Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Grateful Dead for Prog Related?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Grateful Dead for Prog Related?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35732
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Grateful Dead for Prog Related?
    Posted: 14 hours 21 minutes ago at 01:58
I must not be making myself clear. That was not an argument I was making for excluding the Dead. That was just a comment referencing something Richard said in the post that I was responding to (it was a throwaway comment directed at Richard because of what he said). All I can say is that I have not been convinced from reading arguments that The Dead should be included over the years and that it has been rejected for Prog Related before, well overturning that might be problematic. I actually don't personally care that much about what gets added to PA (at one time I care more) but if an SC brings an act to me for consideration for PR or PP, I take how I respond to that seriously. I'm a forum guy, I like the community (well, mostly), the DB doesn't interest that much, but I like talking music and ideas with people, sharing music and some laughs (even if I am the only to laugh at my silly jokes, well not even I laugh at them). Anyway, I will now leave this topic to any who may still be interested. I came into it to try to clear up some misconceptions and now just seem to be muddying the waters. :)

I don;t know what flimsy arguments you think I have been trying to make, and I just don't think you're understanding where I'm coming from. That's okay, I'm not always very clear Svet.

Edited by Logan - 14 hours 14 minutes ago at 02:05
Back to Top
Starshiper View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 08 2024
Location: Englantic
Status: Offline
Points: 407
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Starshiper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 hours 38 minutes ago at 01:41
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

I didn't add JA, but I have supported it and I support a lot of related music that was included in PA. As I said, I don't know Dead very well, but there is lot of bluesy psych music (and jammy music) in PA that I do support (lots in Psychedelic Prog, Krautrock, find stuff in Related etc.)
It just so happens that I'm rather well-acquainted with the Grateful Dead, and I'd like to inform you that they were decidedly more psychedelic than Jefferson Airplane ever managed to be.
Now, don't get me wrong; I'm not here waving a flag for the inclusion of the Dead in Progarchives. After all, much like Jefferson Airplane, they have absolutely no connection to the progressive rock movement whatsoever. I merely wished to refute your rather flimsy argument(s) for not including the Dead, although you, on the other side, as you said, supported the inclusion of another, even less psychedelic band from the San Francisco scene that also has nothing to do with the late 1960s progressive rock movement in Britain.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65243
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 hours 4 minutes ago at 01:15
Originally posted by Starshiper Starshiper wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Brian Wilson & Brothers, aka The Beach Boys are another matter and the evidence for Protoprog is abundant and evident.   In fact they were the first true progressive rock
band.
In fact, The Beach Boys were progressive pop.

Uh, no, they were a rock band through & through whether that makes sense to a modern rock listener or not.   

It would be like saying the Beatles were a pop band when, in every way ~ their roots, influences, approach, early music, later music, social impact ~ both the Beatles and the Beach Boys were a rock 'n roll outfit, even if that doesn't sit well with us.

"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35732
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 hours 20 minutes ago at 00:59
^^ I wasn't trying to imply that that is a reason to exclude the Dead if that's how you perceived it. Others might think that. I've posted so much in this topic that it can be easy to lose the greater context in very selective quoting. That was just a little comment linking to something Richard said (think that's quite clear if one's been reading through the posts sequentially). I didn't add JA, but I have supported it and I support a lot of related music that was included in PA. As I said, I don't know Dead very well, but there is lot of bluesy psych music (and jammy music) in PA that I do support (lots in Psychedelic Prog, Krautrock, find stuff in Related etc.)

I appreciate the diversity of PA as I have been saying. I like that so many movements and styles are present.

Edited by Logan - 15 hours 13 minutes ago at 01:06
Back to Top
Starshiper View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 08 2024
Location: Englantic
Status: Offline
Points: 407
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Starshiper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 hours 24 minutes ago at 00:55
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:



Brian Wilson & Brothers, aka The Beach Boys are another matter and the evidence for Protoprog is abundant and evident.   In fact they were the first true progressive rock band.
In fact, The Beach Boys were progressive pop.
Back to Top
Starshiper View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 08 2024
Location: Englantic
Status: Offline
Points: 407
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Starshiper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 hours 26 minutes ago at 00:53
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

The Grateful Dead is a different movement from tat British progressive movement (or movements) and that should be recognised.
Of course the Grateful Dead belongs to a different movement from the British progressive rock movement, but you've gone and included Jefferson Airplane in the database, haven't you? One mustn’t forget that both the Grateful Dead and Jefferson Airplane were integral to the same U.S. psychedelic rock movement. Both bands emerged from the same cultural milieu—the San Francisco music scene. So, really, that rather flimsy argument for excluding the Dead doesn't hold water, does it?
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65243
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 hours 43 minutes ago at 00:36
Cream absolutely influenced prog, you can hear it (e.g. Tempest just as one example). So I would not object to them being in the Proto-prog category.   Quicksilver is a different matter, and as they did not influence prog (to my ears), I'd have to hear a largely progressive album from them which I am not aware exists.

To reiterate, when all is said & done, I don't think the Grateful Dead would be an astute addition to any category on PA.   

Brian Wilson & Brothers, aka The Beach Boys are another matter and the evidence for Protoprog is abundant and evident.   In fact they were the first true progressive rock band.


"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35732
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 hours 56 minutes ago at 00:23
Apologies, I was not attentive enough and had not read through David's (Atavachron) post before about being progressive carefully.

I have little opinion on the Grateful Dead other than I would not support it based on what I have read over the years (not to mention that it was rejected) but I, for my cans of worms examples, have should support for both Cream and Quicksilver Messenger Service for Proto-Prog or maybe Psych for QMS. Not saying I would add those, or they should be in, but I think they are not really unreasonable to me (using those as bluesy jammy bands with psychedelic and experimental music examples).

Cream has direct relations with acts included in PA, I think it is significant to the progression of rock in the 60s, and it has quirky music with what I think of as progressive qualities. Quicksilver Messenger Service may not have progressed much as a band, but I find the earlier material to be musically relevant to other music at this site. I only know the 60s material well.

Progressive can mean different things. One might describe progressive rock as rock without boundaries and rock that breaks free of rock's genre conventions. And music that progresses what rock can be and do. So unconventional rock. Rock without limits. It can be a genre with subcategories as most defined by certain bands and their followers. Progressive can refer to the way music shifts in track. It can be an approach, style, developments in the music itself, developments over time, an adjective, a noun.....

With Prog as a "proper" genre, I tend to think in narrower terms, but Prog Archives has embraced a very wide diversity of music that can fits more than traditional notions of Prog. I like that because it has more music of interest to me and I have discovered more music of interest to me because of it.

If talking those bluesy Psych jam bands, you;re much more likely to find music in common with other acts in the Psych category and Krautrock than in Symphonic Prog or Neo-Prog. I'm glad that so much experimental and art music has been included in PA, and I'm glad there is diversity. It is good to understand the history and to know how things have changed and more styles and approaches have been adopted. The Grateful Dead is a different movement from tat British progressive movement (or movements) and that should be recognised. As for bad and good, that's so subjective. What's good experimental music to me may be bad to another, and what;s good conventional music to another may be bad to/for me and vice versa. Beauty and worth often is in the ear of the behearer. There is much melodic rock in PA loved by many that is almost unbearable for me to listen to, and to some music which I even find beautiful others just describe as noise or non-music.

Edited by Logan - 15 hours 47 minutes ago at 00:32
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 27953
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote richardh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 hours 11 minutes ago at 23:08
I would always push back against this notion. Never been that keen on 'experimental' and the word 'progressive' can refer to the way a piece of music progresses and not about whether the artist is progressing. It gets highly subjective. Ie 'bad' experimental versus 'good' conventional music? Experimentation is good in itself but can be horrible to listen to. Conventional music can have no unique or experimental qualities but still be good to listen to. I still think we need a strong historical understanding of prog rock and why it exists. I tend to see The Grateful Dead as a band that existed in its own space. They had little to do with the movement that was lead by ELP, Yes, Genesis and King Crimson. They will always be the 'big four' for me. The US bands tended to be more jazz fusion orientated and that is not at all surprising either. Psyche was a hangover from the sixties and largely about hippy dippy culture and especially drugs. The UK prog movement was more formal and conventional and very much middle class and 'safe'. I think many folks have a hard time with this idea and want it to be a more edgy thing. It wasn't.
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35732
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 hours 49 minutes ago at 20:30
^ To me experimental commonly IS progressive. I think that fits ideas of progressive according to lots of music that we be included here. "Cavlary" would not be out place in the Psych category here to me. A lot of Psych and Krautrock fist the more bluesy and experimental and jammy mode, and I tend to prefer that stuff to Symphonic Prog.

If this was all about Prog generic kinds of music (a lot of which is not even truly progressive in an adjectival sense), well this site would be VERY boring to me. We embrace lots of experimental, progressive and art music here.

Edited by Logan - 19 hours 47 minutes ago at 20:32
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65243
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 hours 14 minutes ago at 20:05
I guess it's progressive in a   Number Nine ... Number Nine   sort of way.   To me it's more experimental than progressive.

Edited by Atavachron - 20 hours 14 minutes ago at 20:05
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35732
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 hours 45 minutes ago at 19:34
Are they? Not sure why or how you would demonstrate a lack of progessiveness to the music. To me those both would be fine in Proto-Prog and while I could try to demonstrate again why I think Cream does have progressive qualities, I don;re really care if either was added.

I put this under progressive for instance, if others don't, that's fine. Just as as awesome to me however you classify it. An awesome 1969 release.

This is Cavalry in case the video does not show for any.



Edited by Logan - 20 hours 44 minutes ago at 19:35
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65243
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 hours 24 minutes ago at 18:55
^ But Cream and QMS are demonstrably not progressive.   The Dead's material was less demonstrably not progressive, and because they survived long past those other bands they had the time & chance to at least expand and grow.   When I would see Cipollina playing solo, though an awesome guitar player, he was the same blues-rock artist he'd always been.   Same with Clapton, in fact they are both painfully non-progressive and they wouldn't have it any other way.

There is in fact a difference between artists who maintain their allegiance to a specific musical tradition, and those who have the opportunity to reexamine and liquidate from time to time. The Dead may not have been progressive rock, but, as I say in my Robert Plant review for Principle of Moments, they certainly were digressive rock.

I stand by my evaluation that in the end, the Dead should probably not be added.   But it doesn't change what they were.

"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35732
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 16:27
For a couple of jammy bands that I have thought PA would benefit from having in before, Cream, and more relevant especially Quicksilver Messenger Service. The debut and the live Happy Trails are at least very significant to me. There is a lot of classic Psych related music that could be considerable. Maybe at some time QMS, then everything jammy else....

A can of jam with worms in it or a jam made out of worms does not sound appetising.

Edited by Logan - Yesterday at 16:28
Back to Top
The Dark Elf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13049
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote The Dark Elf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 15:53
No for me. Long songs with a lot of jamming do not necessarily mean the band is progressive. If that were the case, I would suggest The Allman Brothers were far more "progressive" in how they made progressive blues, and their elongated jams were heavily jazz inflected. You are opening a can of worms here.
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Back to Top
Psychedelic Paul View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 16 2019
Location: Nottingham, U.K
Status: Offline
Points: 39906
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Psychedelic Paul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 13:54
Grateful Dead's 13 Studio Albums

                  1970: Grateful Dead - Workingman's Dead - http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_ko_3E6rJJE0FxW4Yh5wCBdbk_PVENlY7k
                  1973: Grateful Dead - Wake of the Flood - http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_kIuk6NdmJ1FwrZPeMQX1yBgIYJjdn0Sus
                  1974: Grateful Dead - From the Mars Hotel - http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6ogdCG3tAWglxi6Zu8X_UBrGtmkhpixD
                  1975: Grateful Dead - Blues for Allah - http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_khc3g5i8poxKSR1IMY0epABITYMVgh_rg
                  1977: Grateful Dead - Terrapin Station - http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_l49FDHDzTfCbfdzRlEtLcx_P2Vfr_Xg2U
                  1978: Grateful Dead - Shakedown Street - http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8D5A65C8DF64ACC4
                  1987: Grateful Dead - In the Dark - http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_kfoiDCbuu9RUmVTOECLA8vLfPL2b_2dwo
                  1989: Grateful Dead - Built to Last - http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_kLeflWlXlBVuDbOrLq_r3ndD0WJfck7uU

Grateful Dead's 7 Official Live Albums

                  1969: Grateful Dead - Live/Dead - http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_lTLgsVtg_PpTAsUc28RW2V5YyWlUnXB88
                  1971: Grateful Dead - Skull and Roses - http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpSaCumrVbF7PZY7-FsiArURps71sw2Kk
                  1972: Grateful Dead - Europe '72 - http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_naWvlMi2BVzMkhtIdUf4E4I4gnIEsvVyU
                  1973: Grateful Dead - History of the Grateful Dead, Vol. 1 (Bear's Choice) - http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_ntsM2PXjOSNtj9TwwpV4KUx2uk3wuGL78
                  1981: Grateful Dead - Reckoning - http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_kDM7PVCoc6wBUZxK2apbTp3mjnVcH5LgA
                  1981: Grateful Dead - Dead Set - http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_kLRFe-dMoLwt32siAvch_wsNec2pIprbA
                  1990: Grateful Dead - Without a Net - http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_m3jodp9xMLVsTEuSCf9lkJyfBZbcKPXQU
                  

Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35732
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 08:31
Time is not unlimited for any of us unfortunately. Admins (in the way we use titles at PA) made it that they don't need to listen at all, but instead the process involved others knowing the material, seeking outside consensus, and then presenting the arguments to the admin. It helps when people are detailed but also streamlined and economical. The most relevant to a Prog site albums can be brought up, the most relevant music from albums, and then the most relevant info suggested (related acts, influence, similar cases etc.). Simple works best. Like they might teach in Arguments 101 (and not in the Argument sketch), a good argument is where the premises that support the conclusion are relevant, sufficient and acceptable. While it has been an expectation that a Special Collab brings a case to Admin, everybody who wants to can have part to play in the process by offering arguments for or against, providing relevant info and material....

In this particular rejected case, I would call it Dead in the water, which might make some grateful. I figure one an celebrate, discuss and enjoy a band whether it's added to PA or now. Adding band does nor make it any more Prog or better or worthy of appreciation from a global perspective.

Ahh, late preparing breakfast for my son, bad dad. he loves to compose music on the piano, by the way. He takes after my dad.
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17487
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 08:11
Originally posted by Cristi Cristi wrote:

...
What was the point of your post here? Just more jibber-jabber. You haven't even shown if you'd be for or against the inclusion of the band. 

"Another nobody to PA's listing? " What's that supposed to mean? Rather rude i dare say. So a new band or a lesser known band/artist is a "nobody"? 
...

Hi,

You know well that I would be FOR having the GD added to PA. 

However, as sad as it might be, it won't happen, and a lot of music, and a bunch of folks that helped a lot of European bands EXPAND their music for a long time, in the end, it is kinda sad ... and if/when you listen to Doug Hevering (Daily Doug) do the GD, you will find that he mentions a lot of musical details that make the whole thing sound even better, instead of just a ... look ma I'm playing progressive music! ... the artistry and musicianship required to create a lot of the thing we see on the GD shows, is incredible, and sadly, something that often is not appreciated, I don't think ... and perhaps, the main reason is that unlike a lot of these bands on PA and the top listings this year, or last year, is that there really are no "songs" that are styled for the 5 minute radio thing, that PA, somehow, still caters to, although what started as "art rock" and became "progressive rock" was not a radio styled song, but what was sometimes called "anti-song" with the very top bands that we list as some of the most important folks to create something that was NOT COMMERCIAL and oriented to 5 minutes.

I'm not an admin, and at my age, I wouldn't wish to be involved (too old and love the quiet and no hassle!!!), besides the fact that many of you folks, sometimes, think I'm posting negatively, when my hope is to make the new music show up, and help take away a lot of the stuff that is really sad and not fitting to the HISTORY of the style ... something that ... I would imagine that the voters adding bands today, don't care for the history of the whole thing, and are simply adding stuff by the numbers ... sort of like ... it has 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 ... therefore it fits and gets added. But, somehow, I wonder if those folks see that those same 6 things can also be found on GD, although spread out a lot more into 20 minutes, instead of a quickie ... so to speak ... no examples or realities needed.

SIDE NOTE: There is no way that all Admins, or anyone, can listen to 25 pieces that are at least 20 minutes long every day ... the process would suffer ... so I suppose that we have to make room for the smaller stuff ... but how do we deal with one of the biggest and most important of elements from that time and place?

I suppose a lot of new bands are "nobody" and I did not exactly mean that literally as it would not be fair to their work or ability ... so I need to fix that ... but it is something that comes from my high level academic family, that loved to say things like that, and in my stuff, on occasion, it slips through ... it's not meant to ... but the point many of those professors make is ... that some of that stuff does not stand up well to the "definition" and "standard" that was created, that gave us those terms and specified a time and a place, in general.

I don't, in general, dislike any music ... and will not post a totally negative review, for example, although I tend to come from the Spike Milligan/Monty Python school of satire and commentary ... something that a lot of folks on PA seem to not enjoy ... I'm probably the #1 Goon fan here, and the #4 (or #5) Monty Python "fan" and a lot of their satire goes thru really well ... not to mention that Terry Gilliam and I share the same birthday (Nov 22) ... although he is the man who made and killed Don Quixote ... and I would not want to be! He is don Quixote in that his dream film is still not made and likely will be way too weird for you and I and most of us! And worse ... it would not be 5 minutes!  Wink  Confused  Shocked


Edited by moshkito - Yesterday at 08:21
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Starshiper View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 08 2024
Location: Englantic
Status: Offline
Points: 407
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Starshiper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 20 2024 at 14:36
Originally posted by Captain Midnight Captain Midnight wrote:

The Grateful Dead deserve a spot under prog related imo,
The Grateful Dead were not a prog-related band. Only Progarchives' psychedelic rock section could be a suitable place for the Dead if they merit inclusion.
Back to Top
Psychedelic Paul View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 16 2019
Location: Nottingham, U.K
Status: Offline
Points: 39906
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Psychedelic Paul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 20 2024 at 10:10
I'd love to see Grateful Dead added to PA and with 13 studio albums and 9 official live albums (according to Wikipedia), maybe one doesn't need to enter The Twilight Zone to catalogue all of their albums after all. Smile


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.117 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.