Print Page | Close Window

Yes,ELP= Dream Theater ?

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Music Lounge
Forum Description: General progressive music discussions
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=42664
Printed Date: February 22 2025 at 01:29
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Yes,ELP= Dream Theater ?
Posted By: Lonely Progger
Subject: Yes,ELP= Dream Theater ?
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 16:01
 
I've noticed that a lot of people don't enjoy Dream Theater, constantly accusing them of technical masturbation, well in what does Yes' very technical music differ from Dream Theater ? ELP is also a very technical Symphonic group what makes it better than DT, is the Symphonic tag ? i find ELP dreadful overblown lyrics( a lot of poor comparisons and metaphors), and they are vey technical, but not that loved on ths site anyway.
Isn't there maybe a bit to much prejudice against DT just because they play prog metal, are from the 90's and have an awful singer ?
Well i'm telling you now i don't really like Yes or Dream Theater , so i don't really listen to either a lot. So i won't really know their obvious big differences. I find them both maybe a bit unfocused from time to time,playing without any emotional goal. So can people tell me in what Yes or ELP are better Than DT?
Because DT is obviously a group very much influenced by Yes, and according to wikipedia Emerson's favourite modern group is Dream Theater.
 
I know this a potentially dangerous topic sorry, with possible very conflicting point of views being expressed.
 
 
 


-------------
Lost in the south of france:
" Le rock progressif ? C'est quoi cette connerie? "



Replies:
Posted By: cursestar
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 16:12
I can kind of see your comparison with ELP - kind of - but as for Yes, I don't agree. Yes' music is technical, yes, but it's also some of the most beautiful (rock) music I've ever heard. I can't say the same about DT.


Posted By: beebs
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 16:24
 I feel that Yes and ELP at their height seemed to be about excesses ("noodling") in their music. Both turned more melodic later in their careers (Yes with "Going For the One" in 1977 and ELP the same year with the "disastrous" "Love Beach") and this alienated many of their followers. It's not a coincidence that progressive rock - which thrived from 1969 or so until about 1980 all but disappeared from the mass musical consciousness (sounds like I've been dipping into The Moody Blues too much, I know...) as New Wave and Punk emerged.
 
 As for Dream Theater, I enjoy some of their music, but in general they do at times smack of what turned me and many others away from progressive rock: the tendency to lean on excessive "noodling". This is the trap that bands like Camel, Gentle Giant, and a handful of others never fell into.


-------------
"Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of one's own mind" * Ralph Waldo Emerson


Posted By: explodingjosh
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 18:38
It seems to me (this is a very subjective comparison) that when Yes shows off their technical ability in a song, it seems like a forward-moving progression in the song and composition, and integral to the whole piece. When Dream Theater shows off, a lot of times it sounds like a tangent, just a technical aside to remind listeners that they are Dream Theater, and they like to show off a bit.

Originally posted by Lonely Progger Lonely Progger wrote:

according to wikipedia Emerson's favourite modern group is Dream Theater.


He needs to listen to more modern groups.Confused


-------------


Posted By: Shakespeare
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 18:48
When Yes is technical, they're still very musical. I personally (and this is strictly personally) find Dream Theater's more complex songs to be cold and mechanical. However, I am not really a huge Yes fan anyway...Magma blows 'em both outta the water. 


Posted By: ProgBagel
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 19:56
Originally posted by explodingjosh explodingjosh wrote:

It seems to me (this is a very subjective comparison) that when Yes
shows off their technical ability in a song, it seems like a
forward-moving progression in the song and composition, and integral to
the whole piece. When Dream Theater shows off, a lot of times it sounds
like a tangent, just a technical aside to remind listeners that they
are Dream Theater, and they like to show off a bit.
Originally posted by Lonely Progger Lonely Progger wrote:

according to wikipedia Emerson's favourite modern group is Dream Theater.
He needs to listen to more modern groups.Confused



According to wikipedia....not Emerson.


Posted By: White Shadow
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 20:00
My dislike of Dream Theater doesn't really have to do with their technicality.  When it comes down to it, I guess it's just their sound.  It's too heavy.  I don't like metal.  But, I do feel they are unnecessarily technical at times, just like I do about ELP.  I wouldn't call it bad music.  It just isn't what I'm into.  I prefer the more subtle stylings of people like Tony Banks and Robert Fripp.  Obviously, technicality is good and a HUGE part of prog (don't get me wrong I like it), but I think there is such a thing as overdose.  My friends love Dream Theater so I hear it a lot.  Many times I feel they start a good idea but it just gets ruined in complex solos and time changes.  Songs lose focus and meaning.  I like ELP a lot and I see what you're saying.  Sometimes, they are overly technical, but again I don't think  it's a much as Dream Theater and it has way more to do with their symphonic sound that I like them and dislike Dream Theater.  Also, the singer does make a big difference.  If it was Emerson, LaBrie and Palmer, I would probably not listen nearly as much.  BTW, I do not find Yes to be over technical at all.

-------------
[signature]


Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 20:06
Dream Theatre is digital and computer mixed while early Yes and ELP are analogue, that is a big, big difference.


Posted By: clarke2001
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 20:58
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

Dream Theatre is digital and computer mixed while early Yes and ELP are analogue, that is a big, big difference.


How very, very true.Cry


-------------
https://japanskipremijeri.bandcamp.com/album/perkusije-gospodine" rel="nofollow - Percussion, sir!


Posted By: cuncuna
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 21:00
Throw some Kansas in and we have a deal... no, wait!... I'll just have the Yes - Elp - Kansas combo, please.

-------------
¡Beware of the Bee!
   


Posted By: ghost_of_morphy
Date Posted: October 17 2007 at 02:06
Originally posted by beebs beebs wrote:

 I feel that Yes and ELP at their height seemed to be about excesses ("noodling") in their music. Both turned more melodic later in their careers (Yes with "Going For the One" in 1977 and ELP the same year with the "disastrous" "Love Beach") and this alienated many of their followers. It's not a coincidence that progressive rock - which thrived from 1969 or so until about 1980 all but disappeared from the mass musical consciousness (sounds like I've been dipping into The Moody Blues too much, I know...) as New Wave and Punk emerged.
 
 As for Dream Theater, I enjoy some of their music, but in general they do at times smack of what turned me and many others away from progressive rock: the tendency to lean on excessive "noodling". This is the trap that bands like Camel, Gentle Giant, and a handful of others never fell into.
 
I think it is unfair to accuse Yes of the excess of noodling prior to GFTO.  Listening to TFTO or Relayer, it's quite clear that except for a couple specific places (White's drum solo in Ritual comes to mind) we are dealing with thoughtfully composed music instead of noodling.


Posted By: Peter
Date Posted: October 17 2007 at 08:30
It's true that DT have become somewhat of a "whipping boy" for non-fans here, but my dislike of the band's music has less to do with anything that is unigue to DT, than it does with the speed, typical lyrical themes, vocal styles and aggressive sound of modern metal in general. This type of music appeals to a great many people, but it just does not appeal to me.
 
And yes, I know that DT belong to a metal sub-genre dubbed "prog metal" due to the incorporation of typical prog elements into the sonic mix (flashy keyboard frills, longer songs with multiple sections, etc), but for me, the metal part of the equation always dominates, and that's where I'm left cold.
 
I will say this though, in partial defense of the much-maligned Labrie: at least he doesn't "growl." That particular metal vocal affectation I really cannot stand.
 
Thus, for me it's a case of "to each his own." Metal (DT, other prog metal or otherwise)  is simply not to my taste. I find the overall sound (not the occasional displays of "flash" or virtuosity) of Yes and ELP to be far removed from metal (as do most others, it seems -- thus their placement here in non-metal categories). I think you are erroneously comparing vastly different types of music. (If they weren't greatly different, I'd likely be a DT fan -- i know I honestly tried to get into them when I first encountered them here.)
 
Ying%20Yang


-------------
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.


Posted By: salmacis
Date Posted: October 17 2007 at 09:01
I don't find Yes or ELP to be purveyors of mindless, endless noodling. ELP always get criticised for this but I don't agree; their compositions are generally excellent (from 1970-73) and the solos are always melodic, IMHO. Edward Macan has just written a book on ELP called 'Endless Enigma' which I've read in passing in a nearby book shop and it's superb; will have to get this one soon as it's possibly the best book I've ever read on prog. He addresses many of the criticisms thrown at the band as being very unfair and inaccurate, and I have to say, from what I read, there is hardly one thing in his assessment of their careers that I don't agree with.
 
Dream Theater, at their best, don't fall foul of this either. I felt the first disc of 6DOIT and half of 'Train Of Thought' were really the only particularly guilty offenders, to be honest. Some of their albums have bits which seem to be there to show us just how well they can play, but not as consistently as those two I mentioned, IMHO.
 
For the record, Emerson was interviewed recently about modern prog. He said the following- from this website... http://www.vintagerock.com/kemerson_interview.aspx - http://www.vintagerock.com/kemerson_interview.aspx

With ELP no longer an active and working band, do you listen to any of the new progressive rock bands out and about today?

I’m a big fan of Jordan Rudess. I went to see Dream Theater at the Universal Amphitheater, and I thought they were bloody loud. Jordan, God bless him, got us some fantastic seats right in front. If I suffered from constipation when I went in, I definitely didn’t when I came out. It was phenomenally loud, but it was good. Very high energy. And I think the Universal Amphitheater allows them that spaciousness their music needs. I think Jordan has done a lot to promote keyboards in the way that he’s got this revolving keyboard set-up. I was very jealous of that.

In order for progressive music to excel and have a new generation of listeners, I think the melodic, thematic development of which ever piece is used as the main vehicle has to be distinctive and memorable. It’s all well and good to be technical and fast all the time, but I think a lot of it after a while just washes over you. It’s the same with the new generation of jazz players. Some that you listen to are unbelievable technical geniuses. But that’s all it is — it's just technique. You come out of a gig and there’s nothing you can remember, there’s no distinctive hook. You say, “That was played very well, but for the life of me I have no idea how it goes. It was just very fast.”

I think you’ll find on the new album which I’m doing, there are distinctive melodies you can actually sing. Apart from the fun that we have with different modulations and chord progressions, going through the whole background is a distinctive melody. I think people will always want melody above technique. It reminds me of my father’s advice in my formative years when I was playing the piano and writing. He would say, “You’ll never make any money playing music that people can’t sing.” And I’ve always kept that in mind. As much as I suppose things like “Tarkus” are not easy to sing, there’s always a moment, where you go, “Ah, this is the melody.” You’ve got to appeal to everybody in advancing progressive music.

 
This is something I completely agree with. You need to know when to pull in the reins and think about structuring the song first, not the soloing. I've heard rather too much modern symph/retro prog which doesn't seem to grasp this.
 


Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: October 17 2007 at 10:21
Re the original post, there is a strangeness to your logic when you promote a band you like, by deriding those you compare them with.


Posted By: Kim?
Date Posted: October 17 2007 at 11:35
I my opinion the whole sound of Dream Theater is so sterile and clean, compared to that of Yes and ELP, thus making it a bit un-emotional.

The focus on tech is of course present in all three bands, but in Dream Theater, it seems to be the main focus - to me anyway.



Posted By: cynthiasmallet
Date Posted: October 17 2007 at 13:58
Keith Emerson is a musical legend and Steve Howe had great stage presence and charisma. But John Petrucci stands up there like a constipated lemon and just randomly churns out near impossible guitar solos. Having said that, Mike Portnoy is a very intelligent drummer, and is probably the only one in the band that doesn't over play his part.

-------------
Would you like to watch TV, or get between the sheets, or contemplate the silent freeway, would you like something to eat?


Posted By: Visitor13
Date Posted: October 17 2007 at 14:09
Originally posted by cynthiasmallet cynthiasmallet wrote:

stands up there like a constipated lemon and just randomly churns out near impossible guitar solos.


Dear Lord, how I wish I could draw


Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: October 17 2007 at 14:24
Originally posted by Visitor13 Visitor13 wrote:

Originally posted by cynthiasmallet cynthiasmallet wrote:

stands up there like a constipated lemon and just randomly churns out near impossible guitar solos.


Dear Lord, how I wish I could draw


That should get a prize as quote of the year here at PA.Clap It's a pity I'm not going to see DT next week in Rome (I chose to see Rush in MilanWink...), because the mental picture of Petrucci looking like a constipated lemon would've had me laugh for the whole of their concert!LOL


Posted By: Dim
Date Posted: October 17 2007 at 17:56
I can see why you would accuse ELP as overly excessive (but imo not as much as dream theater), but not Yes. Besides Ritual and the gates of Delirium, All the other Yessongs are very non self centered and are comprised of an entire bands work then five musicians soloing theyre asses off.

-------------


Posted By: Lonely Progger
Date Posted: October 18 2007 at 12:28
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

Re the original post, there is a strangeness to your logic when you promote a band you like, by deriding those you compare them with.
 
sorry i know that my topic isn't really clear.
I don't really like dream Theater so i'm not trying to really promote, i'm just really trying to see how much of the critiques of DT are objectif and how much of them are based on prejudice because the people who play the music have beards and wear black clothes, because this group who is a major prog one of the 90's 00's, has very poor ratings on this site, and a lot of the stuff they do is really amazing and they do do a lot to promote prog, it always makes me smile to see on pictures promoting their tours Portnoy in the back with a " In The Court Of The Crimson King" shirt showing clearly to the world that he is a progger and that they better watch out LOL.
 
anyway the thing is I am more of a kind of Genesis,King Crimson,Neo Prog & P.T. fellow but i really enjoyed Liquid tension very progressive and has this jazzy side that really makes it flow, so i'm discovering these technical groups ( really dislike ELP so far), so that's why i'm asking these question's about DT & Yes.


-------------
Lost in the south of france:
" Le rock progressif ? C'est quoi cette connerie? "


Posted By: FruMp
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 07:09
Originally posted by Lonely Progger Lonely Progger wrote:

 
I've noticed that a lot of people don't enjoy Dream Theater, constantly accusing them of technical masturbation, well in what does Yes' very technical music differ from Dream Theater ?
 
 


Yes' music is actually good LOL

Also Dream Theater aren't a very technical metal band.


-------------


Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 11:06
My problem with Dream Theater, is mainly the 'metal element' Same as Peters problem really.

In addition to this, I dont like modern digital production in rock music. It renders the music sterile. Bands like ELP and Yes were there first. There is a sincerity about their music and genuine sense of something happening for the first time. You dont get this with Dream Theater. I've sat through Octavarium, Images & Words and thought 'That bit sounds like..This bit sounds like' It's all been done before. Just with sterile production.

They are good musicians and have ahuge appreciative audience who love them so fair play to them I say. I've dipped my toes and bought a few of their albums in the past, but they dont touch me, so I wont be buying anymore. That said, it's good to see a 'modern' prog band playing arenas in the UK.


Posted By: heyitsthatguy
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 11:41
I don't like Dream Theater because their noodling didn't happen in the 70's

-------------




Posted By: Lucent
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 12:24
Originally posted by heyitsthatguy heyitsthatguy wrote:

I don't like Dream Theater because their noodling didn't happen in the 70's



If this was sarcasm, I love you.




Neo-prog is progressive music which has been refined to the point of near-perfection.  My problem with 70s progressive is people overrate it, and underrate the new stuff.  In reality, the 70s guys had more of a grip of what they were doing...but the new guys have more energy.  Dream Theater is twice the band most of the 70s prog bands will ever be (need I give examples?) because of that energy.  As well, people can't realize the truth:

70s prog is dying

Everyone in these prog bands are hitting their near 60s in age, and are declining musically.  Example: I was disappointed with the newer King Crimson works, Rush's new album will never touch 2112 or Moving Pictures, and Yes aren't going at their work much anymore.  Don't get me started on how much I despise Phil Collins for what he did to Genesis.

Let us embrace the new and move on from what was then.


Posted By: puma
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 13:21
Well, see, this is one thing that thick-headed DT fans* don't understand when comparing these bands.

Yes and ELP have this thing. I don't know the word for it, but it's when there's a loud song that gets quiet again. And another thing where every song sounds different...Hmm, man, I forgot the name for that.

And there's that thing where sometimes they don't play technically at all, with songs like Still...You Turn Me On, or Your Move...and that feature where songs have multiple things happening at once, but not like 2 solos at the same time, more like a musical idea conveying an emotion or reflecting the lyrics (as in "I Get Up, I Get Down"), oh, I know what it's called! Subtlety! Which DT sorely lacks.


* - not all DT fans are thick-headed, just the thick-headed ones are


Posted By: steve j
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 15:05
I am new around here, and I cannot believe the slating Dream Theater get.  I would say, if you cannot say anything positive then move onto the next forum.
 
Dream Theater's AVFAM is as good an album in the top 50 albums as any other.  Yes it has some metallic bits, but the whole album is a true prog album with a balance between the heavy and the light and flows between tracks quite beautifully.  Absolutely classic.  As for YES and ELP, both have done their apprenticeships and are now masters of their trade.  Dream Theater are not quite there yet, but I am sure in the fullness of time will get there.  A few more classic albums and they will be.  DT are classically trained musicians and it shows. 
 
I personally do not like SC but that's because of the subject matter only.  I am still going to see them on tour next month.


Posted By: Lucent
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 15:25
Originally posted by steve j steve j wrote:

I am new around here, and I cannot believe the slating Dream Theater get.  I would say, if you cannot say anything positive then move onto the next forum.


Get used to it, man.  Everyone on this forum (probably exception me) is so right winged, it's disgusting.  Thank you for being open minded :3


Posted By: darkmatter
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 15:32
I like Dream Theater too, but don't go around calling people here closed minded.  People have different tastes, that's all.


Posted By: puma
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 15:34
Whew, Lucent, good thing you're here, always saving the day like you always do. Come on, man, get over yourself, are you 14?

And how does "right winged" relate to liking Dream Theater?


Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 15:36
Originally posted by Lucent Lucent wrote:




Originally posted by steve j steve j wrote:

I am new around here, and I cannot believe the slating Dream Theater get.  I would say, if you cannot say anything positive then move onto the next forum.
Get used to it, man.  Everyone on this forum (probably exception me) is so right winged, it's disgusting.  Thank you for being open minded :3


Everyone? Right winged??


Posted By: darkmatter
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 15:37
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Originally posted by Lucent Lucent wrote:




Originally posted by steve j steve j wrote:

I am new around here, and I cannot believe the slating Dream Theater get.  I would say, if you cannot say anything positive then move onto the next forum.
Get used to it, man.  Everyone on this forum (probably exception me) is so right winged, it's disgusting.  Thank you for being open minded :3


Everyone? Right winged??


I don't understand this remark either....


Posted By: Lucent
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 15:39
Originally posted by puma puma wrote:

Whew, Lucent, good thing you're here, always saving the day like you always do. Come on, man, get over yourself, are you 14?

And how does "right winged" relate to liking Dream Theater?


Right winged in the sense of which there's such a high detestment towards a certain type of prog over another.  It's close minded, thus right winged.


Originally posted by darkmatter darkmatter wrote:

Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Originally posted by Lucent Lucent wrote:




Originally posted by steve j steve j wrote:

I am new around here, and I cannot believe the slating Dream Theater get.  I would say, if you cannot say anything positive then move onto the next forum.
Get used to it, man.  Everyone on this forum (probably exception me) is so right winged, it's disgusting.  Thank you for being open minded :3


Everyone? Right winged??


I don't understand this remark either....


Explained above.


I love how I come in and defend something, and everyone gets their panties in a knot.


Posted By: rileydog22
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 15:41
Originally posted by Lucent Lucent wrote:

Originally posted by puma puma wrote:

Whew, Lucent, good thing you're here, always saving the day like you always do. Come on, man, get over yourself, are you 14?

And how does "right winged" relate to liking Dream Theater?


Right winged in the sense of which there's such a high detestment towards a certain type of prog over another.  It's close minded, thus right winged.


Wow, that's deep. 


-------------



Posted By: darkmatter
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 15:45
Originally posted by Lucent Lucent wrote:

Originally posted by puma puma wrote:

Whew, Lucent, good thing you're here, always saving the day like you always do. Come on, man, get over yourself, are you 14?

And how does "right winged" relate to liking Dream Theater?


Right winged in the sense of which there's such a high detestment towards a certain type of prog over another.  It's close minded, thus right winged.


Originally posted by darkmatter darkmatter wrote:

Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Originally posted by Lucent Lucent wrote:




Originally posted by steve j steve j wrote:

I am new around here, and I cannot believe the slating Dream Theater get.  I would say, if you cannot say anything positive then move onto the next forum.
Get used to it, man.  Everyone on this forum (probably exception me) is so right winged, it's disgusting.  Thank you for being open minded :3


Everyone? Right winged??


I don't understand this remark either....


Explained above.


I love how I come in and defend something, and everyone gets their panties in a knot.


I don't have a problem with you defending someone, but you're taking shots at people here by calling them closed minded, which is untrue.


Posted By: Lucent
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 15:48
Originally posted by darkmatter darkmatter wrote:

I don't have a problem with you defending someone, but you're taking shots at people here by calling them closed minded, which is untrue.


You have a point.

Sorry :3


Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 16:02
Originally posted by Lucent Lucent wrote:

Originally posted by puma puma wrote:

Whew, Lucent, good thing you're here, always saving the day
like you always do. Come on, man, get over yourself, are you 14?And how does "right winged" relate to liking Dream Theater?


Right winged in the sense of which there's such a high detestment
towards a certain type of prog over another.  It's close minded, thus
right winged.
Originally posted by darkmatter darkmatter wrote:


Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Originally posted by Lucent Lucent wrote:




Originally posted by steve j steve j wrote:

I am new around here, and I cannot believe the slating Dream Theater get.  I would say, if you cannot say anything positive then move onto the next forum.
Get used to it, man.  Everyone on this forum (probably exception me) is so right winged, it's disgusting.  Thank you for being open minded :3


Everyone? Right winged??
I don't understand this remark either....
Explained above.I love how I come in and defend something, and everyone gets their panties in a knot.


No one got their pants in a knot. I think we were merely curious why 'everyone' here was deemed to be 'right wing' if they didn't like Dream Theater. You must admit it was an odd thing to say.



Posted By: SgtPepper67
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 16:32
Well, I like some Dream Theater stuff but I also find some of their stuff pretty annoying. It's like sometimes they play some really fast solo or whatever for several minutes just to say "look how fast I play", yeah very impressive but I don't enjoy it at all. It doesn't happen to me with ELP for example, but it's just a matter of taste after all.

-------------

In the end the love you take is equal to the love you made...


Posted By: Ghandi 2
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 16:50
Originally posted by rileydog22 rileydog22 wrote:

Originally posted by Lucent Lucent wrote:

Originally posted by puma puma wrote:

Whew, Lucent, good thing you're here, always saving the day like you always do. Come on, man, get over yourself, are you 14?

And how does "right winged" relate to liking Dream Theater?


Right winged in the sense of which there's such a high detestment towards a certain type of prog over another.  It's close minded, thus right winged.


Wow, that's deep. 
Right and left winged refer to politics, not being "close-minded." You could argue that it is "conservative" to prefer '70s symph, but that is something different (the terms are politically used intergangably because the right is usually also resistant to change), so calling it "right wing" is just stupid[i/]. It's dangerous to use words when you don't have a full grasp of their meaning. Although saying Dream Theater (or any other group) is twice the band of any '70s group is a stupid thing to say, anyway (regardless of your preferences, saying something like that only demonstrates ignorance), and since they are easily the most popular prog-metal band, I'm not sure how much more "open-minded" it makes you.
 
That was especially silly since politically most people here are practically bloody Communists. ;-)
 
I agree that '70s prog is dying, but does that change anything? Traditional Classical music is dead, but I still like it (and I like 20th Century Classical music as well).


Posted By: puma
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 17:09
Originally posted by Lucent Lucent wrote:

Originally posted by puma puma wrote:

Whew, Lucent, good thing you're here, always saving the day like you always do. Come on, man, get over yourself, are you 14?

And how does "right winged" relate to liking Dream Theater?


Right winged in the sense of which there's such a high detestment towards a certain type of prog over another.  It's close minded, thus right winged.


Right wing is a political orientation, dude. It has absolutely nothing to do with music in any way, and basically it will destroy the validity of any argument you try to make from now on.


Posted By: Lucent
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 17:13
Originally posted by puma puma wrote:

Originally posted by Lucent Lucent wrote:

[QUOTE=puma]Whew, Lucent, good thing you're here, always saving the day like you always do. Come on, man, get over yourself, are you 14?

And how does "right winged" relate to liking Dream Theater?


Right winged in the sense of which there's such a high detestment towards a certain type of prog over another.  It's close minded, thus right winged.

Right wing is a political orientation, dude. It has absolutely nothing to do with music in any way, and basically it will destroy the validity of any argument you try to make from now on.



It's the same type of thinking is what I'm getting at here.


Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 17:44
A thread about ELP and Dream Theater???

It's been relatively civil so far..surprisingly.




Posted By: rileydog22
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 17:50
Originally posted by Ghandi 2 Ghandi 2 wrote:

Originally posted by rileydog22 rileydog22 wrote:

Originally posted by Lucent Lucent wrote:

Originally posted by puma puma wrote:

Whew, Lucent, good thing you're here, always saving the day like you always do. Come on, man, get over yourself, are you 14?

And how does "right winged" relate to liking Dream Theater?


Right winged in the sense of which there's such a high detestment towards a certain type of prog over another.  It's close minded, thus right winged.


Wow, that's deep. 
Right and left winged refer to politics, not being "close-minded." You could argue that it is "conservative" to prefer '70s symph, but that is something different (the terms are politically used intergangably because the right is usually also resistant to change), so calling it "right wing" is just stupid[i/]. It's dangerous to use words when you don't have a full grasp of their meaning. Although saying Dream Theater (or any other group) is twice the band of any '70s group is a stupid thing to say, anyway (regardless of your preferences, saying something like that only demonstrates ignorance), and since they are easily the most popular prog-metal band, I'm not sure how much more "open-minded" it makes you.
 
That was especially silly since politically most people here are practically bloody Communists. ;-)
 
I agree that '70s prog is dying, but does that change anything? Traditional Classical music is dead, but I still like it (and I like 20th Century Classical music as well).


I understand that; I was sarcastically calling Lucent's statement "deep" because of how wrong he was, not because his statement actually had depth or truth. 


-------------



Posted By: convocation
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 17:58
Originally posted by Lonely Progger Lonely Progger wrote:


"Because DT is obviously a group very much influenced by Yes, and according to wikipedia Emerson's favourite modern group is Dream Theater."
 
I know this a potentially dangerous topic sorry, with possible very conflicting point of views being expressed. 


Wink
If there's a connection between some Yes and DT, then Vivaldi must have started punk rock. Also, I'm sorry to say that, K Emerson must have been blind drunk and stoned on "acid" when and if he said that.
Ying%20Yang



Posted By: warwick
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 21:37
Originally posted by Lucent Lucent wrote:

Originally posted by steve j steve j wrote:

I am new around here, and I cannot believe the slating Dream Theater get.  I would say, if you cannot say anything positive then move onto the next forum.


Get used to it, man.  Everyone on this forum (probably exception me) is so right winged, it's disgusting.  Thank you for being open minded :3


Yeah, that's very open-minded: if you have nothing to say that I like, don't say it. LOLClap


Posted By: warwick
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 21:40
I think ELP lyrics are excellent, musicanship is simply awesome, whereas DT lyrics are childish at best and their songs are clichee'd and artificial. Yes is perfection everywhere in their golden period, so let's not even touch them. 


Posted By: Ghandi 2
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 22:36
Originally posted by Lucent Lucent wrote:

Originally posted by puma puma wrote:

Originally posted by Lucent Lucent wrote:

[QUOTE=puma]Whew, Lucent, good thing you're here, always saving the day like you always do. Come on, man, get over yourself, are you 14?

And how does "right winged" relate to liking Dream Theater?


Right winged in the sense of which there's such a high detestment towards a certain type of prog over another.  It's close minded, thus right winged.

Right wing is a political orientation, dude. It has absolutely nothing to do with music in any way, and basically it will destroy the validity of any argument you try to make from now on.

It's the same type of thinking is what I'm getting at here.
No, it's not. You have no idea what you're talking about. How does favoring a small government make one close-minded? Gah, internet people are so frustrating.
 
I know, riley, give me more credit than that. :) I was quoting you because I didn't want to bother finding the original post and I was too lazy to edit it (and it got italicized for some reason).


Posted By: Dim
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 22:38
Originally posted by warwick warwick wrote:

I think ELP lyrics are excellent, musicanship is simply awesome, whereas DT lyrics are childish at best and their songs are clichee'd and artificial. Yes is perfection everywhere in their golden period, so let's not even touch them. 
 
3 clappies for you!
 
ClapClapClap


-------------


Posted By: russellk
Date Posted: October 20 2007 at 02:53
There's too much of: *insert band 1* are fantastic, and *insert band 2* are crap. Come on. No band was perfect. Someone stand up for YES's 'Union' and explain why it is beyond criticism. And no balanced listener could call DREAM THEATER crap. You may not like them, but there's a world of difference between dislike and a dismissively negative judgement. I actively dislike ELP, but I'm not foolish enough to think that my subjective opinion makes them objectively crap. I respect the opinions of those who are able to articulate the reasons WHY a band is worthwhile.

I'm fascinated by the DT/ELP link: the common view is that both bands indulge in a fair amount of so-called pointless soloing. I'm bemused that people would in the one breath criticise DT for soloing and in the next laud ELP. Make sense to you?

The notion that DT can be summed up in one sentence puzzles me. They play ballads, AOR, speed metal, progressive metal and plenty of symphonic prog. Some of their music is complex (e.g. 'Dance of Eternity') and some is simple (e.g. 'The Spirit Carries On'). Their career has been patchy, but that's hardly a crime. They are wholehearted, giving of everything they have on every album and at every performance. I don't think they've perpetrated a 'Love Beach' or a 'Union'. But, as the most visible representative of the prog-metal genre and recent prog music in general, they do seem to be a touchstone for those who feel the need to disparage the younger generation's prog revival. They are certainly not the most lyrically taxing band, nor are they as demanding a listen as HENRY COW or SLEEPYTIME GORILLA MUSEUM. They do have their cheesy and gauche moments. But they have drawn bucketloads of fans from metal to prog rock: not a bad thing.

Sorry for the rant (though not sorry enough to edit it).


Posted By: puma
Date Posted: October 20 2007 at 03:17
Originally posted by russellk russellk wrote:

They play ballads, AOR, speed metal, progressive metal and plenty of symphonic prog. Some of their music is complex (e.g. 'Dance of Eternity') and some is simple (e.g. 'The Spirit Carries On').


Well maybe I don't want to listen to a band that caters to its genres. Ever think of that? If they were as creative as you say they are they'd do something truly different for once, instead of making the same album 4 times in a row. Not only is it bad enough that all their songs sound like songs they did before, but all their songs sound like songs Pink Floyd did before. What's the point?


Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: October 20 2007 at 04:38
Please
A)Keep it civil "You have no idea what you're taking about" is not civil for example, and
B) Keep the politics out of it, this is a music section.
 
This thread is now in overtime, heading the way of its predecessors.Confused


Posted By: steve j
Date Posted: October 20 2007 at 04:58
Originally posted by puma puma wrote:

Originally posted by russellk russellk wrote:

They play ballads, AOR, speed metal, progressive metal and plenty of symphonic prog. Some of their music is complex (e.g. 'Dance of Eternity') and some is simple (e.g. 'The Spirit Carries On').


Well maybe I don't want to listen to a band that caters to its genres. Ever think of that? If they were as creative as you say they are they'd do something truly different for once, instead of making the same album 4 times in a row. Not only is it bad enough that all their songs sound like songs they did before, but all their songs sound like songs Pink Floyd did before. What's the point?
 
Does Pink Floyd do speed metal and prog metal? which album is it? (Note to myself - listen to more Pink Floyd).
 
Seriously though, no one on this board forces anyone to listen to DT.  I like them, you don't, that's fine.  If everybody only liked Pink Floyd, then we would live very boring lives.  "Variety is the Spice of Life".  What I am trying to say is "lighten up..... easy tiger", think positive, think glass half full! and smile.....Smile.
 
I going off to listen to Riverside and Pocupine tree, I got them for my Birthday.....
 
Happy Birthday to me.............. 


Posted By: FruMp
Date Posted: October 20 2007 at 06:01
Originally posted by warwick warwick wrote:

I think ELP lyrics are excellent, musicanship is simply awesome, whereas DT lyrics are childish at best and their songs are clichee'd and artificial. Yes is perfection everywhere in their golden period, so let's not even touch them. 


I agree about the ELP musicianship and the cliche cheesy lyrics of DT but if Yes were perfection everywhere in their golden period then how come not every song is as good as close to the edge?

There is no such thing as perfection in the music world.


-------------


Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: October 20 2007 at 06:30
Originally posted by warwick warwick wrote:

I think ELP lyrics are excellent, musicanship is simply awesome, whereas DT lyrics are childish at best and their songs are clichee'd and artificial. Yes is perfection everywhere in their golden period, so let's not even touch them. 


Emerson likes DT.Tongue


-------------
https://awesomeprog.com/release-polls/pa" rel="nofollow - Release Polls

Listened to:


Posted By: sarogaxnasoilgo
Date Posted: October 20 2007 at 11:44
I don't know about anybody else but i happen to enjoy Elp, Yes and Dream Theater. Is there anybody else out there who likes all three?!  As for those who say Dream Theater is cold and mechanical with no real feeling .. to each his own opinion i guess but all i can say is that yes its technical but every time i listen to The Dance of Eternity for example i get chills all over my body and it makes me feel great. Likewise Ive had similar experiences with Elp and Yes. All three of these bands genuinely make me feel good...


Posted By: jammun
Date Posted: October 20 2007 at 12:02
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by warwick warwick wrote:

I think ELP lyrics are excellent, musicanship is simply awesome, whereas DT lyrics are childish at best and their songs are clichee'd and artificial. Yes is perfection everywhere in their golden period, so let's not even touch them. 


Emerson likes DT.Tongue
 
Just to keep things lively...
 
Umm, given the quality of Emerson's stuff since, oh, about 1974, not exactly a ringing endorsement.


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: October 20 2007 at 13:40
Originally posted by Lucent Lucent wrote:



Get used to it, man.  Everyone on this forum (probably exception me) is so right winged, it's disgusting.  Thank you for being open minded :3
 
I don't like Dream Theater and am a confessed Right Wionger...So what's the relation?
 
You don't like right wingers, i don't like anything related with the left spectrum of politics, but i reaspect the right of every person to have the position they want, maybe if you had lived in a country where a Communist President destroyed our economy and Maoist terrorists caused more than 30,000 deaths you would think different.
 
But, I don't care about your political position at all and it has no relation with your musical taste, think before you talk, because this is pure BS.
 
I have commuinist friends who hate Rock, Prog, Metal and everything, while a lot of right winged friends don't understand why I don't like Dream Theater.
 
Iván


-------------
            


Posted By: Sunhillow_
Date Posted: October 20 2007 at 16:31
1 - What??????????? Come on.  There is no comparison. How can peasents be side to side to masters???  hehehe.  Now, seriously... Yes and ELP are rather different when you compare to  Dream Theater.  But there are some common ground... like on Yes' 1980 album Drama.   All prog Metal world probably has this album as one of their must have of all time.  but talking about emotion..well... if it is a matter of tastes.. there is nothing to say.. now, talking about the lead vocals.. . poor  Dream Theater...jon Anderson and Greg lake are soooooooooooooo distant...... poor La Brie cant even see them...
 
2 - this forum is intented to be a place of prog rock talking, right?  ok... so ppl should keep the talking about prog rock and avoid fighting each other...


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: October 20 2007 at 17:28
Originally posted by Sunhillow_ Sunhillow_ wrote:

 
2 - this forum is intented to be a place of prog rock talking, right?  ok... so ppl should keep the talking about prog rock and avoid fighting each other...
 
It's not fighting Sunhillow, Politics have nothing to do with music, and this guy is nobody to criticize my political position, this is a free forum, I can believe in what I want.
 
It's already tiresome to read people criticizing our musical tastes, but it's part of what you can expect in a forum, but Religious and Political ideas have no business in this section of the forum.
 
Specially when what is writen is pure crap with no relation, more disgusting that our God given right to believe in what we want is to read Lucent speaking BS.
 
Iván


-------------
            


Posted By: explodingjosh
Date Posted: October 20 2007 at 18:25
what were we talking about?

-------------


Posted By: rileydog22
Date Posted: October 20 2007 at 18:28
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Lucent Lucent wrote:



Get used to it, man.  Everyone on this forum (probably exception me) is so right winged, it's disgusting.  Thank you for being open minded :3
 
I don't like Dream Theater and am a confessed Right Wionger...So what's the relation?
 
You don't like right wingers, i don't like anything related with the left spectrum of politics, but i reaspect the right of every person to have the position they want, maybe if you had lived in a country where a Communist President destroyed our economy and Maoist terrorists caused more than 30,000 deaths you would think different.
 
But, I don't care about your political position at all and it has no relation with your musical taste, think before you talk, because this is pure BS.
 
I have commuinist friends who hate Rock, Prog, Metal and everything, while a lot of right winged friends don't understand why I don't like Dream Theater.
 
Iván


IVAN

STRIKES

AGAIN


-------------



Posted By: Lucent
Date Posted: October 20 2007 at 20:09
I love how when I say one wrong thing, or defend something, the entire thread sparks into a giant drama tornado.

Man, so this must be what a lawyer feels like.



Back on the subject, to the people who say I'm "totally wrong" for the right winged political remark and comparing that to close minded ideals, it's the exact same thinking.  Think about it deeper before I actually start to back my point.




Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: October 20 2007 at 21:01
Originally posted by Lucent Lucent wrote:



Back on the subject, to the people who say I'm "totally wrong" for the right winged political remark and comparing that to close minded ideals, it's the exact same thinking.  Think about it deeper before I actually start to back my point.


 
Yeah Right wingers like me are the sh!t of the world, when we are not defending the Monarchy ideals, we are clubbing baby seals for fun.
 
Even if this was truth, where in hell do you find the relation with the music we listen?
 
Your ignorance in politics is only compared with your lack of abbility to make a simil, there are stubborn close minded left wingers, if not remember Pol Pot, and there are open minded right wingers, some of them like Dream Theater, others not, taste has absolutely no relation with political position.
 
A communist dictator in my country banned Rock because he claimed it was a Yankee form of cultural penetration, if this is open minded, well I rather continue being called close minded
 
Today it'sn easy to listen Prog, it's popular, lots of bands clain they are Prog, but ion the late 70's or 80's it was unpopular, but we were open minded enough to discover almost underground music when the radios, magazines and MTV was bombing us with Disco, New Wave or Michael Jackson.
 
But this is not the place for politics, there's a forum for non musical issues, there you can rant all you want agaibnst the bad rioght wingers.
 
BTW: Do you believe that only if you like Dream Theater you are openm monded? Please don't try to backup this because iit's absurd.
 
Better wait until you are old enough to vote to start talking about politics, when you earn your money with your work and don't live of daddy's pocket, you may change your mind.
 
Iván
 


-------------
            


Posted By: GoldenSpiral
Date Posted: October 20 2007 at 21:07
Please.... no more feeding the troll... 

-------------
http://www.myspace.com/altaic" rel="nofollow - http://www.myspace.com/altaic
ALTAIC

"Oceans Down You'll Lie"
coming soon


Posted By: Dim
Date Posted: October 20 2007 at 21:11
Originally posted by GoldenSpiral GoldenSpiral wrote:

Please.... no more feeding the troll... 
 
 
TOP PWN N00BLET


-------------


Posted By: Lucent
Date Posted: October 21 2007 at 12:32
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Lucent Lucent wrote:



Back on the subject, to the people who say I'm "totally wrong" for the right winged political remark and comparing that to close minded ideals, it's the exact same thinking.  Think about it deeper before I actually start to back my point.


 
Yeah Right wingers like me are the sh!t of the world, when we are not defending the Monarchy ideals, we are clubbing baby seals for fun.
 
Even if this was truth, where in hell do you find the relation with the music we listen?
 
Your ignorance in politics is only compared with your lack of abbility to make a simil, there are stubborn close minded left wingers, if not remember Pol Pot, and there are open minded right wingers, some of them like Dream Theater, others not, taste has absolutely no relation with political position.
 
A communist dictator in my country banned Rock because he claimed it was a Yankee form of cultural penetration, if this is open minded, well I rather continue being called close minded
 
Today it'sn easy to listen Prog, it's popular, lots of bands clain they are Prog, but ion the late 70's or 80's it was unpopular, but we were open minded enough to discover almost underground music when the radios, magazines and MTV was bombing us with Disco, New Wave or Michael Jackson.
 
But this is not the place for politics, there's a forum for non musical issues, there you can rant all you want agaibnst the bad rioght wingers.
 
BTW: Do you believe that only if you like Dream Theater you are openm monded? Please don't try to backup this because iit's absurd.
 
Better wait until you are old enough to vote to start talking about politics, when you earn your money with your work and don't live of daddy's pocket, you may change your mind.
 
Iván
 


I was planning to let go of the situation until you posted.  I've been begging for a moment to debate with you anyway, with your whining and tl;dr posts.

You're right up to the point of which you said the biased remark of "openm mondedness," in which I defend by saying that everyone is prejudging Dream Theater, or not sinking themselves into every element of the band.  I would let them go with their opinions, but it's just an insult-pool of biased remarks with these forums.

As for making my own income remark...you're a big man, aren't you?  For one who lives in a communist dictatorship, you should know a ton about income (I just went there.)

Originally posted by GoldenSpiral GoldenSpiral wrote:

Please.... no more feeding the troll... 



GRAAAAAAAAAAAAH GRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH FOOOOD FOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD!  GIVE ME MORE FOOOOOOOOOOD! GARARARARARARARAAR!


Nah, I'm not trying to troll anyone...I just see it as the more offensive your remarks are or the more absurd, the more people pay attention.  When I throw down an opinion, treat it like any other opinion is all I'm asking you of, even though it isn't the common opinion.   I'm not a mean guy, really.

I like Dream Theater.  I think that the remarks here are biased about Dream Theater.  I used a really bad example to show that.  Let us move on.


Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: October 21 2007 at 12:56
Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

Fermé







Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk