all done scientifically and has nothing to do with human construction......there used to be aan excellent resource on this at completechords.com....i have it printed out and am reading it now, but the site has been cahnged and i cant find it there any longer....also lets think of this question in terms of piano only, to avoid the variables associated with including other instruments, such as the differetn fingerings, etc.....none of this is a problem in a piece transposed to a new key on the piano
Edited by hopelevre |
|
James Lee
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 05 2004 Status: Offline Points: 3525 |
Posted: April 30 2005 at 11:19 |
I'm surprised nobody's made a Derek Smalls "saddest of all keys" reference yet. The range of the specific instrument is important, because transposing affects a number of elements like hand position, harmonic content, level of energy required, et cetera (minor things, mainly, but I'm sure it all adds up). And the flexibility of the instrument itself is a definite factor- a flute (for example) playing at the extreme high or low end of its range will add a dramatically different character than one that is comfortably centered. Also, never underestimate the importance of experience- you hear enough sad songs in F#m when you're young and that will always seem like an intrinsically sad key to you, even if you don't consciously make the distinction. Minor is almost universally considered 'sadder' than major, when the only difference is a lowered 3rd (well, depending on the mode, I mean). Is that a natural distinction or just association? But I think there is something, maybe even at the neural level, that responds differently to different keys. Of course, the keys themselves are an artificial human construction...so it must be specific combinations of wavelengths and timbres that produce the effect. Perhaps music software of the future will provide composition based on desired combinations of mood-affecting fundamental tones. |
|
Guests
Forum Guest Group |
Posted: April 30 2005 at 10:22 |
interesting subtopic: the different instruments and which keys are able to display their intrinsic qualities best
Edited by hopelevre |
|
Moribund
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 21 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 210 |
Posted: April 30 2005 at 09:07 |
Personally, I can't imagine the great melotronic epics of early King Crimson in any key other than E minor. Moonchild strays a little way up to A minor. Interesting that Starless chose G minor - I'm tempted to think this was to accomodate the saxes, but early live recordings exist long before the stuiod arrangement. maybe to allow the violin the low G on the opening melody in the live version (the melody was later changed to the guitar and the notes alterd - a successful update for sure).
|
|
New Progressive Rock Live show now touring UK theatres!
www.masterpiecestheconcert.co.uk |
|
Guests
Forum Guest Group |
Posted: April 30 2005 at 08:22 |
interesting answers, but none of them(except maybe 1) answer the question .....a modulation is NOT a transposition.....please try to understand (by thoroughly reading)this question before trying to answer it........beau:there is absolutely no difference between e flat and d sharp if played in the same octave....what are yu talking about?....they are the same note(same key on a board), and tempered to the same frequency, the only difference is what you call it dependign on how you are analyzing the piece it is in....how can the same key on a keyboard be two different notes?...if yu just mean to say they were different slightly before the scale was tempered, then i understand....however i think you are misunderstanding/ignoring the fact that without the equally tempered scales the keys no longer exist, for it is precisely this temperament which allows them to function the way they do and gave birth to the major-minor tonal system ...before the advent of this we had no harmony, it was all church modes and counterpoint, before that gregorian chant(which gave birth to the modes)......and just because the exact intervals have been tempered, doesnt mean the keys all sound the same.....these tempered frequencies still very much share the characteristics of the more exact frequencies they were changed from, and the keys still very much maintain their moods...i do agree that winds may be more expressive of this characteristic tho(although i would think the instrument manufacturers would be compensating for the equal temperament by now, otherwise our symphonies would never be in tune with each other, the pianist would be playing tempered while the winds non and it would be horrible) .....not strings however, for unless the one playing (and tuning) has perfect pitch he will use a tuner which is set to the tempered scale to tune his instruments...btw, the piano is a stringed instrument as well as it is a percussive one
Edited by hopelevre |
|
Beau Heem
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 12 2005 Location: Finland Status: Offline Points: 227 |
Posted: April 30 2005 at 06:34 |
Well, the reason why different keys really sound different (and there
is a huge difference between, say, a-minor and f#-minor) is that the
way instruments (as well as everything) resonate changes from note to
note, key to key.
Even it seems to be too hard for the pianists and keyboardists of this world to understand, there is a major difference between D# and Eb... Rock music is usually performed with a focus on well-tempered instruments (keyboards) - meaning that each and every interval is just as "wide" as any other interval with the same name. A piano is tuned according to achieve the following result; Every minor 2nd is just the size of every other minor 2nd. Let's say we are to tune an octave of keys. We would choose to begin with C1, and choose it to vibrate at 264 Hz. As an octave means that the number of Hzs is doubled, C2 would then be 528 Hz, and further, C3 would be 1056Hz. This means that a difference between C and C# is not the same in Hzs as the difference between C# and D, but that the difference should be relatively the same. It takes 12 minor seconds to fill the octave, and the octave doubles the number of Hzs - therefore we can count that [i raised to the power of 12] = 2, where i is the coefficent that is used to tune a note that is a minor second higher than the note already defined... if [i raised to the power of 12] = 2, then i = approx. 1,05946 C1=264Hz C#= 1,05946 x 264 Hz= 279,69744 D = 279,69744 x 1,05946 = 296,32825 D#/Eb = 313,94793 etc. In real life, however, keys are tempered to the closest "full" Hz. C = 264. D = 296. E = 333. F = 352. G = 395,5. A = 444. H = 498. C2 = 528. This is a rather artificial way of tuning instruments. And it makes the difference between keys to disappear almost entirely. But as I said before, if strings or woodwinds (or any instruments that aren't well-tempered) are used, the difference between keys is tremendous. Whether a key is tragic and some other happy, I wouldn't know, but there is a difference in the way instruments sound and resonate. Cheers -Beau Edited by Beau Heem |
|
--No enemy but time--
|
|
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |