![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234> |
Author | ||
steve j ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September 30 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 164 |
![]() |
|
I am new around here, and I cannot believe the slating Dream Theater get. I would say, if you cannot say anything positive then move onto the next forum.
Dream Theater's AVFAM is as good an album in the top 50 albums as any other. Yes it has some metallic bits, but the whole album is a true prog album with a balance between the heavy and the light and flows between tracks quite beautifully. Absolutely classic. As for YES and ELP, both have done their apprenticeships and are now masters of their trade. Dream Theater are not quite there yet, but I am sure in the fullness of time will get there. A few more classic albums and they will be. DT are classically trained musicians and it shows.
I personally do not like SC but that's because of the subject matter only. I am still going to see them on tour next month.
|
||
![]() |
||
puma ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: April 15 2007 Location: Boston, MA Status: Offline Points: 484 |
![]() |
|
Well, see, this is one thing that thick-headed DT fans* don't understand when comparing these bands.
Yes and ELP have this thing. I don't know the word for it, but it's when there's a loud song that gets quiet again. And another thing where every song sounds different...Hmm, man, I forgot the name for that. And there's that thing where sometimes they don't play technically at all, with songs like Still...You Turn Me On, or Your Move...and that feature where songs have multiple things happening at once, but not like 2 solos at the same time, more like a musical idea conveying an emotion or reflecting the lyrics (as in "I Get Up, I Get Down"), oh, I know what it's called! Subtlety! Which DT sorely lacks. * - not all DT fans are thick-headed, just the thick-headed ones are |
||
![]() |
||
Lucent ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: September 18 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 259 |
![]() |
|
If this was sarcasm, I love you. Neo-prog is progressive music which has been refined to the point of near-perfection. My problem with 70s progressive is people overrate it, and underrate the new stuff. In reality, the 70s guys had more of a grip of what they were doing...but the new guys have more energy. Dream Theater is twice the band most of the 70s prog bands will ever be (need I give examples?) because of that energy. As well, people can't realize the truth: 70s prog is dying Everyone in these prog bands are hitting their near 60s in age, and are declining musically. Example: I was disappointed with the newer King Crimson works, Rush's new album will never touch 2112 or Moving Pictures, and Yes aren't going at their work much anymore. Don't get me started on how much I despise Phil Collins for what he did to Genesis. Let us embrace the new and move on from what was then. |
||
![]() |
||
heyitsthatguy ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: April 17 2006 Location: Washington Hgts Status: Offline Points: 10094 |
![]() |
|
I don't like Dream Theater because their noodling didn't happen in the 70's
|
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Blacksword ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: June 22 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 16130 |
![]() |
|
My problem with Dream Theater, is mainly the 'metal element' Same as Peters problem really.
In addition to this, I dont like modern digital production in rock music. It renders the music sterile. Bands like ELP and Yes were there first. There is a sincerity about their music and genuine sense of something happening for the first time. You dont get this with Dream Theater. I've sat through Octavarium, Images & Words and thought 'That bit sounds like..This bit sounds like' It's all been done before. Just with sterile production. They are good musicians and have ahuge appreciative audience who love them so fair play to them I say. I've dipped my toes and bought a few of their albums in the past, but they dont touch me, so I wont be buying anymore. That said, it's good to see a 'modern' prog band playing arenas in the UK. Edited by Blacksword - October 19 2007 at 11:13 |
||
![]() |
||
FruMp ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() Joined: September 16 2005 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 322 |
![]() |
|
Yes' music is actually good ![]() Also Dream Theater aren't a very technical metal band. |
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Lonely Progger ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: March 07 2007 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 100 |
![]() |
|
sorry i know that my topic isn't really clear.
I don't really like dream Theater so i'm not trying to really promote, i'm just really trying to see how much of the critiques of DT are objectif and how much of them are based on prejudice because the people who play the music have beards and wear black clothes, because this group who is a major prog one of the 90's 00's, has very poor ratings on this site, and a lot of the stuff they do is really amazing and they do do a lot to promote prog, it always makes me smile to see on pictures promoting their tours Portnoy in the back with a " In The Court Of The Crimson King" shirt showing clearly to the world that he is a progger and that they better watch out
![]() anyway the thing is I am more of a kind of Genesis,King Crimson,Neo Prog & P.T. fellow but i really enjoyed Liquid tension very progressive and has this jazzy side that really makes it flow, so i'm discovering these technical groups ( really dislike ELP so far), so that's why i'm asking these question's about DT & Yes.
|
||
Lost in the south of france:
" Le rock progressif ? C'est quoi cette connerie? " |
||
![]() |
||
Dim ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() Joined: April 17 2007 Location: Austin TX Status: Offline Points: 6890 |
![]() |
|
I can see why you would accuse ELP as overly excessive (but imo not as much as dream theater), but not Yes. Besides Ritual and the gates of Delirium, All the other Yessongs are very non self centered and are comprised of an entire bands work then five musicians soloing theyre asses off.
|
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Raff ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 29 2005 Location: None Status: Offline Points: 24429 |
![]() |
|
That should get a prize as quote of the year here at PA. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Visitor13 ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() VIP Member Joined: February 02 2005 Location: Poland Status: Offline Points: 4702 |
![]() |
|
Dear Lord, how I wish I could draw ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
cynthiasmallet ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: October 01 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 545 |
![]() |
|
Keith Emerson is a musical legend and Steve Howe had great stage presence and charisma. But John Petrucci stands up there like a constipated lemon and just randomly churns out near impossible guitar solos. Having said that, Mike Portnoy is a very intelligent drummer, and is probably the only one in the band that doesn't over play his part.
|
||
Would you like to watch TV, or get between the sheets, or contemplate the silent freeway, would you like something to eat?
|
||
![]() |
||
Kim? ![]() Forum Groupie ![]() Joined: August 09 2007 Location: Norway Status: Offline Points: 84 |
![]() |
|
I my opinion the whole sound of Dream Theater is so sterile and clean, compared to that of Yes and ELP, thus making it a bit un-emotional.
The focus on tech is of course present in all three bands, but in Dream Theater, it seems to be the main focus - to me anyway. |
||
![]() |
||
Easy Livin ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
![]() |
|
Re the original post, there is a strangeness to your logic when you promote a band you like, by deriding those you compare them with.
|
||
![]() |
||
salmacis ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Content Addition Joined: April 10 2005 Status: Offline Points: 3928 |
![]() |
|
I don't find Yes or ELP to be purveyors of mindless, endless noodling. ELP always get criticised for this but I don't agree; their compositions are generally excellent (from 1970-73) and the solos are always melodic, IMHO. Edward Macan has just written a book on ELP called 'Endless Enigma' which I've read in passing in a nearby book shop and it's superb; will have to get this one soon as it's possibly the best book I've ever read on prog. He addresses many of the criticisms thrown at the band as being very unfair and inaccurate, and I have to say, from what I read, there is hardly one thing in his assessment of their careers that I don't agree with.
Dream Theater, at their best, don't fall foul of this either. I felt the first disc of 6DOIT and half of 'Train Of Thought' were really the only particularly guilty offenders, to be honest. Some of their albums have bits which seem to be there to show us just how well they can play, but not as consistently as those two I mentioned, IMHO.
For the record, Emerson was interviewed recently about modern prog. He said the following- from this website... http://www.vintagerock.com/kemerson_interview.aspx
With ELP no longer an active and working band, do you listen to any of the new progressive rock bands out and about today? I’m a big fan of Jordan Rudess. I went to see Dream Theater at the Universal Amphitheater, and I thought they were bloody loud. Jordan, God bless him, got us some fantastic seats right in front. If I suffered from constipation when I went in, I definitely didn’t when I came out. It was phenomenally loud, but it was good. Very high energy. And I think the Universal Amphitheater allows them that spaciousness their music needs. I think Jordan has done a lot to promote keyboards in the way that he’s got this revolving keyboard set-up. I was very jealous of that. In order for progressive music to excel and have a new generation of listeners, I think the melodic, thematic development of which ever piece is used as the main vehicle has to be distinctive and memorable. It’s all well and good to be technical and fast all the time, but I think a lot of it after a while just washes over you. It’s the same with the new generation of jazz players. Some that you listen to are unbelievable technical geniuses. But that’s all it is — it's just technique. You come out of a gig and there’s nothing you can remember, there’s no distinctive hook. You say, “That was played very well, but for the life of me I have no idea how it goes. It was just very fast.” I think you’ll find on the new album which I’m doing, there are distinctive melodies you can actually sing. Apart from the fun that we have with different modulations and chord progressions, going through the whole background is a distinctive melody. I think people will always want melody above technique. It reminds me of my father’s advice in my formative years when I was playing the piano and writing. He would say, “You’ll never make any money playing music that people can’t sing.” And I’ve always kept that in mind. As much as I suppose things like “Tarkus” are not easy to sing, there’s always a moment, where you go, “Ah, this is the melody.” You’ve got to appeal to everybody in advancing progressive music. This is something I completely agree with. You need to know when to pull in the reins and think about structuring the song first, not the soloing. I've heard rather too much modern symph/retro prog which doesn't seem to grasp this.
Edited by salmacis - October 17 2007 at 09:04 |
||
![]() |
||
Peter ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: January 31 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 9669 |
![]() |
|
It's true that DT have become somewhat of a "whipping boy" for non-fans here, but my dislike of the band's music has less to do with anything that is unigue to DT, than it does with the speed, typical lyrical themes, vocal styles and aggressive sound of modern metal in general. This type of music appeals to a great many people, but it just does not appeal to me.
And yes, I know that DT belong to a metal sub-genre dubbed "prog metal" due to the incorporation of typical prog elements into the sonic mix (flashy keyboard frills, longer songs with multiple sections, etc), but for me, the metal part of the equation always dominates, and that's where I'm left cold.
I will say this though, in partial defense of the much-maligned Labrie: at least he doesn't "growl." That particular metal vocal affectation I really cannot stand.
Thus, for me it's a case of "to each his own." Metal (DT, other prog metal or otherwise) is simply not to my taste. I find the overall sound (not the occasional displays of "flash" or virtuosity) of Yes and ELP to be far removed from metal (as do most others, it seems -- thus their placement here in non-metal categories). I think you are erroneously comparing vastly different types of music. (If they weren't greatly different, I'd likely be a DT fan -- i know I honestly tried to get into them when I first encountered them here.)
![]() |
||
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy. |
||
![]() |
||
ghost_of_morphy ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: March 08 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2755 |
![]() |
|
I think it is unfair to accuse Yes of the excess of noodling prior to GFTO. Listening to TFTO or Relayer, it's quite clear that except for a couple specific places (White's drum solo in Ritual comes to mind) we are dealing with thoughtfully composed music instead of noodling.
|
||
![]() |
||
cuncuna ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: March 29 2005 Location: Chile Status: Offline Points: 4318 |
![]() |
|
Throw some Kansas in and we have a deal... no, wait!... I'll just have the Yes - Elp - Kansas combo, please.
|
||
¡Beware of the Bee!
|
||
![]() |
||
clarke2001 ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 14 2006 Location: Croatia Status: Offline Points: 4160 |
![]() |
|
How very, very true. ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Easy Money ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 11 2007 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 10679 |
![]() |
|
Dream Theatre is digital and computer mixed while early Yes and ELP are analogue, that is a big, big difference.
|
||
![]() |
||
White Shadow ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August 20 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 259 |
![]() |
|
My dislike of Dream Theater doesn't really have to do with their technicality. When it comes down to it, I guess it's just their sound. It's too heavy. I don't like metal. But, I do feel they are unnecessarily technical at times, just like I do about ELP. I wouldn't call it bad music. It just isn't what I'm into. I prefer the more subtle stylings of people like Tony Banks and Robert Fripp. Obviously, technicality is good and a HUGE part of prog (don't get me wrong I like it), but I think there is such a thing as overdose. My friends love Dream Theater so I hear it a lot. Many times I feel they start a good idea but it just gets ruined in complex solos and time changes. Songs lose focus and meaning. I like ELP a lot and I see what you're saying. Sometimes, they are overly technical, but again I don't think it's a much as Dream Theater and it has way more to do with their symphonic sound that I like them and dislike Dream Theater. Also, the singer does make a big difference. If it was Emerson, LaBrie and Palmer, I would probably not listen nearly as much. BTW, I do not find Yes to be over technical at all.
Edited by White Shadow - October 16 2007 at 20:02 |
||
[signature]
|
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |