Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Abortion
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Abortion

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
darksinger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 1091
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote darksinger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Abortion
    Posted: May 08 2022 at 20:50
>>I must I'm always amazed that Jen (who is such a "rebel") would choose to back options that would limit her own freedom (or at least other's freedom, if she doesn't want to exert that freedom)Wink<<

translation: "Jen does not think in accordance of what she should as per our federal masters and is therefore less than a woman. We also will call her insane because she dares to be a woman who expresses freedom of thought instead of marching lockstep with the rest of us"
Back to Top
darksinger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 1091
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote darksinger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 08 2022 at 20:44
Originally posted by Mirakaze Mirakaze wrote:

Originally posted by darksinger darksinger wrote:

The Founders felt abortion was a tool of tyranny.


I wonder if they felt that owning slaves was tyrannical.

actually, quite a few of them did. 
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote rogerthat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 08 2022 at 20:41
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

 Sean, we do a horrible job of taking care of the poor. Perhaps if you expended as much energy on finding out why as you do on multi coloring your posts, you would have come up with a better post than this. As I stated a previous post you couldn't follow, Democrats get the Supreme Court justices they deserve due to their failure to vote for their parties' candidates, instead of the flavor of the month, or by not voting at all. I have no sympathy for many of my fellow Dems. They got what they deserve.

Yeah, albeit Ginsburg must share the blame for not retiring when Obama asked her to (and Obama tapped two male judges to retire and replaced them with female judges and yet 'the lady' didn't trust him or something).  But really, if people who are pro-choice also had the same awareness of the President and Senate's role in appointing SC judges, this wouldn't have happened.  If the right to abortion is that important, why wouldn't you vote straight Democrat in every general election as well as every mid term?  Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20617
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote SteveG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 08 2022 at 16:48
Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by darksinger darksinger wrote:

Nobody is taking away the precious "right" to kill unborn children. It is not even being "snatched" from people-the leak was one opinion from one justice and was leaked because the Democrats need a stalwart position to offset the fact this current administration is a mess.
the Democrats need a stalwart position to offset the fact that Republicans are psychotic ... and they got a very good one.




here is the composition of the US Supreme court and who nominated them:
Italics : women
Pro-Choice bold
underlined anti-pro-choice
Blue Dems
Red Reps

C Thomas (73yo) - Bush Sr - rabid anti - will most likely not retire until a Rep prez in place again
Bryer (couldn't find his age) - Clinton (planning to retire in June - Biden expected to nominate Brown-Jackson)[COLOR=#FF0000][/COLOR]
Roberts (67yo) - Dubya (pivot member - could go either way - was pro-Obamacare)
Alito (72) - Dubya (says it's not the role of US SC to judge this matter - enforce it, but not make it evolve)
Sotomayor (67yo)  - Obama
Kagan (62yo) - Obama
[COLOR=#FF0000][/COLOR][COLOR=#FF0000][/COLOR]
Barrett (50yo) - Trump (ultra-catholic woman)
Gorsuch (54yo) - Trump's (pro-discrimination)
Kavanaugh (57yo)  (accused of sex assault in the 80's - charges dropped)  - Trump[COLOR=#FF0000][/COLOR][COLOR=#FF0000][/COLOR]

[COLOR=#3300FF]Oddly enough, it's the two Dubya nominations that could tip it towards Choice

Steve: about the most-likely women to suffer from this ban, it's obvious that poor women will not be able to take "holidays" abroad to have it performed. To avoid getting spotted in clinics (and getting "publicity" from antis), more financially-affluent women take "holidays" abroad.  See Sarah Waddington's indignation in front of Congress of a few days ago.

.
Sean, we do a horrible job of taking care of the poor. Perhaps if you expended as much energy on finding out why as you do on multi coloring your posts, you would have come up with a better post than this. As I stated in a previous post you couldn't follow, Democrats get the Supreme Court justices they deserve due to their failure to vote for their parties' candidates, instead of the flavor of the month, or by not voting at all. I have no sympathy for many of my fellow Dems. They got what they deserve.

Edited by SteveG - May 09 2022 at 04:02
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65613
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 08 2022 at 15:45
Originally posted by darksinger darksinger wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by darksinger darksinger wrote:

Nobody is taking away the precious "right" to kill unborn children. It is not even being "snatched" from people-the leak was one opinion from one justice and was leaked because the Democrats need a stalwart position to offset the fact this current administration is a mess.
the Democrats need a stalwart position to offset the fact that Republicans are psychotic ... and they got a very good one.
The Founders felt abortion was a tool of tyranny. I am of the same mindset


Funny how it's now the other way 'round.


"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
The Dark Elf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13229
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (2) Thanks(2)   Quote The Dark Elf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 08 2022 at 08:29
Originally posted by darksinger darksinger wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by darksinger darksinger wrote:

Nobody is taking away the precious "right" to kill unborn children. It is not even being "snatched" from people-the leak was one opinion from one justice and was leaked because the Democrats need a stalwart position to offset the fact this current administration is a mess.
the Democrats need a stalwart position to offset the fact that Republicans are psychotic ... and they got a very good one.



The Founders felt abortion was a tool of tyranny. I am of the same mindset.
Please stop. The Constitution as a document is pliable and not set in stone; hence, the many necessary amendments added afterwards -- because for all its greatness and its potential, it is also a tragically flawed document. 

The fact that it can be altered as time goes on is one of the brilliant facets of the document. Because the Founders, for whatever their adherence to French Enlightenment ideals, were typical white, wealthy 18th century men. Evidently, they didn't consider it tyrannical to limit the rights of the Constitution to white males and thus eliminating women from the right to vote, and considering black slaves to be subhuman (enshrined in the 3/5ths of a person clause). 

Let's also not forget the Founders thought nothing of Native American genocide and the theft of their land.

So spare me the 250 year old view of what constitutes "tyranny". There is any number of racist, misogynistic, religious and imperialist views that the Founders had that modern society would find appalling. Unless, of course, you identify as an 18th century person. Love the powdered wig.


Edited by The Dark Elf - May 08 2022 at 16:52
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Back to Top
Grumpyprogfan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 09 2019
Location: Kansas City
Status: Offline
Points: 12400
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Grumpyprogfan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 08 2022 at 06:26
Originally posted by Mirakaze Mirakaze wrote:

Originally posted by darksinger darksinger wrote:

The Founders felt abortion was a tool of tyranny.


I wonder if they felt that owning slaves was tyrannical.
The Founders also butchered Native American Indians.
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20414
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sean Trane Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 08 2022 at 03:35
I must I'm always amazed that Jen (who is such a "rebel") would choose to back options that would limit her own freedom (or at least other's freedom, if she doesn't want to exert that freedom)Wink


Originally posted by Mirakaze Mirakaze wrote:

Originally posted by darksinger darksinger wrote:

The Founders felt abortion was a tool of tyranny.


I wonder if they felt that owning slaves was tyrannical.


Yup, it seems that the founders were not exactly "nice" or thoughtful, but they were certainly self-righteous. The people coming off the Mayflower were religious extremists - albeit fleeing other extremists.

AFAIAC, the first modern "tyrany" would be stopping someone from disposing of himself/herself.
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Mirakaze View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Eclectic, JRF/Canterbury, Avant/Zeuhl

Joined: December 17 2019
Location: (redacted)
Status: Offline
Points: 4234
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mirakaze Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 08 2022 at 03:06
Originally posted by darksinger darksinger wrote:

The Founders felt abortion was a tool of tyranny.


I wonder if they felt that owning slaves was tyrannical.
Back to Top
darksinger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 1091
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote darksinger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 07 2022 at 23:13
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by darksinger darksinger wrote:

Nobody is taking away the precious "right" to kill unborn children. It is not even being "snatched" from people-the leak was one opinion from one justice and was leaked because the Democrats need a stalwart position to offset the fact this current administration is a mess.
the Democrats need a stalwart position to offset the fact that Republicans are psychotic ... and they got a very good one.



The Founders felt abortion was a tool of tyranny. I am of the same mindset.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65613
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 07 2022 at 19:41
^ I suspect that's all too true.  We all do what we have to.

"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Hewitt View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: December 12 2021
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 67
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (3) Thanks(3)   Quote Hewitt Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 07 2022 at 19:38
In the real world there is no choice between abortion and no abortion. The only choice we can make is between safe legal abortion or unsafe illegal abortion. It’s a no-brainer.
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20414
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sean Trane Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 07 2022 at 02:09
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by darksinger darksinger wrote:

Nobody is taking away the precious "right" to kill unborn children. It is not even being "snatched" from people-the leak was one opinion from one justice and was leaked because the Democrats need a stalwart position to offset the fact this current administration is a mess.
the Democrats need a stalwart position to offset the fact that Republicans are psychotic ... and they got a very good one.



here is the composition of the US Supreme court and who nominated them:
Italics : women
Pro-Choice bold
underlined anti-pro-choice
Blue Dems
Red Reps

C Thomas (73yo) - Bush Sr - rabid anti - will most likely not retire until a Rep prez in place again
Bryer (couldn't find his age) - Clinton (planning to retire in June - Biden expected to nominate Brown-Jackson)
Roberts (67yo) - Dubya (pivot member - could go either way - was pro-Obamacare)
Alito (72) - Dubya (says it's not the role of US SC to judge this matter - enforce it, but not make it evolve)
Sotomayor (67yo)  - Obama
Kagan (62yo) - Obama
Barrett (50yo) - Trump (ultra-catholic woman)
Gorsuch (54yo) - Trump's (pro-discrimination)
Kavanaugh (57yo)  (accused of sex assault in the 80's - charges dropped)  - Trump

Oddly enough, it's the two Dubya nominations that could tip it towards Choice

Steve: about the most-likely women to suffer from this ban, it's obvious that poor women will not be able to take "holidays" abroad to have it performed. To avoid getting spotted in clinics (and getting "publicity" from antis), more financially-affluent women take "holidays" abroad.  See Sarah Waddington's indignation in front of Congress of a few days ago.

.
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
ExittheLemming View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11420
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ExittheLemming Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 07 2022 at 01:19
We're on page four without even a single Admin intervention. I'm not a Tibetan man but didn't wager we would reach this far. This thread's longevity is itself a fantastic argument for Pro Life.Approve
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65613
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2022 at 22:55
Originally posted by darksinger darksinger wrote:

Nobody is taking away the precious "right" to kill unborn children. It is not even being "snatched" from people-the leak was one opinion from one justice and was leaked because the Democrats need a stalwart position to offset the fact this current administration is a mess.
the Democrats need a stalwart position to offset the fact that Republicans are psychotic ... and they got a very good one.




Edited by Atavachron - May 06 2022 at 22:55
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
The Dark Elf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13229
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote The Dark Elf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2022 at 22:02
Originally posted by darksinger darksinger wrote:

Nobody is taking away the precious "right" to kill unborn children. It is not even being "snatched" from people-the leak was one opinion from one justice and was leaked because the Democrats need a stalwart position to offset the fact this current administration is a mess. 

Wrong. It is not "one opinion from one justice"....

Writing for the five-justice majority, Justice Samuel Alito offers two reasons for this conclusion: The Constitution does not explicitly protect the right to abortion, and the right to obtain an abortion is neither “deeply rooted in [our] history and tradition” nor “essential to our Nation’s ‘scheme of ordered liberty.’”   


Welcome to the land of disinformation. You have been owned by Fox News. Alito's warped reasoning makes my skin crawl. What other "Rights" that we took for granted as being protected under the Constitution will no longer apply because Alito is an 18th century renaissance man? A women's right to vote? Hey, that's a 20th century innovation. Are we going to bring back slavery because Jefferson was knocking up the servants? And to top it off, three of the Justices who are part of that opinion -- Trump's chumps -- lied under oath about Roe v. Wade during their confirmation hearings. 


Edited by The Dark Elf - May 06 2022 at 22:05
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65613
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2022 at 20:00
^ I think I have that on a t-shirt -
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
ExittheLemming View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11420
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ExittheLemming Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2022 at 18:42
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

I'm surprised this has lasted three pages without being blocked.

I said I'd start a fistfight if things got bad and I meant it.   I still will, with pleasure.



Can't help but be reminded of that quote of unknown origin:

'the beatings will continue until morale improves'
Back to Top
darksinger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 1091
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote darksinger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 05 2022 at 21:39
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Maybe the most significant political issue in the U.S. for the past forty years, it's possible the Supreme Court may return the rights around controlling abortion to the individual States and prevent the Federal government from protecting women nationally, according to a leaked document.

As appalling as this is, will this give the Democrats a much-needed boost this year and in 2024 ?   Or will this provide political capital for Republicans ?  

Most importantly, how do you feel about an adult woman's right to decide what to do with her body ?




Nobody is taking away the precious "right" to kill unborn children. It is not even being "snatched" from people-the leak was one opinion from one justice and was leaked because the Democrats need a stalwart position to offset the fact this current administration is a mess. 

As far as my opinion on a "right for a woman to decide what to do with her body", my grandmother almost aborted my dad. I love my grandmother dearly. She was a great mom to my dad despite this and she was a wonderful, giving person. They had abortion back then. It was a poisonous pill of some sort. But had she gone through with it, she would have made a decision for so far five other people's bodies. So, I do not view abortion as "my body, my choice". I view it as "other people's bodies, my choice", because five of us did not have a say in the matter.

With that said, I am not entirely against abortion because I do not feel a rape victim should be forced to carry her attacker's child or if a child is going to be born with defects that will only cause the child to live briefly and in pain, the parents should have a right to not let the child suffer. I do not hate women who get abortions because I feel they felt that was their only viable option and they had a hard decision to make. What I do hate is the marketing of abortion as if it is a soft drink with "cute" slogans such as "shout your abortion" and pretty spokespeople presenting some deluded nonsense-abortion is a serious decision! Often the women who get one are affected psychologically by it. It is not a style or an image. I also hate the politicizing of this leak over it-a person chose to violate the policies and procedures of the SCOTUS to leak a single draft of a single opinion from a single justice as a way to intimidate the SCOTUS to not do its duty of interpreting the Constitution. 


Edited by darksinger - May 05 2022 at 21:40
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65613
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 05 2022 at 18:20
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

I'm surprised this has lasted three pages without being blocked.

I said I'd start a fistfight if things got bad and I meant it.   I still will, with pleasure.

"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.461 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.